Abdominosacral resection: Long-term outcome in 86 patients with locally advanced or locally recurrent rectal cancer
Abstract Aims The purpose of this study is to evaluate the outcome of abdominosacral resections (ASR) in patients with locally advanced or recurrent rectal cancer. Methods From 1994 until 2012 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) and locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) underwent a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of surgical oncology 2014-06, Vol.40 (6), p.699-705 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 705 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 699 |
container_title | European journal of surgical oncology |
container_volume | 40 |
creator | Bosman, S.J Vermeer, T.A Dudink, R.L de Hingh, I.H.J.T Nieuwenhuijzen, G.A.P Rutten, H.J.T |
description | Abstract Aims The purpose of this study is to evaluate the outcome of abdominosacral resections (ASR) in patients with locally advanced or recurrent rectal cancer. Methods From 1994 until 2012 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) and locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) underwent a curative ASR and were enrolled in a database. The postoperative complication rates, predictive factors on oncological outcome and survival rates were registered. Results Seventy-two patients with LRRC (mean age 63; 44 male, 28 female) and 14 patients with LARC (mean age 65; 6 male, 8 female) underwent ASR. R0 resection was achieved in 37 patients with LRRC and 11 patients with LARC. Twenty-seven patients underwent an R1 resection (3 in the LARC group). Eight patients had an R2 resection, compared to no patients in the LARC group. In respectively 26 and 1 patients of the LRRC and LARC groups a grade 3 or 4 complication occurred and the 30-days mortality rate was respectively 3% and 7%. The 5-years overall survival was 28% and 24% respectively. Conclusion En bloc radical resection remains the primary goal in the treatment of dorsally located (recurrent) rectal cancer. After thorough patient selection, ASR is a safe procedure to perform, shows acceptable morbidity rates and leads to a good oncological outcome. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ejso.2014.02.233 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1520339002</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0748798314003126</els_id><sourcerecordid>1520339002</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-30e8855e7873ee273b1e3848545703dbf7e13b5dcea7953984c3599be7b948f33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFu1DAQhi1ERZfCC3BAPnJJsD3x2kYIqaqgRVqph5az5Tiz4JDEi50U7dvjaEsPHDh5ZH3_L803hLzhrOaMb9_3NfY51oLxpmaiFgDPyIZLEJXgUj0nG6YaXSmj4Zy8zLlnjBlQ5gU5F81WGZBmQ_Jl28UxTDE7n9xAE2b0c4jTB7qL0_dqxjTSuMw-jkjDRPWWHtwccJoz_R3mH3SI3g3DkbruwU0eOxrT019Cv6RU2HWaS7tfkfSKnO3dkPH143tBvn35fH91U-1ur79eXe4q33A-V8BQaylRaQWIQkHLEXSjZSMVg67dK-TQys6jU0aC0Y0vK5kWVWsavQe4IO9OvYcUfy2YZzuG7HEY3IRxyZZLwQAMY6Kg4oT6FHNOuLeHFEaXjpYzu8q2vV1l21W2ZcIW2SX09rF_aUfsniJ_7Rbg4wnAsuVDwGSzL-qKpbAKsV0M_-__9E_cD2EKxe1PPGLu45Km4s9ym4Vl9m4993pt3jAGXGzhDyWtpg8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1520339002</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Abdominosacral resection: Long-term outcome in 86 patients with locally advanced or locally recurrent rectal cancer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Bosman, S.J ; Vermeer, T.A ; Dudink, R.L ; de Hingh, I.H.J.T ; Nieuwenhuijzen, G.A.P ; Rutten, H.J.T</creator><creatorcontrib>Bosman, S.J ; Vermeer, T.A ; Dudink, R.L ; de Hingh, I.H.J.T ; Nieuwenhuijzen, G.A.P ; Rutten, H.J.T</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Aims The purpose of this study is to evaluate the outcome of abdominosacral resections (ASR) in patients with locally advanced or recurrent rectal cancer. Methods From 1994 until 2012 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) and locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) underwent a curative ASR and were enrolled in a database. The postoperative complication rates, predictive factors on oncological outcome and survival rates were registered. Results Seventy-two patients with LRRC (mean age 63; 44 male, 28 female) and 14 patients with LARC (mean age 65; 6 male, 8 female) underwent ASR. R0 resection was achieved in 37 patients with LRRC and 11 patients with LARC. Twenty-seven patients underwent an R1 resection (3 in the LARC group). Eight patients had an R2 resection, compared to no patients in the LARC group. In respectively 26 and 1 patients of the LRRC and LARC groups a grade 3 or 4 complication occurred and the 30-days mortality rate was respectively 3% and 7%. The 5-years overall survival was 28% and 24% respectively. Conclusion En bloc radical resection remains the primary goal in the treatment of dorsally located (recurrent) rectal cancer. After thorough patient selection, ASR is a safe procedure to perform, shows acceptable morbidity rates and leads to a good oncological outcome.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0748-7983</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2157</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2014.02.233</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24679359</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Abdomen - surgery ; Abdominosacral resection ; Aged ; Complications ; Female ; Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine ; Humans ; Locally advanced rectal cancer ; Locally recurrent rectal cancer ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - pathology ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - surgery ; Neoplasm Staging ; Oncological outcome ; Postoperative Complications ; Prone Position ; Rectal Neoplasms - pathology ; Rectal Neoplasms - surgery ; Sacrum - pathology ; Sacrum - surgery ; Surgery ; Survival Rate ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>European journal of surgical oncology, 2014-06, Vol.40 (6), p.699-705</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2014 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-30e8855e7873ee273b1e3848545703dbf7e13b5dcea7953984c3599be7b948f33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-30e8855e7873ee273b1e3848545703dbf7e13b5dcea7953984c3599be7b948f33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748798314003126$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24679359$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bosman, S.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vermeer, T.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dudink, R.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Hingh, I.H.J.T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nieuwenhuijzen, G.A.P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rutten, H.J.T</creatorcontrib><title>Abdominosacral resection: Long-term outcome in 86 patients with locally advanced or locally recurrent rectal cancer</title><title>European journal of surgical oncology</title><addtitle>Eur J Surg Oncol</addtitle><description>Abstract Aims The purpose of this study is to evaluate the outcome of abdominosacral resections (ASR) in patients with locally advanced or recurrent rectal cancer. Methods From 1994 until 2012 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) and locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) underwent a curative ASR and were enrolled in a database. The postoperative complication rates, predictive factors on oncological outcome and survival rates were registered. Results Seventy-two patients with LRRC (mean age 63; 44 male, 28 female) and 14 patients with LARC (mean age 65; 6 male, 8 female) underwent ASR. R0 resection was achieved in 37 patients with LRRC and 11 patients with LARC. Twenty-seven patients underwent an R1 resection (3 in the LARC group). Eight patients had an R2 resection, compared to no patients in the LARC group. In respectively 26 and 1 patients of the LRRC and LARC groups a grade 3 or 4 complication occurred and the 30-days mortality rate was respectively 3% and 7%. The 5-years overall survival was 28% and 24% respectively. Conclusion En bloc radical resection remains the primary goal in the treatment of dorsally located (recurrent) rectal cancer. After thorough patient selection, ASR is a safe procedure to perform, shows acceptable morbidity rates and leads to a good oncological outcome.</description><subject>Abdomen - surgery</subject><subject>Abdominosacral resection</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Complications</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Locally advanced rectal cancer</subject><subject>Locally recurrent rectal cancer</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - pathology</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - surgery</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Oncological outcome</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications</subject><subject>Prone Position</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Sacrum - pathology</subject><subject>Sacrum - surgery</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0748-7983</issn><issn>1532-2157</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcFu1DAQhi1ERZfCC3BAPnJJsD3x2kYIqaqgRVqph5az5Tiz4JDEi50U7dvjaEsPHDh5ZH3_L803hLzhrOaMb9_3NfY51oLxpmaiFgDPyIZLEJXgUj0nG6YaXSmj4Zy8zLlnjBlQ5gU5F81WGZBmQ_Jl28UxTDE7n9xAE2b0c4jTB7qL0_dqxjTSuMw-jkjDRPWWHtwccJoz_R3mH3SI3g3DkbruwU0eOxrT019Cv6RU2HWaS7tfkfSKnO3dkPH143tBvn35fH91U-1ur79eXe4q33A-V8BQaylRaQWIQkHLEXSjZSMVg67dK-TQys6jU0aC0Y0vK5kWVWsavQe4IO9OvYcUfy2YZzuG7HEY3IRxyZZLwQAMY6Kg4oT6FHNOuLeHFEaXjpYzu8q2vV1l21W2ZcIW2SX09rF_aUfsniJ_7Rbg4wnAsuVDwGSzL-qKpbAKsV0M_-__9E_cD2EKxe1PPGLu45Km4s9ym4Vl9m4993pt3jAGXGzhDyWtpg8</recordid><startdate>20140601</startdate><enddate>20140601</enddate><creator>Bosman, S.J</creator><creator>Vermeer, T.A</creator><creator>Dudink, R.L</creator><creator>de Hingh, I.H.J.T</creator><creator>Nieuwenhuijzen, G.A.P</creator><creator>Rutten, H.J.T</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140601</creationdate><title>Abdominosacral resection: Long-term outcome in 86 patients with locally advanced or locally recurrent rectal cancer</title><author>Bosman, S.J ; Vermeer, T.A ; Dudink, R.L ; de Hingh, I.H.J.T ; Nieuwenhuijzen, G.A.P ; Rutten, H.J.T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-30e8855e7873ee273b1e3848545703dbf7e13b5dcea7953984c3599be7b948f33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Abdomen - surgery</topic><topic>Abdominosacral resection</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Complications</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Locally advanced rectal cancer</topic><topic>Locally recurrent rectal cancer</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - pathology</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - surgery</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Oncological outcome</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications</topic><topic>Prone Position</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Sacrum - pathology</topic><topic>Sacrum - surgery</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bosman, S.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vermeer, T.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dudink, R.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Hingh, I.H.J.T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nieuwenhuijzen, G.A.P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rutten, H.J.T</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of surgical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bosman, S.J</au><au>Vermeer, T.A</au><au>Dudink, R.L</au><au>de Hingh, I.H.J.T</au><au>Nieuwenhuijzen, G.A.P</au><au>Rutten, H.J.T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Abdominosacral resection: Long-term outcome in 86 patients with locally advanced or locally recurrent rectal cancer</atitle><jtitle>European journal of surgical oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Surg Oncol</addtitle><date>2014-06-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>699</spage><epage>705</epage><pages>699-705</pages><issn>0748-7983</issn><eissn>1532-2157</eissn><abstract>Abstract Aims The purpose of this study is to evaluate the outcome of abdominosacral resections (ASR) in patients with locally advanced or recurrent rectal cancer. Methods From 1994 until 2012 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) and locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) underwent a curative ASR and were enrolled in a database. The postoperative complication rates, predictive factors on oncological outcome and survival rates were registered. Results Seventy-two patients with LRRC (mean age 63; 44 male, 28 female) and 14 patients with LARC (mean age 65; 6 male, 8 female) underwent ASR. R0 resection was achieved in 37 patients with LRRC and 11 patients with LARC. Twenty-seven patients underwent an R1 resection (3 in the LARC group). Eight patients had an R2 resection, compared to no patients in the LARC group. In respectively 26 and 1 patients of the LRRC and LARC groups a grade 3 or 4 complication occurred and the 30-days mortality rate was respectively 3% and 7%. The 5-years overall survival was 28% and 24% respectively. Conclusion En bloc radical resection remains the primary goal in the treatment of dorsally located (recurrent) rectal cancer. After thorough patient selection, ASR is a safe procedure to perform, shows acceptable morbidity rates and leads to a good oncological outcome.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>24679359</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ejso.2014.02.233</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0748-7983 |
ispartof | European journal of surgical oncology, 2014-06, Vol.40 (6), p.699-705 |
issn | 0748-7983 1532-2157 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1520339002 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Abdomen - surgery Abdominosacral resection Aged Complications Female Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine Humans Locally advanced rectal cancer Locally recurrent rectal cancer Magnetic Resonance Imaging Male Middle Aged Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - pathology Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - surgery Neoplasm Staging Oncological outcome Postoperative Complications Prone Position Rectal Neoplasms - pathology Rectal Neoplasms - surgery Sacrum - pathology Sacrum - surgery Surgery Survival Rate Treatment Outcome |
title | Abdominosacral resection: Long-term outcome in 86 patients with locally advanced or locally recurrent rectal cancer |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T15%3A22%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Abdominosacral%20resection:%20Long-term%20outcome%20in%2086%20patients%20with%20locally%20advanced%20or%20locally%20recurrent%20rectal%20cancer&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20surgical%20oncology&rft.au=Bosman,%20S.J&rft.date=2014-06-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=699&rft.epage=705&rft.pages=699-705&rft.issn=0748-7983&rft.eissn=1532-2157&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejso.2014.02.233&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1520339002%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1520339002&rft_id=info:pmid/24679359&rft_els_id=S0748798314003126&rfr_iscdi=true |