The Relative Risk of Invasion: Evaluation of Miscanthus × giganteus Seed Establishment

The sterile hybrid, giant miscanthus, has emerged as a promising cellulosic bioenergy crop because of its rapid growth rate, high biomass yields, and tolerance to poor growing conditions; these are traits that are desirable for cultivation, but also have caused concern for their contribution to inva...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Invasive plant science and management 2014-01, Vol.7 (1), p.93-106
Hauptverfasser: Smith, Larissa L, Barney, Jacob N
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 106
container_issue 1
container_start_page 93
container_title Invasive plant science and management
container_volume 7
creator Smith, Larissa L
Barney, Jacob N
description The sterile hybrid, giant miscanthus, has emerged as a promising cellulosic bioenergy crop because of its rapid growth rate, high biomass yields, and tolerance to poor growing conditions; these are traits that are desirable for cultivation, but also have caused concern for their contribution to invasiveness. New seed-bearing lines of giant miscanthus would decrease establishment costs for growers, yet this previously unresearched propagule source increases fears of escape from cultivation. To evaluate the consequences of seed escape, we compared seedling establishment among seven habitats: no-till agricultural field, agricultural field edge, forest understory, forest edge, riparian, pasture and roadside; these were replicated in Virginia (Blacksburg and Virginia Beach) and Georgia (Tifton), USA. We use a novel head-to-head comparison of giant miscanthus against five invasive and three noninvasive species, thus generating relative comparisons. Overall seed germination was low, with no single species achieving germination rates >37%, in all habitats and geographies. However, habitats with available bare ground and low resident plant competition, such as the agricultural field and forest understory, were more invasible by all species. Giant miscanthus seeds emerged in the roadside and forest edge habitats at all sites. Early in the growing season, we observed significantly more seedlings of giant miscanthus than the invasive and noninvasive species in the agricultural field. Interestingly, overall seedling mortality of giant miscanthus was 99.9%, with only a single 4 cm (1.58 in) tall giant miscanthus seedling surviving at the conclusion of the 6-mo study. The ability to make relative comparisons, by using multiple control species, was necessary for our conclusions in which both giant miscanthus and the noninvasive control species survival (≤1%) contrasted with that of our well-documented invasive species (≤10%). Considering the low overall emergence, increased propagule pressure may be necessary to increase the possibility of giant miscanthus escape. Knowledge gained from our results may help prepare for widespread commercialization, while helping to identify susceptible habitats to seedling establishment and aiding in the development of management protocols. Nomenclature: Giant miscanthus, Miscanthus × giganteus J. M. Greef and Deuter ex Hodk. and Renvoize. Management Implications: There is tremendous concern about exotic bioenergy crops escaping cultivatio
doi_str_mv 10.1614/IPSM-D-13-00051.1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1520362788</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1614_IPSM_D_13_00051_1</cupid><sourcerecordid>3274118481</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b329t-a35821c4bec13dd8b72857e807b18c671208d452ad36509476cd1c9a344858173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkM1KAzEUhYMoqNUHcOWAGzejufkfd6JVC4piFd2FzEzaRqeTOpkp-CQ-kC9mahXEhbjKucl3Tw4HoR3AByCAHQ5uhlfpaQo0xRhzOIAVtAEZzVLJ5OPqtyYZrKPNEJ4wFliIbAM93E1scmsr07p5FC48J36UDOq5Cc7XR0l_bqouPvp6cX_lQmHqdtKF5P0tGbtxHGwchtaWST-0Jq9cmExt3W6htZGpgt3-Onvo_qx_d3KRXl6fD06OL9OckqxNDeWKQMFyWwAtS5VLori0CsscVCEkEKxKxokpqeA4Y1IUJRSZoYwprkDSHtpf-s4a_9LZ0OppzGirytTWd0EDJ5gKIpWK6N4v9Ml3TR3TRQq4YJhLEilYUkXjQ2jsSM8aNzXNqwasF1XrRdX6VAPVn1VH0UO7y52R8dqMGxf0_ZBgEBEgLGM8EvTL1UzzxpVj--PzP3wPl1u58762_0jyAQb0mLs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1515640572</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Relative Risk of Invasion: Evaluation of Miscanthus × giganteus Seed Establishment</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Smith, Larissa L ; Barney, Jacob N</creator><creatorcontrib>Smith, Larissa L ; Barney, Jacob N</creatorcontrib><description>The sterile hybrid, giant miscanthus, has emerged as a promising cellulosic bioenergy crop because of its rapid growth rate, high biomass yields, and tolerance to poor growing conditions; these are traits that are desirable for cultivation, but also have caused concern for their contribution to invasiveness. New seed-bearing lines of giant miscanthus would decrease establishment costs for growers, yet this previously unresearched propagule source increases fears of escape from cultivation. To evaluate the consequences of seed escape, we compared seedling establishment among seven habitats: no-till agricultural field, agricultural field edge, forest understory, forest edge, riparian, pasture and roadside; these were replicated in Virginia (Blacksburg and Virginia Beach) and Georgia (Tifton), USA. We use a novel head-to-head comparison of giant miscanthus against five invasive and three noninvasive species, thus generating relative comparisons. Overall seed germination was low, with no single species achieving germination rates &gt;37%, in all habitats and geographies. However, habitats with available bare ground and low resident plant competition, such as the agricultural field and forest understory, were more invasible by all species. Giant miscanthus seeds emerged in the roadside and forest edge habitats at all sites. Early in the growing season, we observed significantly more seedlings of giant miscanthus than the invasive and noninvasive species in the agricultural field. Interestingly, overall seedling mortality of giant miscanthus was 99.9%, with only a single 4 cm (1.58 in) tall giant miscanthus seedling surviving at the conclusion of the 6-mo study. The ability to make relative comparisons, by using multiple control species, was necessary for our conclusions in which both giant miscanthus and the noninvasive control species survival (≤1%) contrasted with that of our well-documented invasive species (≤10%). Considering the low overall emergence, increased propagule pressure may be necessary to increase the possibility of giant miscanthus escape. Knowledge gained from our results may help prepare for widespread commercialization, while helping to identify susceptible habitats to seedling establishment and aiding in the development of management protocols. Nomenclature: Giant miscanthus, Miscanthus × giganteus J. M. Greef and Deuter ex Hodk. and Renvoize. Management Implications: There is tremendous concern about exotic bioenergy crops escaping cultivation and becoming invasive species. One such crop, the sterile hybrid Miscanthus × giganteus, possesses many desirable agronomic traits, but is expensive to plant. Newly developed fertile lines add a previously under-researched source of wind-dispersed propagules, increasing the chance for establishment outside cultivated fields. Contrary to previous studies of M. × giganteus drought tolerance using vegetative propagules, we found much lower survival of seedlings in dry environments. Of the seven habitats we examined, those with more bare ground and low competition from resident vegetation were more susceptible to invasion. Low competition environments and adequate seed to soil contact is important for seed germination. While M. × giganteus did not exhibit the same ability to establish (one of 16,000 introduced seeds survived 6 mo) as other well-known invasive species we examined, the ability of this species to produce as many as 2.5 billion spikelets ha−1 yr−1, increases the chance of successful establishment. Based on our findings, M. × giganteus is less likely to be problematic in conventional agricultural fields subject to tillage or herbicide applications. Scouting areas near production fields or along transport routes, especially those with low resident plant competition, may help detect young plants when management is relatively easy. Low light environments did not deter seedling emergence of M. × giganteus, and therefore should not be overlooked. Young seedlings of M. × giganteus appear to have high seedling mortality rates, especially when subjected to environmental stress. However, identification of even small populations, at an early age, could be critical for effective eradication as once plants become established and develop extensive rhizomes, management is likely to be much more difficult.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1939-7291</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1939-747X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-747X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1614/IPSM-D-13-00051.1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>810 East 10th Street, Lawrence, KS 66044-8897: Weed Science Society of America</publisher><subject>Agricultural land ; agronomic traits ; Bioenergy ; biofuel ; biomass ; Cloning ; commercialization ; controlled introduction ; Crops ; Cultivation ; drought tolerance ; dry environmental conditions ; edge effects ; Energy crops ; giant miscanthus ; growers ; Growing season ; habitat susceptibility ; habitats ; hybrids ; inflorescences ; invasibility ; invasive species ; Miscanthus ; mortality ; no-tillage ; Nonnative species ; Pasture ; pastures ; pesticide application ; plant competition ; Raw materials ; relative risk ; rhizomes ; Risk assessment ; seed germination ; seedling emergence ; Seedlings ; Seeds ; Understory ; vegetation</subject><ispartof>Invasive plant science and management, 2014-01, Vol.7 (1), p.93-106</ispartof><rights>Weed Science Society of America</rights><rights>Copyright © Weed Science Society of America</rights><rights>Copyright Allen Press Publishing Services Jan-Mar 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b329t-a35821c4bec13dd8b72857e807b18c671208d452ad36509476cd1c9a344858173</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b329t-a35821c4bec13dd8b72857e807b18c671208d452ad36509476cd1c9a344858173</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1939729100003618/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,27903,27904,55606</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smith, Larissa L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barney, Jacob N</creatorcontrib><title>The Relative Risk of Invasion: Evaluation of Miscanthus × giganteus Seed Establishment</title><title>Invasive plant science and management</title><addtitle>Invasive plant sci. manag</addtitle><description>The sterile hybrid, giant miscanthus, has emerged as a promising cellulosic bioenergy crop because of its rapid growth rate, high biomass yields, and tolerance to poor growing conditions; these are traits that are desirable for cultivation, but also have caused concern for their contribution to invasiveness. New seed-bearing lines of giant miscanthus would decrease establishment costs for growers, yet this previously unresearched propagule source increases fears of escape from cultivation. To evaluate the consequences of seed escape, we compared seedling establishment among seven habitats: no-till agricultural field, agricultural field edge, forest understory, forest edge, riparian, pasture and roadside; these were replicated in Virginia (Blacksburg and Virginia Beach) and Georgia (Tifton), USA. We use a novel head-to-head comparison of giant miscanthus against five invasive and three noninvasive species, thus generating relative comparisons. Overall seed germination was low, with no single species achieving germination rates &gt;37%, in all habitats and geographies. However, habitats with available bare ground and low resident plant competition, such as the agricultural field and forest understory, were more invasible by all species. Giant miscanthus seeds emerged in the roadside and forest edge habitats at all sites. Early in the growing season, we observed significantly more seedlings of giant miscanthus than the invasive and noninvasive species in the agricultural field. Interestingly, overall seedling mortality of giant miscanthus was 99.9%, with only a single 4 cm (1.58 in) tall giant miscanthus seedling surviving at the conclusion of the 6-mo study. The ability to make relative comparisons, by using multiple control species, was necessary for our conclusions in which both giant miscanthus and the noninvasive control species survival (≤1%) contrasted with that of our well-documented invasive species (≤10%). Considering the low overall emergence, increased propagule pressure may be necessary to increase the possibility of giant miscanthus escape. Knowledge gained from our results may help prepare for widespread commercialization, while helping to identify susceptible habitats to seedling establishment and aiding in the development of management protocols. Nomenclature: Giant miscanthus, Miscanthus × giganteus J. M. Greef and Deuter ex Hodk. and Renvoize. Management Implications: There is tremendous concern about exotic bioenergy crops escaping cultivation and becoming invasive species. One such crop, the sterile hybrid Miscanthus × giganteus, possesses many desirable agronomic traits, but is expensive to plant. Newly developed fertile lines add a previously under-researched source of wind-dispersed propagules, increasing the chance for establishment outside cultivated fields. Contrary to previous studies of M. × giganteus drought tolerance using vegetative propagules, we found much lower survival of seedlings in dry environments. Of the seven habitats we examined, those with more bare ground and low competition from resident vegetation were more susceptible to invasion. Low competition environments and adequate seed to soil contact is important for seed germination. While M. × giganteus did not exhibit the same ability to establish (one of 16,000 introduced seeds survived 6 mo) as other well-known invasive species we examined, the ability of this species to produce as many as 2.5 billion spikelets ha−1 yr−1, increases the chance of successful establishment. Based on our findings, M. × giganteus is less likely to be problematic in conventional agricultural fields subject to tillage or herbicide applications. Scouting areas near production fields or along transport routes, especially those with low resident plant competition, may help detect young plants when management is relatively easy. Low light environments did not deter seedling emergence of M. × giganteus, and therefore should not be overlooked. Young seedlings of M. × giganteus appear to have high seedling mortality rates, especially when subjected to environmental stress. However, identification of even small populations, at an early age, could be critical for effective eradication as once plants become established and develop extensive rhizomes, management is likely to be much more difficult.</description><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>agronomic traits</subject><subject>Bioenergy</subject><subject>biofuel</subject><subject>biomass</subject><subject>Cloning</subject><subject>commercialization</subject><subject>controlled introduction</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Cultivation</subject><subject>drought tolerance</subject><subject>dry environmental conditions</subject><subject>edge effects</subject><subject>Energy crops</subject><subject>giant miscanthus</subject><subject>growers</subject><subject>Growing season</subject><subject>habitat susceptibility</subject><subject>habitats</subject><subject>hybrids</subject><subject>inflorescences</subject><subject>invasibility</subject><subject>invasive species</subject><subject>Miscanthus</subject><subject>mortality</subject><subject>no-tillage</subject><subject>Nonnative species</subject><subject>Pasture</subject><subject>pastures</subject><subject>pesticide application</subject><subject>plant competition</subject><subject>Raw materials</subject><subject>relative risk</subject><subject>rhizomes</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>seed germination</subject><subject>seedling emergence</subject><subject>Seedlings</subject><subject>Seeds</subject><subject>Understory</subject><subject>vegetation</subject><issn>1939-7291</issn><issn>1939-747X</issn><issn>1939-747X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkM1KAzEUhYMoqNUHcOWAGzejufkfd6JVC4piFd2FzEzaRqeTOpkp-CQ-kC9mahXEhbjKucl3Tw4HoR3AByCAHQ5uhlfpaQo0xRhzOIAVtAEZzVLJ5OPqtyYZrKPNEJ4wFliIbAM93E1scmsr07p5FC48J36UDOq5Cc7XR0l_bqouPvp6cX_lQmHqdtKF5P0tGbtxHGwchtaWST-0Jq9cmExt3W6htZGpgt3-Onvo_qx_d3KRXl6fD06OL9OckqxNDeWKQMFyWwAtS5VLori0CsscVCEkEKxKxokpqeA4Y1IUJRSZoYwprkDSHtpf-s4a_9LZ0OppzGirytTWd0EDJ5gKIpWK6N4v9Ml3TR3TRQq4YJhLEilYUkXjQ2jsSM8aNzXNqwasF1XrRdX6VAPVn1VH0UO7y52R8dqMGxf0_ZBgEBEgLGM8EvTL1UzzxpVj--PzP3wPl1u58762_0jyAQb0mLs</recordid><startdate>201401</startdate><enddate>201401</enddate><creator>Smith, Larissa L</creator><creator>Barney, Jacob N</creator><general>Weed Science Society of America</general><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201401</creationdate><title>The Relative Risk of Invasion: Evaluation of Miscanthus × giganteus Seed Establishment</title><author>Smith, Larissa L ; Barney, Jacob N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b329t-a35821c4bec13dd8b72857e807b18c671208d452ad36509476cd1c9a344858173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>agronomic traits</topic><topic>Bioenergy</topic><topic>biofuel</topic><topic>biomass</topic><topic>Cloning</topic><topic>commercialization</topic><topic>controlled introduction</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Cultivation</topic><topic>drought tolerance</topic><topic>dry environmental conditions</topic><topic>edge effects</topic><topic>Energy crops</topic><topic>giant miscanthus</topic><topic>growers</topic><topic>Growing season</topic><topic>habitat susceptibility</topic><topic>habitats</topic><topic>hybrids</topic><topic>inflorescences</topic><topic>invasibility</topic><topic>invasive species</topic><topic>Miscanthus</topic><topic>mortality</topic><topic>no-tillage</topic><topic>Nonnative species</topic><topic>Pasture</topic><topic>pastures</topic><topic>pesticide application</topic><topic>plant competition</topic><topic>Raw materials</topic><topic>relative risk</topic><topic>rhizomes</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>seed germination</topic><topic>seedling emergence</topic><topic>Seedlings</topic><topic>Seeds</topic><topic>Understory</topic><topic>vegetation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smith, Larissa L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barney, Jacob N</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Invasive plant science and management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smith, Larissa L</au><au>Barney, Jacob N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Relative Risk of Invasion: Evaluation of Miscanthus × giganteus Seed Establishment</atitle><jtitle>Invasive plant science and management</jtitle><addtitle>Invasive plant sci. manag</addtitle><date>2014-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>93</spage><epage>106</epage><pages>93-106</pages><issn>1939-7291</issn><issn>1939-747X</issn><eissn>1939-747X</eissn><abstract>The sterile hybrid, giant miscanthus, has emerged as a promising cellulosic bioenergy crop because of its rapid growth rate, high biomass yields, and tolerance to poor growing conditions; these are traits that are desirable for cultivation, but also have caused concern for their contribution to invasiveness. New seed-bearing lines of giant miscanthus would decrease establishment costs for growers, yet this previously unresearched propagule source increases fears of escape from cultivation. To evaluate the consequences of seed escape, we compared seedling establishment among seven habitats: no-till agricultural field, agricultural field edge, forest understory, forest edge, riparian, pasture and roadside; these were replicated in Virginia (Blacksburg and Virginia Beach) and Georgia (Tifton), USA. We use a novel head-to-head comparison of giant miscanthus against five invasive and three noninvasive species, thus generating relative comparisons. Overall seed germination was low, with no single species achieving germination rates &gt;37%, in all habitats and geographies. However, habitats with available bare ground and low resident plant competition, such as the agricultural field and forest understory, were more invasible by all species. Giant miscanthus seeds emerged in the roadside and forest edge habitats at all sites. Early in the growing season, we observed significantly more seedlings of giant miscanthus than the invasive and noninvasive species in the agricultural field. Interestingly, overall seedling mortality of giant miscanthus was 99.9%, with only a single 4 cm (1.58 in) tall giant miscanthus seedling surviving at the conclusion of the 6-mo study. The ability to make relative comparisons, by using multiple control species, was necessary for our conclusions in which both giant miscanthus and the noninvasive control species survival (≤1%) contrasted with that of our well-documented invasive species (≤10%). Considering the low overall emergence, increased propagule pressure may be necessary to increase the possibility of giant miscanthus escape. Knowledge gained from our results may help prepare for widespread commercialization, while helping to identify susceptible habitats to seedling establishment and aiding in the development of management protocols. Nomenclature: Giant miscanthus, Miscanthus × giganteus J. M. Greef and Deuter ex Hodk. and Renvoize. Management Implications: There is tremendous concern about exotic bioenergy crops escaping cultivation and becoming invasive species. One such crop, the sterile hybrid Miscanthus × giganteus, possesses many desirable agronomic traits, but is expensive to plant. Newly developed fertile lines add a previously under-researched source of wind-dispersed propagules, increasing the chance for establishment outside cultivated fields. Contrary to previous studies of M. × giganteus drought tolerance using vegetative propagules, we found much lower survival of seedlings in dry environments. Of the seven habitats we examined, those with more bare ground and low competition from resident vegetation were more susceptible to invasion. Low competition environments and adequate seed to soil contact is important for seed germination. While M. × giganteus did not exhibit the same ability to establish (one of 16,000 introduced seeds survived 6 mo) as other well-known invasive species we examined, the ability of this species to produce as many as 2.5 billion spikelets ha−1 yr−1, increases the chance of successful establishment. Based on our findings, M. × giganteus is less likely to be problematic in conventional agricultural fields subject to tillage or herbicide applications. Scouting areas near production fields or along transport routes, especially those with low resident plant competition, may help detect young plants when management is relatively easy. Low light environments did not deter seedling emergence of M. × giganteus, and therefore should not be overlooked. Young seedlings of M. × giganteus appear to have high seedling mortality rates, especially when subjected to environmental stress. However, identification of even small populations, at an early age, could be critical for effective eradication as once plants become established and develop extensive rhizomes, management is likely to be much more difficult.</abstract><cop>810 East 10th Street, Lawrence, KS 66044-8897</cop><pub>Weed Science Society of America</pub><doi>10.1614/IPSM-D-13-00051.1</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1939-7291
ispartof Invasive plant science and management, 2014-01, Vol.7 (1), p.93-106
issn 1939-7291
1939-747X
1939-747X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1520362788
source Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects Agricultural land
agronomic traits
Bioenergy
biofuel
biomass
Cloning
commercialization
controlled introduction
Crops
Cultivation
drought tolerance
dry environmental conditions
edge effects
Energy crops
giant miscanthus
growers
Growing season
habitat susceptibility
habitats
hybrids
inflorescences
invasibility
invasive species
Miscanthus
mortality
no-tillage
Nonnative species
Pasture
pastures
pesticide application
plant competition
Raw materials
relative risk
rhizomes
Risk assessment
seed germination
seedling emergence
Seedlings
Seeds
Understory
vegetation
title The Relative Risk of Invasion: Evaluation of Miscanthus × giganteus Seed Establishment
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T05%3A21%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Relative%20Risk%20of%20Invasion:%20Evaluation%20of%20Miscanthus%20%C3%97%20giganteus%20Seed%20Establishment&rft.jtitle=Invasive%20plant%20science%20and%20management&rft.au=Smith,%20Larissa%20L&rft.date=2014-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=93&rft.epage=106&rft.pages=93-106&rft.issn=1939-7291&rft.eissn=1939-747X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1614/IPSM-D-13-00051.1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3274118481%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1515640572&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1614_IPSM_D_13_00051_1&rfr_iscdi=true