Outpatient Approaches to Elective Induction of Labor: Past, Present, and Future

Outpatient Approaches to Elective Induction of Labor: Past, Present, and Future

Assessing the feasibility, acceptability and safety of outpatient labour induction. MEDLINE database was searched for “outpatient labor induction” from January 1, 1986 to February 28, 2013. Main outcomes of interest included hyperstimulation, cesarean births, Apgar scores

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical obstetrics and gynecology 2014-06, Vol.57 (2), p.391-400
Hauptverfasser: RAUF, ZUBAIR, ALFIREVIC, ZARKO
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Administration, Intravaginal
Ambulatory Surgical Procedures - methods
Dinoprostone - administration & dosage
Elective Surgical Procedures - methods
Humans
Labor, Induced - trends
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 400
container_issue 2
container_start_page 391
container_title Clinical obstetrics and gynecology
container_volume 57
creator RAUF, ZUBAIR
ALFIREVIC, ZARKO
description Assessing the feasibility, acceptability and safety of outpatient labour induction. MEDLINE database was searched for “outpatient labor induction” from January 1, 1986 to February 28, 2013. Main outcomes of interest included hyperstimulation, cesarean births, Apgar scores
doi_str_mv 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000028
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1521336340</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1521336340</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3058-712247cd4c49c9a2bc4bd597ab0ab34de38085be006e0932b8e2b8e9429e31dc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kNtKw0AQhhdRbK2-gcheetHonnJY70ppa6HQInodNpspjabZuAeLb29Kq6AXDgwzDP8_M3wIXVNyR4lM72dP0zvyK1h2gvo05iyKY0ZOUb-byUgyQnvowrlXQqiIU3qOekwkCUtT1kfLZfCt8hU0Ho_a1hqlN-CwN3hSg_bVB-B5U4auMw02a7xQhbEPeKWcH-KVBdcZh1g1JZ4GHyxcorO1qh1cHesAvUwnz-PHaLGczcejRaQ5ibMopYyJVJdCC6mlYoUWRRnLVBVEFVyUwDOSxQUQkgCRnBUZ7FMKJoHTUvMBuj3s7V5-D-B8vq2chrpWDZjgchozynnCBemk4iDV1jhnYZ23ttoq-5lTku9R5h3K_C_KznZzvBCKLZQ_pm92nSA7CHam9mDdWx12YPMNqNpv_t_9BQZFfok</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1521336340</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Outpatient Approaches to Elective Induction of Labor: Past, Present, and Future</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>RAUF, ZUBAIR ; ALFIREVIC, ZARKO</creator><creatorcontrib>RAUF, ZUBAIR ; ALFIREVIC, ZARKO</creatorcontrib><description>Assessing the feasibility, acceptability and safety of outpatient labour induction. MEDLINE database was searched for “outpatient labor induction” from January 1, 1986 to February 28, 2013. Main outcomes of interest included hyperstimulation, cesarean births, Apgar scores &lt;7 at 5 minutes, arterial-cord pH of &lt;7.10, and neonatal morbidity/mortality. Overall cesarean rates vary significantly (2.6% to 42%). Hyperstimulation with CTG changes is rare. Neonatal admissions for diverse reasons are often not associated with outpatient induction agent. Overall, maternal satisfaction is high. Outpatient labor induction is feasible and important adverse events are rare. However, paucity of available data and heterogeneity of different studies make it difficult to quantify adverse events or identify a preferred induction method.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-9201</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-5520</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000028</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24662772</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: by Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</publisher><subject>Administration, Intravaginal ; Ambulatory Surgical Procedures - methods ; Dinoprostone - administration &amp; dosage ; Elective Surgical Procedures - methods ; Humans ; Labor, Induced - trends</subject><ispartof>Clinical obstetrics and gynecology, 2014-06, Vol.57 (2), p.391-400</ispartof><rights>2014 by Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3058-712247cd4c49c9a2bc4bd597ab0ab34de38085be006e0932b8e2b8e9429e31dc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24662772$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>RAUF, ZUBAIR</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ALFIREVIC, ZARKO</creatorcontrib><title>Outpatient Approaches to Elective Induction of Labor: Past, Present, and Future</title><title>Clinical obstetrics and gynecology</title><addtitle>Clin Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><description>Assessing the feasibility, acceptability and safety of outpatient labour induction. MEDLINE database was searched for “outpatient labor induction” from January 1, 1986 to February 28, 2013. Main outcomes of interest included hyperstimulation, cesarean births, Apgar scores &lt;7 at 5 minutes, arterial-cord pH of &lt;7.10, and neonatal morbidity/mortality. Overall cesarean rates vary significantly (2.6% to 42%). Hyperstimulation with CTG changes is rare. Neonatal admissions for diverse reasons are often not associated with outpatient induction agent. Overall, maternal satisfaction is high. Outpatient labor induction is feasible and important adverse events are rare. However, paucity of available data and heterogeneity of different studies make it difficult to quantify adverse events or identify a preferred induction method.</description><subject>Administration, Intravaginal</subject><subject>Ambulatory Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Dinoprostone - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Elective Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Labor, Induced - trends</subject><issn>0009-9201</issn><issn>1532-5520</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kNtKw0AQhhdRbK2-gcheetHonnJY70ppa6HQInodNpspjabZuAeLb29Kq6AXDgwzDP8_M3wIXVNyR4lM72dP0zvyK1h2gvo05iyKY0ZOUb-byUgyQnvowrlXQqiIU3qOekwkCUtT1kfLZfCt8hU0Ho_a1hqlN-CwN3hSg_bVB-B5U4auMw02a7xQhbEPeKWcH-KVBdcZh1g1JZ4GHyxcorO1qh1cHesAvUwnz-PHaLGczcejRaQ5ibMopYyJVJdCC6mlYoUWRRnLVBVEFVyUwDOSxQUQkgCRnBUZ7FMKJoHTUvMBuj3s7V5-D-B8vq2chrpWDZjgchozynnCBemk4iDV1jhnYZ23ttoq-5lTku9R5h3K_C_KznZzvBCKLZQ_pm92nSA7CHam9mDdWx12YPMNqNpv_t_9BQZFfok</recordid><startdate>201406</startdate><enddate>201406</enddate><creator>RAUF, ZUBAIR</creator><creator>ALFIREVIC, ZARKO</creator><general>by Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201406</creationdate><title>Outpatient Approaches to Elective Induction of Labor: Past, Present, and Future</title><author>RAUF, ZUBAIR ; ALFIREVIC, ZARKO</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3058-712247cd4c49c9a2bc4bd597ab0ab34de38085be006e0932b8e2b8e9429e31dc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Administration, Intravaginal</topic><topic>Ambulatory Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Dinoprostone - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Elective Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Labor, Induced - trends</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>RAUF, ZUBAIR</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ALFIREVIC, ZARKO</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>RAUF, ZUBAIR</au><au>ALFIREVIC, ZARKO</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Outpatient Approaches to Elective Induction of Labor: Past, Present, and Future</atitle><jtitle>Clinical obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><date>2014-06</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>391</spage><epage>400</epage><pages>391-400</pages><issn>0009-9201</issn><eissn>1532-5520</eissn><abstract>Assessing the feasibility, acceptability and safety of outpatient labour induction. MEDLINE database was searched for “outpatient labor induction” from January 1, 1986 to February 28, 2013. Main outcomes of interest included hyperstimulation, cesarean births, Apgar scores &lt;7 at 5 minutes, arterial-cord pH of &lt;7.10, and neonatal morbidity/mortality. Overall cesarean rates vary significantly (2.6% to 42%). Hyperstimulation with CTG changes is rare. Neonatal admissions for diverse reasons are often not associated with outpatient induction agent. Overall, maternal satisfaction is high. Outpatient labor induction is feasible and important adverse events are rare. However, paucity of available data and heterogeneity of different studies make it difficult to quantify adverse events or identify a preferred induction method.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>by Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</pub><pmid>24662772</pmid><doi>10.1097/GRF.0000000000000028</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0009-9201
ispartof Clinical obstetrics and gynecology, 2014-06, Vol.57 (2), p.391-400
issn 0009-9201
1532-5520
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1521336340
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Administration, Intravaginal
Ambulatory Surgical Procedures - methods
Dinoprostone - administration & dosage
Elective Surgical Procedures - methods
Humans
Labor, Induced - trends
title Outpatient Approaches to Elective Induction of Labor: Past, Present, and Future
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T19%3A06%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Outpatient%20Approaches%20to%20Elective%20Induction%20of%20Labor:%20Past,%20Present,%20and%20Future&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20obstetrics%20and%20gynecology&rft.au=RAUF,%20ZUBAIR&rft.date=2014-06&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=391&rft.epage=400&rft.pages=391-400&rft.issn=0009-9201&rft.eissn=1532-5520&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/GRF.0000000000000028&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1521336340%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1521336340&rft_id=info:pmid/24662772&rfr_iscdi=true