Value of positron emission tomography scan in stage III cutaneous melanoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Purpose The objective of this study was to review the collective experience and utility of FDG-PET scans (FDG-PET) in the detection of systemic metastases in patients with stage III melanoma. Methods A systematic search for relevant studies published between 1990 and 2012 was performed. We...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Surgical oncology 2014-03, Vol.23 (1), p.11-16
Hauptverfasser: Rodriguez Rivera, Angel M, Alabbas, Haytham, Ramjaun, Aliya, Meguerditchian, Ari-Nareg
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 16
container_issue 1
container_start_page 11
container_title Surgical oncology
container_volume 23
creator Rodriguez Rivera, Angel M
Alabbas, Haytham
Ramjaun, Aliya
Meguerditchian, Ari-Nareg
description Abstract Purpose The objective of this study was to review the collective experience and utility of FDG-PET scans (FDG-PET) in the detection of systemic metastases in patients with stage III melanoma. Methods A systematic search for relevant studies published between 1990 and 2012 was performed. We included English language studies that evaluated melanoma patients with stage III disease, with at least 10 patients per study, and collected statistical data to assess FDG-PET utility in the detection of distant metastases. The SIGN tool was used to evaluate methodological quality and a meta-analysis was performed using Stata statistical software to quantify the clinical utility of FDG-PET. Results The systematic search yielded 9 studies eligible for inclusion in quantitative analyses with a total of 623 patients. The overall sensitivity of FDG-PET in detecting systemic metastases was 89.42% (95% CI: 65.07–97.46), and specificity was 88.78% (95% CI: 77.04–94.91). The pooled positive likelihood ratio was 7.97 (95% CI: 3.58–17.71) and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.12 (95% CI: 0.03–0.47). The area under the summary receiver operating curve (SROC) was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.92–0.96) and the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 66.84 (95% CI: 10.66–418.89). A change in stage and/or management was noted in 22% (126/573) of patients when FDG-PET was utilized. Conclusions Our findings indicate that FDG-PET may be useful in detecting distant metastases in patients with stage III melanoma. For this highly selected group of patients, FDG-PET has a high sensitivity, specificity and performance, frequently leading to a change in treatment plan.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.suronc.2014.01.002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1520734174</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0960740414000036</els_id><sourcerecordid>1520734174</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-751b6f60d056c09e8700c86c1ac00705588e646fcf576b7cdd6e06b28eda9bd23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkktv1TAQhS0EoreFf4CQJTZsEsaJH7kskKqKwpUqseCxtRxnUnxJ4lvbAeXf4ygFpG5YeRbfHM_MOYS8YFAyYPLNsYxz8JMtK2C8BFYCVI_IjjVqX9R1BY_JDvYSCsWBn5HzGI8AIFXFnpKzigshawY7cvfNDDNS39OTjy5lQYqji9HlIvnR3wZz-r7QaM1E3URjMrdID4cDtXMyE_o50hEHM_nRvKWXNC4x4WiSszTgT4e_qJm6TCRTmMkMS3TxGXnSmyHi8_v3gny9fv_l6mNx8-nD4eryprCci1QowVrZS-hASAt7bBSAbaRlxgIoEKJpUHLZ214o2SrbdRJBtlWDndm3XVVfkNeb7in4uxlj0nkvi8Owja2ZqEDVnCme0VcP0KOfQ553paARFRMNZIpvlA0-xoC9PgU3mrBoBnq1RB_1ZoleLdHAdLYkt728F5_bEbu_TX88yMC7DcB8jXyzoKN1OFnsXECbdOfd_354KGAHNzlrhh-4YPy3i46VBv15jcWaCsZzIqCW9W9Mx7Pw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1508521580</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Value of positron emission tomography scan in stage III cutaneous melanoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Rodriguez Rivera, Angel M ; Alabbas, Haytham ; Ramjaun, Aliya ; Meguerditchian, Ari-Nareg</creator><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez Rivera, Angel M ; Alabbas, Haytham ; Ramjaun, Aliya ; Meguerditchian, Ari-Nareg</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Purpose The objective of this study was to review the collective experience and utility of FDG-PET scans (FDG-PET) in the detection of systemic metastases in patients with stage III melanoma. Methods A systematic search for relevant studies published between 1990 and 2012 was performed. We included English language studies that evaluated melanoma patients with stage III disease, with at least 10 patients per study, and collected statistical data to assess FDG-PET utility in the detection of distant metastases. The SIGN tool was used to evaluate methodological quality and a meta-analysis was performed using Stata statistical software to quantify the clinical utility of FDG-PET. Results The systematic search yielded 9 studies eligible for inclusion in quantitative analyses with a total of 623 patients. The overall sensitivity of FDG-PET in detecting systemic metastases was 89.42% (95% CI: 65.07–97.46), and specificity was 88.78% (95% CI: 77.04–94.91). The pooled positive likelihood ratio was 7.97 (95% CI: 3.58–17.71) and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.12 (95% CI: 0.03–0.47). The area under the summary receiver operating curve (SROC) was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.92–0.96) and the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 66.84 (95% CI: 10.66–418.89). A change in stage and/or management was noted in 22% (126/573) of patients when FDG-PET was utilized. Conclusions Our findings indicate that FDG-PET may be useful in detecting distant metastases in patients with stage III melanoma. For this highly selected group of patients, FDG-PET has a high sensitivity, specificity and performance, frequently leading to a change in treatment plan.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-7404</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3320</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2014.01.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24556310</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Biopsy ; Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 ; Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine ; Human subjects ; Humans ; Medical imaging ; Medical research ; Melanoma ; Melanoma - diagnostic imaging ; Melanoma - pathology ; Melanoma cutaneous malignant ; Neoplasm metastasis ; Neoplasm Staging ; Positron emission tomography ; Positron-Emission Tomography - utilization ; Prognosis ; Radiopharmaceuticals ; Skin Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Skin Neoplasms - secondary ; Studies ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>Surgical oncology, 2014-03, Vol.23 (1), p.11-16</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2014 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-751b6f60d056c09e8700c86c1ac00705588e646fcf576b7cdd6e06b28eda9bd23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-751b6f60d056c09e8700c86c1ac00705588e646fcf576b7cdd6e06b28eda9bd23</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9830-0391 ; 0000-0002-3018-6913</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.suronc.2014.01.002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24556310$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez Rivera, Angel M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alabbas, Haytham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramjaun, Aliya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meguerditchian, Ari-Nareg</creatorcontrib><title>Value of positron emission tomography scan in stage III cutaneous melanoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis</title><title>Surgical oncology</title><addtitle>Surg Oncol</addtitle><description>Abstract Purpose The objective of this study was to review the collective experience and utility of FDG-PET scans (FDG-PET) in the detection of systemic metastases in patients with stage III melanoma. Methods A systematic search for relevant studies published between 1990 and 2012 was performed. We included English language studies that evaluated melanoma patients with stage III disease, with at least 10 patients per study, and collected statistical data to assess FDG-PET utility in the detection of distant metastases. The SIGN tool was used to evaluate methodological quality and a meta-analysis was performed using Stata statistical software to quantify the clinical utility of FDG-PET. Results The systematic search yielded 9 studies eligible for inclusion in quantitative analyses with a total of 623 patients. The overall sensitivity of FDG-PET in detecting systemic metastases was 89.42% (95% CI: 65.07–97.46), and specificity was 88.78% (95% CI: 77.04–94.91). The pooled positive likelihood ratio was 7.97 (95% CI: 3.58–17.71) and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.12 (95% CI: 0.03–0.47). The area under the summary receiver operating curve (SROC) was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.92–0.96) and the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 66.84 (95% CI: 10.66–418.89). A change in stage and/or management was noted in 22% (126/573) of patients when FDG-PET was utilized. Conclusions Our findings indicate that FDG-PET may be useful in detecting distant metastases in patients with stage III melanoma. For this highly selected group of patients, FDG-PET has a high sensitivity, specificity and performance, frequently leading to a change in treatment plan.</description><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Fluorodeoxyglucose F18</subject><subject>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</subject><subject>Human subjects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Melanoma</subject><subject>Melanoma - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Melanoma - pathology</subject><subject>Melanoma cutaneous malignant</subject><subject>Neoplasm metastasis</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Positron emission tomography</subject><subject>Positron-Emission Tomography - utilization</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Radiopharmaceuticals</subject><subject>Skin Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Skin Neoplasms - secondary</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>0960-7404</issn><issn>1879-3320</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkktv1TAQhS0EoreFf4CQJTZsEsaJH7kskKqKwpUqseCxtRxnUnxJ4lvbAeXf4ygFpG5YeRbfHM_MOYS8YFAyYPLNsYxz8JMtK2C8BFYCVI_IjjVqX9R1BY_JDvYSCsWBn5HzGI8AIFXFnpKzigshawY7cvfNDDNS39OTjy5lQYqji9HlIvnR3wZz-r7QaM1E3URjMrdID4cDtXMyE_o50hEHM_nRvKWXNC4x4WiSszTgT4e_qJm6TCRTmMkMS3TxGXnSmyHi8_v3gny9fv_l6mNx8-nD4eryprCci1QowVrZS-hASAt7bBSAbaRlxgIoEKJpUHLZ214o2SrbdRJBtlWDndm3XVVfkNeb7in4uxlj0nkvi8Owja2ZqEDVnCme0VcP0KOfQ553paARFRMNZIpvlA0-xoC9PgU3mrBoBnq1RB_1ZoleLdHAdLYkt728F5_bEbu_TX88yMC7DcB8jXyzoKN1OFnsXECbdOfd_354KGAHNzlrhh-4YPy3i46VBv15jcWaCsZzIqCW9W9Mx7Pw</recordid><startdate>20140301</startdate><enddate>20140301</enddate><creator>Rodriguez Rivera, Angel M</creator><creator>Alabbas, Haytham</creator><creator>Ramjaun, Aliya</creator><creator>Meguerditchian, Ari-Nareg</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9830-0391</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3018-6913</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20140301</creationdate><title>Value of positron emission tomography scan in stage III cutaneous melanoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis</title><author>Rodriguez Rivera, Angel M ; Alabbas, Haytham ; Ramjaun, Aliya ; Meguerditchian, Ari-Nareg</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-751b6f60d056c09e8700c86c1ac00705588e646fcf576b7cdd6e06b28eda9bd23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Fluorodeoxyglucose F18</topic><topic>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</topic><topic>Human subjects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Melanoma</topic><topic>Melanoma - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Melanoma - pathology</topic><topic>Melanoma cutaneous malignant</topic><topic>Neoplasm metastasis</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Positron emission tomography</topic><topic>Positron-Emission Tomography - utilization</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Radiopharmaceuticals</topic><topic>Skin Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Skin Neoplasms - secondary</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez Rivera, Angel M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alabbas, Haytham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramjaun, Aliya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meguerditchian, Ari-Nareg</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Surgical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rodriguez Rivera, Angel M</au><au>Alabbas, Haytham</au><au>Ramjaun, Aliya</au><au>Meguerditchian, Ari-Nareg</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Value of positron emission tomography scan in stage III cutaneous melanoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Surgical oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Surg Oncol</addtitle><date>2014-03-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>11</spage><epage>16</epage><pages>11-16</pages><issn>0960-7404</issn><eissn>1879-3320</eissn><abstract>Abstract Purpose The objective of this study was to review the collective experience and utility of FDG-PET scans (FDG-PET) in the detection of systemic metastases in patients with stage III melanoma. Methods A systematic search for relevant studies published between 1990 and 2012 was performed. We included English language studies that evaluated melanoma patients with stage III disease, with at least 10 patients per study, and collected statistical data to assess FDG-PET utility in the detection of distant metastases. The SIGN tool was used to evaluate methodological quality and a meta-analysis was performed using Stata statistical software to quantify the clinical utility of FDG-PET. Results The systematic search yielded 9 studies eligible for inclusion in quantitative analyses with a total of 623 patients. The overall sensitivity of FDG-PET in detecting systemic metastases was 89.42% (95% CI: 65.07–97.46), and specificity was 88.78% (95% CI: 77.04–94.91). The pooled positive likelihood ratio was 7.97 (95% CI: 3.58–17.71) and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.12 (95% CI: 0.03–0.47). The area under the summary receiver operating curve (SROC) was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.92–0.96) and the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 66.84 (95% CI: 10.66–418.89). A change in stage and/or management was noted in 22% (126/573) of patients when FDG-PET was utilized. Conclusions Our findings indicate that FDG-PET may be useful in detecting distant metastases in patients with stage III melanoma. For this highly selected group of patients, FDG-PET has a high sensitivity, specificity and performance, frequently leading to a change in treatment plan.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>24556310</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.suronc.2014.01.002</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9830-0391</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3018-6913</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0960-7404
ispartof Surgical oncology, 2014-03, Vol.23 (1), p.11-16
issn 0960-7404
1879-3320
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1520734174
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Biopsy
Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine
Human subjects
Humans
Medical imaging
Medical research
Melanoma
Melanoma - diagnostic imaging
Melanoma - pathology
Melanoma cutaneous malignant
Neoplasm metastasis
Neoplasm Staging
Positron emission tomography
Positron-Emission Tomography - utilization
Prognosis
Radiopharmaceuticals
Skin Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Skin Neoplasms - secondary
Studies
Surgery
title Value of positron emission tomography scan in stage III cutaneous melanoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T06%3A52%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Value%20of%20positron%20emission%20tomography%20scan%20in%20stage%20III%20cutaneous%20melanoma:%20A%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Surgical%20oncology&rft.au=Rodriguez%20Rivera,%20Angel%20M&rft.date=2014-03-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=11&rft.epage=16&rft.pages=11-16&rft.issn=0960-7404&rft.eissn=1879-3320&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.suronc.2014.01.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1520734174%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1508521580&rft_id=info:pmid/24556310&rft_els_id=S0960740414000036&rfr_iscdi=true