Evaluation of a protocol for the quantification of black carbon in sediments

Formation of highly condensed black carbon (BC) from vegetation fires and wood fuel combustion presumably transfers otherwise rapidly cycling carbon from the atmosphere‐biosphere cycle into a much slower cycling geological form. Recently reported BC fractions of total organic carbon (TOC) in surfici...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Global biogeochemical cycles 2001-12, Vol.15 (4), p.881-890
Hauptverfasser: Gustafsson, Örjan, Bucheli, Thomas D., Kukulska, Zofia, Andersson, Mette, Largeau, Claude, Rouzaud, Jean‐Noël, Reddy, Christopher M., Eglinton, Timothy I.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 890
container_issue 4
container_start_page 881
container_title Global biogeochemical cycles
container_volume 15
creator Gustafsson, Örjan
Bucheli, Thomas D.
Kukulska, Zofia
Andersson, Mette
Largeau, Claude
Rouzaud, Jean‐Noël
Reddy, Christopher M.
Eglinton, Timothy I.
description Formation of highly condensed black carbon (BC) from vegetation fires and wood fuel combustion presumably transfers otherwise rapidly cycling carbon from the atmosphere‐biosphere cycle into a much slower cycling geological form. Recently reported BC fractions of total organic carbon (TOC) in surficial marine sediments span a wide range (2‐90%), leaving it presently unclear whether this variation reflects natural processes or is largely due to method differences. In order to elucidate the importance of BC to carbon burial the specificity of applied methods needs to be constrained. Here the operating range and applicability of a commonly used chemothermal oxidation (CTO) method is evaluated using putative BC standards, potentially interfering substances, and natural matrix standards. Test results confirm the applicability of the method to marine sediments. Integrity tests with model substrates suggest applicability to low‐carbon soils but only with a lower specificity to seawater particulate matter. The BC content of marine sediment samples in a set of studies employing the CTO method proved to be consistent with associated geochemical information. The radiocarbon content of the BC isolate in an environmental matrix standard was shown to be similar to the radiocarbon signature of pyrogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), here serving as molecular markers of combustion (fraction modern fM of BC was 0.065 ± 0.014 and of PAHs 0.056 ± 0.020), while being clearly distinct from the radiocarbon content of the bulk TOC (fM = 0.61 ± 0.08). Urgent questions such as the global accumulation rate of black carbon in soils and sediments may prove approachable with the chemothermal oxidation technique of BC quantification.
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2000GB001380
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1520376833</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1520376833</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a5455-27672e928b3affd15ade231a0dc6802dc7b313c7736024affdbfe6033ebcb4733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouH7c_AG9CB6sTjJt0h510SosevEDvIRpmmC022rS9ePf22VFPXkaBp7nneFlbI_DEQdRHgsAqE4BOBawxia8zLK0FCJbZxMoCplKgXKTbcX4NDJZnpcTNjt7o3ZBg--7pHcJJS-hH3rTt4nrQzI82uR1Qd3gnTc_UN2SeU4MhXrcfZdE2_i57Ya4wzYctdHufs9tdnt-djO9SGfX1eX0ZJZSPl5NhZJK2FIUNZJzDc-psQI5QWNkAaIxqkaORimUILIlUjsrAdHWps4U4jY7WOWOz74ubBz03Edj25Y62y-i5rkAVLLAJXq4Qk3oYwzW6Zfg5xQ-NQe9LE3_LW3E97-TKRpqXaDO-PjrIBa8hCUHK-7dt_bz30xdnU4Vz0clXSk-DvbjR6HwrKVClev7q0rj7KK6eyhvdI5f9RCIfg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1520376833</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of a protocol for the quantification of black carbon in sediments</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><creator>Gustafsson, Örjan ; Bucheli, Thomas D. ; Kukulska, Zofia ; Andersson, Mette ; Largeau, Claude ; Rouzaud, Jean‐Noël ; Reddy, Christopher M. ; Eglinton, Timothy I.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gustafsson, Örjan ; Bucheli, Thomas D. ; Kukulska, Zofia ; Andersson, Mette ; Largeau, Claude ; Rouzaud, Jean‐Noël ; Reddy, Christopher M. ; Eglinton, Timothy I.</creatorcontrib><description>Formation of highly condensed black carbon (BC) from vegetation fires and wood fuel combustion presumably transfers otherwise rapidly cycling carbon from the atmosphere‐biosphere cycle into a much slower cycling geological form. Recently reported BC fractions of total organic carbon (TOC) in surficial marine sediments span a wide range (2‐90%), leaving it presently unclear whether this variation reflects natural processes or is largely due to method differences. In order to elucidate the importance of BC to carbon burial the specificity of applied methods needs to be constrained. Here the operating range and applicability of a commonly used chemothermal oxidation (CTO) method is evaluated using putative BC standards, potentially interfering substances, and natural matrix standards. Test results confirm the applicability of the method to marine sediments. Integrity tests with model substrates suggest applicability to low‐carbon soils but only with a lower specificity to seawater particulate matter. The BC content of marine sediment samples in a set of studies employing the CTO method proved to be consistent with associated geochemical information. The radiocarbon content of the BC isolate in an environmental matrix standard was shown to be similar to the radiocarbon signature of pyrogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), here serving as molecular markers of combustion (fraction modern fM of BC was 0.065 ± 0.014 and of PAHs 0.056 ± 0.020), while being clearly distinct from the radiocarbon content of the bulk TOC (fM = 0.61 ± 0.08). Urgent questions such as the global accumulation rate of black carbon in soils and sediments may prove approachable with the chemothermal oxidation technique of BC quantification.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0886-6236</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-9224</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2000GB001380</identifier><identifier>CODEN: GBCYEP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Exact sciences and technology ; Geochemistry ; Marine and continental quaternary ; Soil and rock geochemistry ; Surficial geology</subject><ispartof>Global biogeochemical cycles, 2001-12, Vol.15 (4), p.881-890</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2001 by the American Geophysical Union.</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a5455-27672e928b3affd15ade231a0dc6802dc7b313c7736024affdbfe6033ebcb4733</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a5455-27672e928b3affd15ade231a0dc6802dc7b313c7736024affdbfe6033ebcb4733</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2000GB001380$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2000GB001380$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,1434,11519,27929,27930,45579,45580,46414,46473,46838,46897</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=13381900$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gustafsson, Örjan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bucheli, Thomas D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kukulska, Zofia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andersson, Mette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Largeau, Claude</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rouzaud, Jean‐Noël</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reddy, Christopher M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eglinton, Timothy I.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of a protocol for the quantification of black carbon in sediments</title><title>Global biogeochemical cycles</title><addtitle>Global Biogeochem. Cycles</addtitle><description>Formation of highly condensed black carbon (BC) from vegetation fires and wood fuel combustion presumably transfers otherwise rapidly cycling carbon from the atmosphere‐biosphere cycle into a much slower cycling geological form. Recently reported BC fractions of total organic carbon (TOC) in surficial marine sediments span a wide range (2‐90%), leaving it presently unclear whether this variation reflects natural processes or is largely due to method differences. In order to elucidate the importance of BC to carbon burial the specificity of applied methods needs to be constrained. Here the operating range and applicability of a commonly used chemothermal oxidation (CTO) method is evaluated using putative BC standards, potentially interfering substances, and natural matrix standards. Test results confirm the applicability of the method to marine sediments. Integrity tests with model substrates suggest applicability to low‐carbon soils but only with a lower specificity to seawater particulate matter. The BC content of marine sediment samples in a set of studies employing the CTO method proved to be consistent with associated geochemical information. The radiocarbon content of the BC isolate in an environmental matrix standard was shown to be similar to the radiocarbon signature of pyrogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), here serving as molecular markers of combustion (fraction modern fM of BC was 0.065 ± 0.014 and of PAHs 0.056 ± 0.020), while being clearly distinct from the radiocarbon content of the bulk TOC (fM = 0.61 ± 0.08). Urgent questions such as the global accumulation rate of black carbon in soils and sediments may prove approachable with the chemothermal oxidation technique of BC quantification.</description><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Geochemistry</subject><subject>Marine and continental quaternary</subject><subject>Soil and rock geochemistry</subject><subject>Surficial geology</subject><issn>0886-6236</issn><issn>1944-9224</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouH7c_AG9CB6sTjJt0h510SosevEDvIRpmmC022rS9ePf22VFPXkaBp7nneFlbI_DEQdRHgsAqE4BOBawxia8zLK0FCJbZxMoCplKgXKTbcX4NDJZnpcTNjt7o3ZBg--7pHcJJS-hH3rTt4nrQzI82uR1Qd3gnTc_UN2SeU4MhXrcfZdE2_i57Ya4wzYctdHufs9tdnt-djO9SGfX1eX0ZJZSPl5NhZJK2FIUNZJzDc-psQI5QWNkAaIxqkaORimUILIlUjsrAdHWps4U4jY7WOWOz74ubBz03Edj25Y62y-i5rkAVLLAJXq4Qk3oYwzW6Zfg5xQ-NQe9LE3_LW3E97-TKRpqXaDO-PjrIBa8hCUHK-7dt_bz30xdnU4Vz0clXSk-DvbjR6HwrKVClev7q0rj7KK6eyhvdI5f9RCIfg</recordid><startdate>200112</startdate><enddate>200112</enddate><creator>Gustafsson, Örjan</creator><creator>Bucheli, Thomas D.</creator><creator>Kukulska, Zofia</creator><creator>Andersson, Mette</creator><creator>Largeau, Claude</creator><creator>Rouzaud, Jean‐Noël</creator><creator>Reddy, Christopher M.</creator><creator>Eglinton, Timothy I.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>American Geophysical Union</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200112</creationdate><title>Evaluation of a protocol for the quantification of black carbon in sediments</title><author>Gustafsson, Örjan ; Bucheli, Thomas D. ; Kukulska, Zofia ; Andersson, Mette ; Largeau, Claude ; Rouzaud, Jean‐Noël ; Reddy, Christopher M. ; Eglinton, Timothy I.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a5455-27672e928b3affd15ade231a0dc6802dc7b313c7736024affdbfe6033ebcb4733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Geochemistry</topic><topic>Marine and continental quaternary</topic><topic>Soil and rock geochemistry</topic><topic>Surficial geology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gustafsson, Örjan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bucheli, Thomas D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kukulska, Zofia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andersson, Mette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Largeau, Claude</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rouzaud, Jean‐Noël</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reddy, Christopher M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eglinton, Timothy I.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Global biogeochemical cycles</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gustafsson, Örjan</au><au>Bucheli, Thomas D.</au><au>Kukulska, Zofia</au><au>Andersson, Mette</au><au>Largeau, Claude</au><au>Rouzaud, Jean‐Noël</au><au>Reddy, Christopher M.</au><au>Eglinton, Timothy I.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of a protocol for the quantification of black carbon in sediments</atitle><jtitle>Global biogeochemical cycles</jtitle><addtitle>Global Biogeochem. Cycles</addtitle><date>2001-12</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>881</spage><epage>890</epage><pages>881-890</pages><issn>0886-6236</issn><eissn>1944-9224</eissn><coden>GBCYEP</coden><abstract>Formation of highly condensed black carbon (BC) from vegetation fires and wood fuel combustion presumably transfers otherwise rapidly cycling carbon from the atmosphere‐biosphere cycle into a much slower cycling geological form. Recently reported BC fractions of total organic carbon (TOC) in surficial marine sediments span a wide range (2‐90%), leaving it presently unclear whether this variation reflects natural processes or is largely due to method differences. In order to elucidate the importance of BC to carbon burial the specificity of applied methods needs to be constrained. Here the operating range and applicability of a commonly used chemothermal oxidation (CTO) method is evaluated using putative BC standards, potentially interfering substances, and natural matrix standards. Test results confirm the applicability of the method to marine sediments. Integrity tests with model substrates suggest applicability to low‐carbon soils but only with a lower specificity to seawater particulate matter. The BC content of marine sediment samples in a set of studies employing the CTO method proved to be consistent with associated geochemical information. The radiocarbon content of the BC isolate in an environmental matrix standard was shown to be similar to the radiocarbon signature of pyrogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), here serving as molecular markers of combustion (fraction modern fM of BC was 0.065 ± 0.014 and of PAHs 0.056 ± 0.020), while being clearly distinct from the radiocarbon content of the bulk TOC (fM = 0.61 ± 0.08). Urgent questions such as the global accumulation rate of black carbon in soils and sediments may prove approachable with the chemothermal oxidation technique of BC quantification.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2000GB001380</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0886-6236
ispartof Global biogeochemical cycles, 2001-12, Vol.15 (4), p.881-890
issn 0886-6236
1944-9224
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1520376833
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Access via Wiley Online Library; Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)
subjects Earth sciences
Earth, ocean, space
Exact sciences and technology
Geochemistry
Marine and continental quaternary
Soil and rock geochemistry
Surficial geology
title Evaluation of a protocol for the quantification of black carbon in sediments
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T16%3A33%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20a%20protocol%20for%20the%20quantification%20of%20black%20carbon%20in%20sediments&rft.jtitle=Global%20biogeochemical%20cycles&rft.au=Gustafsson,%20%C3%96rjan&rft.date=2001-12&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=881&rft.epage=890&rft.pages=881-890&rft.issn=0886-6236&rft.eissn=1944-9224&rft.coden=GBCYEP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2000GB001380&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1520376833%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1520376833&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true