A tailored, supportive care intervention using systematic assessment designed for people with inoperable lung cancer: a randomised controlled trial
Objective People with inoperable lung cancer experience higher levels of distress, more unmet needs and symptoms than other cancer patients. There is an urgent need to test innovative approaches to improve psychosocial and symptom outcomes in this group. This study tested the hypothesis that a tailo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England) England), 2013-11, Vol.22 (11), p.2445-2453 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2453 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 2445 |
container_title | Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England) |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Schofield, Penelope Ugalde, Anna Gough, Karla Reece, John Krishnasamy, Meinir Carey, Mariko Ball, David Aranda, Sanchia |
description | Objective
People with inoperable lung cancer experience higher levels of distress, more unmet needs and symptoms than other cancer patients. There is an urgent need to test innovative approaches to improve psychosocial and symptom outcomes in this group. This study tested the hypothesis that a tailored, multidisciplinary supportive care programme based on systematic needs assessment would reduce perceived unmet needs and distress and improve quality of life.
Methods
A randomised controlled trial design was used. The tailored intervention comprised two sessions at treatment commencement and completion. Sessions included a self‐completed needs assessment, active listening, self‐care education and communication of unmet psychosocial and symptom needs to the multidisciplinary team for management and referral. Outcomes were assessed with the Needs Assessment for Advanced Lung Cancer Patients, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Distress Thermometer and European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Q‐C30 V2.0.
Results
One hundred and eight patients with a diagnosis of inoperable lung or pleural cancer (including mesothelioma) were recruited from a specialist facility before the trial closed prematurely (original target 200). None of the primary contrasts of interest were significant (all p > 0.10), although change score analysis indicated a relative benefit from the intervention for unmet symptom needs at 8 and 12 weeks post‐assessment (effect size = 0.55 and 0.40, respectively).
Conclusion
Although a novel approach, the hypothesis that the intervention would benefit perceived unmet needs, psychological morbidity, distress and health‐related quality of life was not supported overall. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/pon.3306 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1520321780</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1520321780</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4536-5ee6818d6892641ece3090fb2c940ae52d14d45badf40f4d9b485dbb2b298a963</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc9qFTEUhwdRbK2CTyABNy6cmv8zcVeqrWJpu1BchszkTE3NTaZJpvU-R1_YXHqtIIiuckK-850Tfk3znOB9gjF9M8ewzxiWD5pdgpVqiSTk4aYWXasoVzvNk5wvMa6wko-bHco6xjqKd5vbA1SM8zGBfY3yMs8xFXcNaDQJkAsF0jWE4mJAS3bhAuV1LrAyxY3I5Aw5r-ozspDdRQCLppjQDHH2gG5c-VYNcYZkhnr3S20fTRghvUUGJRNsXLlcm8YYSore17IkZ_zT5tFkfIZn23Ov-XL0_vPhh_bk7Pjj4cFJO3LBZCsAZE96K3tFJScwAsMKTwMdFccGBLWEWy4GYyeOJ27VwHthh4EOVPVGSbbXvLrzzileLZCLrvuM4L0JEJesiaCYUdL1-N8o72RdQpDuP1AuFOGSqoq-_AO9jEsK9c-VEooSwRn7LRxTzDnBpOfkViatNcF6E7-u8etN_BV9sRUuwwrsPfgr7wq0d8CN87D-q0ifn51uhVve1dh_3PMmfdeyY53QX0-PNX5HWf9JntcxPwG-oslv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1459215433</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A tailored, supportive care intervention using systematic assessment designed for people with inoperable lung cancer: a randomised controlled trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Schofield, Penelope ; Ugalde, Anna ; Gough, Karla ; Reece, John ; Krishnasamy, Meinir ; Carey, Mariko ; Ball, David ; Aranda, Sanchia</creator><creatorcontrib>Schofield, Penelope ; Ugalde, Anna ; Gough, Karla ; Reece, John ; Krishnasamy, Meinir ; Carey, Mariko ; Ball, David ; Aranda, Sanchia</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
People with inoperable lung cancer experience higher levels of distress, more unmet needs and symptoms than other cancer patients. There is an urgent need to test innovative approaches to improve psychosocial and symptom outcomes in this group. This study tested the hypothesis that a tailored, multidisciplinary supportive care programme based on systematic needs assessment would reduce perceived unmet needs and distress and improve quality of life.
Methods
A randomised controlled trial design was used. The tailored intervention comprised two sessions at treatment commencement and completion. Sessions included a self‐completed needs assessment, active listening, self‐care education and communication of unmet psychosocial and symptom needs to the multidisciplinary team for management and referral. Outcomes were assessed with the Needs Assessment for Advanced Lung Cancer Patients, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Distress Thermometer and European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Q‐C30 V2.0.
Results
One hundred and eight patients with a diagnosis of inoperable lung or pleural cancer (including mesothelioma) were recruited from a specialist facility before the trial closed prematurely (original target 200). None of the primary contrasts of interest were significant (all p > 0.10), although change score analysis indicated a relative benefit from the intervention for unmet symptom needs at 8 and 12 weeks post‐assessment (effect size = 0.55 and 0.40, respectively).
Conclusion
Although a novel approach, the hypothesis that the intervention would benefit perceived unmet needs, psychological morbidity, distress and health‐related quality of life was not supported overall. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1057-9249</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1611</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/pon.3306</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23733720</identifier><identifier>CODEN: POJCEE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Aged ; Anxiety - etiology ; Anxiety - psychology ; cancer ; Cancer therapies ; Clinical trials ; Depression - etiology ; Depression - psychology ; Female ; Health Services Needs and Demand ; Humans ; Innovations ; intervention ; Linear Models ; Lung cancer ; Lung Neoplasms - psychology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Needs analysis ; Needs Assessment ; oncology ; Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care) ; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales ; Psychological distress ; Quality of Life ; Social Support ; Socioeconomic Factors ; Stress, Psychological - etiology ; Stress, Psychological - psychology ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Symptom Assessment ; Symptoms ; Unmet needs</subject><ispartof>Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England), 2013-11, Vol.22 (11), p.2445-2453</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright Wiley Subscription Services, Inc. Nov 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4536-5ee6818d6892641ece3090fb2c940ae52d14d45badf40f4d9b485dbb2b298a963</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4536-5ee6818d6892641ece3090fb2c940ae52d14d45badf40f4d9b485dbb2b298a963</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fpon.3306$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fpon.3306$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,30999,31000,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23733720$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schofield, Penelope</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ugalde, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gough, Karla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reece, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krishnasamy, Meinir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carey, Mariko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ball, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aranda, Sanchia</creatorcontrib><title>A tailored, supportive care intervention using systematic assessment designed for people with inoperable lung cancer: a randomised controlled trial</title><title>Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England)</title><addtitle>Psycho-Oncology</addtitle><description>Objective
People with inoperable lung cancer experience higher levels of distress, more unmet needs and symptoms than other cancer patients. There is an urgent need to test innovative approaches to improve psychosocial and symptom outcomes in this group. This study tested the hypothesis that a tailored, multidisciplinary supportive care programme based on systematic needs assessment would reduce perceived unmet needs and distress and improve quality of life.
Methods
A randomised controlled trial design was used. The tailored intervention comprised two sessions at treatment commencement and completion. Sessions included a self‐completed needs assessment, active listening, self‐care education and communication of unmet psychosocial and symptom needs to the multidisciplinary team for management and referral. Outcomes were assessed with the Needs Assessment for Advanced Lung Cancer Patients, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Distress Thermometer and European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Q‐C30 V2.0.
Results
One hundred and eight patients with a diagnosis of inoperable lung or pleural cancer (including mesothelioma) were recruited from a specialist facility before the trial closed prematurely (original target 200). None of the primary contrasts of interest were significant (all p > 0.10), although change score analysis indicated a relative benefit from the intervention for unmet symptom needs at 8 and 12 weeks post‐assessment (effect size = 0.55 and 0.40, respectively).
Conclusion
Although a novel approach, the hypothesis that the intervention would benefit perceived unmet needs, psychological morbidity, distress and health‐related quality of life was not supported overall. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anxiety - etiology</subject><subject>Anxiety - psychology</subject><subject>cancer</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Depression - etiology</subject><subject>Depression - psychology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Services Needs and Demand</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>intervention</subject><subject>Linear Models</subject><subject>Lung cancer</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - psychology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Needs analysis</subject><subject>Needs Assessment</subject><subject>oncology</subject><subject>Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care)</subject><subject>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</subject><subject>Psychological distress</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Social Support</subject><subject>Socioeconomic Factors</subject><subject>Stress, Psychological - etiology</subject><subject>Stress, Psychological - psychology</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Symptom Assessment</subject><subject>Symptoms</subject><subject>Unmet needs</subject><issn>1057-9249</issn><issn>1099-1611</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc9qFTEUhwdRbK2CTyABNy6cmv8zcVeqrWJpu1BchszkTE3NTaZJpvU-R1_YXHqtIIiuckK-850Tfk3znOB9gjF9M8ewzxiWD5pdgpVqiSTk4aYWXasoVzvNk5wvMa6wko-bHco6xjqKd5vbA1SM8zGBfY3yMs8xFXcNaDQJkAsF0jWE4mJAS3bhAuV1LrAyxY3I5Aw5r-ozspDdRQCLppjQDHH2gG5c-VYNcYZkhnr3S20fTRghvUUGJRNsXLlcm8YYSore17IkZ_zT5tFkfIZn23Ov-XL0_vPhh_bk7Pjj4cFJO3LBZCsAZE96K3tFJScwAsMKTwMdFccGBLWEWy4GYyeOJ27VwHthh4EOVPVGSbbXvLrzzileLZCLrvuM4L0JEJesiaCYUdL1-N8o72RdQpDuP1AuFOGSqoq-_AO9jEsK9c-VEooSwRn7LRxTzDnBpOfkViatNcF6E7-u8etN_BV9sRUuwwrsPfgr7wq0d8CN87D-q0ifn51uhVve1dh_3PMmfdeyY53QX0-PNX5HWf9JntcxPwG-oslv</recordid><startdate>201311</startdate><enddate>201311</enddate><creator>Schofield, Penelope</creator><creator>Ugalde, Anna</creator><creator>Gough, Karla</creator><creator>Reece, John</creator><creator>Krishnasamy, Meinir</creator><creator>Carey, Mariko</creator><creator>Ball, David</creator><creator>Aranda, Sanchia</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201311</creationdate><title>A tailored, supportive care intervention using systematic assessment designed for people with inoperable lung cancer: a randomised controlled trial</title><author>Schofield, Penelope ; Ugalde, Anna ; Gough, Karla ; Reece, John ; Krishnasamy, Meinir ; Carey, Mariko ; Ball, David ; Aranda, Sanchia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4536-5ee6818d6892641ece3090fb2c940ae52d14d45badf40f4d9b485dbb2b298a963</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anxiety - etiology</topic><topic>Anxiety - psychology</topic><topic>cancer</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Depression - etiology</topic><topic>Depression - psychology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Services Needs and Demand</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>intervention</topic><topic>Linear Models</topic><topic>Lung cancer</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - psychology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Needs analysis</topic><topic>Needs Assessment</topic><topic>oncology</topic><topic>Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care)</topic><topic>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</topic><topic>Psychological distress</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Social Support</topic><topic>Socioeconomic Factors</topic><topic>Stress, Psychological - etiology</topic><topic>Stress, Psychological - psychology</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Symptom Assessment</topic><topic>Symptoms</topic><topic>Unmet needs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schofield, Penelope</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ugalde, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gough, Karla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reece, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krishnasamy, Meinir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carey, Mariko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ball, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aranda, Sanchia</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schofield, Penelope</au><au>Ugalde, Anna</au><au>Gough, Karla</au><au>Reece, John</au><au>Krishnasamy, Meinir</au><au>Carey, Mariko</au><au>Ball, David</au><au>Aranda, Sanchia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A tailored, supportive care intervention using systematic assessment designed for people with inoperable lung cancer: a randomised controlled trial</atitle><jtitle>Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Psycho-Oncology</addtitle><date>2013-11</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2445</spage><epage>2453</epage><pages>2445-2453</pages><issn>1057-9249</issn><eissn>1099-1611</eissn><coden>POJCEE</coden><abstract>Objective
People with inoperable lung cancer experience higher levels of distress, more unmet needs and symptoms than other cancer patients. There is an urgent need to test innovative approaches to improve psychosocial and symptom outcomes in this group. This study tested the hypothesis that a tailored, multidisciplinary supportive care programme based on systematic needs assessment would reduce perceived unmet needs and distress and improve quality of life.
Methods
A randomised controlled trial design was used. The tailored intervention comprised two sessions at treatment commencement and completion. Sessions included a self‐completed needs assessment, active listening, self‐care education and communication of unmet psychosocial and symptom needs to the multidisciplinary team for management and referral. Outcomes were assessed with the Needs Assessment for Advanced Lung Cancer Patients, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Distress Thermometer and European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Q‐C30 V2.0.
Results
One hundred and eight patients with a diagnosis of inoperable lung or pleural cancer (including mesothelioma) were recruited from a specialist facility before the trial closed prematurely (original target 200). None of the primary contrasts of interest were significant (all p > 0.10), although change score analysis indicated a relative benefit from the intervention for unmet symptom needs at 8 and 12 weeks post‐assessment (effect size = 0.55 and 0.40, respectively).
Conclusion
Although a novel approach, the hypothesis that the intervention would benefit perceived unmet needs, psychological morbidity, distress and health‐related quality of life was not supported overall. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>23733720</pmid><doi>10.1002/pon.3306</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1057-9249 |
ispartof | Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England), 2013-11, Vol.22 (11), p.2445-2453 |
issn | 1057-9249 1099-1611 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1520321780 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
subjects | Aged Anxiety - etiology Anxiety - psychology cancer Cancer therapies Clinical trials Depression - etiology Depression - psychology Female Health Services Needs and Demand Humans Innovations intervention Linear Models Lung cancer Lung Neoplasms - psychology Male Middle Aged Needs analysis Needs Assessment oncology Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care) Psychiatric Status Rating Scales Psychological distress Quality of Life Social Support Socioeconomic Factors Stress, Psychological - etiology Stress, Psychological - psychology Surveys and Questionnaires Symptom Assessment Symptoms Unmet needs |
title | A tailored, supportive care intervention using systematic assessment designed for people with inoperable lung cancer: a randomised controlled trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T00%3A24%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20tailored,%20supportive%20care%20intervention%20using%20systematic%20assessment%20designed%20for%20people%20with%20inoperable%20lung%20cancer:%20a%20randomised%20controlled%20trial&rft.jtitle=Psycho-oncology%20(Chichester,%20England)&rft.au=Schofield,%20Penelope&rft.date=2013-11&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2445&rft.epage=2453&rft.pages=2445-2453&rft.issn=1057-9249&rft.eissn=1099-1611&rft.coden=POJCEE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/pon.3306&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1520321780%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1459215433&rft_id=info:pmid/23733720&rfr_iscdi=true |