Growth performance of immunologically castrated (with Improvest) barrows (with or without ractopamine) compared to gilt, physically castrated barrow, and intact male pigs
The study used a randomized complete block design (blocking factor was date of start on test) with 5 treatments: 1) physically castrated barrows (PC), 2) intact males (IM), 3) gilts (G), 4) immunologically castrated barrows (IC), and 5) immunologically castrated barrows fed ractopamine at 5 mg/kg (I...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of animal science 2014-05, Vol.92 (5), p.2289-2295 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2295 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 2289 |
container_title | Journal of animal science |
container_volume | 92 |
creator | Puls, C L Rojo, A Ellis, M Boler, D D McKeith, F K Killefer, J Gaines, A M Matzat, P D Schroeder, A L |
description | The study used a randomized complete block design (blocking factor was date of start on test) with 5 treatments: 1) physically castrated barrows (PC), 2) intact males (IM), 3) gilts (G), 4) immunologically castrated barrows (IC), and 5) immunologically castrated barrows fed ractopamine at 5 mg/kg (IC+RAC). The study used 192 pigs and was performed from the 16 wk of age (67.2 ± 2.52 kg BW) to a pen mean BW of 132.5 ± 3.60 kg. For IC+RAC, ractopamine was fed for the final 23 d of the study. Pigs were housed in groups of 4 (10 groups for PC, IM, G, and IC and 8 groups for IC+RAC) in a finishing building at a floor space of 1.18 m(2)/pig. Diets were formulated to meet requirements of IM except that the diet for the IC+RAC fed during the ractopamine feeding period was formulated to meet requirements of pigs on that treatment. Pigs had ad libitum access to feed and water throughout the study period and were individually weighed at the start, wk 2 and 4, and subsequently every week until the end of study. For the overall study period, IC had greater (P ≤ 0.05) ADG than the other genders (1,150, 1,024, 1,064, and 954 g/d for IC, PC, IM, and G, respectively; SEM = 25.8) and required fewer days to reach slaughter weight than the other genders (58.1, 61.6, 61.6, and 66.5 d for IC, PC, IM, and G, respectively; SEM = 1.26). Overall ADFI was less (P ≤ 0.05) for IM and G than IC and PC, which were similar (P > 0.05) in this respect (3.11, 3.06, 2.68, and 2.75 kg/d for IC, PC, IM, and G, respectively; SEM = 0.061). Overall G:F was greater (P ≤ 0.05) for IM than the other genders; IC had greater overall G:F than PC and G, which were similar in this respect (0.371, 0.335, 0.397, and 0.347 kg/kg for IC, PC, IM, and G, respectively; SEM = 0.0068). Immunologically castrated barrows had greater (P ≤ 0.05) ADG (30.7%) and ADFI (22.5%) than PC from the second week following the second Improvest dose to the end of the study. During the ractopamine feeding period, IC+RAC had greater (P ≤ 0.05) ADG (11.6%) and G:F (17.3%) than IC. The results of this study confirmed previously observed gender differences and effects of ractopamine on growth performance and that IC grew faster and had greater feed efficiency than PC during the study period. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2527/jas.2013-6861 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1520354614</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3340807311</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-98c599d54f375610ae483fb1ebc33218d7ef4dc02c20998003f2e61b63f429fd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkU1v2yAYgFG1qcnSHnetkHZJpDjlw2BznKquqxRpl_VsYQwpkTEu4EX5S_2VI0q2w3Z6Dzw84uUB4DNGG8JIdb-XcUMQpgWvOb4Cc8wIKyjm9AOYI0RwUdeYzMCnGPcIYcIEuwYzUvIKs4rPwftT8If0CkcdjA9ODkpDb6B1bhp873dWyb4_QiVjCjLpDi4PNuPPbgz-l45pBVsZsiJeDnyAp-mnBINUyY_S2UGvoPJulCHfTx7ubJ_WcHw9xv_sZ9kayqGDdkjZAJ3sNRztLt6Aj0b2Ud9e5gK8fHv8-fC92P54en74ui0UFTgVolZMiI6VhlaMYyR1WVPTYt0qSgmuu0qbslOIKIKEqBGihmiOW05NSYTp6AIsz9684tuUd2ycjUr3vRy0n2KTfxhRVnJcZvTLP-jeT2HIr8sUrURFaGYXoDhTKvgYgzbNGKyT4dhg1JwiNjlic4rYnCJm_u5inVqnu7_0n2r0NwU6mrM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1537972320</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Growth performance of immunologically castrated (with Improvest) barrows (with or without ractopamine) compared to gilt, physically castrated barrow, and intact male pigs</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Puls, C L ; Rojo, A ; Ellis, M ; Boler, D D ; McKeith, F K ; Killefer, J ; Gaines, A M ; Matzat, P D ; Schroeder, A L</creator><creatorcontrib>Puls, C L ; Rojo, A ; Ellis, M ; Boler, D D ; McKeith, F K ; Killefer, J ; Gaines, A M ; Matzat, P D ; Schroeder, A L</creatorcontrib><description>The study used a randomized complete block design (blocking factor was date of start on test) with 5 treatments: 1) physically castrated barrows (PC), 2) intact males (IM), 3) gilts (G), 4) immunologically castrated barrows (IC), and 5) immunologically castrated barrows fed ractopamine at 5 mg/kg (IC+RAC). The study used 192 pigs and was performed from the 16 wk of age (67.2 ± 2.52 kg BW) to a pen mean BW of 132.5 ± 3.60 kg. For IC+RAC, ractopamine was fed for the final 23 d of the study. Pigs were housed in groups of 4 (10 groups for PC, IM, G, and IC and 8 groups for IC+RAC) in a finishing building at a floor space of 1.18 m(2)/pig. Diets were formulated to meet requirements of IM except that the diet for the IC+RAC fed during the ractopamine feeding period was formulated to meet requirements of pigs on that treatment. Pigs had ad libitum access to feed and water throughout the study period and were individually weighed at the start, wk 2 and 4, and subsequently every week until the end of study. For the overall study period, IC had greater (P ≤ 0.05) ADG than the other genders (1,150, 1,024, 1,064, and 954 g/d for IC, PC, IM, and G, respectively; SEM = 25.8) and required fewer days to reach slaughter weight than the other genders (58.1, 61.6, 61.6, and 66.5 d for IC, PC, IM, and G, respectively; SEM = 1.26). Overall ADFI was less (P ≤ 0.05) for IM and G than IC and PC, which were similar (P > 0.05) in this respect (3.11, 3.06, 2.68, and 2.75 kg/d for IC, PC, IM, and G, respectively; SEM = 0.061). Overall G:F was greater (P ≤ 0.05) for IM than the other genders; IC had greater overall G:F than PC and G, which were similar in this respect (0.371, 0.335, 0.397, and 0.347 kg/kg for IC, PC, IM, and G, respectively; SEM = 0.0068). Immunologically castrated barrows had greater (P ≤ 0.05) ADG (30.7%) and ADFI (22.5%) than PC from the second week following the second Improvest dose to the end of the study. During the ractopamine feeding period, IC+RAC had greater (P ≤ 0.05) ADG (11.6%) and G:F (17.3%) than IC. The results of this study confirmed previously observed gender differences and effects of ractopamine on growth performance and that IC grew faster and had greater feed efficiency than PC during the study period.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2527/jas.2013-6861</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24671576</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adrenergic beta-Agonists - pharmacology ; Animal Feed - analysis ; Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena ; Animal sciences ; Animals ; Castration ; Diet - veterinary ; Female ; Hogs ; Male ; Orchiectomy - methods ; Orchiectomy - veterinary ; Phenethylamines - pharmacology ; Physical growth ; Sex Factors ; Swine - growth & development ; Vaccines, Contraceptive - immunology</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 2014-05, Vol.92 (5), p.2289-2295</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Society of Animal Science May 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-98c599d54f375610ae483fb1ebc33218d7ef4dc02c20998003f2e61b63f429fd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-98c599d54f375610ae483fb1ebc33218d7ef4dc02c20998003f2e61b63f429fd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24671576$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Puls, C L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rojo, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellis, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boler, D D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKeith, F K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Killefer, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaines, A M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matzat, P D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schroeder, A L</creatorcontrib><title>Growth performance of immunologically castrated (with Improvest) barrows (with or without ractopamine) compared to gilt, physically castrated barrow, and intact male pigs</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><addtitle>J Anim Sci</addtitle><description>The study used a randomized complete block design (blocking factor was date of start on test) with 5 treatments: 1) physically castrated barrows (PC), 2) intact males (IM), 3) gilts (G), 4) immunologically castrated barrows (IC), and 5) immunologically castrated barrows fed ractopamine at 5 mg/kg (IC+RAC). The study used 192 pigs and was performed from the 16 wk of age (67.2 ± 2.52 kg BW) to a pen mean BW of 132.5 ± 3.60 kg. For IC+RAC, ractopamine was fed for the final 23 d of the study. Pigs were housed in groups of 4 (10 groups for PC, IM, G, and IC and 8 groups for IC+RAC) in a finishing building at a floor space of 1.18 m(2)/pig. Diets were formulated to meet requirements of IM except that the diet for the IC+RAC fed during the ractopamine feeding period was formulated to meet requirements of pigs on that treatment. Pigs had ad libitum access to feed and water throughout the study period and were individually weighed at the start, wk 2 and 4, and subsequently every week until the end of study. For the overall study period, IC had greater (P ≤ 0.05) ADG than the other genders (1,150, 1,024, 1,064, and 954 g/d for IC, PC, IM, and G, respectively; SEM = 25.8) and required fewer days to reach slaughter weight than the other genders (58.1, 61.6, 61.6, and 66.5 d for IC, PC, IM, and G, respectively; SEM = 1.26). Overall ADFI was less (P ≤ 0.05) for IM and G than IC and PC, which were similar (P > 0.05) in this respect (3.11, 3.06, 2.68, and 2.75 kg/d for IC, PC, IM, and G, respectively; SEM = 0.061). Overall G:F was greater (P ≤ 0.05) for IM than the other genders; IC had greater overall G:F than PC and G, which were similar in this respect (0.371, 0.335, 0.397, and 0.347 kg/kg for IC, PC, IM, and G, respectively; SEM = 0.0068). Immunologically castrated barrows had greater (P ≤ 0.05) ADG (30.7%) and ADFI (22.5%) than PC from the second week following the second Improvest dose to the end of the study. During the ractopamine feeding period, IC+RAC had greater (P ≤ 0.05) ADG (11.6%) and G:F (17.3%) than IC. The results of this study confirmed previously observed gender differences and effects of ractopamine on growth performance and that IC grew faster and had greater feed efficiency than PC during the study period.</description><subject>Adrenergic beta-Agonists - pharmacology</subject><subject>Animal Feed - analysis</subject><subject>Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena</subject><subject>Animal sciences</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Castration</subject><subject>Diet - veterinary</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hogs</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Orchiectomy - methods</subject><subject>Orchiectomy - veterinary</subject><subject>Phenethylamines - pharmacology</subject><subject>Physical growth</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>Swine - growth & development</subject><subject>Vaccines, Contraceptive - immunology</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNplkU1v2yAYgFG1qcnSHnetkHZJpDjlw2BznKquqxRpl_VsYQwpkTEu4EX5S_2VI0q2w3Z6Dzw84uUB4DNGG8JIdb-XcUMQpgWvOb4Cc8wIKyjm9AOYI0RwUdeYzMCnGPcIYcIEuwYzUvIKs4rPwftT8If0CkcdjA9ODkpDb6B1bhp873dWyb4_QiVjCjLpDi4PNuPPbgz-l45pBVsZsiJeDnyAp-mnBINUyY_S2UGvoPJulCHfTx7ubJ_WcHw9xv_sZ9kayqGDdkjZAJ3sNRztLt6Aj0b2Ud9e5gK8fHv8-fC92P54en74ui0UFTgVolZMiI6VhlaMYyR1WVPTYt0qSgmuu0qbslOIKIKEqBGihmiOW05NSYTp6AIsz9684tuUd2ycjUr3vRy0n2KTfxhRVnJcZvTLP-jeT2HIr8sUrURFaGYXoDhTKvgYgzbNGKyT4dhg1JwiNjlic4rYnCJm_u5inVqnu7_0n2r0NwU6mrM</recordid><startdate>20140501</startdate><enddate>20140501</enddate><creator>Puls, C L</creator><creator>Rojo, A</creator><creator>Ellis, M</creator><creator>Boler, D D</creator><creator>McKeith, F K</creator><creator>Killefer, J</creator><creator>Gaines, A M</creator><creator>Matzat, P D</creator><creator>Schroeder, A L</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140501</creationdate><title>Growth performance of immunologically castrated (with Improvest) barrows (with or without ractopamine) compared to gilt, physically castrated barrow, and intact male pigs</title><author>Puls, C L ; Rojo, A ; Ellis, M ; Boler, D D ; McKeith, F K ; Killefer, J ; Gaines, A M ; Matzat, P D ; Schroeder, A L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-98c599d54f375610ae483fb1ebc33218d7ef4dc02c20998003f2e61b63f429fd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adrenergic beta-Agonists - pharmacology</topic><topic>Animal Feed - analysis</topic><topic>Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena</topic><topic>Animal sciences</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Castration</topic><topic>Diet - veterinary</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hogs</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Orchiectomy - methods</topic><topic>Orchiectomy - veterinary</topic><topic>Phenethylamines - pharmacology</topic><topic>Physical growth</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>Swine - growth & development</topic><topic>Vaccines, Contraceptive - immunology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Puls, C L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rojo, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellis, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boler, D D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKeith, F K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Killefer, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaines, A M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matzat, P D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schroeder, A L</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Puls, C L</au><au>Rojo, A</au><au>Ellis, M</au><au>Boler, D D</au><au>McKeith, F K</au><au>Killefer, J</au><au>Gaines, A M</au><au>Matzat, P D</au><au>Schroeder, A L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Growth performance of immunologically castrated (with Improvest) barrows (with or without ractopamine) compared to gilt, physically castrated barrow, and intact male pigs</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><addtitle>J Anim Sci</addtitle><date>2014-05-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>92</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>2289</spage><epage>2295</epage><pages>2289-2295</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract>The study used a randomized complete block design (blocking factor was date of start on test) with 5 treatments: 1) physically castrated barrows (PC), 2) intact males (IM), 3) gilts (G), 4) immunologically castrated barrows (IC), and 5) immunologically castrated barrows fed ractopamine at 5 mg/kg (IC+RAC). The study used 192 pigs and was performed from the 16 wk of age (67.2 ± 2.52 kg BW) to a pen mean BW of 132.5 ± 3.60 kg. For IC+RAC, ractopamine was fed for the final 23 d of the study. Pigs were housed in groups of 4 (10 groups for PC, IM, G, and IC and 8 groups for IC+RAC) in a finishing building at a floor space of 1.18 m(2)/pig. Diets were formulated to meet requirements of IM except that the diet for the IC+RAC fed during the ractopamine feeding period was formulated to meet requirements of pigs on that treatment. Pigs had ad libitum access to feed and water throughout the study period and were individually weighed at the start, wk 2 and 4, and subsequently every week until the end of study. For the overall study period, IC had greater (P ≤ 0.05) ADG than the other genders (1,150, 1,024, 1,064, and 954 g/d for IC, PC, IM, and G, respectively; SEM = 25.8) and required fewer days to reach slaughter weight than the other genders (58.1, 61.6, 61.6, and 66.5 d for IC, PC, IM, and G, respectively; SEM = 1.26). Overall ADFI was less (P ≤ 0.05) for IM and G than IC and PC, which were similar (P > 0.05) in this respect (3.11, 3.06, 2.68, and 2.75 kg/d for IC, PC, IM, and G, respectively; SEM = 0.061). Overall G:F was greater (P ≤ 0.05) for IM than the other genders; IC had greater overall G:F than PC and G, which were similar in this respect (0.371, 0.335, 0.397, and 0.347 kg/kg for IC, PC, IM, and G, respectively; SEM = 0.0068). Immunologically castrated barrows had greater (P ≤ 0.05) ADG (30.7%) and ADFI (22.5%) than PC from the second week following the second Improvest dose to the end of the study. During the ractopamine feeding period, IC+RAC had greater (P ≤ 0.05) ADG (11.6%) and G:F (17.3%) than IC. The results of this study confirmed previously observed gender differences and effects of ractopamine on growth performance and that IC grew faster and had greater feed efficiency than PC during the study period.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>24671576</pmid><doi>10.2527/jas.2013-6861</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-8812 |
ispartof | Journal of animal science, 2014-05, Vol.92 (5), p.2289-2295 |
issn | 0021-8812 1525-3163 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1520354614 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE |
subjects | Adrenergic beta-Agonists - pharmacology Animal Feed - analysis Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena Animal sciences Animals Castration Diet - veterinary Female Hogs Male Orchiectomy - methods Orchiectomy - veterinary Phenethylamines - pharmacology Physical growth Sex Factors Swine - growth & development Vaccines, Contraceptive - immunology |
title | Growth performance of immunologically castrated (with Improvest) barrows (with or without ractopamine) compared to gilt, physically castrated barrow, and intact male pigs |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T13%3A09%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Growth%20performance%20of%20immunologically%20castrated%20(with%20Improvest)%20barrows%20(with%20or%20without%20ractopamine)%20compared%20to%20gilt,%20physically%20castrated%20barrow,%20and%20intact%20male%20pigs&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Puls,%20C%20L&rft.date=2014-05-01&rft.volume=92&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=2289&rft.epage=2295&rft.pages=2289-2295&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/10.2527/jas.2013-6861&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3340807311%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1537972320&rft_id=info:pmid/24671576&rfr_iscdi=true |