Comparison of morphology and biocompatibility of acellular nerve scaffolds processed by different chemical methods
To investigate the morphological differences among acellular rat nerve scaffolds processed by different chemical methods and compare the biocompatibility between rat nerve grafts processed by different chemical methods and rat adipose-derived stem cells in vitro. Acellular rat sciatic nerve scaffold...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine 2014-05, Vol.25 (5), p.1283-1291 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1291 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 1283 |
| container_title | Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine |
| container_volume | 25 |
| creator | Gao, Songtao Zheng, Yan Cai, Qiqing Yao, Weitao Wang, Jiaqiang Zhang, Peng Wang, Xin |
| description | To investigate the morphological differences among acellular rat nerve scaffolds processed by different chemical methods and compare the biocompatibility between rat nerve grafts processed by different chemical methods and rat adipose-derived stem cells in vitro. Acellular rat sciatic nerve scaffolds processed by two different chemical methods (the Sondell method and the optimized method) and normal rat sciatic nerves were used as control. The structure and components of nerve scaffold were observed under microscopy, the degrees of decellularization and demyelination of nerve scaffold and integrity of nerve fiber tubes were assessed. The rat adipose-derived stem cells growth and adherence on scaffold were studied by scanning electron microscopy, the activity and adhesive ratio of rat adipose-derived stem cells in the nerve scaffold were compared. The basal lamina tubes and the extracellular matrix in the epineurium and perineurium in the nerve graft of optimized method were better preserved than the nerve graft of the Sondell method. After co-cultured with scaffolds, the difference of cell activity between three groups (two cell–scaffold combinations and control group) at the same observation time were not statistically significant (
P
> 0.05),the adhesive ratio of rat adipose-derived stem cells in the scaffold of the optimized method was better than that of the Sondell method. The scaffold of the optimized method is more effective than the scaffold of the Sondell method for peripheral nerve tissue engineering. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10856-014-5150-3 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1520382367</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3273538751</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-3ce70a0c1e8831e3f18a230da77ba788b6102c1267424315aef6378de537d2f93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUuLFDEUhYM4OO3oD3AjARHc1HjzqqSX0viCgdmM65BK3UxnqKq0SZXQ_35SdPtAEFxlcb9zcu49hLxicM0A9PvCwKi2ASYbxRQ04gnZMKVFI40wT8kGtko3Ugm4JM9LeQAAuVXqGbnkUirONd-QvEvjweVY0kRToGPKh30a0v2RuqmnXUx-nc-xi0OcjyviPA7DMrhMJ8w_kBbvQkhDX-ghJ4-lYNUdaR9DwIzTTP0ex-jdQEec96kvL8hFcEPBl-f3inz79PFu96W5uf38dffhpvFS87kRHjU48AyNEQxFYMZxAb3TunPamK5lwD3jrZZcCqYchlZo06MSuudhK67Iu5NvzfV9wTLbMZY1vJswLcUyxUEYLlr9HyhrxbblICv65i_0IS15qouslJKq3lxVip0on1MpGYM95Di6fLQM7NqdPXVna3d27c6Kqnl9dl66Eftfip9lVeDtGXD16EPIbvKx_OaqnxJq3YafuFJH0z3mPyL-8_dHeZOxNQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1515459575</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of morphology and biocompatibility of acellular nerve scaffolds processed by different chemical methods</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Gao, Songtao ; Zheng, Yan ; Cai, Qiqing ; Yao, Weitao ; Wang, Jiaqiang ; Zhang, Peng ; Wang, Xin</creator><creatorcontrib>Gao, Songtao ; Zheng, Yan ; Cai, Qiqing ; Yao, Weitao ; Wang, Jiaqiang ; Zhang, Peng ; Wang, Xin</creatorcontrib><description>To investigate the morphological differences among acellular rat nerve scaffolds processed by different chemical methods and compare the biocompatibility between rat nerve grafts processed by different chemical methods and rat adipose-derived stem cells in vitro. Acellular rat sciatic nerve scaffolds processed by two different chemical methods (the Sondell method and the optimized method) and normal rat sciatic nerves were used as control. The structure and components of nerve scaffold were observed under microscopy, the degrees of decellularization and demyelination of nerve scaffold and integrity of nerve fiber tubes were assessed. The rat adipose-derived stem cells growth and adherence on scaffold were studied by scanning electron microscopy, the activity and adhesive ratio of rat adipose-derived stem cells in the nerve scaffold were compared. The basal lamina tubes and the extracellular matrix in the epineurium and perineurium in the nerve graft of optimized method were better preserved than the nerve graft of the Sondell method. After co-cultured with scaffolds, the difference of cell activity between three groups (two cell–scaffold combinations and control group) at the same observation time were not statistically significant (
P
> 0.05),the adhesive ratio of rat adipose-derived stem cells in the scaffold of the optimized method was better than that of the Sondell method. The scaffold of the optimized method is more effective than the scaffold of the Sondell method for peripheral nerve tissue engineering.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0957-4530</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-4838</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10856-014-5150-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24452272</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer US</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biocompatible Materials - chemistry ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomaterials ; Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering ; Biomedical materials ; Ceramics ; Chemistry and Materials Science ; Comparative studies ; Composites ; Equipment Failure Analysis ; Glass ; Guided Tissue Regeneration - instrumentation ; Male ; Materials Science ; Medical sciences ; Morphology ; Natural Materials ; Nerve Regeneration - physiology ; Neurons ; Polymer Sciences ; Prosthesis Design ; Rats ; Rats, Sprague-Dawley ; Regenerative Medicine/Tissue Engineering ; Rodents ; Sciatic Nerve - cytology ; Sciatic Nerve - physiology ; Sciatic Nerve - surgery ; Stem Cell Transplantation - instrumentation ; Stem Cell Transplantation - methods ; Surfaces and Interfaces ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Technology. Biomaterials. Equipments ; Thin Films ; Tissue Scaffolds</subject><ispartof>Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine, 2014-05, Vol.25 (5), p.1283-1291</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-3ce70a0c1e8831e3f18a230da77ba788b6102c1267424315aef6378de537d2f93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-3ce70a0c1e8831e3f18a230da77ba788b6102c1267424315aef6378de537d2f93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10856-014-5150-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10856-014-5150-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=28565357$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24452272$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gao, Songtao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cai, Qiqing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yao, Weitao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jiaqiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Peng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xin</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of morphology and biocompatibility of acellular nerve scaffolds processed by different chemical methods</title><title>Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine</title><addtitle>J Mater Sci: Mater Med</addtitle><addtitle>J Mater Sci Mater Med</addtitle><description>To investigate the morphological differences among acellular rat nerve scaffolds processed by different chemical methods and compare the biocompatibility between rat nerve grafts processed by different chemical methods and rat adipose-derived stem cells in vitro. Acellular rat sciatic nerve scaffolds processed by two different chemical methods (the Sondell method and the optimized method) and normal rat sciatic nerves were used as control. The structure and components of nerve scaffold were observed under microscopy, the degrees of decellularization and demyelination of nerve scaffold and integrity of nerve fiber tubes were assessed. The rat adipose-derived stem cells growth and adherence on scaffold were studied by scanning electron microscopy, the activity and adhesive ratio of rat adipose-derived stem cells in the nerve scaffold were compared. The basal lamina tubes and the extracellular matrix in the epineurium and perineurium in the nerve graft of optimized method were better preserved than the nerve graft of the Sondell method. After co-cultured with scaffolds, the difference of cell activity between three groups (two cell–scaffold combinations and control group) at the same observation time were not statistically significant (
P
> 0.05),the adhesive ratio of rat adipose-derived stem cells in the scaffold of the optimized method was better than that of the Sondell method. The scaffold of the optimized method is more effective than the scaffold of the Sondell method for peripheral nerve tissue engineering.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biocompatible Materials - chemistry</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomaterials</subject><subject>Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering</subject><subject>Biomedical materials</subject><subject>Ceramics</subject><subject>Chemistry and Materials Science</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Composites</subject><subject>Equipment Failure Analysis</subject><subject>Glass</subject><subject>Guided Tissue Regeneration - instrumentation</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Materials Science</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Natural Materials</subject><subject>Nerve Regeneration - physiology</subject><subject>Neurons</subject><subject>Polymer Sciences</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Rats, Sprague-Dawley</subject><subject>Regenerative Medicine/Tissue Engineering</subject><subject>Rodents</subject><subject>Sciatic Nerve - cytology</subject><subject>Sciatic Nerve - physiology</subject><subject>Sciatic Nerve - surgery</subject><subject>Stem Cell Transplantation - instrumentation</subject><subject>Stem Cell Transplantation - methods</subject><subject>Surfaces and Interfaces</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Technology. Biomaterials. Equipments</subject><subject>Thin Films</subject><subject>Tissue Scaffolds</subject><issn>0957-4530</issn><issn>1573-4838</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUuLFDEUhYM4OO3oD3AjARHc1HjzqqSX0viCgdmM65BK3UxnqKq0SZXQ_35SdPtAEFxlcb9zcu49hLxicM0A9PvCwKi2ASYbxRQ04gnZMKVFI40wT8kGtko3Ugm4JM9LeQAAuVXqGbnkUirONd-QvEvjweVY0kRToGPKh30a0v2RuqmnXUx-nc-xi0OcjyviPA7DMrhMJ8w_kBbvQkhDX-ghJ4-lYNUdaR9DwIzTTP0ex-jdQEec96kvL8hFcEPBl-f3inz79PFu96W5uf38dffhpvFS87kRHjU48AyNEQxFYMZxAb3TunPamK5lwD3jrZZcCqYchlZo06MSuudhK67Iu5NvzfV9wTLbMZY1vJswLcUyxUEYLlr9HyhrxbblICv65i_0IS15qouslJKq3lxVip0on1MpGYM95Di6fLQM7NqdPXVna3d27c6Kqnl9dl66Eftfip9lVeDtGXD16EPIbvKx_OaqnxJq3YafuFJH0z3mPyL-8_dHeZOxNQ</recordid><startdate>20140501</startdate><enddate>20140501</enddate><creator>Gao, Songtao</creator><creator>Zheng, Yan</creator><creator>Cai, Qiqing</creator><creator>Yao, Weitao</creator><creator>Wang, Jiaqiang</creator><creator>Zhang, Peng</creator><creator>Wang, Xin</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0W</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140501</creationdate><title>Comparison of morphology and biocompatibility of acellular nerve scaffolds processed by different chemical methods</title><author>Gao, Songtao ; Zheng, Yan ; Cai, Qiqing ; Yao, Weitao ; Wang, Jiaqiang ; Zhang, Peng ; Wang, Xin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-3ce70a0c1e8831e3f18a230da77ba788b6102c1267424315aef6378de537d2f93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biocompatible Materials - chemistry</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomaterials</topic><topic>Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering</topic><topic>Biomedical materials</topic><topic>Ceramics</topic><topic>Chemistry and Materials Science</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Composites</topic><topic>Equipment Failure Analysis</topic><topic>Glass</topic><topic>Guided Tissue Regeneration - instrumentation</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Materials Science</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Natural Materials</topic><topic>Nerve Regeneration - physiology</topic><topic>Neurons</topic><topic>Polymer Sciences</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Rats, Sprague-Dawley</topic><topic>Regenerative Medicine/Tissue Engineering</topic><topic>Rodents</topic><topic>Sciatic Nerve - cytology</topic><topic>Sciatic Nerve - physiology</topic><topic>Sciatic Nerve - surgery</topic><topic>Stem Cell Transplantation - instrumentation</topic><topic>Stem Cell Transplantation - methods</topic><topic>Surfaces and Interfaces</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Technology. Biomaterials. Equipments</topic><topic>Thin Films</topic><topic>Tissue Scaffolds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gao, Songtao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cai, Qiqing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yao, Weitao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jiaqiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Peng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xin</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health & Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>DELNET Engineering & Technology Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gao, Songtao</au><au>Zheng, Yan</au><au>Cai, Qiqing</au><au>Yao, Weitao</au><au>Wang, Jiaqiang</au><au>Zhang, Peng</au><au>Wang, Xin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of morphology and biocompatibility of acellular nerve scaffolds processed by different chemical methods</atitle><jtitle>Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine</jtitle><stitle>J Mater Sci: Mater Med</stitle><addtitle>J Mater Sci Mater Med</addtitle><date>2014-05-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1283</spage><epage>1291</epage><pages>1283-1291</pages><issn>0957-4530</issn><eissn>1573-4838</eissn><abstract>To investigate the morphological differences among acellular rat nerve scaffolds processed by different chemical methods and compare the biocompatibility between rat nerve grafts processed by different chemical methods and rat adipose-derived stem cells in vitro. Acellular rat sciatic nerve scaffolds processed by two different chemical methods (the Sondell method and the optimized method) and normal rat sciatic nerves were used as control. The structure and components of nerve scaffold were observed under microscopy, the degrees of decellularization and demyelination of nerve scaffold and integrity of nerve fiber tubes were assessed. The rat adipose-derived stem cells growth and adherence on scaffold were studied by scanning electron microscopy, the activity and adhesive ratio of rat adipose-derived stem cells in the nerve scaffold were compared. The basal lamina tubes and the extracellular matrix in the epineurium and perineurium in the nerve graft of optimized method were better preserved than the nerve graft of the Sondell method. After co-cultured with scaffolds, the difference of cell activity between three groups (two cell–scaffold combinations and control group) at the same observation time were not statistically significant (
P
> 0.05),the adhesive ratio of rat adipose-derived stem cells in the scaffold of the optimized method was better than that of the Sondell method. The scaffold of the optimized method is more effective than the scaffold of the Sondell method for peripheral nerve tissue engineering.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>24452272</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10856-014-5150-3</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0957-4530 |
| ispartof | Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine, 2014-05, Vol.25 (5), p.1283-1291 |
| issn | 0957-4530 1573-4838 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1520382367 |
| source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
| subjects | Animals Biocompatible Materials - chemistry Biological and medical sciences Biomaterials Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering Biomedical materials Ceramics Chemistry and Materials Science Comparative studies Composites Equipment Failure Analysis Glass Guided Tissue Regeneration - instrumentation Male Materials Science Medical sciences Morphology Natural Materials Nerve Regeneration - physiology Neurons Polymer Sciences Prosthesis Design Rats Rats, Sprague-Dawley Regenerative Medicine/Tissue Engineering Rodents Sciatic Nerve - cytology Sciatic Nerve - physiology Sciatic Nerve - surgery Stem Cell Transplantation - instrumentation Stem Cell Transplantation - methods Surfaces and Interfaces Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases Technology. Biomaterials. Equipments Thin Films Tissue Scaffolds |
| title | Comparison of morphology and biocompatibility of acellular nerve scaffolds processed by different chemical methods |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T17%3A11%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20morphology%20and%20biocompatibility%20of%20acellular%20nerve%20scaffolds%20processed%20by%20different%20chemical%20methods&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20materials%20science.%20Materials%20in%20medicine&rft.au=Gao,%20Songtao&rft.date=2014-05-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1283&rft.epage=1291&rft.pages=1283-1291&rft.issn=0957-4530&rft.eissn=1573-4838&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10856-014-5150-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3273538751%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1515459575&rft_id=info:pmid/24452272&rfr_iscdi=true |