A tailored, supportive care intervention using systematic assessment designed for people with inoperable lung cancer: a randomised controlled trial

Objective People with inoperable lung cancer experience higher levels of distress, more unmet needs and symptoms than other cancer patients. There is an urgent need to test innovative approaches to improve psychosocial and symptom outcomes in this group. This study tested the hypothesis that a tailo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England) England), 2013-11, Vol.22 (11), p.2445-2453
Hauptverfasser: Schofield, Penelope, Ugalde, Anna, Gough, Karla, Reece, John, Krishnasamy, Meinir, Carey, Mariko, Ball, David, Aranda, Sanchia
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2453
container_issue 11
container_start_page 2445
container_title Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England)
container_volume 22
creator Schofield, Penelope
Ugalde, Anna
Gough, Karla
Reece, John
Krishnasamy, Meinir
Carey, Mariko
Ball, David
Aranda, Sanchia
description Objective People with inoperable lung cancer experience higher levels of distress, more unmet needs and symptoms than other cancer patients. There is an urgent need to test innovative approaches to improve psychosocial and symptom outcomes in this group. This study tested the hypothesis that a tailored, multidisciplinary supportive care programme based on systematic needs assessment would reduce perceived unmet needs and distress and improve quality of life. Methods A randomised controlled trial design was used. The tailored intervention comprised two sessions at treatment commencement and completion. Sessions included a self‐completed needs assessment, active listening, self‐care education and communication of unmet psychosocial and symptom needs to the multidisciplinary team for management and referral. Outcomes were assessed with the Needs Assessment for Advanced Lung Cancer Patients, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Distress Thermometer and European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Q‐C30 V2.0. Results One hundred and eight patients with a diagnosis of inoperable lung or pleural cancer (including mesothelioma) were recruited from a specialist facility before the trial closed prematurely (original target 200). None of the primary contrasts of interest were significant (all p > 0.10), although change score analysis indicated a relative benefit from the intervention for unmet symptom needs at 8 and 12 weeks post‐assessment (effect size = 0.55 and 0.40, respectively). Conclusion Although a novel approach, the hypothesis that the intervention would benefit perceived unmet needs, psychological morbidity, distress and health‐related quality of life was not supported overall. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/pon.3306
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1520321780</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1520321780</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4536-5ee6818d6892641ece3090fb2c940ae52d14d45badf40f4d9b485dbb2b298a963</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc9qFTEUhwdRbK2CTyABNy6cmv8zcVeqrWJpu1BchszkTE3NTaZJpvU-R1_YXHqtIIiuckK-850Tfk3znOB9gjF9M8ewzxiWD5pdgpVqiSTk4aYWXasoVzvNk5wvMa6wko-bHco6xjqKd5vbA1SM8zGBfY3yMs8xFXcNaDQJkAsF0jWE4mJAS3bhAuV1LrAyxY3I5Aw5r-ozspDdRQCLppjQDHH2gG5c-VYNcYZkhnr3S20fTRghvUUGJRNsXLlcm8YYSore17IkZ_zT5tFkfIZn23Ov-XL0_vPhh_bk7Pjj4cFJO3LBZCsAZE96K3tFJScwAsMKTwMdFccGBLWEWy4GYyeOJ27VwHthh4EOVPVGSbbXvLrzzileLZCLrvuM4L0JEJesiaCYUdL1-N8o72RdQpDuP1AuFOGSqoq-_AO9jEsK9c-VEooSwRn7LRxTzDnBpOfkViatNcF6E7-u8etN_BV9sRUuwwrsPfgr7wq0d8CN87D-q0ifn51uhVve1dh_3PMmfdeyY53QX0-PNX5HWf9JntcxPwG-oslv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1459215433</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A tailored, supportive care intervention using systematic assessment designed for people with inoperable lung cancer: a randomised controlled trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Schofield, Penelope ; Ugalde, Anna ; Gough, Karla ; Reece, John ; Krishnasamy, Meinir ; Carey, Mariko ; Ball, David ; Aranda, Sanchia</creator><creatorcontrib>Schofield, Penelope ; Ugalde, Anna ; Gough, Karla ; Reece, John ; Krishnasamy, Meinir ; Carey, Mariko ; Ball, David ; Aranda, Sanchia</creatorcontrib><description>Objective People with inoperable lung cancer experience higher levels of distress, more unmet needs and symptoms than other cancer patients. There is an urgent need to test innovative approaches to improve psychosocial and symptom outcomes in this group. This study tested the hypothesis that a tailored, multidisciplinary supportive care programme based on systematic needs assessment would reduce perceived unmet needs and distress and improve quality of life. Methods A randomised controlled trial design was used. The tailored intervention comprised two sessions at treatment commencement and completion. Sessions included a self‐completed needs assessment, active listening, self‐care education and communication of unmet psychosocial and symptom needs to the multidisciplinary team for management and referral. Outcomes were assessed with the Needs Assessment for Advanced Lung Cancer Patients, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Distress Thermometer and European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Q‐C30 V2.0. Results One hundred and eight patients with a diagnosis of inoperable lung or pleural cancer (including mesothelioma) were recruited from a specialist facility before the trial closed prematurely (original target 200). None of the primary contrasts of interest were significant (all p &gt; 0.10), although change score analysis indicated a relative benefit from the intervention for unmet symptom needs at 8 and 12 weeks post‐assessment (effect size = 0.55 and 0.40, respectively). Conclusion Although a novel approach, the hypothesis that the intervention would benefit perceived unmet needs, psychological morbidity, distress and health‐related quality of life was not supported overall. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1057-9249</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1611</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/pon.3306</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23733720</identifier><identifier>CODEN: POJCEE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Aged ; Anxiety - etiology ; Anxiety - psychology ; cancer ; Cancer therapies ; Clinical trials ; Depression - etiology ; Depression - psychology ; Female ; Health Services Needs and Demand ; Humans ; Innovations ; intervention ; Linear Models ; Lung cancer ; Lung Neoplasms - psychology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Needs analysis ; Needs Assessment ; oncology ; Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care) ; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales ; Psychological distress ; Quality of Life ; Social Support ; Socioeconomic Factors ; Stress, Psychological - etiology ; Stress, Psychological - psychology ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Symptom Assessment ; Symptoms ; Unmet needs</subject><ispartof>Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England), 2013-11, Vol.22 (11), p.2445-2453</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2013 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright Wiley Subscription Services, Inc. Nov 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4536-5ee6818d6892641ece3090fb2c940ae52d14d45badf40f4d9b485dbb2b298a963</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4536-5ee6818d6892641ece3090fb2c940ae52d14d45badf40f4d9b485dbb2b298a963</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fpon.3306$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fpon.3306$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,30999,31000,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23733720$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schofield, Penelope</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ugalde, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gough, Karla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reece, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krishnasamy, Meinir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carey, Mariko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ball, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aranda, Sanchia</creatorcontrib><title>A tailored, supportive care intervention using systematic assessment designed for people with inoperable lung cancer: a randomised controlled trial</title><title>Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England)</title><addtitle>Psycho-Oncology</addtitle><description>Objective People with inoperable lung cancer experience higher levels of distress, more unmet needs and symptoms than other cancer patients. There is an urgent need to test innovative approaches to improve psychosocial and symptom outcomes in this group. This study tested the hypothesis that a tailored, multidisciplinary supportive care programme based on systematic needs assessment would reduce perceived unmet needs and distress and improve quality of life. Methods A randomised controlled trial design was used. The tailored intervention comprised two sessions at treatment commencement and completion. Sessions included a self‐completed needs assessment, active listening, self‐care education and communication of unmet psychosocial and symptom needs to the multidisciplinary team for management and referral. Outcomes were assessed with the Needs Assessment for Advanced Lung Cancer Patients, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Distress Thermometer and European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Q‐C30 V2.0. Results One hundred and eight patients with a diagnosis of inoperable lung or pleural cancer (including mesothelioma) were recruited from a specialist facility before the trial closed prematurely (original target 200). None of the primary contrasts of interest were significant (all p &gt; 0.10), although change score analysis indicated a relative benefit from the intervention for unmet symptom needs at 8 and 12 weeks post‐assessment (effect size = 0.55 and 0.40, respectively). Conclusion Although a novel approach, the hypothesis that the intervention would benefit perceived unmet needs, psychological morbidity, distress and health‐related quality of life was not supported overall. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anxiety - etiology</subject><subject>Anxiety - psychology</subject><subject>cancer</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Depression - etiology</subject><subject>Depression - psychology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Services Needs and Demand</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>intervention</subject><subject>Linear Models</subject><subject>Lung cancer</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - psychology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Needs analysis</subject><subject>Needs Assessment</subject><subject>oncology</subject><subject>Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care)</subject><subject>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</subject><subject>Psychological distress</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Social Support</subject><subject>Socioeconomic Factors</subject><subject>Stress, Psychological - etiology</subject><subject>Stress, Psychological - psychology</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Symptom Assessment</subject><subject>Symptoms</subject><subject>Unmet needs</subject><issn>1057-9249</issn><issn>1099-1611</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc9qFTEUhwdRbK2CTyABNy6cmv8zcVeqrWJpu1BchszkTE3NTaZJpvU-R1_YXHqtIIiuckK-850Tfk3znOB9gjF9M8ewzxiWD5pdgpVqiSTk4aYWXasoVzvNk5wvMa6wko-bHco6xjqKd5vbA1SM8zGBfY3yMs8xFXcNaDQJkAsF0jWE4mJAS3bhAuV1LrAyxY3I5Aw5r-ozspDdRQCLppjQDHH2gG5c-VYNcYZkhnr3S20fTRghvUUGJRNsXLlcm8YYSore17IkZ_zT5tFkfIZn23Ov-XL0_vPhh_bk7Pjj4cFJO3LBZCsAZE96K3tFJScwAsMKTwMdFccGBLWEWy4GYyeOJ27VwHthh4EOVPVGSbbXvLrzzileLZCLrvuM4L0JEJesiaCYUdL1-N8o72RdQpDuP1AuFOGSqoq-_AO9jEsK9c-VEooSwRn7LRxTzDnBpOfkViatNcF6E7-u8etN_BV9sRUuwwrsPfgr7wq0d8CN87D-q0ifn51uhVve1dh_3PMmfdeyY53QX0-PNX5HWf9JntcxPwG-oslv</recordid><startdate>201311</startdate><enddate>201311</enddate><creator>Schofield, Penelope</creator><creator>Ugalde, Anna</creator><creator>Gough, Karla</creator><creator>Reece, John</creator><creator>Krishnasamy, Meinir</creator><creator>Carey, Mariko</creator><creator>Ball, David</creator><creator>Aranda, Sanchia</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201311</creationdate><title>A tailored, supportive care intervention using systematic assessment designed for people with inoperable lung cancer: a randomised controlled trial</title><author>Schofield, Penelope ; Ugalde, Anna ; Gough, Karla ; Reece, John ; Krishnasamy, Meinir ; Carey, Mariko ; Ball, David ; Aranda, Sanchia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4536-5ee6818d6892641ece3090fb2c940ae52d14d45badf40f4d9b485dbb2b298a963</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anxiety - etiology</topic><topic>Anxiety - psychology</topic><topic>cancer</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Depression - etiology</topic><topic>Depression - psychology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Services Needs and Demand</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>intervention</topic><topic>Linear Models</topic><topic>Lung cancer</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - psychology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Needs analysis</topic><topic>Needs Assessment</topic><topic>oncology</topic><topic>Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care)</topic><topic>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</topic><topic>Psychological distress</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Social Support</topic><topic>Socioeconomic Factors</topic><topic>Stress, Psychological - etiology</topic><topic>Stress, Psychological - psychology</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Symptom Assessment</topic><topic>Symptoms</topic><topic>Unmet needs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schofield, Penelope</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ugalde, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gough, Karla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reece, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krishnasamy, Meinir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carey, Mariko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ball, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aranda, Sanchia</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schofield, Penelope</au><au>Ugalde, Anna</au><au>Gough, Karla</au><au>Reece, John</au><au>Krishnasamy, Meinir</au><au>Carey, Mariko</au><au>Ball, David</au><au>Aranda, Sanchia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A tailored, supportive care intervention using systematic assessment designed for people with inoperable lung cancer: a randomised controlled trial</atitle><jtitle>Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Psycho-Oncology</addtitle><date>2013-11</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2445</spage><epage>2453</epage><pages>2445-2453</pages><issn>1057-9249</issn><eissn>1099-1611</eissn><coden>POJCEE</coden><abstract>Objective People with inoperable lung cancer experience higher levels of distress, more unmet needs and symptoms than other cancer patients. There is an urgent need to test innovative approaches to improve psychosocial and symptom outcomes in this group. This study tested the hypothesis that a tailored, multidisciplinary supportive care programme based on systematic needs assessment would reduce perceived unmet needs and distress and improve quality of life. Methods A randomised controlled trial design was used. The tailored intervention comprised two sessions at treatment commencement and completion. Sessions included a self‐completed needs assessment, active listening, self‐care education and communication of unmet psychosocial and symptom needs to the multidisciplinary team for management and referral. Outcomes were assessed with the Needs Assessment for Advanced Lung Cancer Patients, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Distress Thermometer and European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Q‐C30 V2.0. Results One hundred and eight patients with a diagnosis of inoperable lung or pleural cancer (including mesothelioma) were recruited from a specialist facility before the trial closed prematurely (original target 200). None of the primary contrasts of interest were significant (all p &gt; 0.10), although change score analysis indicated a relative benefit from the intervention for unmet symptom needs at 8 and 12 weeks post‐assessment (effect size = 0.55 and 0.40, respectively). Conclusion Although a novel approach, the hypothesis that the intervention would benefit perceived unmet needs, psychological morbidity, distress and health‐related quality of life was not supported overall. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>23733720</pmid><doi>10.1002/pon.3306</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1057-9249
ispartof Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England), 2013-11, Vol.22 (11), p.2445-2453
issn 1057-9249
1099-1611
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1520321780
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
subjects Aged
Anxiety - etiology
Anxiety - psychology
cancer
Cancer therapies
Clinical trials
Depression - etiology
Depression - psychology
Female
Health Services Needs and Demand
Humans
Innovations
intervention
Linear Models
Lung cancer
Lung Neoplasms - psychology
Male
Middle Aged
Needs analysis
Needs Assessment
oncology
Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care)
Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
Psychological distress
Quality of Life
Social Support
Socioeconomic Factors
Stress, Psychological - etiology
Stress, Psychological - psychology
Surveys and Questionnaires
Symptom Assessment
Symptoms
Unmet needs
title A tailored, supportive care intervention using systematic assessment designed for people with inoperable lung cancer: a randomised controlled trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T00%3A24%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20tailored,%20supportive%20care%20intervention%20using%20systematic%20assessment%20designed%20for%20people%20with%20inoperable%20lung%20cancer:%20a%20randomised%20controlled%20trial&rft.jtitle=Psycho-oncology%20(Chichester,%20England)&rft.au=Schofield,%20Penelope&rft.date=2013-11&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2445&rft.epage=2453&rft.pages=2445-2453&rft.issn=1057-9249&rft.eissn=1099-1611&rft.coden=POJCEE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/pon.3306&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1520321780%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1459215433&rft_id=info:pmid/23733720&rfr_iscdi=true