Testing linear theory of EMIC waves in the inner magnetosphere: Cluster observations

In this paper, we test whether time periods with hot proton temperature anisotropy are associated with electromagnetic ion cyclotron (EMIC) waves and whether the plasma conditions during the observed waves satisfy the linear theory threshold condition. We identify 865 events observed by the Composit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of geophysical research. Space physics 2014-02, Vol.119 (2), p.1004-1027
Hauptverfasser: Lin, R.-L., Zhang, J.-C., Allen, R. C., Kistler, L. M., Mouikis, C. G., Gong, J.-C., Liu, S.-Q., Shi, L.-Q., Klecker, B., Sauvaud, J.-A., Dunlop, M. W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1027
container_issue 2
container_start_page 1004
container_title Journal of geophysical research. Space physics
container_volume 119
creator Lin, R.-L.
Zhang, J.-C.
Allen, R. C.
Kistler, L. M.
Mouikis, C. G.
Gong, J.-C.
Liu, S.-Q.
Shi, L.-Q.
Klecker, B.
Sauvaud, J.-A.
Dunlop, M. W.
description In this paper, we test whether time periods with hot proton temperature anisotropy are associated with electromagnetic ion cyclotron (EMIC) waves and whether the plasma conditions during the observed waves satisfy the linear theory threshold condition. We identify 865 events observed by the Composition Distribution Function instrument onboard Cluster spacecraft 4 during 1 January 2001 to 1 January 2011 that exhibit a positive temperature anisotropy (Ahp = T⊥ h/T∥ h − 1) in the 10–40 keV protons. The events occur over an L range from 4 to 10 in all magnetic local times and at magnetic latitudes (MLATs) within ±50°. Of these hot proton temperature anisotropy (HPTA) events, only 68 events have electromagnetic ion cyclotron (EMIC) waves. In these 68 HPTA events, for those at 3.81.0 nT2/Hz mainly appear in the region with fEMIC/fH,eq  0.45  × fEMIC/fH,lo, and Ahp/(Ahp + 1)  0.25. By testing a threshold equation for the EMIC instability based on linear theory, we find that for EMIC waves with |MLAT| ≤ 10° in the He, H, and >H bands, the percentages that satisfy the predicted conditions for wave growth by the threshold equation are 15.2%, 24.6%, and 25.6%. For the EMIC waves with |MLAT| > 10° the percentages that satisfy the wave growth predicted conditions are only 2.8%, 2.6%, and 0.0%. Finally, possible reasons for the low forecast accuracies of EMIC waves are suggested. Key Points We do the statistical analysis of EMIC waves from a 10 year Cluster observation We test the A_hp versus EMIC wave frequency formula of Kennel and Petschek (1966) We test the linear theory derived by Blum et al. (2009)
doi_str_mv 10.1002/2013JA019541
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1520373915</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3531855711</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4823-caf415ecdc98b9917919908196f196908071ca31e007a5a93746428dc2d7f2a93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRSMEElXpjg-IxIYFAT_iOGZXqj5Vnirq0nJTp01J42InLf17pgogxAJL1oyvzlhzr-edY3SNESI3BGE6aiMsWIiPvAbBkQhEiMjxd09jdOq1nFshODFImDW8yUS7MisWfp4VWlm_XGpj975J_e79sOPv1FY7PysOOpRCW3-tFoUujdsstdW3fievXAmymTltt6rMTOHOvJNU5U63vmrTe-11J51BMH7sDzvtcZCEMaFBotIQM53MExHPhMBcYCFgMxGlcKFDHCeKYo0QV0wJysMoJPE8IXOeEng3vcv634017xUYkevMJTrPVaFN5SRmBFFOwSigF3_QlalsAdtJHNGYiJiGHKirmkqscc7qVG5stlZ2LzGSh5Tl75QBpzW-y3K9_5eVo_5LmyGwDVNBPZVBcB8_U8q-yYhTzuT0oS-fn6LBtMe4vKOfP4GKaw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1638298347</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Testing linear theory of EMIC waves in the inner magnetosphere: Cluster observations</title><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Lin, R.-L. ; Zhang, J.-C. ; Allen, R. C. ; Kistler, L. M. ; Mouikis, C. G. ; Gong, J.-C. ; Liu, S.-Q. ; Shi, L.-Q. ; Klecker, B. ; Sauvaud, J.-A. ; Dunlop, M. W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lin, R.-L. ; Zhang, J.-C. ; Allen, R. C. ; Kistler, L. M. ; Mouikis, C. G. ; Gong, J.-C. ; Liu, S.-Q. ; Shi, L.-Q. ; Klecker, B. ; Sauvaud, J.-A. ; Dunlop, M. W.</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper, we test whether time periods with hot proton temperature anisotropy are associated with electromagnetic ion cyclotron (EMIC) waves and whether the plasma conditions during the observed waves satisfy the linear theory threshold condition. We identify 865 events observed by the Composition Distribution Function instrument onboard Cluster spacecraft 4 during 1 January 2001 to 1 January 2011 that exhibit a positive temperature anisotropy (Ahp = T⊥ h/T∥ h − 1) in the 10–40 keV protons. The events occur over an L range from 4 to 10 in all magnetic local times and at magnetic latitudes (MLATs) within ±50°. Of these hot proton temperature anisotropy (HPTA) events, only 68 events have electromagnetic ion cyclotron (EMIC) waves. In these 68 HPTA events, for those at 3.8&lt;L ≤ 5 and |MLAT| ≤ 10°, the EMIC waves with powers &gt;1.0 nT2/Hz mainly appear in the region with fEMIC/fH,eq &lt; 0.8. Two stop bands are present, one near the region with fEMIC/fH,eq ≈ 0.33, the other in the region with 0.8 &lt; fEMIC/fH,eq &lt; 0.9. Most of the EMIC waves in the He, H, and &gt;H bands satisfy Ahp/(Ahp + 1) &gt; fEMIC/fH,lo, Ahp/(Ahp + 1) &gt; 0.45  × fEMIC/fH,lo, and Ahp/(Ahp + 1) &lt; 0.45  × fEMIC/fH,lo. fEMIC,  fH,eq, and fH,lo are the EMIC wave frequency, the magnetic equatorial, and the local proton gyrofrequencies. We also find that the EMIC waves predominantly occur with Ahp &gt; 0.25. By testing a threshold equation for the EMIC instability based on linear theory, we find that for EMIC waves with |MLAT| ≤ 10° in the He, H, and &gt;H bands, the percentages that satisfy the predicted conditions for wave growth by the threshold equation are 15.2%, 24.6%, and 25.6%. For the EMIC waves with |MLAT| &gt; 10° the percentages that satisfy the wave growth predicted conditions are only 2.8%, 2.6%, and 0.0%. Finally, possible reasons for the low forecast accuracies of EMIC waves are suggested. Key Points We do the statistical analysis of EMIC waves from a 10 year Cluster observation We test the A_hp versus EMIC wave frequency formula of Kennel and Petschek (1966) We test the linear theory derived by Blum et al. (2009)</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-9380</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-9402</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/2013JA019541</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Anisotropy ; Cluster ; electron density ; EMIC waves ; Geophysics ; Magnetic fields ; magnetosphere ; Spacecraft ; Statistical analysis ; Theory ; Waves</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Space physics, 2014-02, Vol.119 (2), p.1004-1027</ispartof><rights>2014. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4823-caf415ecdc98b9917919908196f196908071ca31e007a5a93746428dc2d7f2a93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4823-caf415ecdc98b9917919908196f196908071ca31e007a5a93746428dc2d7f2a93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2F2013JA019541$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2F2013JA019541$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46808</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lin, R.-L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, J.-C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, R. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kistler, L. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mouikis, C. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gong, J.-C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, S.-Q.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, L.-Q.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klecker, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sauvaud, J.-A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunlop, M. W.</creatorcontrib><title>Testing linear theory of EMIC waves in the inner magnetosphere: Cluster observations</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Space physics</title><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res. Space Physics</addtitle><description>In this paper, we test whether time periods with hot proton temperature anisotropy are associated with electromagnetic ion cyclotron (EMIC) waves and whether the plasma conditions during the observed waves satisfy the linear theory threshold condition. We identify 865 events observed by the Composition Distribution Function instrument onboard Cluster spacecraft 4 during 1 January 2001 to 1 January 2011 that exhibit a positive temperature anisotropy (Ahp = T⊥ h/T∥ h − 1) in the 10–40 keV protons. The events occur over an L range from 4 to 10 in all magnetic local times and at magnetic latitudes (MLATs) within ±50°. Of these hot proton temperature anisotropy (HPTA) events, only 68 events have electromagnetic ion cyclotron (EMIC) waves. In these 68 HPTA events, for those at 3.8&lt;L ≤ 5 and |MLAT| ≤ 10°, the EMIC waves with powers &gt;1.0 nT2/Hz mainly appear in the region with fEMIC/fH,eq &lt; 0.8. Two stop bands are present, one near the region with fEMIC/fH,eq ≈ 0.33, the other in the region with 0.8 &lt; fEMIC/fH,eq &lt; 0.9. Most of the EMIC waves in the He, H, and &gt;H bands satisfy Ahp/(Ahp + 1) &gt; fEMIC/fH,lo, Ahp/(Ahp + 1) &gt; 0.45  × fEMIC/fH,lo, and Ahp/(Ahp + 1) &lt; 0.45  × fEMIC/fH,lo. fEMIC,  fH,eq, and fH,lo are the EMIC wave frequency, the magnetic equatorial, and the local proton gyrofrequencies. We also find that the EMIC waves predominantly occur with Ahp &gt; 0.25. By testing a threshold equation for the EMIC instability based on linear theory, we find that for EMIC waves with |MLAT| ≤ 10° in the He, H, and &gt;H bands, the percentages that satisfy the predicted conditions for wave growth by the threshold equation are 15.2%, 24.6%, and 25.6%. For the EMIC waves with |MLAT| &gt; 10° the percentages that satisfy the wave growth predicted conditions are only 2.8%, 2.6%, and 0.0%. Finally, possible reasons for the low forecast accuracies of EMIC waves are suggested. Key Points We do the statistical analysis of EMIC waves from a 10 year Cluster observation We test the A_hp versus EMIC wave frequency formula of Kennel and Petschek (1966) We test the linear theory derived by Blum et al. (2009)</description><subject>Anisotropy</subject><subject>Cluster</subject><subject>electron density</subject><subject>EMIC waves</subject><subject>Geophysics</subject><subject>Magnetic fields</subject><subject>magnetosphere</subject><subject>Spacecraft</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Theory</subject><subject>Waves</subject><issn>2169-9380</issn><issn>2169-9402</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRSMEElXpjg-IxIYFAT_iOGZXqj5Vnirq0nJTp01J42InLf17pgogxAJL1oyvzlhzr-edY3SNESI3BGE6aiMsWIiPvAbBkQhEiMjxd09jdOq1nFshODFImDW8yUS7MisWfp4VWlm_XGpj975J_e79sOPv1FY7PysOOpRCW3-tFoUujdsstdW3fievXAmymTltt6rMTOHOvJNU5U63vmrTe-11J51BMH7sDzvtcZCEMaFBotIQM53MExHPhMBcYCFgMxGlcKFDHCeKYo0QV0wJysMoJPE8IXOeEng3vcv634017xUYkevMJTrPVaFN5SRmBFFOwSigF3_QlalsAdtJHNGYiJiGHKirmkqscc7qVG5stlZ2LzGSh5Tl75QBpzW-y3K9_5eVo_5LmyGwDVNBPZVBcB8_U8q-yYhTzuT0oS-fn6LBtMe4vKOfP4GKaw</recordid><startdate>201402</startdate><enddate>201402</enddate><creator>Lin, R.-L.</creator><creator>Zhang, J.-C.</creator><creator>Allen, R. C.</creator><creator>Kistler, L. M.</creator><creator>Mouikis, C. G.</creator><creator>Gong, J.-C.</creator><creator>Liu, S.-Q.</creator><creator>Shi, L.-Q.</creator><creator>Klecker, B.</creator><creator>Sauvaud, J.-A.</creator><creator>Dunlop, M. W.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201402</creationdate><title>Testing linear theory of EMIC waves in the inner magnetosphere: Cluster observations</title><author>Lin, R.-L. ; Zhang, J.-C. ; Allen, R. C. ; Kistler, L. M. ; Mouikis, C. G. ; Gong, J.-C. ; Liu, S.-Q. ; Shi, L.-Q. ; Klecker, B. ; Sauvaud, J.-A. ; Dunlop, M. W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4823-caf415ecdc98b9917919908196f196908071ca31e007a5a93746428dc2d7f2a93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Anisotropy</topic><topic>Cluster</topic><topic>electron density</topic><topic>EMIC waves</topic><topic>Geophysics</topic><topic>Magnetic fields</topic><topic>magnetosphere</topic><topic>Spacecraft</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Theory</topic><topic>Waves</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lin, R.-L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, J.-C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, R. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kistler, L. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mouikis, C. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gong, J.-C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, S.-Q.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, L.-Q.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klecker, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sauvaud, J.-A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunlop, M. W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Space physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lin, R.-L.</au><au>Zhang, J.-C.</au><au>Allen, R. C.</au><au>Kistler, L. M.</au><au>Mouikis, C. G.</au><au>Gong, J.-C.</au><au>Liu, S.-Q.</au><au>Shi, L.-Q.</au><au>Klecker, B.</au><au>Sauvaud, J.-A.</au><au>Dunlop, M. W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Testing linear theory of EMIC waves in the inner magnetosphere: Cluster observations</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Space physics</jtitle><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res. Space Physics</addtitle><date>2014-02</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>119</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>1004</spage><epage>1027</epage><pages>1004-1027</pages><issn>2169-9380</issn><eissn>2169-9402</eissn><abstract>In this paper, we test whether time periods with hot proton temperature anisotropy are associated with electromagnetic ion cyclotron (EMIC) waves and whether the plasma conditions during the observed waves satisfy the linear theory threshold condition. We identify 865 events observed by the Composition Distribution Function instrument onboard Cluster spacecraft 4 during 1 January 2001 to 1 January 2011 that exhibit a positive temperature anisotropy (Ahp = T⊥ h/T∥ h − 1) in the 10–40 keV protons. The events occur over an L range from 4 to 10 in all magnetic local times and at magnetic latitudes (MLATs) within ±50°. Of these hot proton temperature anisotropy (HPTA) events, only 68 events have electromagnetic ion cyclotron (EMIC) waves. In these 68 HPTA events, for those at 3.8&lt;L ≤ 5 and |MLAT| ≤ 10°, the EMIC waves with powers &gt;1.0 nT2/Hz mainly appear in the region with fEMIC/fH,eq &lt; 0.8. Two stop bands are present, one near the region with fEMIC/fH,eq ≈ 0.33, the other in the region with 0.8 &lt; fEMIC/fH,eq &lt; 0.9. Most of the EMIC waves in the He, H, and &gt;H bands satisfy Ahp/(Ahp + 1) &gt; fEMIC/fH,lo, Ahp/(Ahp + 1) &gt; 0.45  × fEMIC/fH,lo, and Ahp/(Ahp + 1) &lt; 0.45  × fEMIC/fH,lo. fEMIC,  fH,eq, and fH,lo are the EMIC wave frequency, the magnetic equatorial, and the local proton gyrofrequencies. We also find that the EMIC waves predominantly occur with Ahp &gt; 0.25. By testing a threshold equation for the EMIC instability based on linear theory, we find that for EMIC waves with |MLAT| ≤ 10° in the He, H, and &gt;H bands, the percentages that satisfy the predicted conditions for wave growth by the threshold equation are 15.2%, 24.6%, and 25.6%. For the EMIC waves with |MLAT| &gt; 10° the percentages that satisfy the wave growth predicted conditions are only 2.8%, 2.6%, and 0.0%. Finally, possible reasons for the low forecast accuracies of EMIC waves are suggested. Key Points We do the statistical analysis of EMIC waves from a 10 year Cluster observation We test the A_hp versus EMIC wave frequency formula of Kennel and Petschek (1966) We test the linear theory derived by Blum et al. (2009)</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/2013JA019541</doi><tpages>24</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2169-9380
ispartof Journal of geophysical research. Space physics, 2014-02, Vol.119 (2), p.1004-1027
issn 2169-9380
2169-9402
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1520373915
source Wiley Free Content; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Anisotropy
Cluster
electron density
EMIC waves
Geophysics
Magnetic fields
magnetosphere
Spacecraft
Statistical analysis
Theory
Waves
title Testing linear theory of EMIC waves in the inner magnetosphere: Cluster observations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T12%3A46%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Testing%20linear%20theory%20of%20EMIC%20waves%20in%20the%20inner%20magnetosphere:%20Cluster%20observations&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Space%20physics&rft.au=Lin,%20R.-L.&rft.date=2014-02&rft.volume=119&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=1004&rft.epage=1027&rft.pages=1004-1027&rft.issn=2169-9380&rft.eissn=2169-9402&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/2013JA019541&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3531855711%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1638298347&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true