Considering cost accountancy items in crop production simulations under climate change

▶ Cost accountancy items were calculated from dynamic agro-ecosystem model outputs within an interactive Decision Support System. ▶ Yield-based revenues were evaluated in the light of a changing climate and simulated irrigation and fertilisation quantities. ▶ Projections suggest increasing attractiv...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of agronomy 2014-01, Vol.52, p.57-68
Hauptverfasser: Münch, T., Berg, M., Mirschel, W., Wieland, R., Nendel, C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 68
container_issue
container_start_page 57
container_title European journal of agronomy
container_volume 52
creator Münch, T.
Berg, M.
Mirschel, W.
Wieland, R.
Nendel, C.
description ▶ Cost accountancy items were calculated from dynamic agro-ecosystem model outputs within an interactive Decision Support System. ▶ Yield-based revenues were evaluated in the light of a changing climate and simulated irrigation and fertilisation quantities. ▶ Projections suggest increasing attractiveness to employ irrigation for stabilising cereal yields. A Farm Economy Coefficient Generator (FECG) is presented as a post-processing tool for agro-ecological simulation models (ASMs) that deliver yields and consumption figures for nitrogen fertiliser and irrigation water use. The FECG carries out simple cost accountancy calculations using typical production techniques, costs and prices for the selected area. The default settings can be adjusted by the user to specifically describe local farm management. Together with various ASMs, the FECG is embedded in a web-based, geo-referenced decision support system to enable users to extract information on future yields and net returns on a regional or farm-level basis. Using the example of a winter wheat–winter barley–silage maize crop rotation in Germany and downscaled A1B climate data it was demonstrated how the ASM–FECG tandem can be used to analyse the cost and benefit of irrigation. In this example the irrigation costs would still outweigh the yield increase today, while in around 2070 the increased difference between potential and water-limited yield is likely to make irrigation profitable, provided that costs and price levels remain constant. The susceptibility of these results to changing market conditions is discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.eja.2013.01.005
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1524402121</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1161030113000063</els_id><sourcerecordid>1524402121</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-56e4feb05d61cc49030d84d874a239bdb57cf87e3ef455762f611761f00ab6c03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwANx85JKwG8dJKk6o4k-qxAW4Ws5mUxylTokTJN4eV-XMaecw32pmhLhGSBGwuO1S7myaAaoUMAXQJ2KBVamSUik8jRoLTEABnouLEDoAqDKdL8THevDBNTw6v5U0hElaomH2k_X0I93EuyCdlzQOe7kfh2amyQ1eBrebe3uQQc4-4pJ6t7MTS_q0fsuX4qy1feCrv7sU748Pb-vnZPP69LK-3ySkFEyJLjhvuQbdFEiUr2LApsqbqsxtplZ1U-uS2qpkxW2udVlkbYFYFtgC2LogUEtxc_wbs33NHCazc4G4763nYQ4GdZbnkGGG0YpHa-wSwsit2Y8x8vhjEMxhQ9OZuKE5bGgATdwwMndHhmOHb8ejCeTYEzduZJpMM7h_6F-yu3pp</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1524402121</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Considering cost accountancy items in crop production simulations under climate change</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Münch, T. ; Berg, M. ; Mirschel, W. ; Wieland, R. ; Nendel, C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Münch, T. ; Berg, M. ; Mirschel, W. ; Wieland, R. ; Nendel, C.</creatorcontrib><description>▶ Cost accountancy items were calculated from dynamic agro-ecosystem model outputs within an interactive Decision Support System. ▶ Yield-based revenues were evaluated in the light of a changing climate and simulated irrigation and fertilisation quantities. ▶ Projections suggest increasing attractiveness to employ irrigation for stabilising cereal yields. A Farm Economy Coefficient Generator (FECG) is presented as a post-processing tool for agro-ecological simulation models (ASMs) that deliver yields and consumption figures for nitrogen fertiliser and irrigation water use. The FECG carries out simple cost accountancy calculations using typical production techniques, costs and prices for the selected area. The default settings can be adjusted by the user to specifically describe local farm management. Together with various ASMs, the FECG is embedded in a web-based, geo-referenced decision support system to enable users to extract information on future yields and net returns on a regional or farm-level basis. Using the example of a winter wheat–winter barley–silage maize crop rotation in Germany and downscaled A1B climate data it was demonstrated how the ASM–FECG tandem can be used to analyse the cost and benefit of irrigation. In this example the irrigation costs would still outweigh the yield increase today, while in around 2070 the increased difference between potential and water-limited yield is likely to make irrigation profitable, provided that costs and price levels remain constant. The susceptibility of these results to changing market conditions is discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1161-0301</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7331</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.eja.2013.01.005</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Agro-ecosystem modelling ; Crop growth ; Dry matter yield ; Farm accountancy ; Zea mays</subject><ispartof>European journal of agronomy, 2014-01, Vol.52, p.57-68</ispartof><rights>2013 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-56e4feb05d61cc49030d84d874a239bdb57cf87e3ef455762f611761f00ab6c03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-56e4feb05d61cc49030d84d874a239bdb57cf87e3ef455762f611761f00ab6c03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1161030113000063$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Münch, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berg, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mirschel, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wieland, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nendel, C.</creatorcontrib><title>Considering cost accountancy items in crop production simulations under climate change</title><title>European journal of agronomy</title><description>▶ Cost accountancy items were calculated from dynamic agro-ecosystem model outputs within an interactive Decision Support System. ▶ Yield-based revenues were evaluated in the light of a changing climate and simulated irrigation and fertilisation quantities. ▶ Projections suggest increasing attractiveness to employ irrigation for stabilising cereal yields. A Farm Economy Coefficient Generator (FECG) is presented as a post-processing tool for agro-ecological simulation models (ASMs) that deliver yields and consumption figures for nitrogen fertiliser and irrigation water use. The FECG carries out simple cost accountancy calculations using typical production techniques, costs and prices for the selected area. The default settings can be adjusted by the user to specifically describe local farm management. Together with various ASMs, the FECG is embedded in a web-based, geo-referenced decision support system to enable users to extract information on future yields and net returns on a regional or farm-level basis. Using the example of a winter wheat–winter barley–silage maize crop rotation in Germany and downscaled A1B climate data it was demonstrated how the ASM–FECG tandem can be used to analyse the cost and benefit of irrigation. In this example the irrigation costs would still outweigh the yield increase today, while in around 2070 the increased difference between potential and water-limited yield is likely to make irrigation profitable, provided that costs and price levels remain constant. The susceptibility of these results to changing market conditions is discussed.</description><subject>Agro-ecosystem modelling</subject><subject>Crop growth</subject><subject>Dry matter yield</subject><subject>Farm accountancy</subject><subject>Zea mays</subject><issn>1161-0301</issn><issn>1873-7331</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwANx85JKwG8dJKk6o4k-qxAW4Ws5mUxylTokTJN4eV-XMaecw32pmhLhGSBGwuO1S7myaAaoUMAXQJ2KBVamSUik8jRoLTEABnouLEDoAqDKdL8THevDBNTw6v5U0hElaomH2k_X0I93EuyCdlzQOe7kfh2amyQ1eBrebe3uQQc4-4pJ6t7MTS_q0fsuX4qy1feCrv7sU748Pb-vnZPP69LK-3ySkFEyJLjhvuQbdFEiUr2LApsqbqsxtplZ1U-uS2qpkxW2udVlkbYFYFtgC2LogUEtxc_wbs33NHCazc4G4763nYQ4GdZbnkGGG0YpHa-wSwsit2Y8x8vhjEMxhQ9OZuKE5bGgATdwwMndHhmOHb8ejCeTYEzduZJpMM7h_6F-yu3pp</recordid><startdate>201401</startdate><enddate>201401</enddate><creator>Münch, T.</creator><creator>Berg, M.</creator><creator>Mirschel, W.</creator><creator>Wieland, R.</creator><creator>Nendel, C.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>KL.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201401</creationdate><title>Considering cost accountancy items in crop production simulations under climate change</title><author>Münch, T. ; Berg, M. ; Mirschel, W. ; Wieland, R. ; Nendel, C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-56e4feb05d61cc49030d84d874a239bdb57cf87e3ef455762f611761f00ab6c03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Agro-ecosystem modelling</topic><topic>Crop growth</topic><topic>Dry matter yield</topic><topic>Farm accountancy</topic><topic>Zea mays</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Münch, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berg, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mirschel, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wieland, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nendel, C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of agronomy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Münch, T.</au><au>Berg, M.</au><au>Mirschel, W.</au><au>Wieland, R.</au><au>Nendel, C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Considering cost accountancy items in crop production simulations under climate change</atitle><jtitle>European journal of agronomy</jtitle><date>2014-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>52</volume><spage>57</spage><epage>68</epage><pages>57-68</pages><issn>1161-0301</issn><eissn>1873-7331</eissn><abstract>▶ Cost accountancy items were calculated from dynamic agro-ecosystem model outputs within an interactive Decision Support System. ▶ Yield-based revenues were evaluated in the light of a changing climate and simulated irrigation and fertilisation quantities. ▶ Projections suggest increasing attractiveness to employ irrigation for stabilising cereal yields. A Farm Economy Coefficient Generator (FECG) is presented as a post-processing tool for agro-ecological simulation models (ASMs) that deliver yields and consumption figures for nitrogen fertiliser and irrigation water use. The FECG carries out simple cost accountancy calculations using typical production techniques, costs and prices for the selected area. The default settings can be adjusted by the user to specifically describe local farm management. Together with various ASMs, the FECG is embedded in a web-based, geo-referenced decision support system to enable users to extract information on future yields and net returns on a regional or farm-level basis. Using the example of a winter wheat–winter barley–silage maize crop rotation in Germany and downscaled A1B climate data it was demonstrated how the ASM–FECG tandem can be used to analyse the cost and benefit of irrigation. In this example the irrigation costs would still outweigh the yield increase today, while in around 2070 the increased difference between potential and water-limited yield is likely to make irrigation profitable, provided that costs and price levels remain constant. The susceptibility of these results to changing market conditions is discussed.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.eja.2013.01.005</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1161-0301
ispartof European journal of agronomy, 2014-01, Vol.52, p.57-68
issn 1161-0301
1873-7331
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1524402121
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Agro-ecosystem modelling
Crop growth
Dry matter yield
Farm accountancy
Zea mays
title Considering cost accountancy items in crop production simulations under climate change
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T20%3A04%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Considering%20cost%20accountancy%20items%20in%20crop%20production%20simulations%20under%20climate%20change&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20agronomy&rft.au=M%C3%BCnch,%20T.&rft.date=2014-01&rft.volume=52&rft.spage=57&rft.epage=68&rft.pages=57-68&rft.issn=1161-0301&rft.eissn=1873-7331&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.eja.2013.01.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1524402121%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1524402121&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1161030113000063&rfr_iscdi=true