Geographical Information Systems (GIS) and Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods for the evaluation of solar farms locations: Case study in south-eastern Spain

This paper is based on the combination of a Geographic Information System (GIS) and tools or multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods in order to obtain the evaluation of the optimal placement of photovoltaic solar power plants in the area of Cartagena (Region of Murcia), in southeast Spain. Th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Renewable & sustainable energy reviews 2013-08, Vol.24, p.544-556
Hauptverfasser: Sánchez-Lozano, Juan M., Teruel-Solano, Jerónimo, Soto-Elvira, Pedro L., Socorro García-Cascales, M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 556
container_issue
container_start_page 544
container_title Renewable & sustainable energy reviews
container_volume 24
creator Sánchez-Lozano, Juan M.
Teruel-Solano, Jerónimo
Soto-Elvira, Pedro L.
Socorro García-Cascales, M.
description This paper is based on the combination of a Geographic Information System (GIS) and tools or multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods in order to obtain the evaluation of the optimal placement of photovoltaic solar power plants in the area of Cartagena (Region of Murcia), in southeast Spain. The combination GIS–MCDM generates an excellent analysis tool that allows for the creation of an extensive cartographic and alphanumeric database that will later be used by multi-criteria methodologies to simplify problems to solve and promote the use of multiple criteria. In GIS two types of criteria will be reflected: constraints or restrictive criteria, and weighting criteria or factors. Constraints or restrictive criteria will make it possible to reduce the area of study by discarding those areas that prevent the implementation of renewable energy plants. These criteria will be obtained from the legislation (planning regulations, protected areas, road networks, railways, waterways, mountains, etc). Weighting criteria or factors will be those which, according to the objective to be reached, influence the ability to solve a concrete alternative. The choice of such criteria is marked by the influence presented to the overall goal; in this case they will be location, geomorphological, environmental and climatic criteria. Through the use of MCDM the criteria or factors mentioned will be weighted in order to evaluate potential sites to locate a solar plant. Analysis and calculation of the weights of these factors will be conducted using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). The assessment of the alternatives according to their degree of adequacy is carried out through the TOPSIS method (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution).
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.rser.2013.03.019
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1520363012</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1364032113001780</els_id><sourcerecordid>1520363012</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-1cc0c42c34c64a588e849702798d21935e3ff92e1fc2f3b5e4d68c683a5f5cc13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1uEzEUhS0EEiXwAmzwBildTPDP_CI21bQNkRqxCF1bF8914jAzDranUp6I18RhKpZIV7JlfT736BxC3nO24oyXn44rH9CvBONyxdLw5gW54nXVZKxs2Mt0l2WeMSn4a_ImhCNjvKgreUV-r9HtPZwOVkNPN6NxfoBo3Uh35xBxCHS53uyuKYwd3U59tFnrbURvgd6ituFCbuGnHfd0uW1vt9d0wHhwXaBJicYDUnyCfpolnaHB9eCpAZ-Ue6f_vofPtIWANMSpO1M7JmiKhwwhGfDJyAns-Ja8MtAHfPd8Lsjj_d339mv28G29aW8eMi3rKmZca6ZzoWWuyxyKusY6byomqqbuBG9kgdKYRiA3Whj5o8C8K2td1hIKU2jN5YIsZ92Td78mDFENNmjsexjRTUHxQjBZSsZFQsWMau9C8GjUydsB_Flxpi6tqKO6tKIurSiWJhlYkI_P-hBS4sbDmFL891NUeSpMlIn7MHMGnIK9T8zjLgkVqTlRVsnEgnyZCUxxPNm0J2iLo8bOetRRdc7-z8gfK7-tmg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1520363012</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Geographical Information Systems (GIS) and Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods for the evaluation of solar farms locations: Case study in south-eastern Spain</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Sánchez-Lozano, Juan M. ; Teruel-Solano, Jerónimo ; Soto-Elvira, Pedro L. ; Socorro García-Cascales, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sánchez-Lozano, Juan M. ; Teruel-Solano, Jerónimo ; Soto-Elvira, Pedro L. ; Socorro García-Cascales, M.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper is based on the combination of a Geographic Information System (GIS) and tools or multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods in order to obtain the evaluation of the optimal placement of photovoltaic solar power plants in the area of Cartagena (Region of Murcia), in southeast Spain. The combination GIS–MCDM generates an excellent analysis tool that allows for the creation of an extensive cartographic and alphanumeric database that will later be used by multi-criteria methodologies to simplify problems to solve and promote the use of multiple criteria. In GIS two types of criteria will be reflected: constraints or restrictive criteria, and weighting criteria or factors. Constraints or restrictive criteria will make it possible to reduce the area of study by discarding those areas that prevent the implementation of renewable energy plants. These criteria will be obtained from the legislation (planning regulations, protected areas, road networks, railways, waterways, mountains, etc). Weighting criteria or factors will be those which, according to the objective to be reached, influence the ability to solve a concrete alternative. The choice of such criteria is marked by the influence presented to the overall goal; in this case they will be location, geomorphological, environmental and climatic criteria. Through the use of MCDM the criteria or factors mentioned will be weighted in order to evaluate potential sites to locate a solar plant. Analysis and calculation of the weights of these factors will be conducted using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). The assessment of the alternatives according to their degree of adequacy is carried out through the TOPSIS method (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1364-0321</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0690</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2013.03.019</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) ; Applied sciences ; case studies ; conservation areas ; Energy ; Exact sciences and technology ; farms ; geographic information systems ; Geographic Information Systems (GIS) ; laws and regulations ; mountains ; multi-criteria decision making ; Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) ; Natural energy ; Optimization locations ; Photovoltaic conversion ; Photovoltaic plants ; Photovoltaic power plants ; planning ; power plants ; railroads ; Solar energy ; Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) ; waterways</subject><ispartof>Renewable &amp; sustainable energy reviews, 2013-08, Vol.24, p.544-556</ispartof><rights>2013 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-1cc0c42c34c64a588e849702798d21935e3ff92e1fc2f3b5e4d68c683a5f5cc13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-1cc0c42c34c64a588e849702798d21935e3ff92e1fc2f3b5e4d68c683a5f5cc13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.03.019$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27929,27930,46000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=27406926$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sánchez-Lozano, Juan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teruel-Solano, Jerónimo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soto-Elvira, Pedro L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Socorro García-Cascales, M.</creatorcontrib><title>Geographical Information Systems (GIS) and Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods for the evaluation of solar farms locations: Case study in south-eastern Spain</title><title>Renewable &amp; sustainable energy reviews</title><description>This paper is based on the combination of a Geographic Information System (GIS) and tools or multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods in order to obtain the evaluation of the optimal placement of photovoltaic solar power plants in the area of Cartagena (Region of Murcia), in southeast Spain. The combination GIS–MCDM generates an excellent analysis tool that allows for the creation of an extensive cartographic and alphanumeric database that will later be used by multi-criteria methodologies to simplify problems to solve and promote the use of multiple criteria. In GIS two types of criteria will be reflected: constraints or restrictive criteria, and weighting criteria or factors. Constraints or restrictive criteria will make it possible to reduce the area of study by discarding those areas that prevent the implementation of renewable energy plants. These criteria will be obtained from the legislation (planning regulations, protected areas, road networks, railways, waterways, mountains, etc). Weighting criteria or factors will be those which, according to the objective to be reached, influence the ability to solve a concrete alternative. The choice of such criteria is marked by the influence presented to the overall goal; in this case they will be location, geomorphological, environmental and climatic criteria. Through the use of MCDM the criteria or factors mentioned will be weighted in order to evaluate potential sites to locate a solar plant. Analysis and calculation of the weights of these factors will be conducted using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). The assessment of the alternatives according to their degree of adequacy is carried out through the TOPSIS method (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution).</description><subject>Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>case studies</subject><subject>conservation areas</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>farms</subject><subject>geographic information systems</subject><subject>Geographic Information Systems (GIS)</subject><subject>laws and regulations</subject><subject>mountains</subject><subject>multi-criteria decision making</subject><subject>Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM)</subject><subject>Natural energy</subject><subject>Optimization locations</subject><subject>Photovoltaic conversion</subject><subject>Photovoltaic plants</subject><subject>Photovoltaic power plants</subject><subject>planning</subject><subject>power plants</subject><subject>railroads</subject><subject>Solar energy</subject><subject>Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS)</subject><subject>waterways</subject><issn>1364-0321</issn><issn>1879-0690</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc1uEzEUhS0EEiXwAmzwBildTPDP_CI21bQNkRqxCF1bF8914jAzDranUp6I18RhKpZIV7JlfT736BxC3nO24oyXn44rH9CvBONyxdLw5gW54nXVZKxs2Mt0l2WeMSn4a_ImhCNjvKgreUV-r9HtPZwOVkNPN6NxfoBo3Uh35xBxCHS53uyuKYwd3U59tFnrbURvgd6ituFCbuGnHfd0uW1vt9d0wHhwXaBJicYDUnyCfpolnaHB9eCpAZ-Ue6f_vofPtIWANMSpO1M7JmiKhwwhGfDJyAns-Ja8MtAHfPd8Lsjj_d339mv28G29aW8eMi3rKmZca6ZzoWWuyxyKusY6byomqqbuBG9kgdKYRiA3Whj5o8C8K2td1hIKU2jN5YIsZ92Td78mDFENNmjsexjRTUHxQjBZSsZFQsWMau9C8GjUydsB_Flxpi6tqKO6tKIurSiWJhlYkI_P-hBS4sbDmFL891NUeSpMlIn7MHMGnIK9T8zjLgkVqTlRVsnEgnyZCUxxPNm0J2iLo8bOetRRdc7-z8gfK7-tmg</recordid><startdate>20130801</startdate><enddate>20130801</enddate><creator>Sánchez-Lozano, Juan M.</creator><creator>Teruel-Solano, Jerónimo</creator><creator>Soto-Elvira, Pedro L.</creator><creator>Socorro García-Cascales, M.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130801</creationdate><title>Geographical Information Systems (GIS) and Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods for the evaluation of solar farms locations: Case study in south-eastern Spain</title><author>Sánchez-Lozano, Juan M. ; Teruel-Solano, Jerónimo ; Soto-Elvira, Pedro L. ; Socorro García-Cascales, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-1cc0c42c34c64a588e849702798d21935e3ff92e1fc2f3b5e4d68c683a5f5cc13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>case studies</topic><topic>conservation areas</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>farms</topic><topic>geographic information systems</topic><topic>Geographic Information Systems (GIS)</topic><topic>laws and regulations</topic><topic>mountains</topic><topic>multi-criteria decision making</topic><topic>Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM)</topic><topic>Natural energy</topic><topic>Optimization locations</topic><topic>Photovoltaic conversion</topic><topic>Photovoltaic plants</topic><topic>Photovoltaic power plants</topic><topic>planning</topic><topic>power plants</topic><topic>railroads</topic><topic>Solar energy</topic><topic>Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS)</topic><topic>waterways</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sánchez-Lozano, Juan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teruel-Solano, Jerónimo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soto-Elvira, Pedro L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Socorro García-Cascales, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Renewable &amp; sustainable energy reviews</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sánchez-Lozano, Juan M.</au><au>Teruel-Solano, Jerónimo</au><au>Soto-Elvira, Pedro L.</au><au>Socorro García-Cascales, M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Geographical Information Systems (GIS) and Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods for the evaluation of solar farms locations: Case study in south-eastern Spain</atitle><jtitle>Renewable &amp; sustainable energy reviews</jtitle><date>2013-08-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>24</volume><spage>544</spage><epage>556</epage><pages>544-556</pages><issn>1364-0321</issn><eissn>1879-0690</eissn><abstract>This paper is based on the combination of a Geographic Information System (GIS) and tools or multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods in order to obtain the evaluation of the optimal placement of photovoltaic solar power plants in the area of Cartagena (Region of Murcia), in southeast Spain. The combination GIS–MCDM generates an excellent analysis tool that allows for the creation of an extensive cartographic and alphanumeric database that will later be used by multi-criteria methodologies to simplify problems to solve and promote the use of multiple criteria. In GIS two types of criteria will be reflected: constraints or restrictive criteria, and weighting criteria or factors. Constraints or restrictive criteria will make it possible to reduce the area of study by discarding those areas that prevent the implementation of renewable energy plants. These criteria will be obtained from the legislation (planning regulations, protected areas, road networks, railways, waterways, mountains, etc). Weighting criteria or factors will be those which, according to the objective to be reached, influence the ability to solve a concrete alternative. The choice of such criteria is marked by the influence presented to the overall goal; in this case they will be location, geomorphological, environmental and climatic criteria. Through the use of MCDM the criteria or factors mentioned will be weighted in order to evaluate potential sites to locate a solar plant. Analysis and calculation of the weights of these factors will be conducted using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). The assessment of the alternatives according to their degree of adequacy is carried out through the TOPSIS method (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution).</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.rser.2013.03.019</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1364-0321
ispartof Renewable & sustainable energy reviews, 2013-08, Vol.24, p.544-556
issn 1364-0321
1879-0690
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1520363012
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)
Applied sciences
case studies
conservation areas
Energy
Exact sciences and technology
farms
geographic information systems
Geographic Information Systems (GIS)
laws and regulations
mountains
multi-criteria decision making
Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM)
Natural energy
Optimization locations
Photovoltaic conversion
Photovoltaic plants
Photovoltaic power plants
planning
power plants
railroads
Solar energy
Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS)
waterways
title Geographical Information Systems (GIS) and Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods for the evaluation of solar farms locations: Case study in south-eastern Spain
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T17%3A11%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Geographical%20Information%20Systems%20(GIS)%20and%20Multi-Criteria%20Decision%20Making%20(MCDM)%20methods%20for%20the%20evaluation%20of%20solar%20farms%20locations:%20Case%20study%20in%20south-eastern%20Spain&rft.jtitle=Renewable%20&%20sustainable%20energy%20reviews&rft.au=S%C3%A1nchez-Lozano,%20Juan%20M.&rft.date=2013-08-01&rft.volume=24&rft.spage=544&rft.epage=556&rft.pages=544-556&rft.issn=1364-0321&rft.eissn=1879-0690&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.rser.2013.03.019&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1520363012%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1520363012&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1364032113001780&rfr_iscdi=true