Neural correlates of combinatorial semantic processing of literal and figurative noun noun compound words

The right hemisphere's role in language comprehension is supported by results from several neuropsychology and neuroimaging studies. Special interest surrounds right temporoparietal structures, which are thought to be involved in processing novel metaphorical expressions, primarily due to the c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.) Fla.), 2012-11, Vol.63 (3), p.1432-1442
Hauptverfasser: Forgács, Bálint, Bohrn, Isabel, Baudewig, Jürgen, Hofmann, Markus J., Pléh, Csaba, Jacobs, Arthur M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1442
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1432
container_title NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.)
container_volume 63
creator Forgács, Bálint
Bohrn, Isabel
Baudewig, Jürgen
Hofmann, Markus J.
Pléh, Csaba
Jacobs, Arthur M.
description The right hemisphere's role in language comprehension is supported by results from several neuropsychology and neuroimaging studies. Special interest surrounds right temporoparietal structures, which are thought to be involved in processing novel metaphorical expressions, primarily due to the coarse semantic coding of concepts. In this event related fMRI experiment we aimed at assessing the extent of semantic distance processing in the comprehension of figurative meaning to clarify the role of the right hemisphere. Four categories of German noun noun compound words were presented in a semantic decision task: a) conventional metaphors; b) novel metaphors; c) conventional literal, and; d) novel literal expressions, controlled for length, frequency, imageability, arousal, and emotional valence. Conventional literal and metaphorical compounds increased BOLD signal change in right temporoparietal regions, suggesting combinatorial semantic processing, in line with the coarse semantic coding theory, but at odds with the graded salience hypothesis. Both novel literal and novel metaphorical expressions increased activity in left inferior frontal areas, presumably as a result of phonetic, morphosyntactic, and semantic unification processes, challenging predictions regarding right hemispheric involvement in processing unusual meanings. Meanwhile, both conventional and novel metaphorical expressions induced BOLD signal change in left hemispherical regions, suggesting that even novel metaphor processing involves more than linking semantically distant concepts. ► Conventional/novel and literal/metaphorical NNCs presented in an fMRI experiment. ► All categories require different semantic combinations of non-associated constituents. ► Conventional NNCs activated RH areas, reflecting coarse semantic coding. ► Novel items activated the LIFG, as a result of semantic selection and unification. ► Both kinds of metaphorical NNCs evoked LH fine coding to establish meaning.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.07.029
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1520380849</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1053811912007495</els_id><sourcerecordid>1520380849</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-f1e20c93f66ae178ea9c981b69704724e93759fd918828af6af6f29364d9e9d43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFvFSEUhYnR2Nr6F8wkbtzMyIWZAZbaaDVpdGPXhAeXF15m4BVmavz3MnltTdw0IVwI3zkXOIQ0QDugMH48dBHXnMJs9tgxCqyjoqNMvSDnQNXQqkGwl9t64K0EUGfkTSkHSqmCXr4mZ4xJPoJQ5yT8qEZmamzKGSezYGmSr7t5F6JZUg71rOBs4hJsc8zJYikh7jdoCgtuUhNd48O-2izhHpuY1niaqsuxVtf8TtmVS_LKm6ng24d6QW6_fvl19a29-Xn9_erTTWt7PiytB2TUKu7H0SAIiUZZJWE3KkF7wXpUXAzKOwVSMmn8WIdnio-9U6hczy_Ih5Nvve3dimXRcygWp8lETGvRMDDKJZW9eh4FYLynFHhF3_-HHtKaY31INaSjlKPgolLyRNmcSsno9THXkPIfDVRvyemD_pec3pLTVOiaXJW-e2iw7mZ0T8LHqCrw-QRg_bz7gFkXGzBadCGjXbRL4fkufwG91K_H</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1506886737</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Neural correlates of combinatorial semantic processing of literal and figurative noun noun compound words</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Forgács, Bálint ; Bohrn, Isabel ; Baudewig, Jürgen ; Hofmann, Markus J. ; Pléh, Csaba ; Jacobs, Arthur M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Forgács, Bálint ; Bohrn, Isabel ; Baudewig, Jürgen ; Hofmann, Markus J. ; Pléh, Csaba ; Jacobs, Arthur M.</creatorcontrib><description>The right hemisphere's role in language comprehension is supported by results from several neuropsychology and neuroimaging studies. Special interest surrounds right temporoparietal structures, which are thought to be involved in processing novel metaphorical expressions, primarily due to the coarse semantic coding of concepts. In this event related fMRI experiment we aimed at assessing the extent of semantic distance processing in the comprehension of figurative meaning to clarify the role of the right hemisphere. Four categories of German noun noun compound words were presented in a semantic decision task: a) conventional metaphors; b) novel metaphors; c) conventional literal, and; d) novel literal expressions, controlled for length, frequency, imageability, arousal, and emotional valence. Conventional literal and metaphorical compounds increased BOLD signal change in right temporoparietal regions, suggesting combinatorial semantic processing, in line with the coarse semantic coding theory, but at odds with the graded salience hypothesis. Both novel literal and novel metaphorical expressions increased activity in left inferior frontal areas, presumably as a result of phonetic, morphosyntactic, and semantic unification processes, challenging predictions regarding right hemispheric involvement in processing unusual meanings. Meanwhile, both conventional and novel metaphorical expressions induced BOLD signal change in left hemispherical regions, suggesting that even novel metaphor processing involves more than linking semantically distant concepts. ► Conventional/novel and literal/metaphorical NNCs presented in an fMRI experiment. ► All categories require different semantic combinations of non-associated constituents. ► Conventional NNCs activated RH areas, reflecting coarse semantic coding. ► Novel items activated the LIFG, as a result of semantic selection and unification. ► Both kinds of metaphorical NNCs evoked LH fine coding to establish meaning.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-8119</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-9572</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.07.029</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22836179</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Brain - physiology ; Brain Mapping ; Coarse semantic coding ; Comprehension - physiology ; Female ; fMRI ; Humans ; Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted ; Language ; LIFG ; Linguistics ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Metaphor ; Right hemisphere ; Semantic distance ; Semantics ; Speech Perception - physiology ; Studies ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.), 2012-11, Vol.63 (3), p.1432-1442</ispartof><rights>2012 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Nov 15, 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-f1e20c93f66ae178ea9c981b69704724e93759fd918828af6af6f29364d9e9d43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-f1e20c93f66ae178ea9c981b69704724e93759fd918828af6af6f29364d9e9d43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811912007495$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22836179$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Forgács, Bálint</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bohrn, Isabel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baudewig, Jürgen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hofmann, Markus J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pléh, Csaba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobs, Arthur M.</creatorcontrib><title>Neural correlates of combinatorial semantic processing of literal and figurative noun noun compound words</title><title>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.)</title><addtitle>Neuroimage</addtitle><description>The right hemisphere's role in language comprehension is supported by results from several neuropsychology and neuroimaging studies. Special interest surrounds right temporoparietal structures, which are thought to be involved in processing novel metaphorical expressions, primarily due to the coarse semantic coding of concepts. In this event related fMRI experiment we aimed at assessing the extent of semantic distance processing in the comprehension of figurative meaning to clarify the role of the right hemisphere. Four categories of German noun noun compound words were presented in a semantic decision task: a) conventional metaphors; b) novel metaphors; c) conventional literal, and; d) novel literal expressions, controlled for length, frequency, imageability, arousal, and emotional valence. Conventional literal and metaphorical compounds increased BOLD signal change in right temporoparietal regions, suggesting combinatorial semantic processing, in line with the coarse semantic coding theory, but at odds with the graded salience hypothesis. Both novel literal and novel metaphorical expressions increased activity in left inferior frontal areas, presumably as a result of phonetic, morphosyntactic, and semantic unification processes, challenging predictions regarding right hemispheric involvement in processing unusual meanings. Meanwhile, both conventional and novel metaphorical expressions induced BOLD signal change in left hemispherical regions, suggesting that even novel metaphor processing involves more than linking semantically distant concepts. ► Conventional/novel and literal/metaphorical NNCs presented in an fMRI experiment. ► All categories require different semantic combinations of non-associated constituents. ► Conventional NNCs activated RH areas, reflecting coarse semantic coding. ► Novel items activated the LIFG, as a result of semantic selection and unification. ► Both kinds of metaphorical NNCs evoked LH fine coding to establish meaning.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Brain - physiology</subject><subject>Brain Mapping</subject><subject>Coarse semantic coding</subject><subject>Comprehension - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>fMRI</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>LIFG</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Metaphor</subject><subject>Right hemisphere</subject><subject>Semantic distance</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Speech Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1053-8119</issn><issn>1095-9572</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUFvFSEUhYnR2Nr6F8wkbtzMyIWZAZbaaDVpdGPXhAeXF15m4BVmavz3MnltTdw0IVwI3zkXOIQ0QDugMH48dBHXnMJs9tgxCqyjoqNMvSDnQNXQqkGwl9t64K0EUGfkTSkHSqmCXr4mZ4xJPoJQ5yT8qEZmamzKGSezYGmSr7t5F6JZUg71rOBs4hJsc8zJYikh7jdoCgtuUhNd48O-2izhHpuY1niaqsuxVtf8TtmVS_LKm6ng24d6QW6_fvl19a29-Xn9_erTTWt7PiytB2TUKu7H0SAIiUZZJWE3KkF7wXpUXAzKOwVSMmn8WIdnio-9U6hczy_Ih5Nvve3dimXRcygWp8lETGvRMDDKJZW9eh4FYLynFHhF3_-HHtKaY31INaSjlKPgolLyRNmcSsno9THXkPIfDVRvyemD_pec3pLTVOiaXJW-e2iw7mZ0T8LHqCrw-QRg_bz7gFkXGzBadCGjXbRL4fkufwG91K_H</recordid><startdate>20121115</startdate><enddate>20121115</enddate><creator>Forgács, Bálint</creator><creator>Bohrn, Isabel</creator><creator>Baudewig, Jürgen</creator><creator>Hofmann, Markus J.</creator><creator>Pléh, Csaba</creator><creator>Jacobs, Arthur M.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121115</creationdate><title>Neural correlates of combinatorial semantic processing of literal and figurative noun noun compound words</title><author>Forgács, Bálint ; Bohrn, Isabel ; Baudewig, Jürgen ; Hofmann, Markus J. ; Pléh, Csaba ; Jacobs, Arthur M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-f1e20c93f66ae178ea9c981b69704724e93759fd918828af6af6f29364d9e9d43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Brain - physiology</topic><topic>Brain Mapping</topic><topic>Coarse semantic coding</topic><topic>Comprehension - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>fMRI</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>LIFG</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Metaphor</topic><topic>Right hemisphere</topic><topic>Semantic distance</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Speech Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Forgács, Bálint</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bohrn, Isabel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baudewig, Jürgen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hofmann, Markus J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pléh, Csaba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobs, Arthur M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><jtitle>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Forgács, Bálint</au><au>Bohrn, Isabel</au><au>Baudewig, Jürgen</au><au>Hofmann, Markus J.</au><au>Pléh, Csaba</au><au>Jacobs, Arthur M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Neural correlates of combinatorial semantic processing of literal and figurative noun noun compound words</atitle><jtitle>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.)</jtitle><addtitle>Neuroimage</addtitle><date>2012-11-15</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1432</spage><epage>1442</epage><pages>1432-1442</pages><issn>1053-8119</issn><eissn>1095-9572</eissn><abstract>The right hemisphere's role in language comprehension is supported by results from several neuropsychology and neuroimaging studies. Special interest surrounds right temporoparietal structures, which are thought to be involved in processing novel metaphorical expressions, primarily due to the coarse semantic coding of concepts. In this event related fMRI experiment we aimed at assessing the extent of semantic distance processing in the comprehension of figurative meaning to clarify the role of the right hemisphere. Four categories of German noun noun compound words were presented in a semantic decision task: a) conventional metaphors; b) novel metaphors; c) conventional literal, and; d) novel literal expressions, controlled for length, frequency, imageability, arousal, and emotional valence. Conventional literal and metaphorical compounds increased BOLD signal change in right temporoparietal regions, suggesting combinatorial semantic processing, in line with the coarse semantic coding theory, but at odds with the graded salience hypothesis. Both novel literal and novel metaphorical expressions increased activity in left inferior frontal areas, presumably as a result of phonetic, morphosyntactic, and semantic unification processes, challenging predictions regarding right hemispheric involvement in processing unusual meanings. Meanwhile, both conventional and novel metaphorical expressions induced BOLD signal change in left hemispherical regions, suggesting that even novel metaphor processing involves more than linking semantically distant concepts. ► Conventional/novel and literal/metaphorical NNCs presented in an fMRI experiment. ► All categories require different semantic combinations of non-associated constituents. ► Conventional NNCs activated RH areas, reflecting coarse semantic coding. ► Novel items activated the LIFG, as a result of semantic selection and unification. ► Both kinds of metaphorical NNCs evoked LH fine coding to establish meaning.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>22836179</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.07.029</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1053-8119
ispartof NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.), 2012-11, Vol.63 (3), p.1432-1442
issn 1053-8119
1095-9572
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1520380849
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Brain - physiology
Brain Mapping
Coarse semantic coding
Comprehension - physiology
Female
fMRI
Humans
Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
Language
LIFG
Linguistics
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Metaphor
Right hemisphere
Semantic distance
Semantics
Speech Perception - physiology
Studies
Young Adult
title Neural correlates of combinatorial semantic processing of literal and figurative noun noun compound words
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T21%3A06%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Neural%20correlates%20of%20combinatorial%20semantic%20processing%20of%20literal%20and%20figurative%20noun%20noun%20compound%20words&rft.jtitle=NeuroImage%20(Orlando,%20Fla.)&rft.au=Forg%C3%A1cs,%20B%C3%A1lint&rft.date=2012-11-15&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1432&rft.epage=1442&rft.pages=1432-1442&rft.issn=1053-8119&rft.eissn=1095-9572&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.07.029&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1520380849%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1506886737&rft_id=info:pmid/22836179&rft_els_id=S1053811912007495&rfr_iscdi=true