Assessment of Virtual Reality Robotic Simulation Performance by Urology Resident Trainees
Objectives To examine resident performance on the Mimic dV-Trainer (MdVT; Mimic Technologies, Inc., Seattle, WA) for correlation with resident trainee level (postgraduate year [PGY]), console experience (CE), and simulator exposure in their training program to assess for internal bias with the simul...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of surgical education 2014-05, Vol.71 (3), p.302-308 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 308 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 302 |
container_title | Journal of surgical education |
container_volume | 71 |
creator | Ruparel, Raaj K., MD Taylor, Abby S., MD Patel, Janil, BS Patel, Vipul R., MD Heckman, Michael G., MS Rawal, Bhupendra, MS Leveillee, Raymond J., MD Thiel, David D., MD |
description | Objectives To examine resident performance on the Mimic dV-Trainer (MdVT; Mimic Technologies, Inc., Seattle, WA) for correlation with resident trainee level (postgraduate year [PGY]), console experience (CE), and simulator exposure in their training program to assess for internal bias with the simulator. Design Residents from programs of the Southeastern Section of the American Urologic Association participated. Each resident was scored on 4 simulator tasks (peg board, camera targeting, energy dissection [ED], and needle targeting) with 3 different outcomes (final score, economy of motion score, and time to complete exercise) measured for each task. These scores were evaluated for association with PGY, CE, and simulator exposure. Setting Robotic skills training laboratory. Participants A total of 27 residents from 14 programs of the Southeastern Section of the American Urologic Association participated. Results Time to complete the ED exercise was significantly shorter for residents who had logged live robotic console compared with those who had not (p = 0.003). There were no other associations with live robotic console time that approached significance (all p ≥ 0.21). The only measure that was significantly associated with PGY was time to complete ED exercise (p = 0.009). No associations with previous utilization of a robotic simulator in the resident’s home training program were statistically significant. Conclusions The ED exercise on the MdVT is most associated with CE and PGY compared with other exercises. Exposure of trainees to the MdVT in training programs does not appear to alter performance scores compared with trainees who do not have the simulator. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jsurg.2013.09.009 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1521912629</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1931720413002274</els_id><sourcerecordid>1521912629</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-1585fe6ef61e42ef6c9b406f9806668a6da1c316527b3d3da5eb45bf89a456f23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctu1jAQRi1ERS_wBEgoSzYJvidegFRVpSBVouoFiZXlOOPKwYmLnSD9b4_DX7rohtXM4nwzmjMIvSW4IZjID2Mz5jXdNxQT1mDVYKxeoCPStV3dckFfll4xUrcU80N0nPOIseCKqlfokPJWtR3nR-jHac6Q8wTzUkVXffdpWU2orsEEv-yq69jHxdvqxk9rMIuPc3UFycU0mdlC1e-quxRDvC8kZD9sU26T8TNAfo0OnAkZ3jzWE3T3-fz27Et9-e3i69npZW054UtNRCccSHCSAKelWNVzLJ3qsJSyM3IwxDIiBW17NrDBCOi56F2nDBfSUXaC3u_nPqT4a4W86MlnCyGYGeKaNRGUKEIlVQVle9SmmHMCpx-Sn0zaaYL15lSP-q9TvTnVWOnitKTePS5Y-wmGp8w_iQX4uAegnPnbQ9LZeih-Bp_ALnqI_j8LPj3L2-Bnb034CTvIY1zTXAxqojPVWN9sb92-ShjGlLac_QHO257Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1521912629</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of Virtual Reality Robotic Simulation Performance by Urology Resident Trainees</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Ruparel, Raaj K., MD ; Taylor, Abby S., MD ; Patel, Janil, BS ; Patel, Vipul R., MD ; Heckman, Michael G., MS ; Rawal, Bhupendra, MS ; Leveillee, Raymond J., MD ; Thiel, David D., MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Ruparel, Raaj K., MD ; Taylor, Abby S., MD ; Patel, Janil, BS ; Patel, Vipul R., MD ; Heckman, Michael G., MS ; Rawal, Bhupendra, MS ; Leveillee, Raymond J., MD ; Thiel, David D., MD</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives To examine resident performance on the Mimic dV-Trainer (MdVT; Mimic Technologies, Inc., Seattle, WA) for correlation with resident trainee level (postgraduate year [PGY]), console experience (CE), and simulator exposure in their training program to assess for internal bias with the simulator. Design Residents from programs of the Southeastern Section of the American Urologic Association participated. Each resident was scored on 4 simulator tasks (peg board, camera targeting, energy dissection [ED], and needle targeting) with 3 different outcomes (final score, economy of motion score, and time to complete exercise) measured for each task. These scores were evaluated for association with PGY, CE, and simulator exposure. Setting Robotic skills training laboratory. Participants A total of 27 residents from 14 programs of the Southeastern Section of the American Urologic Association participated. Results Time to complete the ED exercise was significantly shorter for residents who had logged live robotic console compared with those who had not (p = 0.003). There were no other associations with live robotic console time that approached significance (all p ≥ 0.21). The only measure that was significantly associated with PGY was time to complete ED exercise (p = 0.009). No associations with previous utilization of a robotic simulator in the resident’s home training program were statistically significant. Conclusions The ED exercise on the MdVT is most associated with CE and PGY compared with other exercises. Exposure of trainees to the MdVT in training programs does not appear to alter performance scores compared with trainees who do not have the simulator.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1931-7204</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-7452</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2013.09.009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24797844</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Internship and Residency ; Medical Knowledge ; Professionalism ; Prostatectomy - education ; resident training ; robotic prostatectomy ; robotic surgery ; robotic training ; Robotics ; simulation ; Surgery ; Urology - education ; User-Computer Interface</subject><ispartof>Journal of surgical education, 2014-05, Vol.71 (3), p.302-308</ispartof><rights>Association of Program Directors in Surgery</rights><rights>2014 Association of Program Directors in Surgery</rights><rights>2013 Published by Association of Program Directors in Surgery on behalf of Association of Program Directors in Surgery.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-1585fe6ef61e42ef6c9b406f9806668a6da1c316527b3d3da5eb45bf89a456f23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-1585fe6ef61e42ef6c9b406f9806668a6da1c316527b3d3da5eb45bf89a456f23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1931720413002274$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24797844$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ruparel, Raaj K., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Abby S., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Janil, BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Vipul R., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heckman, Michael G., MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rawal, Bhupendra, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leveillee, Raymond J., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thiel, David D., MD</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of Virtual Reality Robotic Simulation Performance by Urology Resident Trainees</title><title>Journal of surgical education</title><addtitle>J Surg Educ</addtitle><description>Objectives To examine resident performance on the Mimic dV-Trainer (MdVT; Mimic Technologies, Inc., Seattle, WA) for correlation with resident trainee level (postgraduate year [PGY]), console experience (CE), and simulator exposure in their training program to assess for internal bias with the simulator. Design Residents from programs of the Southeastern Section of the American Urologic Association participated. Each resident was scored on 4 simulator tasks (peg board, camera targeting, energy dissection [ED], and needle targeting) with 3 different outcomes (final score, economy of motion score, and time to complete exercise) measured for each task. These scores were evaluated for association with PGY, CE, and simulator exposure. Setting Robotic skills training laboratory. Participants A total of 27 residents from 14 programs of the Southeastern Section of the American Urologic Association participated. Results Time to complete the ED exercise was significantly shorter for residents who had logged live robotic console compared with those who had not (p = 0.003). There were no other associations with live robotic console time that approached significance (all p ≥ 0.21). The only measure that was significantly associated with PGY was time to complete ED exercise (p = 0.009). No associations with previous utilization of a robotic simulator in the resident’s home training program were statistically significant. Conclusions The ED exercise on the MdVT is most associated with CE and PGY compared with other exercises. Exposure of trainees to the MdVT in training programs does not appear to alter performance scores compared with trainees who do not have the simulator.</description><subject>Internship and Residency</subject><subject>Medical Knowledge</subject><subject>Professionalism</subject><subject>Prostatectomy - education</subject><subject>resident training</subject><subject>robotic prostatectomy</subject><subject>robotic surgery</subject><subject>robotic training</subject><subject>Robotics</subject><subject>simulation</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Urology - education</subject><subject>User-Computer Interface</subject><issn>1931-7204</issn><issn>1878-7452</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkctu1jAQRi1ERS_wBEgoSzYJvidegFRVpSBVouoFiZXlOOPKwYmLnSD9b4_DX7rohtXM4nwzmjMIvSW4IZjID2Mz5jXdNxQT1mDVYKxeoCPStV3dckFfll4xUrcU80N0nPOIseCKqlfokPJWtR3nR-jHac6Q8wTzUkVXffdpWU2orsEEv-yq69jHxdvqxk9rMIuPc3UFycU0mdlC1e-quxRDvC8kZD9sU26T8TNAfo0OnAkZ3jzWE3T3-fz27Et9-e3i69npZW054UtNRCccSHCSAKelWNVzLJ3qsJSyM3IwxDIiBW17NrDBCOi56F2nDBfSUXaC3u_nPqT4a4W86MlnCyGYGeKaNRGUKEIlVQVle9SmmHMCpx-Sn0zaaYL15lSP-q9TvTnVWOnitKTePS5Y-wmGp8w_iQX4uAegnPnbQ9LZeih-Bp_ALnqI_j8LPj3L2-Bnb034CTvIY1zTXAxqojPVWN9sb92-ShjGlLac_QHO257Q</recordid><startdate>20140501</startdate><enddate>20140501</enddate><creator>Ruparel, Raaj K., MD</creator><creator>Taylor, Abby S., MD</creator><creator>Patel, Janil, BS</creator><creator>Patel, Vipul R., MD</creator><creator>Heckman, Michael G., MS</creator><creator>Rawal, Bhupendra, MS</creator><creator>Leveillee, Raymond J., MD</creator><creator>Thiel, David D., MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140501</creationdate><title>Assessment of Virtual Reality Robotic Simulation Performance by Urology Resident Trainees</title><author>Ruparel, Raaj K., MD ; Taylor, Abby S., MD ; Patel, Janil, BS ; Patel, Vipul R., MD ; Heckman, Michael G., MS ; Rawal, Bhupendra, MS ; Leveillee, Raymond J., MD ; Thiel, David D., MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-1585fe6ef61e42ef6c9b406f9806668a6da1c316527b3d3da5eb45bf89a456f23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Internship and Residency</topic><topic>Medical Knowledge</topic><topic>Professionalism</topic><topic>Prostatectomy - education</topic><topic>resident training</topic><topic>robotic prostatectomy</topic><topic>robotic surgery</topic><topic>robotic training</topic><topic>Robotics</topic><topic>simulation</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Urology - education</topic><topic>User-Computer Interface</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ruparel, Raaj K., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Abby S., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Janil, BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Vipul R., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heckman, Michael G., MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rawal, Bhupendra, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leveillee, Raymond J., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thiel, David D., MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of surgical education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ruparel, Raaj K., MD</au><au>Taylor, Abby S., MD</au><au>Patel, Janil, BS</au><au>Patel, Vipul R., MD</au><au>Heckman, Michael G., MS</au><au>Rawal, Bhupendra, MS</au><au>Leveillee, Raymond J., MD</au><au>Thiel, David D., MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of Virtual Reality Robotic Simulation Performance by Urology Resident Trainees</atitle><jtitle>Journal of surgical education</jtitle><addtitle>J Surg Educ</addtitle><date>2014-05-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>302</spage><epage>308</epage><pages>302-308</pages><issn>1931-7204</issn><eissn>1878-7452</eissn><abstract>Objectives To examine resident performance on the Mimic dV-Trainer (MdVT; Mimic Technologies, Inc., Seattle, WA) for correlation with resident trainee level (postgraduate year [PGY]), console experience (CE), and simulator exposure in their training program to assess for internal bias with the simulator. Design Residents from programs of the Southeastern Section of the American Urologic Association participated. Each resident was scored on 4 simulator tasks (peg board, camera targeting, energy dissection [ED], and needle targeting) with 3 different outcomes (final score, economy of motion score, and time to complete exercise) measured for each task. These scores were evaluated for association with PGY, CE, and simulator exposure. Setting Robotic skills training laboratory. Participants A total of 27 residents from 14 programs of the Southeastern Section of the American Urologic Association participated. Results Time to complete the ED exercise was significantly shorter for residents who had logged live robotic console compared with those who had not (p = 0.003). There were no other associations with live robotic console time that approached significance (all p ≥ 0.21). The only measure that was significantly associated with PGY was time to complete ED exercise (p = 0.009). No associations with previous utilization of a robotic simulator in the resident’s home training program were statistically significant. Conclusions The ED exercise on the MdVT is most associated with CE and PGY compared with other exercises. Exposure of trainees to the MdVT in training programs does not appear to alter performance scores compared with trainees who do not have the simulator.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>24797844</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jsurg.2013.09.009</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1931-7204 |
ispartof | Journal of surgical education, 2014-05, Vol.71 (3), p.302-308 |
issn | 1931-7204 1878-7452 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1521912629 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Internship and Residency Medical Knowledge Professionalism Prostatectomy - education resident training robotic prostatectomy robotic surgery robotic training Robotics simulation Surgery Urology - education User-Computer Interface |
title | Assessment of Virtual Reality Robotic Simulation Performance by Urology Resident Trainees |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T01%3A16%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20Virtual%20Reality%20Robotic%20Simulation%20Performance%20by%20Urology%20Resident%20Trainees&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20surgical%20education&rft.au=Ruparel,%20Raaj%20K.,%20MD&rft.date=2014-05-01&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=302&rft.epage=308&rft.pages=302-308&rft.issn=1931-7204&rft.eissn=1878-7452&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jsurg.2013.09.009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1521912629%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1521912629&rft_id=info:pmid/24797844&rft_els_id=S1931720413002274&rfr_iscdi=true |