Interfacial thickness and interaction between asphalt and mineral fillers

In order to improve the road performance of asphalt mixture, interfacial structure and interaction of asphalt mastic which is the most important component of asphalt mixture were studied. The interface thicknesses of asphalt mastics were calculated by the specific heat value changes in glass transit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Materials and structures 2014-04, Vol.47 (4), p.605-614
Hauptverfasser: Tan, Yiqiu, Guo, Meng
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 614
container_issue 4
container_start_page 605
container_title Materials and structures
container_volume 47
creator Tan, Yiqiu
Guo, Meng
description In order to improve the road performance of asphalt mixture, interfacial structure and interaction of asphalt mastic which is the most important component of asphalt mixture were studied. The interface thicknesses of asphalt mastics were calculated by the specific heat value changes in glass transition. The critical volume fractions of asphalt mastics were determined for each asphalt-filler combination using a simple two-point projection technique based on the reciprocal relative creep compliance. The interface interaction parameter was proposed based on modified Palierne emulsion model, and its effect factors were analyzed. The results show that the interface layer between asphalt and filler is nanoscale, which becomes thicker with the increasing of filler volume fraction, and granite filler has the thickest interface layer. The higher the temperature is, the smaller the critical volume fraction is. When the temperature is lower than 45 °C, the critical volume fractions ranking of asphalt mastics is as follows: limestone > andesite > granite. When the temperature is higher than 45 °C, the distinction of critical volume fraction is not obvious. B value can represent interaction between asphalt and filler exactly. The interface interaction ranking between asphalt and different fillers is as follows: granite > andesite > limestone. The higher the temperature is (or the more fine the filler is), the stronger the interface interaction is.
doi_str_mv 10.1617/s11527-013-0083-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1520950763</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3238862131</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-8871d52f41af2e38c6e0a4d483ae4c6ff188eb9c9c8b86da9cec7ce2255b75e33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhQdRsFZ_gLsBEdyM5jGTx1KKj0LBja5DJnNjU9NMTaaI_97UKSKCqwTOdw-HryjOMbrGDPObhHFDeIUwrRAStBIHxQQLjismOD3Mf9rIqpGSHxcnKa0QohJjMinm8zBAtNo47cth6cxbgJRKHbrS7RJtBteHsoXhAyCUOm2W2g_f-dqFnPvSOu8hptPiyGqf4Gz_TouX-7vn2WO1eHqYz24XlaFcDpXIo7qG2BprS4AKwwDpuqsF1VAbZi0WAlpppBGtYJ2WBgw3QEjTtLwBSqfF1di7if37FtKg1i4Z8F4H6LdJZQ9INoizHXrxB1312xjyukyhmuOaCpYpPFIm9ilFsGoT3VrHT4WR2slVo1yV5aqdXCXyzeW-WSejvY06GJd-DolgmBGJMkdGLuUovEL8teDf8i-aPomh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1504714386</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interfacial thickness and interaction between asphalt and mineral fillers</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Tan, Yiqiu ; Guo, Meng</creator><creatorcontrib>Tan, Yiqiu ; Guo, Meng</creatorcontrib><description>In order to improve the road performance of asphalt mixture, interfacial structure and interaction of asphalt mastic which is the most important component of asphalt mixture were studied. The interface thicknesses of asphalt mastics were calculated by the specific heat value changes in glass transition. The critical volume fractions of asphalt mastics were determined for each asphalt-filler combination using a simple two-point projection technique based on the reciprocal relative creep compliance. The interface interaction parameter was proposed based on modified Palierne emulsion model, and its effect factors were analyzed. The results show that the interface layer between asphalt and filler is nanoscale, which becomes thicker with the increasing of filler volume fraction, and granite filler has the thickest interface layer. The higher the temperature is, the smaller the critical volume fraction is. When the temperature is lower than 45 °C, the critical volume fractions ranking of asphalt mastics is as follows: limestone &gt; andesite &gt; granite. When the temperature is higher than 45 °C, the distinction of critical volume fraction is not obvious. B value can represent interaction between asphalt and filler exactly. The interface interaction ranking between asphalt and different fillers is as follows: granite &gt; andesite &gt; limestone. The higher the temperature is (or the more fine the filler is), the stronger the interface interaction is.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1359-5997</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1871-6873</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1617/s11527-013-0083-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Andesite ; Applied sciences ; Asphalt ; Bitumen. Tars. Bituminous binders and bituminous concretes ; Building construction ; Building Materials ; Buildings. Public works ; Civil Engineering ; Engineering ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fillers ; Granite ; Machines ; Manufacturing ; Materials ; Materials Science ; Mathematical models ; Nanostructure ; Original Article ; Processes ; Ranking ; Solid Mechanics ; Strength of materials (elasticity, plasticity, buckling, etc.) ; Structural analysis. Stresses ; Theoretical and Applied Mechanics ; Volume fraction</subject><ispartof>Materials and structures, 2014-04, Vol.47 (4), p.605-614</ispartof><rights>RILEM 2013</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>RILEM 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-8871d52f41af2e38c6e0a4d483ae4c6ff188eb9c9c8b86da9cec7ce2255b75e33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-8871d52f41af2e38c6e0a4d483ae4c6ff188eb9c9c8b86da9cec7ce2255b75e33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1617/s11527-013-0083-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1617/s11527-013-0083-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=28616290$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tan, Yiqiu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Meng</creatorcontrib><title>Interfacial thickness and interaction between asphalt and mineral fillers</title><title>Materials and structures</title><addtitle>Mater Struct</addtitle><description>In order to improve the road performance of asphalt mixture, interfacial structure and interaction of asphalt mastic which is the most important component of asphalt mixture were studied. The interface thicknesses of asphalt mastics were calculated by the specific heat value changes in glass transition. The critical volume fractions of asphalt mastics were determined for each asphalt-filler combination using a simple two-point projection technique based on the reciprocal relative creep compliance. The interface interaction parameter was proposed based on modified Palierne emulsion model, and its effect factors were analyzed. The results show that the interface layer between asphalt and filler is nanoscale, which becomes thicker with the increasing of filler volume fraction, and granite filler has the thickest interface layer. The higher the temperature is, the smaller the critical volume fraction is. When the temperature is lower than 45 °C, the critical volume fractions ranking of asphalt mastics is as follows: limestone &gt; andesite &gt; granite. When the temperature is higher than 45 °C, the distinction of critical volume fraction is not obvious. B value can represent interaction between asphalt and filler exactly. The interface interaction ranking between asphalt and different fillers is as follows: granite &gt; andesite &gt; limestone. The higher the temperature is (or the more fine the filler is), the stronger the interface interaction is.</description><subject>Andesite</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Asphalt</subject><subject>Bitumen. Tars. Bituminous binders and bituminous concretes</subject><subject>Building construction</subject><subject>Building Materials</subject><subject>Buildings. Public works</subject><subject>Civil Engineering</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fillers</subject><subject>Granite</subject><subject>Machines</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>Materials</subject><subject>Materials Science</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Nanostructure</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Processes</subject><subject>Ranking</subject><subject>Solid Mechanics</subject><subject>Strength of materials (elasticity, plasticity, buckling, etc.)</subject><subject>Structural analysis. Stresses</subject><subject>Theoretical and Applied Mechanics</subject><subject>Volume fraction</subject><issn>1359-5997</issn><issn>1871-6873</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhQdRsFZ_gLsBEdyM5jGTx1KKj0LBja5DJnNjU9NMTaaI_97UKSKCqwTOdw-HryjOMbrGDPObhHFDeIUwrRAStBIHxQQLjismOD3Mf9rIqpGSHxcnKa0QohJjMinm8zBAtNo47cth6cxbgJRKHbrS7RJtBteHsoXhAyCUOm2W2g_f-dqFnPvSOu8hptPiyGqf4Gz_TouX-7vn2WO1eHqYz24XlaFcDpXIo7qG2BprS4AKwwDpuqsF1VAbZi0WAlpppBGtYJ2WBgw3QEjTtLwBSqfF1di7if37FtKg1i4Z8F4H6LdJZQ9INoizHXrxB1312xjyukyhmuOaCpYpPFIm9ilFsGoT3VrHT4WR2slVo1yV5aqdXCXyzeW-WSejvY06GJd-DolgmBGJMkdGLuUovEL8teDf8i-aPomh</recordid><startdate>20140401</startdate><enddate>20140401</enddate><creator>Tan, Yiqiu</creator><creator>Guo, Meng</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140401</creationdate><title>Interfacial thickness and interaction between asphalt and mineral fillers</title><author>Tan, Yiqiu ; Guo, Meng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-8871d52f41af2e38c6e0a4d483ae4c6ff188eb9c9c8b86da9cec7ce2255b75e33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Andesite</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Asphalt</topic><topic>Bitumen. Tars. Bituminous binders and bituminous concretes</topic><topic>Building construction</topic><topic>Building Materials</topic><topic>Buildings. Public works</topic><topic>Civil Engineering</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fillers</topic><topic>Granite</topic><topic>Machines</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>Materials</topic><topic>Materials Science</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Nanostructure</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Processes</topic><topic>Ranking</topic><topic>Solid Mechanics</topic><topic>Strength of materials (elasticity, plasticity, buckling, etc.)</topic><topic>Structural analysis. Stresses</topic><topic>Theoretical and Applied Mechanics</topic><topic>Volume fraction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tan, Yiqiu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Meng</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Materials and structures</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tan, Yiqiu</au><au>Guo, Meng</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interfacial thickness and interaction between asphalt and mineral fillers</atitle><jtitle>Materials and structures</jtitle><stitle>Mater Struct</stitle><date>2014-04-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>605</spage><epage>614</epage><pages>605-614</pages><issn>1359-5997</issn><eissn>1871-6873</eissn><abstract>In order to improve the road performance of asphalt mixture, interfacial structure and interaction of asphalt mastic which is the most important component of asphalt mixture were studied. The interface thicknesses of asphalt mastics were calculated by the specific heat value changes in glass transition. The critical volume fractions of asphalt mastics were determined for each asphalt-filler combination using a simple two-point projection technique based on the reciprocal relative creep compliance. The interface interaction parameter was proposed based on modified Palierne emulsion model, and its effect factors were analyzed. The results show that the interface layer between asphalt and filler is nanoscale, which becomes thicker with the increasing of filler volume fraction, and granite filler has the thickest interface layer. The higher the temperature is, the smaller the critical volume fraction is. When the temperature is lower than 45 °C, the critical volume fractions ranking of asphalt mastics is as follows: limestone &gt; andesite &gt; granite. When the temperature is higher than 45 °C, the distinction of critical volume fraction is not obvious. B value can represent interaction between asphalt and filler exactly. The interface interaction ranking between asphalt and different fillers is as follows: granite &gt; andesite &gt; limestone. The higher the temperature is (or the more fine the filler is), the stronger the interface interaction is.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1617/s11527-013-0083-8</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1359-5997
ispartof Materials and structures, 2014-04, Vol.47 (4), p.605-614
issn 1359-5997
1871-6873
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1520950763
source Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Andesite
Applied sciences
Asphalt
Bitumen. Tars. Bituminous binders and bituminous concretes
Building construction
Building Materials
Buildings. Public works
Civil Engineering
Engineering
Exact sciences and technology
Fillers
Granite
Machines
Manufacturing
Materials
Materials Science
Mathematical models
Nanostructure
Original Article
Processes
Ranking
Solid Mechanics
Strength of materials (elasticity, plasticity, buckling, etc.)
Structural analysis. Stresses
Theoretical and Applied Mechanics
Volume fraction
title Interfacial thickness and interaction between asphalt and mineral fillers
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T21%3A51%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interfacial%20thickness%20and%20interaction%20between%20asphalt%20and%20mineral%20fillers&rft.jtitle=Materials%20and%20structures&rft.au=Tan,%20Yiqiu&rft.date=2014-04-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=605&rft.epage=614&rft.pages=605-614&rft.issn=1359-5997&rft.eissn=1871-6873&rft_id=info:doi/10.1617/s11527-013-0083-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3238862131%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1504714386&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true