Beyond insecticides: new thinking on an ancient problem
Key Points Vector-borne diseases are on the rise globally. Although there have been some successes with vaccines and drug treatment, most of the current measures for limiting these diseases focus on vector control. Habitat modification, insecticides, bed nets, biopesticides and sterile-male releases...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Nature reviews. Microbiology 2013-03, Vol.11 (3), p.181-193 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 193 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 181 |
container_title | Nature reviews. Microbiology |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | McGraw, Elizabeth A. O'Neill, Scott L. |
description | Key Points
Vector-borne diseases are on the rise globally. Although there have been some successes with vaccines and drug treatment, most of the current measures for limiting these diseases focus on vector control.
Habitat modification, insecticides, bed nets, biopesticides and sterile-male releases have all been used in the past, with some efficacy. There are also several emerging technologies that rely on genetic modification of the vector or bacterial symbionts for biological control of the vector.
Genetic modification approaches include release of insects carrying a dominant lethal (RIDL), homing endonuclease genes (HEGs) and RNAi, with RIDL being the most progressed of these three approaches and currently in the stage of open-field releases. In this approach, mosquito populations are reduced by releasing males carrying a transgene that renders their female offspring flightless.
The insect endosymbiont
Wolbachia
is being developed for control via three potential pathways: releasing male mosquitoes that are mating-incompatible with wild-type female mosquitoes to reduce or eliminate populations, reducing the lifespan of the vector to reduce the number of insects able to transmit the disease, and reducing the ability of a range of pathogens to infect the insect. This latter approach is currently on trial in open-field release studies.
The roll out of all these methods will require substantial engagement with all stakeholders to ensure community and government support.
Each of the methods harbours risks around long-term stability and the evolution of resistance. These potential drawbacks will only truly be tested by monitoring the efficacy of the approaches following their implementation. As with other interventions, combinations of these approaches with more traditional control practices, such as the use of insecticides, vaccines and drug therapy, might offer the best solution for long-term disease control.
In addition to developing vaccines and drugs that target vector-borne diseases, historically the use of insecticides has been the main approach for targeting the vector itself. However, as McGraw and O'Neill describe in this Review, there has been substantial recent progress in developing alternative genetic and biological vector-control strategies.
Vector-borne disease is one of the greatest contributors to human mortality and morbidity throughout the tropics. Mosquito-transmitted diseases such as malaria, dengue, yellow fever and filariasis are the m |
doi_str_mv | 10.1038/nrmicro2968 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1520366727</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A320845185</galeid><sourcerecordid>A320845185</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-fb087f084681d001d2bc50d65c5998eb3a9599898d86168d9a2e6673142420e23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtLxDAUhYMoOj5W7qXgRtDRPJo0cTeKLxhwo-vSJrdjtE3HpEXm35syPkYRJIFcku_c5OQgtE_wKcFMnjnfWO1bqoRcQyOSpXhMOEvXv2oqttB2CM8YU84zuom2KEsJkYKNUHYBi9aZxLoAurPaGgjniYO3pHuy7sW6WdK6pBimtuC6ZO7bsoZmF21URR1g72PdQY_XVw-Xt-Pp_c3d5WQ61pziblyVWGYVlqmQxGBMDC01x0ZwzZWSULJCDYWSRgoipFEFBSEyRlKaUgyU7aCjZd9472sPocsbGzTUdeGg7UMe3WEWFTT7H6VSsvgzmEX08Bf63PbeRSORUpiSVBH1Tc2KGnLrqrbzhR6a5hNGoylOJI_U6R9UHAZiLq2Dysb9H4LjpSCGFoKHKp972xR-kROcD4nmK4lG-uDjqX3ZgPliPyOMwMkSCPHIzcCvePmj3zvq46cv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1290214919</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Beyond insecticides: new thinking on an ancient problem</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>Nature Journals Online</source><creator>McGraw, Elizabeth A. ; O'Neill, Scott L.</creator><creatorcontrib>McGraw, Elizabeth A. ; O'Neill, Scott L.</creatorcontrib><description>Key Points
Vector-borne diseases are on the rise globally. Although there have been some successes with vaccines and drug treatment, most of the current measures for limiting these diseases focus on vector control.
Habitat modification, insecticides, bed nets, biopesticides and sterile-male releases have all been used in the past, with some efficacy. There are also several emerging technologies that rely on genetic modification of the vector or bacterial symbionts for biological control of the vector.
Genetic modification approaches include release of insects carrying a dominant lethal (RIDL), homing endonuclease genes (HEGs) and RNAi, with RIDL being the most progressed of these three approaches and currently in the stage of open-field releases. In this approach, mosquito populations are reduced by releasing males carrying a transgene that renders their female offspring flightless.
The insect endosymbiont
Wolbachia
is being developed for control via three potential pathways: releasing male mosquitoes that are mating-incompatible with wild-type female mosquitoes to reduce or eliminate populations, reducing the lifespan of the vector to reduce the number of insects able to transmit the disease, and reducing the ability of a range of pathogens to infect the insect. This latter approach is currently on trial in open-field release studies.
The roll out of all these methods will require substantial engagement with all stakeholders to ensure community and government support.
Each of the methods harbours risks around long-term stability and the evolution of resistance. These potential drawbacks will only truly be tested by monitoring the efficacy of the approaches following their implementation. As with other interventions, combinations of these approaches with more traditional control practices, such as the use of insecticides, vaccines and drug therapy, might offer the best solution for long-term disease control.
In addition to developing vaccines and drugs that target vector-borne diseases, historically the use of insecticides has been the main approach for targeting the vector itself. However, as McGraw and O'Neill describe in this Review, there has been substantial recent progress in developing alternative genetic and biological vector-control strategies.
Vector-borne disease is one of the greatest contributors to human mortality and morbidity throughout the tropics. Mosquito-transmitted diseases such as malaria, dengue, yellow fever and filariasis are the main contributors to this burden. Although insecticides have historically been used to try to control vector populations, over the past 15 years, substantial progress has been made in developing alternative vector control strategies ranging from biocontrol methods through to genetic modification of wild insect populations. Here, we review recent advances concerning these strategies and consider the potential impediments to their deployment, including the challenges of obtaining regulatory approval and community acceptance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1740-1526</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1740-1534</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/nrmicro2968</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23411863</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>41 ; 631/326/2565/107 ; Animals ; Aquatic insects ; Biological control ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Causes of ; Chagas disease ; Dengue fever ; Disease transmission ; Distribution ; Drugs ; Encephalitis ; Genetic aspects ; Genetically modified organisms ; Health aspects ; Humans ; Infectious Diseases ; Insect Control - methods ; Insect Vectors ; Insecticides ; Life Sciences ; Malaria ; Medical Microbiology ; Microbiology ; Morbidity ; Mortality ; Mosquitoes ; Parasites ; Parasitic diseases ; Parasitology ; Regulatory approval ; review-article ; Tropical Climate ; Tropical diseases ; Tropical environments ; Vaccines ; Vector-borne diseases ; Vectors (Biology) ; Virology</subject><ispartof>Nature reviews. Microbiology, 2013-03, Vol.11 (3), p.181-193</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature Limited 2013</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2013 Nature Publishing Group</rights><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group Mar 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-fb087f084681d001d2bc50d65c5998eb3a9599898d86168d9a2e6673142420e23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-fb087f084681d001d2bc50d65c5998eb3a9599898d86168d9a2e6673142420e23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1038/nrmicro2968$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1038/nrmicro2968$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23411863$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McGraw, Elizabeth A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Neill, Scott L.</creatorcontrib><title>Beyond insecticides: new thinking on an ancient problem</title><title>Nature reviews. Microbiology</title><addtitle>Nat Rev Microbiol</addtitle><addtitle>Nat Rev Microbiol</addtitle><description>Key Points
Vector-borne diseases are on the rise globally. Although there have been some successes with vaccines and drug treatment, most of the current measures for limiting these diseases focus on vector control.
Habitat modification, insecticides, bed nets, biopesticides and sterile-male releases have all been used in the past, with some efficacy. There are also several emerging technologies that rely on genetic modification of the vector or bacterial symbionts for biological control of the vector.
Genetic modification approaches include release of insects carrying a dominant lethal (RIDL), homing endonuclease genes (HEGs) and RNAi, with RIDL being the most progressed of these three approaches and currently in the stage of open-field releases. In this approach, mosquito populations are reduced by releasing males carrying a transgene that renders their female offspring flightless.
The insect endosymbiont
Wolbachia
is being developed for control via three potential pathways: releasing male mosquitoes that are mating-incompatible with wild-type female mosquitoes to reduce or eliminate populations, reducing the lifespan of the vector to reduce the number of insects able to transmit the disease, and reducing the ability of a range of pathogens to infect the insect. This latter approach is currently on trial in open-field release studies.
The roll out of all these methods will require substantial engagement with all stakeholders to ensure community and government support.
Each of the methods harbours risks around long-term stability and the evolution of resistance. These potential drawbacks will only truly be tested by monitoring the efficacy of the approaches following their implementation. As with other interventions, combinations of these approaches with more traditional control practices, such as the use of insecticides, vaccines and drug therapy, might offer the best solution for long-term disease control.
In addition to developing vaccines and drugs that target vector-borne diseases, historically the use of insecticides has been the main approach for targeting the vector itself. However, as McGraw and O'Neill describe in this Review, there has been substantial recent progress in developing alternative genetic and biological vector-control strategies.
Vector-borne disease is one of the greatest contributors to human mortality and morbidity throughout the tropics. Mosquito-transmitted diseases such as malaria, dengue, yellow fever and filariasis are the main contributors to this burden. Although insecticides have historically been used to try to control vector populations, over the past 15 years, substantial progress has been made in developing alternative vector control strategies ranging from biocontrol methods through to genetic modification of wild insect populations. Here, we review recent advances concerning these strategies and consider the potential impediments to their deployment, including the challenges of obtaining regulatory approval and community acceptance.</description><subject>41</subject><subject>631/326/2565/107</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Aquatic insects</subject><subject>Biological control</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Causes of</subject><subject>Chagas disease</subject><subject>Dengue fever</subject><subject>Disease transmission</subject><subject>Distribution</subject><subject>Drugs</subject><subject>Encephalitis</subject><subject>Genetic aspects</subject><subject>Genetically modified organisms</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infectious Diseases</subject><subject>Insect Control - methods</subject><subject>Insect Vectors</subject><subject>Insecticides</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Malaria</subject><subject>Medical Microbiology</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Mosquitoes</subject><subject>Parasites</subject><subject>Parasitic diseases</subject><subject>Parasitology</subject><subject>Regulatory approval</subject><subject>review-article</subject><subject>Tropical Climate</subject><subject>Tropical diseases</subject><subject>Tropical environments</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><subject>Vector-borne diseases</subject><subject>Vectors (Biology)</subject><subject>Virology</subject><issn>1740-1526</issn><issn>1740-1534</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtLxDAUhYMoOj5W7qXgRtDRPJo0cTeKLxhwo-vSJrdjtE3HpEXm35syPkYRJIFcku_c5OQgtE_wKcFMnjnfWO1bqoRcQyOSpXhMOEvXv2oqttB2CM8YU84zuom2KEsJkYKNUHYBi9aZxLoAurPaGgjniYO3pHuy7sW6WdK6pBimtuC6ZO7bsoZmF21URR1g72PdQY_XVw-Xt-Pp_c3d5WQ61pziblyVWGYVlqmQxGBMDC01x0ZwzZWSULJCDYWSRgoipFEFBSEyRlKaUgyU7aCjZd9472sPocsbGzTUdeGg7UMe3WEWFTT7H6VSsvgzmEX08Bf63PbeRSORUpiSVBH1Tc2KGnLrqrbzhR6a5hNGoylOJI_U6R9UHAZiLq2Dysb9H4LjpSCGFoKHKp972xR-kROcD4nmK4lG-uDjqX3ZgPliPyOMwMkSCPHIzcCvePmj3zvq46cv</recordid><startdate>20130301</startdate><enddate>20130301</enddate><creator>McGraw, Elizabeth A.</creator><creator>O'Neill, Scott L.</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130301</creationdate><title>Beyond insecticides: new thinking on an ancient problem</title><author>McGraw, Elizabeth A. ; O'Neill, Scott L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-fb087f084681d001d2bc50d65c5998eb3a9599898d86168d9a2e6673142420e23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>41</topic><topic>631/326/2565/107</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Aquatic insects</topic><topic>Biological control</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Causes of</topic><topic>Chagas disease</topic><topic>Dengue fever</topic><topic>Disease transmission</topic><topic>Distribution</topic><topic>Drugs</topic><topic>Encephalitis</topic><topic>Genetic aspects</topic><topic>Genetically modified organisms</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infectious Diseases</topic><topic>Insect Control - methods</topic><topic>Insect Vectors</topic><topic>Insecticides</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Malaria</topic><topic>Medical Microbiology</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Mosquitoes</topic><topic>Parasites</topic><topic>Parasitic diseases</topic><topic>Parasitology</topic><topic>Regulatory approval</topic><topic>review-article</topic><topic>Tropical Climate</topic><topic>Tropical diseases</topic><topic>Tropical environments</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><topic>Vector-borne diseases</topic><topic>Vectors (Biology)</topic><topic>Virology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McGraw, Elizabeth A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Neill, Scott L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Nature reviews. Microbiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McGraw, Elizabeth A.</au><au>O'Neill, Scott L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Beyond insecticides: new thinking on an ancient problem</atitle><jtitle>Nature reviews. Microbiology</jtitle><stitle>Nat Rev Microbiol</stitle><addtitle>Nat Rev Microbiol</addtitle><date>2013-03-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>181</spage><epage>193</epage><pages>181-193</pages><issn>1740-1526</issn><eissn>1740-1534</eissn><abstract>Key Points
Vector-borne diseases are on the rise globally. Although there have been some successes with vaccines and drug treatment, most of the current measures for limiting these diseases focus on vector control.
Habitat modification, insecticides, bed nets, biopesticides and sterile-male releases have all been used in the past, with some efficacy. There are also several emerging technologies that rely on genetic modification of the vector or bacterial symbionts for biological control of the vector.
Genetic modification approaches include release of insects carrying a dominant lethal (RIDL), homing endonuclease genes (HEGs) and RNAi, with RIDL being the most progressed of these three approaches and currently in the stage of open-field releases. In this approach, mosquito populations are reduced by releasing males carrying a transgene that renders their female offspring flightless.
The insect endosymbiont
Wolbachia
is being developed for control via three potential pathways: releasing male mosquitoes that are mating-incompatible with wild-type female mosquitoes to reduce or eliminate populations, reducing the lifespan of the vector to reduce the number of insects able to transmit the disease, and reducing the ability of a range of pathogens to infect the insect. This latter approach is currently on trial in open-field release studies.
The roll out of all these methods will require substantial engagement with all stakeholders to ensure community and government support.
Each of the methods harbours risks around long-term stability and the evolution of resistance. These potential drawbacks will only truly be tested by monitoring the efficacy of the approaches following their implementation. As with other interventions, combinations of these approaches with more traditional control practices, such as the use of insecticides, vaccines and drug therapy, might offer the best solution for long-term disease control.
In addition to developing vaccines and drugs that target vector-borne diseases, historically the use of insecticides has been the main approach for targeting the vector itself. However, as McGraw and O'Neill describe in this Review, there has been substantial recent progress in developing alternative genetic and biological vector-control strategies.
Vector-borne disease is one of the greatest contributors to human mortality and morbidity throughout the tropics. Mosquito-transmitted diseases such as malaria, dengue, yellow fever and filariasis are the main contributors to this burden. Although insecticides have historically been used to try to control vector populations, over the past 15 years, substantial progress has been made in developing alternative vector control strategies ranging from biocontrol methods through to genetic modification of wild insect populations. Here, we review recent advances concerning these strategies and consider the potential impediments to their deployment, including the challenges of obtaining regulatory approval and community acceptance.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>23411863</pmid><doi>10.1038/nrmicro2968</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1740-1526 |
ispartof | Nature reviews. Microbiology, 2013-03, Vol.11 (3), p.181-193 |
issn | 1740-1526 1740-1534 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1520366727 |
source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; Nature Journals Online |
subjects | 41 631/326/2565/107 Animals Aquatic insects Biological control Biomedical and Life Sciences Causes of Chagas disease Dengue fever Disease transmission Distribution Drugs Encephalitis Genetic aspects Genetically modified organisms Health aspects Humans Infectious Diseases Insect Control - methods Insect Vectors Insecticides Life Sciences Malaria Medical Microbiology Microbiology Morbidity Mortality Mosquitoes Parasites Parasitic diseases Parasitology Regulatory approval review-article Tropical Climate Tropical diseases Tropical environments Vaccines Vector-borne diseases Vectors (Biology) Virology |
title | Beyond insecticides: new thinking on an ancient problem |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T21%3A11%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Beyond%20insecticides:%20new%20thinking%20on%20an%20ancient%20problem&rft.jtitle=Nature%20reviews.%20Microbiology&rft.au=McGraw,%20Elizabeth%20A.&rft.date=2013-03-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=181&rft.epage=193&rft.pages=181-193&rft.issn=1740-1526&rft.eissn=1740-1534&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/nrmicro2968&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA320845185%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1290214919&rft_id=info:pmid/23411863&rft_galeid=A320845185&rfr_iscdi=true |