Habitat management influences overwinter survival of mule deer fawns in Colorado

In the absence of natural or anthropogenic disturbance, many pinyon pine (Pinus edulis)-Utah juniper (Juniperus osteosperma) woodland habitats reach late serai stages that encroach into forest openings. This encroachment typically occurs at the expense of browse species that are preferred by mule de...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of wildlife management 2014-04, Vol.78 (3), p.448-455
Hauptverfasser: Bergman, Eric J., Bishop, Chad J., Freddy, David J., White, Gary C., Doherty Jr, Paul F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 455
container_issue 3
container_start_page 448
container_title The Journal of wildlife management
container_volume 78
creator Bergman, Eric J.
Bishop, Chad J.
Freddy, David J.
White, Gary C.
Doherty Jr, Paul F.
description In the absence of natural or anthropogenic disturbance, many pinyon pine (Pinus edulis)-Utah juniper (Juniperus osteosperma) woodland habitats reach late serai stages that encroach into forest openings. This encroachment typically occurs at the expense of browse species that are preferred by mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus). Wildlife managers often treat habitat management as a tool to bolster mule deer populations, but documented changes in deer vital rates in response to habitat manipulations are lacking. We evaluated the effects of different levels of habitat improvement on pinyon pine-Utah juniper winter ranges in Colorado on mule deer overwinter survival. Mule deer fawns that overwintered on areas that received both a traditional mechanical treatment as well as follow-up chemical treatments experienced increased survival (Ŝ = 0.768, SE = 0.0851) over fawns on winter range that had only received traditional mechanical treatments or no habitat treatments (Ŝ = 0.675, SE = 0.112). When treatment intensity was partitioned into 3 levels: no treatment, traditional mechanical treatments, and advanced treatments comprised of both mechanical and chemical treatments, mule deer fawns inhabiting winter range subjected to advanced treatments experienced higher survival (Ŝ = 0.768, SE = 0.0849) than fawns on units that experienced only traditional mechanical treatments (Ŝ = 0.687, SE = 0.108), which in turn experienced higher survival than fawns in areas that had received no habitat treatments (S = 0.669, SE = 0.113). Our study provides evidence that habitat management on winter ranges can positively influence a key vital rate for mule deer in pinyon pine-Utah juniper ecosystems. We recommend that as habitat treatments are planned for benefit of mule deer, those plans include follow-up reseeding and weed control efforts.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jwmg.683
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1520372102</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>43188164</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>43188164</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3833-393eb310917f3f69e7d1fdbb9427716b63501ad5835a2c478f3e107f553b29043</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0F2L1DAUBuAgCo6r4B8QCiJ4092cnOajlzrorO74caGMeBPSNlk6pumatDPuvzfDLLOwVwfyPucQXkJeAj0HStnFdj9cnwuFj8gCapQlUyAfk0WOWMkr-PWUPEtpSykCKLEg3y9N009mKgYTzLUdbJiKPjg_29DaVIw7G_d9mGws0hx3_c74YnTFMHtbdDa_OrMPKW8Uy9GP0XTjc_LEGZ_si7t5Rn5-_PBjeVmuv60-Ld-tyxYVYok12gaB1iAdOlFb2YHrmqaumJQgGoGcgum4Qm5YW0nl0AKVjnNsWE0rPCNvj3dv4vh3tmnSQ59a670JdpyTBs4oSgaUZfr6Ad2Ocwz5d1kBFapGflBv7pRJrfEumtD2Sd_EfjDxVjNViboCmV15dPve29tTDlQf-teH_nXuX3_efFnlmf2ro9-maYwnXyEoBaK6v9enyf475Sb-0UKi5HrzdaUprt__3qyv9BL_A-p1kWk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1510689352</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Habitat management influences overwinter survival of mule deer fawns in Colorado</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Bergman, Eric J. ; Bishop, Chad J. ; Freddy, David J. ; White, Gary C. ; Doherty Jr, Paul F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bergman, Eric J. ; Bishop, Chad J. ; Freddy, David J. ; White, Gary C. ; Doherty Jr, Paul F.</creatorcontrib><description>In the absence of natural or anthropogenic disturbance, many pinyon pine (Pinus edulis)-Utah juniper (Juniperus osteosperma) woodland habitats reach late serai stages that encroach into forest openings. This encroachment typically occurs at the expense of browse species that are preferred by mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus). Wildlife managers often treat habitat management as a tool to bolster mule deer populations, but documented changes in deer vital rates in response to habitat manipulations are lacking. We evaluated the effects of different levels of habitat improvement on pinyon pine-Utah juniper winter ranges in Colorado on mule deer overwinter survival. Mule deer fawns that overwintered on areas that received both a traditional mechanical treatment as well as follow-up chemical treatments experienced increased survival (Ŝ = 0.768, SE = 0.0851) over fawns on winter range that had only received traditional mechanical treatments or no habitat treatments (Ŝ = 0.675, SE = 0.112). When treatment intensity was partitioned into 3 levels: no treatment, traditional mechanical treatments, and advanced treatments comprised of both mechanical and chemical treatments, mule deer fawns inhabiting winter range subjected to advanced treatments experienced higher survival (Ŝ = 0.768, SE = 0.0849) than fawns on units that experienced only traditional mechanical treatments (Ŝ = 0.687, SE = 0.108), which in turn experienced higher survival than fawns in areas that had received no habitat treatments (S = 0.669, SE = 0.113). Our study provides evidence that habitat management on winter ranges can positively influence a key vital rate for mule deer in pinyon pine-Utah juniper ecosystems. We recommend that as habitat treatments are planned for benefit of mule deer, those plans include follow-up reseeding and weed control efforts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-541X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1937-2817</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.683</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JWMAA9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bethesda, MD: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Anthropogenic factors ; Applied ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chemical treatment ; Colorado ; Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife ; Deer ; Encroachment ; fawn survival ; Fawns ; Forest habitats ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Habitat conservation ; Habitat improvement ; habitat management ; Habitat Relations ; Habitats ; hydro-axe ; Juniperus osteosperma ; Mass ; Mule deer ; Odocoileus hemionus ; Parametric models ; Pinus ; roller-chop ; Survival ; Survival rates ; Weed control ; Wildlife conservation ; Wildlife habitats ; Wildlife management ; Winter ; Woodlands</subject><ispartof>The Journal of wildlife management, 2014-04, Vol.78 (3), p.448-455</ispartof><rights>Copyright© 2014 The Wildlife Society</rights><rights>The Wildlife Society, 2014</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3833-393eb310917f3f69e7d1fdbb9427716b63501ad5835a2c478f3e107f553b29043</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/43188164$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/43188164$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=28469417$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bergman, Eric J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bishop, Chad J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freddy, David J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Gary C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doherty Jr, Paul F.</creatorcontrib><title>Habitat management influences overwinter survival of mule deer fawns in Colorado</title><title>The Journal of wildlife management</title><addtitle>Jour. Wild. Mgmt</addtitle><description>In the absence of natural or anthropogenic disturbance, many pinyon pine (Pinus edulis)-Utah juniper (Juniperus osteosperma) woodland habitats reach late serai stages that encroach into forest openings. This encroachment typically occurs at the expense of browse species that are preferred by mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus). Wildlife managers often treat habitat management as a tool to bolster mule deer populations, but documented changes in deer vital rates in response to habitat manipulations are lacking. We evaluated the effects of different levels of habitat improvement on pinyon pine-Utah juniper winter ranges in Colorado on mule deer overwinter survival. Mule deer fawns that overwintered on areas that received both a traditional mechanical treatment as well as follow-up chemical treatments experienced increased survival (Ŝ = 0.768, SE = 0.0851) over fawns on winter range that had only received traditional mechanical treatments or no habitat treatments (Ŝ = 0.675, SE = 0.112). When treatment intensity was partitioned into 3 levels: no treatment, traditional mechanical treatments, and advanced treatments comprised of both mechanical and chemical treatments, mule deer fawns inhabiting winter range subjected to advanced treatments experienced higher survival (Ŝ = 0.768, SE = 0.0849) than fawns on units that experienced only traditional mechanical treatments (Ŝ = 0.687, SE = 0.108), which in turn experienced higher survival than fawns in areas that had received no habitat treatments (S = 0.669, SE = 0.113). Our study provides evidence that habitat management on winter ranges can positively influence a key vital rate for mule deer in pinyon pine-Utah juniper ecosystems. We recommend that as habitat treatments are planned for benefit of mule deer, those plans include follow-up reseeding and weed control efforts.</description><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Anthropogenic factors</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chemical treatment</subject><subject>Colorado</subject><subject>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</subject><subject>Deer</subject><subject>Encroachment</subject><subject>fawn survival</subject><subject>Fawns</subject><subject>Forest habitats</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Habitat conservation</subject><subject>Habitat improvement</subject><subject>habitat management</subject><subject>Habitat Relations</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>hydro-axe</subject><subject>Juniperus osteosperma</subject><subject>Mass</subject><subject>Mule deer</subject><subject>Odocoileus hemionus</subject><subject>Parametric models</subject><subject>Pinus</subject><subject>roller-chop</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Survival rates</subject><subject>Weed control</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><subject>Wildlife habitats</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><subject>Winter</subject><subject>Woodlands</subject><issn>0022-541X</issn><issn>1937-2817</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpd0F2L1DAUBuAgCo6r4B8QCiJ4092cnOajlzrorO74caGMeBPSNlk6pumatDPuvzfDLLOwVwfyPucQXkJeAj0HStnFdj9cnwuFj8gCapQlUyAfk0WOWMkr-PWUPEtpSykCKLEg3y9N009mKgYTzLUdbJiKPjg_29DaVIw7G_d9mGws0hx3_c74YnTFMHtbdDa_OrMPKW8Uy9GP0XTjc_LEGZ_si7t5Rn5-_PBjeVmuv60-Ld-tyxYVYok12gaB1iAdOlFb2YHrmqaumJQgGoGcgum4Qm5YW0nl0AKVjnNsWE0rPCNvj3dv4vh3tmnSQ59a670JdpyTBs4oSgaUZfr6Ad2Ocwz5d1kBFapGflBv7pRJrfEumtD2Sd_EfjDxVjNViboCmV15dPve29tTDlQf-teH_nXuX3_efFnlmf2ro9-maYwnXyEoBaK6v9enyf475Sb-0UKi5HrzdaUprt__3qyv9BL_A-p1kWk</recordid><startdate>201404</startdate><enddate>201404</enddate><creator>Bergman, Eric J.</creator><creator>Bishop, Chad J.</creator><creator>Freddy, David J.</creator><creator>White, Gary C.</creator><creator>Doherty Jr, Paul F.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>Wildlife Society</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201404</creationdate><title>Habitat management influences overwinter survival of mule deer fawns in Colorado</title><author>Bergman, Eric J. ; Bishop, Chad J. ; Freddy, David J. ; White, Gary C. ; Doherty Jr, Paul F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3833-393eb310917f3f69e7d1fdbb9427716b63501ad5835a2c478f3e107f553b29043</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Anthropogenic factors</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chemical treatment</topic><topic>Colorado</topic><topic>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</topic><topic>Deer</topic><topic>Encroachment</topic><topic>fawn survival</topic><topic>Fawns</topic><topic>Forest habitats</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Habitat conservation</topic><topic>Habitat improvement</topic><topic>habitat management</topic><topic>Habitat Relations</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>hydro-axe</topic><topic>Juniperus osteosperma</topic><topic>Mass</topic><topic>Mule deer</topic><topic>Odocoileus hemionus</topic><topic>Parametric models</topic><topic>Pinus</topic><topic>roller-chop</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Survival rates</topic><topic>Weed control</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><topic>Wildlife habitats</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><topic>Winter</topic><topic>Woodlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bergman, Eric J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bishop, Chad J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freddy, David J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Gary C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doherty Jr, Paul F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bergman, Eric J.</au><au>Bishop, Chad J.</au><au>Freddy, David J.</au><au>White, Gary C.</au><au>Doherty Jr, Paul F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Habitat management influences overwinter survival of mule deer fawns in Colorado</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle><addtitle>Jour. Wild. Mgmt</addtitle><date>2014-04</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>78</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>448</spage><epage>455</epage><pages>448-455</pages><issn>0022-541X</issn><eissn>1937-2817</eissn><coden>JWMAA9</coden><abstract>In the absence of natural or anthropogenic disturbance, many pinyon pine (Pinus edulis)-Utah juniper (Juniperus osteosperma) woodland habitats reach late serai stages that encroach into forest openings. This encroachment typically occurs at the expense of browse species that are preferred by mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus). Wildlife managers often treat habitat management as a tool to bolster mule deer populations, but documented changes in deer vital rates in response to habitat manipulations are lacking. We evaluated the effects of different levels of habitat improvement on pinyon pine-Utah juniper winter ranges in Colorado on mule deer overwinter survival. Mule deer fawns that overwintered on areas that received both a traditional mechanical treatment as well as follow-up chemical treatments experienced increased survival (Ŝ = 0.768, SE = 0.0851) over fawns on winter range that had only received traditional mechanical treatments or no habitat treatments (Ŝ = 0.675, SE = 0.112). When treatment intensity was partitioned into 3 levels: no treatment, traditional mechanical treatments, and advanced treatments comprised of both mechanical and chemical treatments, mule deer fawns inhabiting winter range subjected to advanced treatments experienced higher survival (Ŝ = 0.768, SE = 0.0849) than fawns on units that experienced only traditional mechanical treatments (Ŝ = 0.687, SE = 0.108), which in turn experienced higher survival than fawns in areas that had received no habitat treatments (S = 0.669, SE = 0.113). Our study provides evidence that habitat management on winter ranges can positively influence a key vital rate for mule deer in pinyon pine-Utah juniper ecosystems. We recommend that as habitat treatments are planned for benefit of mule deer, those plans include follow-up reseeding and weed control efforts.</abstract><cop>Bethesda, MD</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/jwmg.683</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-541X
ispartof The Journal of wildlife management, 2014-04, Vol.78 (3), p.448-455
issn 0022-541X
1937-2817
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1520372102
source Access via Wiley Online Library; Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Anthropogenic factors
Applied ecology
Biological and medical sciences
Chemical treatment
Colorado
Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife
Deer
Encroachment
fawn survival
Fawns
Forest habitats
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General aspects
Habitat conservation
Habitat improvement
habitat management
Habitat Relations
Habitats
hydro-axe
Juniperus osteosperma
Mass
Mule deer
Odocoileus hemionus
Parametric models
Pinus
roller-chop
Survival
Survival rates
Weed control
Wildlife conservation
Wildlife habitats
Wildlife management
Winter
Woodlands
title Habitat management influences overwinter survival of mule deer fawns in Colorado
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T17%3A14%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Habitat%20management%20influences%20overwinter%20survival%20of%20mule%20deer%20fawns%20in%20Colorado&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20wildlife%20management&rft.au=Bergman,%20Eric%20J.&rft.date=2014-04&rft.volume=78&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=448&rft.epage=455&rft.pages=448-455&rft.issn=0022-541X&rft.eissn=1937-2817&rft.coden=JWMAA9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jwmg.683&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E43188164%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1510689352&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=43188164&rfr_iscdi=true