Habitat management influences overwinter survival of mule deer fawns in Colorado
In the absence of natural or anthropogenic disturbance, many pinyon pine (Pinus edulis)-Utah juniper (Juniperus osteosperma) woodland habitats reach late serai stages that encroach into forest openings. This encroachment typically occurs at the expense of browse species that are preferred by mule de...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of wildlife management 2014-04, Vol.78 (3), p.448-455 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 455 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 448 |
container_title | The Journal of wildlife management |
container_volume | 78 |
creator | Bergman, Eric J. Bishop, Chad J. Freddy, David J. White, Gary C. Doherty Jr, Paul F. |
description | In the absence of natural or anthropogenic disturbance, many pinyon pine (Pinus edulis)-Utah juniper (Juniperus osteosperma) woodland habitats reach late serai stages that encroach into forest openings. This encroachment typically occurs at the expense of browse species that are preferred by mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus). Wildlife managers often treat habitat management as a tool to bolster mule deer populations, but documented changes in deer vital rates in response to habitat manipulations are lacking. We evaluated the effects of different levels of habitat improvement on pinyon pine-Utah juniper winter ranges in Colorado on mule deer overwinter survival. Mule deer fawns that overwintered on areas that received both a traditional mechanical treatment as well as follow-up chemical treatments experienced increased survival (Ŝ = 0.768, SE = 0.0851) over fawns on winter range that had only received traditional mechanical treatments or no habitat treatments (Ŝ = 0.675, SE = 0.112). When treatment intensity was partitioned into 3 levels: no treatment, traditional mechanical treatments, and advanced treatments comprised of both mechanical and chemical treatments, mule deer fawns inhabiting winter range subjected to advanced treatments experienced higher survival (Ŝ = 0.768, SE = 0.0849) than fawns on units that experienced only traditional mechanical treatments (Ŝ = 0.687, SE = 0.108), which in turn experienced higher survival than fawns in areas that had received no habitat treatments (S = 0.669, SE = 0.113). Our study provides evidence that habitat management on winter ranges can positively influence a key vital rate for mule deer in pinyon pine-Utah juniper ecosystems. We recommend that as habitat treatments are planned for benefit of mule deer, those plans include follow-up reseeding and weed control efforts. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jwmg.683 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1520372102</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>43188164</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>43188164</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3833-393eb310917f3f69e7d1fdbb9427716b63501ad5835a2c478f3e107f553b29043</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0F2L1DAUBuAgCo6r4B8QCiJ4092cnOajlzrorO74caGMeBPSNlk6pumatDPuvzfDLLOwVwfyPucQXkJeAj0HStnFdj9cnwuFj8gCapQlUyAfk0WOWMkr-PWUPEtpSykCKLEg3y9N009mKgYTzLUdbJiKPjg_29DaVIw7G_d9mGws0hx3_c74YnTFMHtbdDa_OrMPKW8Uy9GP0XTjc_LEGZ_si7t5Rn5-_PBjeVmuv60-Ld-tyxYVYok12gaB1iAdOlFb2YHrmqaumJQgGoGcgum4Qm5YW0nl0AKVjnNsWE0rPCNvj3dv4vh3tmnSQ59a670JdpyTBs4oSgaUZfr6Ad2Ocwz5d1kBFapGflBv7pRJrfEumtD2Sd_EfjDxVjNViboCmV15dPve29tTDlQf-teH_nXuX3_efFnlmf2ro9-maYwnXyEoBaK6v9enyf475Sb-0UKi5HrzdaUprt__3qyv9BL_A-p1kWk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1510689352</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Habitat management influences overwinter survival of mule deer fawns in Colorado</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Bergman, Eric J. ; Bishop, Chad J. ; Freddy, David J. ; White, Gary C. ; Doherty Jr, Paul F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bergman, Eric J. ; Bishop, Chad J. ; Freddy, David J. ; White, Gary C. ; Doherty Jr, Paul F.</creatorcontrib><description>In the absence of natural or anthropogenic disturbance, many pinyon pine (Pinus edulis)-Utah juniper (Juniperus osteosperma) woodland habitats reach late serai stages that encroach into forest openings. This encroachment typically occurs at the expense of browse species that are preferred by mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus). Wildlife managers often treat habitat management as a tool to bolster mule deer populations, but documented changes in deer vital rates in response to habitat manipulations are lacking. We evaluated the effects of different levels of habitat improvement on pinyon pine-Utah juniper winter ranges in Colorado on mule deer overwinter survival. Mule deer fawns that overwintered on areas that received both a traditional mechanical treatment as well as follow-up chemical treatments experienced increased survival (Ŝ = 0.768, SE = 0.0851) over fawns on winter range that had only received traditional mechanical treatments or no habitat treatments (Ŝ = 0.675, SE = 0.112). When treatment intensity was partitioned into 3 levels: no treatment, traditional mechanical treatments, and advanced treatments comprised of both mechanical and chemical treatments, mule deer fawns inhabiting winter range subjected to advanced treatments experienced higher survival (Ŝ = 0.768, SE = 0.0849) than fawns on units that experienced only traditional mechanical treatments (Ŝ = 0.687, SE = 0.108), which in turn experienced higher survival than fawns in areas that had received no habitat treatments (S = 0.669, SE = 0.113). Our study provides evidence that habitat management on winter ranges can positively influence a key vital rate for mule deer in pinyon pine-Utah juniper ecosystems. We recommend that as habitat treatments are planned for benefit of mule deer, those plans include follow-up reseeding and weed control efforts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-541X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1937-2817</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.683</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JWMAA9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bethesda, MD: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Anthropogenic factors ; Applied ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chemical treatment ; Colorado ; Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife ; Deer ; Encroachment ; fawn survival ; Fawns ; Forest habitats ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Habitat conservation ; Habitat improvement ; habitat management ; Habitat Relations ; Habitats ; hydro-axe ; Juniperus osteosperma ; Mass ; Mule deer ; Odocoileus hemionus ; Parametric models ; Pinus ; roller-chop ; Survival ; Survival rates ; Weed control ; Wildlife conservation ; Wildlife habitats ; Wildlife management ; Winter ; Woodlands</subject><ispartof>The Journal of wildlife management, 2014-04, Vol.78 (3), p.448-455</ispartof><rights>Copyright© 2014 The Wildlife Society</rights><rights>The Wildlife Society, 2014</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3833-393eb310917f3f69e7d1fdbb9427716b63501ad5835a2c478f3e107f553b29043</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/43188164$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/43188164$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=28469417$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bergman, Eric J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bishop, Chad J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freddy, David J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Gary C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doherty Jr, Paul F.</creatorcontrib><title>Habitat management influences overwinter survival of mule deer fawns in Colorado</title><title>The Journal of wildlife management</title><addtitle>Jour. Wild. Mgmt</addtitle><description>In the absence of natural or anthropogenic disturbance, many pinyon pine (Pinus edulis)-Utah juniper (Juniperus osteosperma) woodland habitats reach late serai stages that encroach into forest openings. This encroachment typically occurs at the expense of browse species that are preferred by mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus). Wildlife managers often treat habitat management as a tool to bolster mule deer populations, but documented changes in deer vital rates in response to habitat manipulations are lacking. We evaluated the effects of different levels of habitat improvement on pinyon pine-Utah juniper winter ranges in Colorado on mule deer overwinter survival. Mule deer fawns that overwintered on areas that received both a traditional mechanical treatment as well as follow-up chemical treatments experienced increased survival (Ŝ = 0.768, SE = 0.0851) over fawns on winter range that had only received traditional mechanical treatments or no habitat treatments (Ŝ = 0.675, SE = 0.112). When treatment intensity was partitioned into 3 levels: no treatment, traditional mechanical treatments, and advanced treatments comprised of both mechanical and chemical treatments, mule deer fawns inhabiting winter range subjected to advanced treatments experienced higher survival (Ŝ = 0.768, SE = 0.0849) than fawns on units that experienced only traditional mechanical treatments (Ŝ = 0.687, SE = 0.108), which in turn experienced higher survival than fawns in areas that had received no habitat treatments (S = 0.669, SE = 0.113). Our study provides evidence that habitat management on winter ranges can positively influence a key vital rate for mule deer in pinyon pine-Utah juniper ecosystems. We recommend that as habitat treatments are planned for benefit of mule deer, those plans include follow-up reseeding and weed control efforts.</description><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Anthropogenic factors</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chemical treatment</subject><subject>Colorado</subject><subject>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</subject><subject>Deer</subject><subject>Encroachment</subject><subject>fawn survival</subject><subject>Fawns</subject><subject>Forest habitats</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Habitat conservation</subject><subject>Habitat improvement</subject><subject>habitat management</subject><subject>Habitat Relations</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>hydro-axe</subject><subject>Juniperus osteosperma</subject><subject>Mass</subject><subject>Mule deer</subject><subject>Odocoileus hemionus</subject><subject>Parametric models</subject><subject>Pinus</subject><subject>roller-chop</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Survival rates</subject><subject>Weed control</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><subject>Wildlife habitats</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><subject>Winter</subject><subject>Woodlands</subject><issn>0022-541X</issn><issn>1937-2817</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpd0F2L1DAUBuAgCo6r4B8QCiJ4092cnOajlzrorO74caGMeBPSNlk6pumatDPuvzfDLLOwVwfyPucQXkJeAj0HStnFdj9cnwuFj8gCapQlUyAfk0WOWMkr-PWUPEtpSykCKLEg3y9N009mKgYTzLUdbJiKPjg_29DaVIw7G_d9mGws0hx3_c74YnTFMHtbdDa_OrMPKW8Uy9GP0XTjc_LEGZ_si7t5Rn5-_PBjeVmuv60-Ld-tyxYVYok12gaB1iAdOlFb2YHrmqaumJQgGoGcgum4Qm5YW0nl0AKVjnNsWE0rPCNvj3dv4vh3tmnSQ59a670JdpyTBs4oSgaUZfr6Ad2Ocwz5d1kBFapGflBv7pRJrfEumtD2Sd_EfjDxVjNViboCmV15dPve29tTDlQf-teH_nXuX3_efFnlmf2ro9-maYwnXyEoBaK6v9enyf475Sb-0UKi5HrzdaUprt__3qyv9BL_A-p1kWk</recordid><startdate>201404</startdate><enddate>201404</enddate><creator>Bergman, Eric J.</creator><creator>Bishop, Chad J.</creator><creator>Freddy, David J.</creator><creator>White, Gary C.</creator><creator>Doherty Jr, Paul F.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>Wildlife Society</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201404</creationdate><title>Habitat management influences overwinter survival of mule deer fawns in Colorado</title><author>Bergman, Eric J. ; Bishop, Chad J. ; Freddy, David J. ; White, Gary C. ; Doherty Jr, Paul F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3833-393eb310917f3f69e7d1fdbb9427716b63501ad5835a2c478f3e107f553b29043</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Anthropogenic factors</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chemical treatment</topic><topic>Colorado</topic><topic>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</topic><topic>Deer</topic><topic>Encroachment</topic><topic>fawn survival</topic><topic>Fawns</topic><topic>Forest habitats</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Habitat conservation</topic><topic>Habitat improvement</topic><topic>habitat management</topic><topic>Habitat Relations</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>hydro-axe</topic><topic>Juniperus osteosperma</topic><topic>Mass</topic><topic>Mule deer</topic><topic>Odocoileus hemionus</topic><topic>Parametric models</topic><topic>Pinus</topic><topic>roller-chop</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Survival rates</topic><topic>Weed control</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><topic>Wildlife habitats</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><topic>Winter</topic><topic>Woodlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bergman, Eric J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bishop, Chad J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freddy, David J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Gary C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doherty Jr, Paul F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bergman, Eric J.</au><au>Bishop, Chad J.</au><au>Freddy, David J.</au><au>White, Gary C.</au><au>Doherty Jr, Paul F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Habitat management influences overwinter survival of mule deer fawns in Colorado</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle><addtitle>Jour. Wild. Mgmt</addtitle><date>2014-04</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>78</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>448</spage><epage>455</epage><pages>448-455</pages><issn>0022-541X</issn><eissn>1937-2817</eissn><coden>JWMAA9</coden><abstract>In the absence of natural or anthropogenic disturbance, many pinyon pine (Pinus edulis)-Utah juniper (Juniperus osteosperma) woodland habitats reach late serai stages that encroach into forest openings. This encroachment typically occurs at the expense of browse species that are preferred by mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus). Wildlife managers often treat habitat management as a tool to bolster mule deer populations, but documented changes in deer vital rates in response to habitat manipulations are lacking. We evaluated the effects of different levels of habitat improvement on pinyon pine-Utah juniper winter ranges in Colorado on mule deer overwinter survival. Mule deer fawns that overwintered on areas that received both a traditional mechanical treatment as well as follow-up chemical treatments experienced increased survival (Ŝ = 0.768, SE = 0.0851) over fawns on winter range that had only received traditional mechanical treatments or no habitat treatments (Ŝ = 0.675, SE = 0.112). When treatment intensity was partitioned into 3 levels: no treatment, traditional mechanical treatments, and advanced treatments comprised of both mechanical and chemical treatments, mule deer fawns inhabiting winter range subjected to advanced treatments experienced higher survival (Ŝ = 0.768, SE = 0.0849) than fawns on units that experienced only traditional mechanical treatments (Ŝ = 0.687, SE = 0.108), which in turn experienced higher survival than fawns in areas that had received no habitat treatments (S = 0.669, SE = 0.113). Our study provides evidence that habitat management on winter ranges can positively influence a key vital rate for mule deer in pinyon pine-Utah juniper ecosystems. We recommend that as habitat treatments are planned for benefit of mule deer, those plans include follow-up reseeding and weed control efforts.</abstract><cop>Bethesda, MD</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/jwmg.683</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-541X |
ispartof | The Journal of wildlife management, 2014-04, Vol.78 (3), p.448-455 |
issn | 0022-541X 1937-2817 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1520372102 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library; Jstor Complete Legacy |
subjects | Animal, plant and microbial ecology Anthropogenic factors Applied ecology Biological and medical sciences Chemical treatment Colorado Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife Deer Encroachment fawn survival Fawns Forest habitats Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General aspects Habitat conservation Habitat improvement habitat management Habitat Relations Habitats hydro-axe Juniperus osteosperma Mass Mule deer Odocoileus hemionus Parametric models Pinus roller-chop Survival Survival rates Weed control Wildlife conservation Wildlife habitats Wildlife management Winter Woodlands |
title | Habitat management influences overwinter survival of mule deer fawns in Colorado |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T17%3A14%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Habitat%20management%20influences%20overwinter%20survival%20of%20mule%20deer%20fawns%20in%20Colorado&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20wildlife%20management&rft.au=Bergman,%20Eric%20J.&rft.date=2014-04&rft.volume=78&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=448&rft.epage=455&rft.pages=448-455&rft.issn=0022-541X&rft.eissn=1937-2817&rft.coden=JWMAA9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jwmg.683&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E43188164%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1510689352&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=43188164&rfr_iscdi=true |