Value of positron emission tomography scan in stage III cutaneous melanoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract Purpose The objective of this study was to review the collective experience and utility of FDG-PET scans (FDG-PET) in the detection of systemic metastases in patients with stage III melanoma. Methods A systematic search for relevant studies published between 1990 and 2012 was performed. We...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Surgical oncology 2014-03, Vol.23 (1), p.11-16 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 16 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 11 |
container_title | Surgical oncology |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | Rodriguez Rivera, Angel M Alabbas, Haytham Ramjaun, Aliya Meguerditchian, Ari-Nareg |
description | Abstract Purpose The objective of this study was to review the collective experience and utility of FDG-PET scans (FDG-PET) in the detection of systemic metastases in patients with stage III melanoma. Methods A systematic search for relevant studies published between 1990 and 2012 was performed. We included English language studies that evaluated melanoma patients with stage III disease, with at least 10 patients per study, and collected statistical data to assess FDG-PET utility in the detection of distant metastases. The SIGN tool was used to evaluate methodological quality and a meta-analysis was performed using Stata statistical software to quantify the clinical utility of FDG-PET. Results The systematic search yielded 9 studies eligible for inclusion in quantitative analyses with a total of 623 patients. The overall sensitivity of FDG-PET in detecting systemic metastases was 89.42% (95% CI: 65.07–97.46), and specificity was 88.78% (95% CI: 77.04–94.91). The pooled positive likelihood ratio was 7.97 (95% CI: 3.58–17.71) and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.12 (95% CI: 0.03–0.47). The area under the summary receiver operating curve (SROC) was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.92–0.96) and the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 66.84 (95% CI: 10.66–418.89). A change in stage and/or management was noted in 22% (126/573) of patients when FDG-PET was utilized. Conclusions Our findings indicate that FDG-PET may be useful in detecting distant metastases in patients with stage III melanoma. For this highly selected group of patients, FDG-PET has a high sensitivity, specificity and performance, frequently leading to a change in treatment plan. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.suronc.2014.01.002 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1520734174</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0960740414000036</els_id><sourcerecordid>1520734174</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-751b6f60d056c09e8700c86c1ac00705588e646fcf576b7cdd6e06b28eda9bd23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkktv1TAQhS0EoreFf4CQJTZsEsaJH7kskKqKwpUqseCxtRxnUnxJ4lvbAeXf4ygFpG5YeRbfHM_MOYS8YFAyYPLNsYxz8JMtK2C8BFYCVI_IjjVqX9R1BY_JDvYSCsWBn5HzGI8AIFXFnpKzigshawY7cvfNDDNS39OTjy5lQYqji9HlIvnR3wZz-r7QaM1E3URjMrdID4cDtXMyE_o50hEHM_nRvKWXNC4x4WiSszTgT4e_qJm6TCRTmMkMS3TxGXnSmyHi8_v3gny9fv_l6mNx8-nD4eryprCci1QowVrZS-hASAt7bBSAbaRlxgIoEKJpUHLZ214o2SrbdRJBtlWDndm3XVVfkNeb7in4uxlj0nkvi8Owja2ZqEDVnCme0VcP0KOfQ553paARFRMNZIpvlA0-xoC9PgU3mrBoBnq1RB_1ZoleLdHAdLYkt728F5_bEbu_TX88yMC7DcB8jXyzoKN1OFnsXECbdOfd_354KGAHNzlrhh-4YPy3i46VBv15jcWaCsZzIqCW9W9Mx7Pw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1508521580</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Value of positron emission tomography scan in stage III cutaneous melanoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Rodriguez Rivera, Angel M ; Alabbas, Haytham ; Ramjaun, Aliya ; Meguerditchian, Ari-Nareg</creator><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez Rivera, Angel M ; Alabbas, Haytham ; Ramjaun, Aliya ; Meguerditchian, Ari-Nareg</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Purpose The objective of this study was to review the collective experience and utility of FDG-PET scans (FDG-PET) in the detection of systemic metastases in patients with stage III melanoma. Methods A systematic search for relevant studies published between 1990 and 2012 was performed. We included English language studies that evaluated melanoma patients with stage III disease, with at least 10 patients per study, and collected statistical data to assess FDG-PET utility in the detection of distant metastases. The SIGN tool was used to evaluate methodological quality and a meta-analysis was performed using Stata statistical software to quantify the clinical utility of FDG-PET. Results The systematic search yielded 9 studies eligible for inclusion in quantitative analyses with a total of 623 patients. The overall sensitivity of FDG-PET in detecting systemic metastases was 89.42% (95% CI: 65.07–97.46), and specificity was 88.78% (95% CI: 77.04–94.91). The pooled positive likelihood ratio was 7.97 (95% CI: 3.58–17.71) and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.12 (95% CI: 0.03–0.47). The area under the summary receiver operating curve (SROC) was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.92–0.96) and the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 66.84 (95% CI: 10.66–418.89). A change in stage and/or management was noted in 22% (126/573) of patients when FDG-PET was utilized. Conclusions Our findings indicate that FDG-PET may be useful in detecting distant metastases in patients with stage III melanoma. For this highly selected group of patients, FDG-PET has a high sensitivity, specificity and performance, frequently leading to a change in treatment plan.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-7404</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3320</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2014.01.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24556310</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Biopsy ; Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 ; Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine ; Human subjects ; Humans ; Medical imaging ; Medical research ; Melanoma ; Melanoma - diagnostic imaging ; Melanoma - pathology ; Melanoma cutaneous malignant ; Neoplasm metastasis ; Neoplasm Staging ; Positron emission tomography ; Positron-Emission Tomography - utilization ; Prognosis ; Radiopharmaceuticals ; Skin Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Skin Neoplasms - secondary ; Studies ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>Surgical oncology, 2014-03, Vol.23 (1), p.11-16</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2014 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-751b6f60d056c09e8700c86c1ac00705588e646fcf576b7cdd6e06b28eda9bd23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-751b6f60d056c09e8700c86c1ac00705588e646fcf576b7cdd6e06b28eda9bd23</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9830-0391 ; 0000-0002-3018-6913</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.suronc.2014.01.002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24556310$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez Rivera, Angel M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alabbas, Haytham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramjaun, Aliya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meguerditchian, Ari-Nareg</creatorcontrib><title>Value of positron emission tomography scan in stage III cutaneous melanoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis</title><title>Surgical oncology</title><addtitle>Surg Oncol</addtitle><description>Abstract Purpose The objective of this study was to review the collective experience and utility of FDG-PET scans (FDG-PET) in the detection of systemic metastases in patients with stage III melanoma. Methods A systematic search for relevant studies published between 1990 and 2012 was performed. We included English language studies that evaluated melanoma patients with stage III disease, with at least 10 patients per study, and collected statistical data to assess FDG-PET utility in the detection of distant metastases. The SIGN tool was used to evaluate methodological quality and a meta-analysis was performed using Stata statistical software to quantify the clinical utility of FDG-PET. Results The systematic search yielded 9 studies eligible for inclusion in quantitative analyses with a total of 623 patients. The overall sensitivity of FDG-PET in detecting systemic metastases was 89.42% (95% CI: 65.07–97.46), and specificity was 88.78% (95% CI: 77.04–94.91). The pooled positive likelihood ratio was 7.97 (95% CI: 3.58–17.71) and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.12 (95% CI: 0.03–0.47). The area under the summary receiver operating curve (SROC) was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.92–0.96) and the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 66.84 (95% CI: 10.66–418.89). A change in stage and/or management was noted in 22% (126/573) of patients when FDG-PET was utilized. Conclusions Our findings indicate that FDG-PET may be useful in detecting distant metastases in patients with stage III melanoma. For this highly selected group of patients, FDG-PET has a high sensitivity, specificity and performance, frequently leading to a change in treatment plan.</description><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Fluorodeoxyglucose F18</subject><subject>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</subject><subject>Human subjects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Melanoma</subject><subject>Melanoma - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Melanoma - pathology</subject><subject>Melanoma cutaneous malignant</subject><subject>Neoplasm metastasis</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Positron emission tomography</subject><subject>Positron-Emission Tomography - utilization</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Radiopharmaceuticals</subject><subject>Skin Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Skin Neoplasms - secondary</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>0960-7404</issn><issn>1879-3320</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkktv1TAQhS0EoreFf4CQJTZsEsaJH7kskKqKwpUqseCxtRxnUnxJ4lvbAeXf4ygFpG5YeRbfHM_MOYS8YFAyYPLNsYxz8JMtK2C8BFYCVI_IjjVqX9R1BY_JDvYSCsWBn5HzGI8AIFXFnpKzigshawY7cvfNDDNS39OTjy5lQYqji9HlIvnR3wZz-r7QaM1E3URjMrdID4cDtXMyE_o50hEHM_nRvKWXNC4x4WiSszTgT4e_qJm6TCRTmMkMS3TxGXnSmyHi8_v3gny9fv_l6mNx8-nD4eryprCci1QowVrZS-hASAt7bBSAbaRlxgIoEKJpUHLZ214o2SrbdRJBtlWDndm3XVVfkNeb7in4uxlj0nkvi8Owja2ZqEDVnCme0VcP0KOfQ553paARFRMNZIpvlA0-xoC9PgU3mrBoBnq1RB_1ZoleLdHAdLYkt728F5_bEbu_TX88yMC7DcB8jXyzoKN1OFnsXECbdOfd_354KGAHNzlrhh-4YPy3i46VBv15jcWaCsZzIqCW9W9Mx7Pw</recordid><startdate>20140301</startdate><enddate>20140301</enddate><creator>Rodriguez Rivera, Angel M</creator><creator>Alabbas, Haytham</creator><creator>Ramjaun, Aliya</creator><creator>Meguerditchian, Ari-Nareg</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9830-0391</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3018-6913</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20140301</creationdate><title>Value of positron emission tomography scan in stage III cutaneous melanoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis</title><author>Rodriguez Rivera, Angel M ; Alabbas, Haytham ; Ramjaun, Aliya ; Meguerditchian, Ari-Nareg</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-751b6f60d056c09e8700c86c1ac00705588e646fcf576b7cdd6e06b28eda9bd23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Fluorodeoxyglucose F18</topic><topic>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</topic><topic>Human subjects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Melanoma</topic><topic>Melanoma - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Melanoma - pathology</topic><topic>Melanoma cutaneous malignant</topic><topic>Neoplasm metastasis</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Positron emission tomography</topic><topic>Positron-Emission Tomography - utilization</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Radiopharmaceuticals</topic><topic>Skin Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Skin Neoplasms - secondary</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez Rivera, Angel M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alabbas, Haytham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramjaun, Aliya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meguerditchian, Ari-Nareg</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Surgical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rodriguez Rivera, Angel M</au><au>Alabbas, Haytham</au><au>Ramjaun, Aliya</au><au>Meguerditchian, Ari-Nareg</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Value of positron emission tomography scan in stage III cutaneous melanoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Surgical oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Surg Oncol</addtitle><date>2014-03-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>11</spage><epage>16</epage><pages>11-16</pages><issn>0960-7404</issn><eissn>1879-3320</eissn><abstract>Abstract Purpose The objective of this study was to review the collective experience and utility of FDG-PET scans (FDG-PET) in the detection of systemic metastases in patients with stage III melanoma. Methods A systematic search for relevant studies published between 1990 and 2012 was performed. We included English language studies that evaluated melanoma patients with stage III disease, with at least 10 patients per study, and collected statistical data to assess FDG-PET utility in the detection of distant metastases. The SIGN tool was used to evaluate methodological quality and a meta-analysis was performed using Stata statistical software to quantify the clinical utility of FDG-PET. Results The systematic search yielded 9 studies eligible for inclusion in quantitative analyses with a total of 623 patients. The overall sensitivity of FDG-PET in detecting systemic metastases was 89.42% (95% CI: 65.07–97.46), and specificity was 88.78% (95% CI: 77.04–94.91). The pooled positive likelihood ratio was 7.97 (95% CI: 3.58–17.71) and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.12 (95% CI: 0.03–0.47). The area under the summary receiver operating curve (SROC) was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.92–0.96) and the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 66.84 (95% CI: 10.66–418.89). A change in stage and/or management was noted in 22% (126/573) of patients when FDG-PET was utilized. Conclusions Our findings indicate that FDG-PET may be useful in detecting distant metastases in patients with stage III melanoma. For this highly selected group of patients, FDG-PET has a high sensitivity, specificity and performance, frequently leading to a change in treatment plan.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>24556310</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.suronc.2014.01.002</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9830-0391</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3018-6913</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0960-7404 |
ispartof | Surgical oncology, 2014-03, Vol.23 (1), p.11-16 |
issn | 0960-7404 1879-3320 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1520734174 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Biopsy Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine Human subjects Humans Medical imaging Medical research Melanoma Melanoma - diagnostic imaging Melanoma - pathology Melanoma cutaneous malignant Neoplasm metastasis Neoplasm Staging Positron emission tomography Positron-Emission Tomography - utilization Prognosis Radiopharmaceuticals Skin Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Skin Neoplasms - secondary Studies Surgery |
title | Value of positron emission tomography scan in stage III cutaneous melanoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T06%3A52%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Value%20of%20positron%20emission%20tomography%20scan%20in%20stage%20III%20cutaneous%20melanoma:%20A%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Surgical%20oncology&rft.au=Rodriguez%20Rivera,%20Angel%20M&rft.date=2014-03-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=11&rft.epage=16&rft.pages=11-16&rft.issn=0960-7404&rft.eissn=1879-3320&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.suronc.2014.01.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1520734174%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1508521580&rft_id=info:pmid/24556310&rft_els_id=S0960740414000036&rfr_iscdi=true |