How Competitive Is the Match for Radiology Residency? Present View and Historical Perspective

Purpose Interest in radiology as a career among US medical students has changed. The aim of this study was to investigate the recent and historical trends in residency applications and how they have affected competitiveness in obtaining a position. Methods Statistics published by the National Reside...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American College of Radiology 2014-05, Vol.11 (5), p.501-506
Hauptverfasser: Chen, Jim Y., MD, Heller, Matthew T., MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 506
container_issue 5
container_start_page 501
container_title Journal of the American College of Radiology
container_volume 11
creator Chen, Jim Y., MD
Heller, Matthew T., MD
description Purpose Interest in radiology as a career among US medical students has changed. The aim of this study was to investigate the recent and historical trends in residency applications and how they have affected competitiveness in obtaining a position. Methods Statistics published by the National Resident Matching Program in “Results and Data: Main Residency Match” for 1991 to 2013 were analyzed. Results The number of radiology residency positions has trended upward over the past 23 years; however, the number of applicants from US medical schools has been widely variable. The number of applicants peaked in 2009 but has since decreased every year. The number of positions per US senior applicant (PPUSA) is a judge of specialty competitiveness on a supply-and-demand basis. A lower PPUSA indicates a more competitive specialty. Radiology saw its most competitive year in 2001, with only 0.91 PPUSA. PPUSA has been on the rise every year since 2009. From 2009 to 2013, the number of residency positions increased by 56, but there were 241 fewer US senior medical students preferring radiology. In 2013, there were 1,143 residency positions available for only 845 US senior medical students who preferred the specialty. The PPUSA was 1.35, making 2013 the least competitive year in obtaining a radiology residency position since 1998. Over the past 23 years, 5.5% of all US senior medical students have applied to radiology for residency. Interest reached an all-time high in 2009, at almost 7%. In 2013, only 4.8% of all US seniors preferred radiology, the lowest since 1999. The historical (1991–2013), current (2011–2013), and most recent (2013) PPUSAs for radiology were 1.19, 1.29, and 1.35, respectively. For comparison, the current PPUSAs for the following specialties were: 0.74 for plastic surgery, 0.83 for orthopedic surgery, 0.95 for dermatology, 1.10 for general surgery, 1.24 for obstetrics and gynecology, 1.31 for anesthesiology, 1.42 for pediatrics, and 1.80 for internal medicine (1.80). Conclusions Although radiology residency positions have continued to increase, interest among US seniors has dropped every year since 2009. The 2013 match was the least competitive since 1998. Over the past 3 years, the competitiveness of matching radiology on a supply-and-demand basis has been close to that of obstetrics and gynecology and anesthesiology.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.11.011
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1521328803</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1546144013007667</els_id><sourcerecordid>1521328803</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-413f4fadb9e3db05c315c2fb6e56c68aab076db1174f6fee1f6c8b6a642991b33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90cFu1DAQBuAIUdFSeAEOyEcuCR7bcRIJgdAK2EqtqEqLuCDLscfUIRsvdrbVvj2xtnDgwMlz-OeX_E1RvABaAQX5eqgGbWLFKPAKoKIAj4oTqOu25KL79jjPQpYgBD0unqY0UMqapm2fFMdMNB2nAk6K7-twT1Zhs8XZz_4OyVki8y2SCz2bW-JCJFfa-jCGH3tyhclbnMz-HbmMmHCayVeP90RPlqx9mkP0Ro_kEmPaosltz4ojp8eEzx_e0-Lm44fr1bo8__zpbPX-vDQCYC4FcCectn2H3Pa0Nhxqw1wvsZZGtlr3tJG2B2iEkw4RnDRtL7UUrOug5_y0eHXo3cbwa4dpVhufDI6jnjDskoKaAWdtS3OUHaImhpQiOrWNfqPjXgFVmVUNKrOqzKoA1MK6LL186N_1G7R_V_44LoE3hwAuv7zzGFUyfqFC6-NCoWzw_-9_-8-6Gf2UNX_iHtMQdnFa_BSoxBRVX_Jh812B00VGNvw3TpWeSQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1521328803</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How Competitive Is the Match for Radiology Residency? Present View and Historical Perspective</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Chen, Jim Y., MD ; Heller, Matthew T., MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Chen, Jim Y., MD ; Heller, Matthew T., MD</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose Interest in radiology as a career among US medical students has changed. The aim of this study was to investigate the recent and historical trends in residency applications and how they have affected competitiveness in obtaining a position. Methods Statistics published by the National Resident Matching Program in “Results and Data: Main Residency Match” for 1991 to 2013 were analyzed. Results The number of radiology residency positions has trended upward over the past 23 years; however, the number of applicants from US medical schools has been widely variable. The number of applicants peaked in 2009 but has since decreased every year. The number of positions per US senior applicant (PPUSA) is a judge of specialty competitiveness on a supply-and-demand basis. A lower PPUSA indicates a more competitive specialty. Radiology saw its most competitive year in 2001, with only 0.91 PPUSA. PPUSA has been on the rise every year since 2009. From 2009 to 2013, the number of residency positions increased by 56, but there were 241 fewer US senior medical students preferring radiology. In 2013, there were 1,143 residency positions available for only 845 US senior medical students who preferred the specialty. The PPUSA was 1.35, making 2013 the least competitive year in obtaining a radiology residency position since 1998. Over the past 23 years, 5.5% of all US senior medical students have applied to radiology for residency. Interest reached an all-time high in 2009, at almost 7%. In 2013, only 4.8% of all US seniors preferred radiology, the lowest since 1999. The historical (1991–2013), current (2011–2013), and most recent (2013) PPUSAs for radiology were 1.19, 1.29, and 1.35, respectively. For comparison, the current PPUSAs for the following specialties were: 0.74 for plastic surgery, 0.83 for orthopedic surgery, 0.95 for dermatology, 1.10 for general surgery, 1.24 for obstetrics and gynecology, 1.31 for anesthesiology, 1.42 for pediatrics, and 1.80 for internal medicine (1.80). Conclusions Although radiology residency positions have continued to increase, interest among US seniors has dropped every year since 2009. The 2013 match was the least competitive since 1998. Over the past 3 years, the competitiveness of matching radiology on a supply-and-demand basis has been close to that of obstetrics and gynecology and anesthesiology.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1546-1440</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-349X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.11.011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24793041</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>application ; Career Choice ; competitive ; Education, Medical, Graduate ; Humans ; Internship and Residency - statistics &amp; numerical data ; match ; Radiology ; Radiology - education ; residency ; Students, Medical ; United States</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American College of Radiology, 2014-05, Vol.11 (5), p.501-506</ispartof><rights>American College of Radiology</rights><rights>2014 American College of Radiology</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-413f4fadb9e3db05c315c2fb6e56c68aab076db1174f6fee1f6c8b6a642991b33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-413f4fadb9e3db05c315c2fb6e56c68aab076db1174f6fee1f6c8b6a642991b33</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1306-8210</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2013.11.011$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24793041$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chen, Jim Y., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heller, Matthew T., MD</creatorcontrib><title>How Competitive Is the Match for Radiology Residency? Present View and Historical Perspective</title><title>Journal of the American College of Radiology</title><addtitle>J Am Coll Radiol</addtitle><description>Purpose Interest in radiology as a career among US medical students has changed. The aim of this study was to investigate the recent and historical trends in residency applications and how they have affected competitiveness in obtaining a position. Methods Statistics published by the National Resident Matching Program in “Results and Data: Main Residency Match” for 1991 to 2013 were analyzed. Results The number of radiology residency positions has trended upward over the past 23 years; however, the number of applicants from US medical schools has been widely variable. The number of applicants peaked in 2009 but has since decreased every year. The number of positions per US senior applicant (PPUSA) is a judge of specialty competitiveness on a supply-and-demand basis. A lower PPUSA indicates a more competitive specialty. Radiology saw its most competitive year in 2001, with only 0.91 PPUSA. PPUSA has been on the rise every year since 2009. From 2009 to 2013, the number of residency positions increased by 56, but there were 241 fewer US senior medical students preferring radiology. In 2013, there were 1,143 residency positions available for only 845 US senior medical students who preferred the specialty. The PPUSA was 1.35, making 2013 the least competitive year in obtaining a radiology residency position since 1998. Over the past 23 years, 5.5% of all US senior medical students have applied to radiology for residency. Interest reached an all-time high in 2009, at almost 7%. In 2013, only 4.8% of all US seniors preferred radiology, the lowest since 1999. The historical (1991–2013), current (2011–2013), and most recent (2013) PPUSAs for radiology were 1.19, 1.29, and 1.35, respectively. For comparison, the current PPUSAs for the following specialties were: 0.74 for plastic surgery, 0.83 for orthopedic surgery, 0.95 for dermatology, 1.10 for general surgery, 1.24 for obstetrics and gynecology, 1.31 for anesthesiology, 1.42 for pediatrics, and 1.80 for internal medicine (1.80). Conclusions Although radiology residency positions have continued to increase, interest among US seniors has dropped every year since 2009. The 2013 match was the least competitive since 1998. Over the past 3 years, the competitiveness of matching radiology on a supply-and-demand basis has been close to that of obstetrics and gynecology and anesthesiology.</description><subject>application</subject><subject>Career Choice</subject><subject>competitive</subject><subject>Education, Medical, Graduate</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internship and Residency - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>match</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Radiology - education</subject><subject>residency</subject><subject>Students, Medical</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>1546-1440</issn><issn>1558-349X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp90cFu1DAQBuAIUdFSeAEOyEcuCR7bcRIJgdAK2EqtqEqLuCDLscfUIRsvdrbVvj2xtnDgwMlz-OeX_E1RvABaAQX5eqgGbWLFKPAKoKIAj4oTqOu25KL79jjPQpYgBD0unqY0UMqapm2fFMdMNB2nAk6K7-twT1Zhs8XZz_4OyVki8y2SCz2bW-JCJFfa-jCGH3tyhclbnMz-HbmMmHCayVeP90RPlqx9mkP0Ro_kEmPaosltz4ojp8eEzx_e0-Lm44fr1bo8__zpbPX-vDQCYC4FcCectn2H3Pa0Nhxqw1wvsZZGtlr3tJG2B2iEkw4RnDRtL7UUrOug5_y0eHXo3cbwa4dpVhufDI6jnjDskoKaAWdtS3OUHaImhpQiOrWNfqPjXgFVmVUNKrOqzKoA1MK6LL186N_1G7R_V_44LoE3hwAuv7zzGFUyfqFC6-NCoWzw_-9_-8-6Gf2UNX_iHtMQdnFa_BSoxBRVX_Jh812B00VGNvw3TpWeSQ</recordid><startdate>20140501</startdate><enddate>20140501</enddate><creator>Chen, Jim Y., MD</creator><creator>Heller, Matthew T., MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1306-8210</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20140501</creationdate><title>How Competitive Is the Match for Radiology Residency? Present View and Historical Perspective</title><author>Chen, Jim Y., MD ; Heller, Matthew T., MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-413f4fadb9e3db05c315c2fb6e56c68aab076db1174f6fee1f6c8b6a642991b33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>application</topic><topic>Career Choice</topic><topic>competitive</topic><topic>Education, Medical, Graduate</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internship and Residency - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>match</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Radiology - education</topic><topic>residency</topic><topic>Students, Medical</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chen, Jim Y., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heller, Matthew T., MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American College of Radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chen, Jim Y., MD</au><au>Heller, Matthew T., MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How Competitive Is the Match for Radiology Residency? Present View and Historical Perspective</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American College of Radiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Coll Radiol</addtitle><date>2014-05-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>501</spage><epage>506</epage><pages>501-506</pages><issn>1546-1440</issn><eissn>1558-349X</eissn><abstract>Purpose Interest in radiology as a career among US medical students has changed. The aim of this study was to investigate the recent and historical trends in residency applications and how they have affected competitiveness in obtaining a position. Methods Statistics published by the National Resident Matching Program in “Results and Data: Main Residency Match” for 1991 to 2013 were analyzed. Results The number of radiology residency positions has trended upward over the past 23 years; however, the number of applicants from US medical schools has been widely variable. The number of applicants peaked in 2009 but has since decreased every year. The number of positions per US senior applicant (PPUSA) is a judge of specialty competitiveness on a supply-and-demand basis. A lower PPUSA indicates a more competitive specialty. Radiology saw its most competitive year in 2001, with only 0.91 PPUSA. PPUSA has been on the rise every year since 2009. From 2009 to 2013, the number of residency positions increased by 56, but there were 241 fewer US senior medical students preferring radiology. In 2013, there were 1,143 residency positions available for only 845 US senior medical students who preferred the specialty. The PPUSA was 1.35, making 2013 the least competitive year in obtaining a radiology residency position since 1998. Over the past 23 years, 5.5% of all US senior medical students have applied to radiology for residency. Interest reached an all-time high in 2009, at almost 7%. In 2013, only 4.8% of all US seniors preferred radiology, the lowest since 1999. The historical (1991–2013), current (2011–2013), and most recent (2013) PPUSAs for radiology were 1.19, 1.29, and 1.35, respectively. For comparison, the current PPUSAs for the following specialties were: 0.74 for plastic surgery, 0.83 for orthopedic surgery, 0.95 for dermatology, 1.10 for general surgery, 1.24 for obstetrics and gynecology, 1.31 for anesthesiology, 1.42 for pediatrics, and 1.80 for internal medicine (1.80). Conclusions Although radiology residency positions have continued to increase, interest among US seniors has dropped every year since 2009. The 2013 match was the least competitive since 1998. Over the past 3 years, the competitiveness of matching radiology on a supply-and-demand basis has been close to that of obstetrics and gynecology and anesthesiology.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>24793041</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jacr.2013.11.011</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1306-8210</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1546-1440
ispartof Journal of the American College of Radiology, 2014-05, Vol.11 (5), p.501-506
issn 1546-1440
1558-349X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1521328803
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects application
Career Choice
competitive
Education, Medical, Graduate
Humans
Internship and Residency - statistics & numerical data
match
Radiology
Radiology - education
residency
Students, Medical
United States
title How Competitive Is the Match for Radiology Residency? Present View and Historical Perspective
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T17%3A25%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20Competitive%20Is%20the%20Match%20for%20Radiology%20Residency?%20Present%20View%20and%20Historical%20Perspective&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20College%20of%20Radiology&rft.au=Chen,%20Jim%20Y.,%20MD&rft.date=2014-05-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=501&rft.epage=506&rft.pages=501-506&rft.issn=1546-1440&rft.eissn=1558-349X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jacr.2013.11.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1521328803%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1521328803&rft_id=info:pmid/24793041&rft_els_id=S1546144013007667&rfr_iscdi=true