Immediate Restoration of Single Tapered Implants with Nonoccluding Provisional Crowns: A 5-Year Clinical Prospective Study

Background Dental literature has limited number of publications regarding long‐term outcome data of immediate restoration of single missing teeth with an implant‐supported provisional crown. Purpose This 5‐year study evaluated hard and soft tissue responses to the immediate placement of single impla...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical implant dentistry and related research 2014-04, Vol.16 (2), p.248-258
Hauptverfasser: Lang, Lisa A., Turkyilmaz, Ilser, Edgin, Wendell A., Verrett, Ronald, Garcia, Lily T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 258
container_issue 2
container_start_page 248
container_title Clinical implant dentistry and related research
container_volume 16
creator Lang, Lisa A.
Turkyilmaz, Ilser
Edgin, Wendell A.
Verrett, Ronald
Garcia, Lily T.
description Background Dental literature has limited number of publications regarding long‐term outcome data of immediate restoration of single missing teeth with an implant‐supported provisional crown. Purpose This 5‐year study evaluated hard and soft tissue responses to the immediate placement of single implant‐supported provisional crowns. Materials and Methods Twenty patients received one dental implant restored immediately with a provisional acrylic resin screw‐retained crown. Crestal bone loss was evaluated from standardized periapical radiographs collected at 3‐month intervals for the first 21 months followed by a 5‐year evaluation. Historical controls acquired from available dental literature were used for comparison. Results One implant failed within 2 months of surgical placement, presenting with pain and mobility. The remaining implants demonstrated no infection, pain, or radiolucencies. Nineteen implants were clinically immobile, osseointegrated, and asymptomatic at 21 months. At 5 years, one patient died, three patients were noncompliant, and 15 implants were evaluated as functional. Mean bone loss (MBL) at 1 year and 21 months was approximately 0.5 ± 0.5 mm and 0.70 ± 0.26 mm at 5 years. There was no statistically significant difference between MBLs at p 
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2012.00475.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1524405015</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1519839242</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4395-b67e7927bedf34acfd4df34702b0ba8e2d5b4afaa8d64de07cae67ea424bc4fe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1v1DAQhiMEoh_wF5CPXBJsx9kkiEtJoV1pVVC3CMHFcuwJeEniYCfdXX49E7bsub54pHkeWzNvFBFGE4bnzSZhOS3igtMi4ZTxhFKRZ8nuSXR6bDzFOuNpTIuyPInOQthQyhlbsOfRCecFCmV6Gv1Zdh0Yq0YgtxBG59VoXU9cQ9a2_9ECuVMDeDBk2Q2t6sdAtnb8SW5c77RuJ4MQ-ezdvQ2oqZZU3m378JZckCz-BsqTqrW91dhBKgygR3sPZD1OZv8ietaoNsDLh_s8-vLxw111Ha8-XS2ri1WsRVpmcb3IIS95XoNpUqF0Y8Rc5JTXtFYFcJPVQjVKFWYhDNBcK0BFCS5qLRpIz6PXh3cH735POKTsbNDQ4jjgpiBxS0LQjLLsESgri7TkgiNaHFCNcwUPjRy87ZTfS0blHJLcyDkLOWch55Dkv5DkDtVXD79MNS7_KP5PBYF3B2BrW9g_-mFZLS-xQD0-6DaMsDvqyv-SizxF8uvNlayq2_fV5fe1XKV_Afz_sW4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1519839242</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Immediate Restoration of Single Tapered Implants with Nonoccluding Provisional Crowns: A 5-Year Clinical Prospective Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Lang, Lisa A. ; Turkyilmaz, Ilser ; Edgin, Wendell A. ; Verrett, Ronald ; Garcia, Lily T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lang, Lisa A. ; Turkyilmaz, Ilser ; Edgin, Wendell A. ; Verrett, Ronald ; Garcia, Lily T.</creatorcontrib><description>Background Dental literature has limited number of publications regarding long‐term outcome data of immediate restoration of single missing teeth with an implant‐supported provisional crown. Purpose This 5‐year study evaluated hard and soft tissue responses to the immediate placement of single implant‐supported provisional crowns. Materials and Methods Twenty patients received one dental implant restored immediately with a provisional acrylic resin screw‐retained crown. Crestal bone loss was evaluated from standardized periapical radiographs collected at 3‐month intervals for the first 21 months followed by a 5‐year evaluation. Historical controls acquired from available dental literature were used for comparison. Results One implant failed within 2 months of surgical placement, presenting with pain and mobility. The remaining implants demonstrated no infection, pain, or radiolucencies. Nineteen implants were clinically immobile, osseointegrated, and asymptomatic at 21 months. At 5 years, one patient died, three patients were noncompliant, and 15 implants were evaluated as functional. Mean bone loss (MBL) at 1 year and 21 months was approximately 0.5 ± 0.5 mm and 0.70 ± 0.26 mm at 5 years. There was no statistically significant difference between MBLs at p &lt; 0.05. Conclusions Immediate provisionalization of single dental implants compares favorably with conventional loading protocols. Long‐term data suggest that immediate provisionalization of single dental implants is a viable treatment option.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1523-0899</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1708-8208</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2012.00475.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22804793</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>bone loss ; clinical outcomes ; Crowns ; dental implants ; Dental Implants, Single-Tooth ; Dentistry ; Humans ; immediate provisional ; Prospective Studies</subject><ispartof>Clinical implant dentistry and related research, 2014-04, Vol.16 (2), p.248-258</ispartof><rights>2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4395-b67e7927bedf34acfd4df34702b0ba8e2d5b4afaa8d64de07cae67ea424bc4fe3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4395-b67e7927bedf34acfd4df34702b0ba8e2d5b4afaa8d64de07cae67ea424bc4fe3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1708-8208.2012.00475.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1708-8208.2012.00475.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22804793$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lang, Lisa A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turkyilmaz, Ilser</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edgin, Wendell A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verrett, Ronald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia, Lily T.</creatorcontrib><title>Immediate Restoration of Single Tapered Implants with Nonoccluding Provisional Crowns: A 5-Year Clinical Prospective Study</title><title>Clinical implant dentistry and related research</title><addtitle>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</addtitle><description>Background Dental literature has limited number of publications regarding long‐term outcome data of immediate restoration of single missing teeth with an implant‐supported provisional crown. Purpose This 5‐year study evaluated hard and soft tissue responses to the immediate placement of single implant‐supported provisional crowns. Materials and Methods Twenty patients received one dental implant restored immediately with a provisional acrylic resin screw‐retained crown. Crestal bone loss was evaluated from standardized periapical radiographs collected at 3‐month intervals for the first 21 months followed by a 5‐year evaluation. Historical controls acquired from available dental literature were used for comparison. Results One implant failed within 2 months of surgical placement, presenting with pain and mobility. The remaining implants demonstrated no infection, pain, or radiolucencies. Nineteen implants were clinically immobile, osseointegrated, and asymptomatic at 21 months. At 5 years, one patient died, three patients were noncompliant, and 15 implants were evaluated as functional. Mean bone loss (MBL) at 1 year and 21 months was approximately 0.5 ± 0.5 mm and 0.70 ± 0.26 mm at 5 years. There was no statistically significant difference between MBLs at p &lt; 0.05. Conclusions Immediate provisionalization of single dental implants compares favorably with conventional loading protocols. Long‐term data suggest that immediate provisionalization of single dental implants is a viable treatment option.</description><subject>bone loss</subject><subject>clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Crowns</subject><subject>dental implants</subject><subject>Dental Implants, Single-Tooth</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>immediate provisional</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><issn>1523-0899</issn><issn>1708-8208</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1v1DAQhiMEoh_wF5CPXBJsx9kkiEtJoV1pVVC3CMHFcuwJeEniYCfdXX49E7bsub54pHkeWzNvFBFGE4bnzSZhOS3igtMi4ZTxhFKRZ8nuSXR6bDzFOuNpTIuyPInOQthQyhlbsOfRCecFCmV6Gv1Zdh0Yq0YgtxBG59VoXU9cQ9a2_9ECuVMDeDBk2Q2t6sdAtnb8SW5c77RuJ4MQ-ezdvQ2oqZZU3m378JZckCz-BsqTqrW91dhBKgygR3sPZD1OZv8ietaoNsDLh_s8-vLxw111Ha8-XS2ri1WsRVpmcb3IIS95XoNpUqF0Y8Rc5JTXtFYFcJPVQjVKFWYhDNBcK0BFCS5qLRpIz6PXh3cH735POKTsbNDQ4jjgpiBxS0LQjLLsESgri7TkgiNaHFCNcwUPjRy87ZTfS0blHJLcyDkLOWch55Dkv5DkDtVXD79MNS7_KP5PBYF3B2BrW9g_-mFZLS-xQD0-6DaMsDvqyv-SizxF8uvNlayq2_fV5fe1XKV_Afz_sW4</recordid><startdate>201404</startdate><enddate>201404</enddate><creator>Lang, Lisa A.</creator><creator>Turkyilmaz, Ilser</creator><creator>Edgin, Wendell A.</creator><creator>Verrett, Ronald</creator><creator>Garcia, Lily T.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201404</creationdate><title>Immediate Restoration of Single Tapered Implants with Nonoccluding Provisional Crowns: A 5-Year Clinical Prospective Study</title><author>Lang, Lisa A. ; Turkyilmaz, Ilser ; Edgin, Wendell A. ; Verrett, Ronald ; Garcia, Lily T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4395-b67e7927bedf34acfd4df34702b0ba8e2d5b4afaa8d64de07cae67ea424bc4fe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>bone loss</topic><topic>clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Crowns</topic><topic>dental implants</topic><topic>Dental Implants, Single-Tooth</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>immediate provisional</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lang, Lisa A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turkyilmaz, Ilser</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edgin, Wendell A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verrett, Ronald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia, Lily T.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Clinical implant dentistry and related research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lang, Lisa A.</au><au>Turkyilmaz, Ilser</au><au>Edgin, Wendell A.</au><au>Verrett, Ronald</au><au>Garcia, Lily T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Immediate Restoration of Single Tapered Implants with Nonoccluding Provisional Crowns: A 5-Year Clinical Prospective Study</atitle><jtitle>Clinical implant dentistry and related research</jtitle><addtitle>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</addtitle><date>2014-04</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>248</spage><epage>258</epage><pages>248-258</pages><issn>1523-0899</issn><eissn>1708-8208</eissn><abstract>Background Dental literature has limited number of publications regarding long‐term outcome data of immediate restoration of single missing teeth with an implant‐supported provisional crown. Purpose This 5‐year study evaluated hard and soft tissue responses to the immediate placement of single implant‐supported provisional crowns. Materials and Methods Twenty patients received one dental implant restored immediately with a provisional acrylic resin screw‐retained crown. Crestal bone loss was evaluated from standardized periapical radiographs collected at 3‐month intervals for the first 21 months followed by a 5‐year evaluation. Historical controls acquired from available dental literature were used for comparison. Results One implant failed within 2 months of surgical placement, presenting with pain and mobility. The remaining implants demonstrated no infection, pain, or radiolucencies. Nineteen implants were clinically immobile, osseointegrated, and asymptomatic at 21 months. At 5 years, one patient died, three patients were noncompliant, and 15 implants were evaluated as functional. Mean bone loss (MBL) at 1 year and 21 months was approximately 0.5 ± 0.5 mm and 0.70 ± 0.26 mm at 5 years. There was no statistically significant difference between MBLs at p &lt; 0.05. Conclusions Immediate provisionalization of single dental implants compares favorably with conventional loading protocols. Long‐term data suggest that immediate provisionalization of single dental implants is a viable treatment option.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>22804793</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1708-8208.2012.00475.x</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1523-0899
ispartof Clinical implant dentistry and related research, 2014-04, Vol.16 (2), p.248-258
issn 1523-0899
1708-8208
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1524405015
source MEDLINE; Wiley Journals
subjects bone loss
clinical outcomes
Crowns
dental implants
Dental Implants, Single-Tooth
Dentistry
Humans
immediate provisional
Prospective Studies
title Immediate Restoration of Single Tapered Implants with Nonoccluding Provisional Crowns: A 5-Year Clinical Prospective Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T08%3A43%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Immediate%20Restoration%20of%20Single%20Tapered%20Implants%20with%20Nonoccluding%20Provisional%20Crowns:%20A%205-Year%20Clinical%20Prospective%20Study&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20implant%20dentistry%20and%20related%20research&rft.au=Lang,%20Lisa%20A.&rft.date=2014-04&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=248&rft.epage=258&rft.pages=248-258&rft.issn=1523-0899&rft.eissn=1708-8208&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2012.00475.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1519839242%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1519839242&rft_id=info:pmid/22804793&rfr_iscdi=true