Immediate Restoration of Single Tapered Implants with Nonoccluding Provisional Crowns: A 5-Year Clinical Prospective Study
Background Dental literature has limited number of publications regarding long‐term outcome data of immediate restoration of single missing teeth with an implant‐supported provisional crown. Purpose This 5‐year study evaluated hard and soft tissue responses to the immediate placement of single impla...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical implant dentistry and related research 2014-04, Vol.16 (2), p.248-258 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 258 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 248 |
container_title | Clinical implant dentistry and related research |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Lang, Lisa A. Turkyilmaz, Ilser Edgin, Wendell A. Verrett, Ronald Garcia, Lily T. |
description | Background
Dental literature has limited number of publications regarding long‐term outcome data of immediate restoration of single missing teeth with an implant‐supported provisional crown.
Purpose
This 5‐year study evaluated hard and soft tissue responses to the immediate placement of single implant‐supported provisional crowns.
Materials and Methods
Twenty patients received one dental implant restored immediately with a provisional acrylic resin screw‐retained crown. Crestal bone loss was evaluated from standardized periapical radiographs collected at 3‐month intervals for the first 21 months followed by a 5‐year evaluation. Historical controls acquired from available dental literature were used for comparison.
Results
One implant failed within 2 months of surgical placement, presenting with pain and mobility. The remaining implants demonstrated no infection, pain, or radiolucencies. Nineteen implants were clinically immobile, osseointegrated, and asymptomatic at 21 months. At 5 years, one patient died, three patients were noncompliant, and 15 implants were evaluated as functional. Mean bone loss (MBL) at 1 year and 21 months was approximately 0.5 ± 0.5 mm and 0.70 ± 0.26 mm at 5 years. There was no statistically significant difference between MBLs at p |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2012.00475.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1524405015</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1519839242</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4395-b67e7927bedf34acfd4df34702b0ba8e2d5b4afaa8d64de07cae67ea424bc4fe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1v1DAQhiMEoh_wF5CPXBJsx9kkiEtJoV1pVVC3CMHFcuwJeEniYCfdXX49E7bsub54pHkeWzNvFBFGE4bnzSZhOS3igtMi4ZTxhFKRZ8nuSXR6bDzFOuNpTIuyPInOQthQyhlbsOfRCecFCmV6Gv1Zdh0Yq0YgtxBG59VoXU9cQ9a2_9ECuVMDeDBk2Q2t6sdAtnb8SW5c77RuJ4MQ-ezdvQ2oqZZU3m378JZckCz-BsqTqrW91dhBKgygR3sPZD1OZv8ietaoNsDLh_s8-vLxw111Ha8-XS2ri1WsRVpmcb3IIS95XoNpUqF0Y8Rc5JTXtFYFcJPVQjVKFWYhDNBcK0BFCS5qLRpIz6PXh3cH735POKTsbNDQ4jjgpiBxS0LQjLLsESgri7TkgiNaHFCNcwUPjRy87ZTfS0blHJLcyDkLOWch55Dkv5DkDtVXD79MNS7_KP5PBYF3B2BrW9g_-mFZLS-xQD0-6DaMsDvqyv-SizxF8uvNlayq2_fV5fe1XKV_Afz_sW4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1519839242</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Immediate Restoration of Single Tapered Implants with Nonoccluding Provisional Crowns: A 5-Year Clinical Prospective Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Lang, Lisa A. ; Turkyilmaz, Ilser ; Edgin, Wendell A. ; Verrett, Ronald ; Garcia, Lily T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lang, Lisa A. ; Turkyilmaz, Ilser ; Edgin, Wendell A. ; Verrett, Ronald ; Garcia, Lily T.</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Dental literature has limited number of publications regarding long‐term outcome data of immediate restoration of single missing teeth with an implant‐supported provisional crown.
Purpose
This 5‐year study evaluated hard and soft tissue responses to the immediate placement of single implant‐supported provisional crowns.
Materials and Methods
Twenty patients received one dental implant restored immediately with a provisional acrylic resin screw‐retained crown. Crestal bone loss was evaluated from standardized periapical radiographs collected at 3‐month intervals for the first 21 months followed by a 5‐year evaluation. Historical controls acquired from available dental literature were used for comparison.
Results
One implant failed within 2 months of surgical placement, presenting with pain and mobility. The remaining implants demonstrated no infection, pain, or radiolucencies. Nineteen implants were clinically immobile, osseointegrated, and asymptomatic at 21 months. At 5 years, one patient died, three patients were noncompliant, and 15 implants were evaluated as functional. Mean bone loss (MBL) at 1 year and 21 months was approximately 0.5 ± 0.5 mm and 0.70 ± 0.26 mm at 5 years. There was no statistically significant difference between MBLs at p < 0.05.
Conclusions
Immediate provisionalization of single dental implants compares favorably with conventional loading protocols. Long‐term data suggest that immediate provisionalization of single dental implants is a viable treatment option.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1523-0899</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1708-8208</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2012.00475.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22804793</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>bone loss ; clinical outcomes ; Crowns ; dental implants ; Dental Implants, Single-Tooth ; Dentistry ; Humans ; immediate provisional ; Prospective Studies</subject><ispartof>Clinical implant dentistry and related research, 2014-04, Vol.16 (2), p.248-258</ispartof><rights>2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4395-b67e7927bedf34acfd4df34702b0ba8e2d5b4afaa8d64de07cae67ea424bc4fe3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4395-b67e7927bedf34acfd4df34702b0ba8e2d5b4afaa8d64de07cae67ea424bc4fe3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1708-8208.2012.00475.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1708-8208.2012.00475.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22804793$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lang, Lisa A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turkyilmaz, Ilser</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edgin, Wendell A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verrett, Ronald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia, Lily T.</creatorcontrib><title>Immediate Restoration of Single Tapered Implants with Nonoccluding Provisional Crowns: A 5-Year Clinical Prospective Study</title><title>Clinical implant dentistry and related research</title><addtitle>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</addtitle><description>Background
Dental literature has limited number of publications regarding long‐term outcome data of immediate restoration of single missing teeth with an implant‐supported provisional crown.
Purpose
This 5‐year study evaluated hard and soft tissue responses to the immediate placement of single implant‐supported provisional crowns.
Materials and Methods
Twenty patients received one dental implant restored immediately with a provisional acrylic resin screw‐retained crown. Crestal bone loss was evaluated from standardized periapical radiographs collected at 3‐month intervals for the first 21 months followed by a 5‐year evaluation. Historical controls acquired from available dental literature were used for comparison.
Results
One implant failed within 2 months of surgical placement, presenting with pain and mobility. The remaining implants demonstrated no infection, pain, or radiolucencies. Nineteen implants were clinically immobile, osseointegrated, and asymptomatic at 21 months. At 5 years, one patient died, three patients were noncompliant, and 15 implants were evaluated as functional. Mean bone loss (MBL) at 1 year and 21 months was approximately 0.5 ± 0.5 mm and 0.70 ± 0.26 mm at 5 years. There was no statistically significant difference between MBLs at p < 0.05.
Conclusions
Immediate provisionalization of single dental implants compares favorably with conventional loading protocols. Long‐term data suggest that immediate provisionalization of single dental implants is a viable treatment option.</description><subject>bone loss</subject><subject>clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Crowns</subject><subject>dental implants</subject><subject>Dental Implants, Single-Tooth</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>immediate provisional</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><issn>1523-0899</issn><issn>1708-8208</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1v1DAQhiMEoh_wF5CPXBJsx9kkiEtJoV1pVVC3CMHFcuwJeEniYCfdXX49E7bsub54pHkeWzNvFBFGE4bnzSZhOS3igtMi4ZTxhFKRZ8nuSXR6bDzFOuNpTIuyPInOQthQyhlbsOfRCecFCmV6Gv1Zdh0Yq0YgtxBG59VoXU9cQ9a2_9ECuVMDeDBk2Q2t6sdAtnb8SW5c77RuJ4MQ-ezdvQ2oqZZU3m378JZckCz-BsqTqrW91dhBKgygR3sPZD1OZv8ietaoNsDLh_s8-vLxw111Ha8-XS2ri1WsRVpmcb3IIS95XoNpUqF0Y8Rc5JTXtFYFcJPVQjVKFWYhDNBcK0BFCS5qLRpIz6PXh3cH735POKTsbNDQ4jjgpiBxS0LQjLLsESgri7TkgiNaHFCNcwUPjRy87ZTfS0blHJLcyDkLOWch55Dkv5DkDtVXD79MNS7_KP5PBYF3B2BrW9g_-mFZLS-xQD0-6DaMsDvqyv-SizxF8uvNlayq2_fV5fe1XKV_Afz_sW4</recordid><startdate>201404</startdate><enddate>201404</enddate><creator>Lang, Lisa A.</creator><creator>Turkyilmaz, Ilser</creator><creator>Edgin, Wendell A.</creator><creator>Verrett, Ronald</creator><creator>Garcia, Lily T.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201404</creationdate><title>Immediate Restoration of Single Tapered Implants with Nonoccluding Provisional Crowns: A 5-Year Clinical Prospective Study</title><author>Lang, Lisa A. ; Turkyilmaz, Ilser ; Edgin, Wendell A. ; Verrett, Ronald ; Garcia, Lily T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4395-b67e7927bedf34acfd4df34702b0ba8e2d5b4afaa8d64de07cae67ea424bc4fe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>bone loss</topic><topic>clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Crowns</topic><topic>dental implants</topic><topic>Dental Implants, Single-Tooth</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>immediate provisional</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lang, Lisa A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turkyilmaz, Ilser</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edgin, Wendell A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verrett, Ronald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia, Lily T.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Clinical implant dentistry and related research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lang, Lisa A.</au><au>Turkyilmaz, Ilser</au><au>Edgin, Wendell A.</au><au>Verrett, Ronald</au><au>Garcia, Lily T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Immediate Restoration of Single Tapered Implants with Nonoccluding Provisional Crowns: A 5-Year Clinical Prospective Study</atitle><jtitle>Clinical implant dentistry and related research</jtitle><addtitle>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</addtitle><date>2014-04</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>248</spage><epage>258</epage><pages>248-258</pages><issn>1523-0899</issn><eissn>1708-8208</eissn><abstract>Background
Dental literature has limited number of publications regarding long‐term outcome data of immediate restoration of single missing teeth with an implant‐supported provisional crown.
Purpose
This 5‐year study evaluated hard and soft tissue responses to the immediate placement of single implant‐supported provisional crowns.
Materials and Methods
Twenty patients received one dental implant restored immediately with a provisional acrylic resin screw‐retained crown. Crestal bone loss was evaluated from standardized periapical radiographs collected at 3‐month intervals for the first 21 months followed by a 5‐year evaluation. Historical controls acquired from available dental literature were used for comparison.
Results
One implant failed within 2 months of surgical placement, presenting with pain and mobility. The remaining implants demonstrated no infection, pain, or radiolucencies. Nineteen implants were clinically immobile, osseointegrated, and asymptomatic at 21 months. At 5 years, one patient died, three patients were noncompliant, and 15 implants were evaluated as functional. Mean bone loss (MBL) at 1 year and 21 months was approximately 0.5 ± 0.5 mm and 0.70 ± 0.26 mm at 5 years. There was no statistically significant difference between MBLs at p < 0.05.
Conclusions
Immediate provisionalization of single dental implants compares favorably with conventional loading protocols. Long‐term data suggest that immediate provisionalization of single dental implants is a viable treatment option.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>22804793</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1708-8208.2012.00475.x</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1523-0899 |
ispartof | Clinical implant dentistry and related research, 2014-04, Vol.16 (2), p.248-258 |
issn | 1523-0899 1708-8208 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1524405015 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Journals |
subjects | bone loss clinical outcomes Crowns dental implants Dental Implants, Single-Tooth Dentistry Humans immediate provisional Prospective Studies |
title | Immediate Restoration of Single Tapered Implants with Nonoccluding Provisional Crowns: A 5-Year Clinical Prospective Study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T08%3A43%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Immediate%20Restoration%20of%20Single%20Tapered%20Implants%20with%20Nonoccluding%20Provisional%20Crowns:%20A%205-Year%20Clinical%20Prospective%20Study&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20implant%20dentistry%20and%20related%20research&rft.au=Lang,%20Lisa%20A.&rft.date=2014-04&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=248&rft.epage=258&rft.pages=248-258&rft.issn=1523-0899&rft.eissn=1708-8208&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2012.00475.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1519839242%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1519839242&rft_id=info:pmid/22804793&rfr_iscdi=true |