Lower Federal Court Judicial Confirmation Fights: A Critical Review of the Empirical Literature and Future Research Directions
Unlike the massive literature about US Supreme Court confirmation battles, little has been written about lower federal court confirmation fights. However, in the past 20 years much has been written about the lower federal court confirmation process. Here, we take stock of the political science liter...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PS, political science & politics political science & politics, 2014-01, Vol.47 (1), p.149-164 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 164 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 149 |
container_title | PS, political science & politics |
container_volume | 47 |
creator | Shomade, Salmon A. Hartley, Roger E. Holmes, Lisa M. |
description | Unlike the massive literature about US Supreme Court confirmation battles, little has been written about lower federal court confirmation fights. However, in the past 20 years much has been written about the lower federal court confirmation process. Here, we take stock of the political science literature in this area and highlight where scholarly interest appears to be going. Believing a contemporary assessment of the state of the field should be of interest and use to scholars of American politics, we dissect the recent empirical literature and offer suggestions for future research. Most importantly, we offer a one-stop shop for recent literature for scholars interested in this topic. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S1049096513001510 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1520320755</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1049096513001510</cupid><jstor_id>43284500</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>43284500</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-458b79e39d409bc1682bd99214d94f679e2a7e2f416994d3ec9d443fa622cb3b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUtLAzEUhQdRsFZ_gAsh4MbNaJ4zjTupHR8UhKrrIZO506Z0ZmqSsbjxt5s-EFHMJvfmO-ck5EbRKcGXBJP06plgLrFMBGEYE0HwXtQjgqWxkEzshzrgeM0PoyPn5jisgcC96HPcrsCiDEqwaoGGbWc9euxKo82mbSpja-VN26DMTGfeXaMbNLTGGx34BN4NrFBbIT8DNKqXxm7Ox8aHON9ZQKopUdZtygk4UFbP0K2xoNeZ7jg6qNTCwclu70ev2ehleB-Pn-4ehjfjWDPKfczFoEglMFlyLAtNkgEtSikp4aXkVRIQVSnQipNESl4y0EHJWaUSSnXBCtaPLra5S9u-deB8XhunYbFQDbSdy4mgmFGcChGk57-k8_ApTXhdTnhKKMWc8qAiW5W2rXMWqnxpTa3sR05wvp5I_mciwXO29cydb-23gTM64AKvOdtlqrqwppzCj6v_Tf0C7MGWQg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1471220424</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Lower Federal Court Judicial Confirmation Fights: A Critical Review of the Empirical Literature and Future Research Directions</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Shomade, Salmon A. ; Hartley, Roger E. ; Holmes, Lisa M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Shomade, Salmon A. ; Hartley, Roger E. ; Holmes, Lisa M.</creatorcontrib><description>Unlike the massive literature about US Supreme Court confirmation battles, little has been written about lower federal court confirmation fights. However, in the past 20 years much has been written about the lower federal court confirmation process. Here, we take stock of the political science literature in this area and highlight where scholarly interest appears to be going. Believing a contemporary assessment of the state of the field should be of interest and use to scholars of American politics, we dissect the recent empirical literature and offer suggestions for future research. Most importantly, we offer a one-stop shop for recent literature for scholars interested in this topic.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1049-0965</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-5935</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1049096513001510</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Administrative courts ; Appellate courts ; Courts ; FEATURES ; Federal courts ; Hearings & confirmations ; Intellectuals ; Judges & magistrates ; Judicial system ; Lower courts ; Political interest groups ; Political research ; Political Science ; Research Methodology ; Senators ; Supreme Courts ; United States of America ; United States Senate ; United States Supreme Court</subject><ispartof>PS, political science & politics, 2014-01, Vol.47 (1), p.149-164</ispartof><rights>Copyright © American Political Science Association 2014</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 American Political Science Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-458b79e39d409bc1682bd99214d94f679e2a7e2f416994d3ec9d443fa622cb3b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/43284500$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1049096513001510/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,803,12844,27923,27924,55627,58016,58249</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shomade, Salmon A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartley, Roger E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmes, Lisa M.</creatorcontrib><title>Lower Federal Court Judicial Confirmation Fights: A Critical Review of the Empirical Literature and Future Research Directions</title><title>PS, political science & politics</title><addtitle>APSC</addtitle><description>Unlike the massive literature about US Supreme Court confirmation battles, little has been written about lower federal court confirmation fights. However, in the past 20 years much has been written about the lower federal court confirmation process. Here, we take stock of the political science literature in this area and highlight where scholarly interest appears to be going. Believing a contemporary assessment of the state of the field should be of interest and use to scholars of American politics, we dissect the recent empirical literature and offer suggestions for future research. Most importantly, we offer a one-stop shop for recent literature for scholars interested in this topic.</description><subject>Administrative courts</subject><subject>Appellate courts</subject><subject>Courts</subject><subject>FEATURES</subject><subject>Federal courts</subject><subject>Hearings & confirmations</subject><subject>Intellectuals</subject><subject>Judges & magistrates</subject><subject>Judicial system</subject><subject>Lower courts</subject><subject>Political interest groups</subject><subject>Political research</subject><subject>Political Science</subject><subject>Research Methodology</subject><subject>Senators</subject><subject>Supreme Courts</subject><subject>United States of America</subject><subject>United States Senate</subject><subject>United States Supreme Court</subject><issn>1049-0965</issn><issn>1537-5935</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUtLAzEUhQdRsFZ_gAsh4MbNaJ4zjTupHR8UhKrrIZO506Z0ZmqSsbjxt5s-EFHMJvfmO-ck5EbRKcGXBJP06plgLrFMBGEYE0HwXtQjgqWxkEzshzrgeM0PoyPn5jisgcC96HPcrsCiDEqwaoGGbWc9euxKo82mbSpja-VN26DMTGfeXaMbNLTGGx34BN4NrFBbIT8DNKqXxm7Ox8aHON9ZQKopUdZtygk4UFbP0K2xoNeZ7jg6qNTCwclu70ev2ehleB-Pn-4ehjfjWDPKfczFoEglMFlyLAtNkgEtSikp4aXkVRIQVSnQipNESl4y0EHJWaUSSnXBCtaPLra5S9u-deB8XhunYbFQDbSdy4mgmFGcChGk57-k8_ApTXhdTnhKKMWc8qAiW5W2rXMWqnxpTa3sR05wvp5I_mciwXO29cydb-23gTM64AKvOdtlqrqwppzCj6v_Tf0C7MGWQg</recordid><startdate>201401</startdate><enddate>201401</enddate><creator>Shomade, Salmon A.</creator><creator>Hartley, Roger E.</creator><creator>Holmes, Lisa M.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201401</creationdate><title>Lower Federal Court Judicial Confirmation Fights: A Critical Review of the Empirical Literature and Future Research Directions</title><author>Shomade, Salmon A. ; Hartley, Roger E. ; Holmes, Lisa M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-458b79e39d409bc1682bd99214d94f679e2a7e2f416994d3ec9d443fa622cb3b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Administrative courts</topic><topic>Appellate courts</topic><topic>Courts</topic><topic>FEATURES</topic><topic>Federal courts</topic><topic>Hearings & confirmations</topic><topic>Intellectuals</topic><topic>Judges & magistrates</topic><topic>Judicial system</topic><topic>Lower courts</topic><topic>Political interest groups</topic><topic>Political research</topic><topic>Political Science</topic><topic>Research Methodology</topic><topic>Senators</topic><topic>Supreme Courts</topic><topic>United States of America</topic><topic>United States Senate</topic><topic>United States Supreme Court</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shomade, Salmon A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartley, Roger E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmes, Lisa M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>PS, political science & politics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shomade, Salmon A.</au><au>Hartley, Roger E.</au><au>Holmes, Lisa M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Lower Federal Court Judicial Confirmation Fights: A Critical Review of the Empirical Literature and Future Research Directions</atitle><jtitle>PS, political science & politics</jtitle><addtitle>APSC</addtitle><date>2014-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>149</spage><epage>164</epage><pages>149-164</pages><issn>1049-0965</issn><eissn>1537-5935</eissn><abstract>Unlike the massive literature about US Supreme Court confirmation battles, little has been written about lower federal court confirmation fights. However, in the past 20 years much has been written about the lower federal court confirmation process. Here, we take stock of the political science literature in this area and highlight where scholarly interest appears to be going. Believing a contemporary assessment of the state of the field should be of interest and use to scholars of American politics, we dissect the recent empirical literature and offer suggestions for future research. Most importantly, we offer a one-stop shop for recent literature for scholars interested in this topic.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S1049096513001510</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1049-0965 |
ispartof | PS, political science & politics, 2014-01, Vol.47 (1), p.149-164 |
issn | 1049-0965 1537-5935 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1520320755 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
subjects | Administrative courts Appellate courts Courts FEATURES Federal courts Hearings & confirmations Intellectuals Judges & magistrates Judicial system Lower courts Political interest groups Political research Political Science Research Methodology Senators Supreme Courts United States of America United States Senate United States Supreme Court |
title | Lower Federal Court Judicial Confirmation Fights: A Critical Review of the Empirical Literature and Future Research Directions |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T01%3A45%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Lower%20Federal%20Court%20Judicial%20Confirmation%20Fights:%20A%20Critical%20Review%20of%20the%20Empirical%20Literature%20and%20Future%20Research%20Directions&rft.jtitle=PS,%20political%20science%20&%20politics&rft.au=Shomade,%20Salmon%20A.&rft.date=2014-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=149&rft.epage=164&rft.pages=149-164&rft.issn=1049-0965&rft.eissn=1537-5935&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1049096513001510&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E43284500%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1471220424&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1049096513001510&rft_jstor_id=43284500&rfr_iscdi=true |