"Re-righting Business": John Ruggie and the Struggle to Develop International Human Rights Standards for Transnational Firms

As the major players in globalization, firms often operate in states where human rights may not be respected. Without direct intent, firms may be complicit in human rights violations. In 2008, John Ruggie, the United Nations (UN) Special Representative on business and human rights, developed a frame...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Human rights quarterly 2013-05, Vol.35 (2), p.333-364
Hauptverfasser: Aaronson, Susan Ariel, Higham, Ian
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 364
container_issue 2
container_start_page 333
container_title Human rights quarterly
container_volume 35
creator Aaronson, Susan Ariel
Higham, Ian
description As the major players in globalization, firms often operate in states where human rights may not be respected. Without direct intent, firms may be complicit in human rights violations. In 2008, John Ruggie, the United Nations (UN) Special Representative on business and human rights, developed a framework for policymakers to protect human rights and for executives to respect human rights. On 16 June 2011, the UN Human Rights Council endorsed Ruggie's "Guiding Principles" (GPs) for implementing this framework. This article describes how firms, states, and to a lesser extent nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), have responded to this delineation of the human rights responsibilities of business. This article makes four key points: 1) the GPs are an important advance in global governance; 2) the process of developing the GPs was a model of transparent, inclusive twenty-first century governance, although the public is generally unaware of the issue or the new policy; 3) the GPs are a creative and broad rethinking of how to evaluate the human rights performance of corporations; and 4) the GPs are unlikely to have much influence unless policymakers educate their national firms and their citizens regarding the human rights responsibilities of business and press these executives to act.
doi_str_mv 10.1353/hrq.2013.0032
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1520313592</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><informt_id>10.3316/agispt.20220520067346</informt_id><jstor_id>24518019</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24518019</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c568t-4fbe779c5af9d1433027e20abe335573742cbd0fb0ccf5a44ec3761385790283</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNks1v1DAQxSMEEkvhyBHJKhcuWcZfccINWsoWVUJq98DN8iZO4lUSb20HCal_PBMtLBIX6oul0e-N3sy8LHtNYU255O_7cL9mQPkagLMn2YpCKXNVie9PsxUwJXPgFXuevYhxDwBKsWKVPZzf2jy4rk9u6sinObrJxnj-gXz1_URu565zlpipIam35C4FLAyWJE8u7Q87-AO5npINk0nOT2Ygm3k0KFv6RcRRaEITSesD2QYzxRN45cIYX2bPWjNE--r3f5Ztrz5vLzb5zbcv1xcfb_JaFmXKRbuzSlW1NG3VUME5DmMZmJ3lXErFlWD1roF2B3XdSiOErbkqKC-lqoCV_Cx7d2x7CP5-tjHp0cXaDoOZrJ-jppJjV5Bl9QiUAcdlV-wRKGWMoln6f1TQiuM5oED07T_o3s-432GhoGD4pEAqP1J18DEG2-pDcKMJPzUFvWRBYxb0kgW9ZAH5zZEPo0vadC4eko7WhLrXbsLrLGUfOt14t7TgnBZ_MAaMAY4NheJiMShOBve2TuMc7V-PEmNVgr5borckj3IUQiVR9uYo28fkw8kuE5KWgNP_AtG119A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1406222254</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>"Re-righting Business": John Ruggie and the Struggle to Develop International Human Rights Standards for Transnational Firms</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Political Science Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Aaronson, Susan Ariel ; Higham, Ian</creator><creatorcontrib>Aaronson, Susan Ariel ; Higham, Ian</creatorcontrib><description>As the major players in globalization, firms often operate in states where human rights may not be respected. Without direct intent, firms may be complicit in human rights violations. In 2008, John Ruggie, the United Nations (UN) Special Representative on business and human rights, developed a framework for policymakers to protect human rights and for executives to respect human rights. On 16 June 2011, the UN Human Rights Council endorsed Ruggie's "Guiding Principles" (GPs) for implementing this framework. This article describes how firms, states, and to a lesser extent nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), have responded to this delineation of the human rights responsibilities of business. This article makes four key points: 1) the GPs are an important advance in global governance; 2) the process of developing the GPs was a model of transparent, inclusive twenty-first century governance, although the public is generally unaware of the issue or the new policy; 3) the GPs are a creative and broad rethinking of how to evaluate the human rights performance of corporations; and 4) the GPs are unlikely to have much influence unless policymakers educate their national firms and their citizens regarding the human rights responsibilities of business and press these executives to act.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0275-0392</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1085-794X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1085-794X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1353/hrq.2013.0032</identifier><identifier>CODEN: HRQUDZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press</publisher><subject>Business ; Citizens ; Companies ; Corporate governance ; Corporate responsibility ; Corporations ; Creativity ; Enterprises ; Executives ; Globalization ; Governance ; Government and politics ; Government spending ; Human Rights ; Human Rights Violations ; International law and human rights ; NGOs ; Nongovernmental Organizations ; Policy making ; Press ; Taxes ; Transnationalism ; Twenty First Century ; United Nations</subject><ispartof>Human rights quarterly, 2013-05, Vol.35 (2), p.333-364</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Johns Hopkins University Press 2013</rights><rights>Copyright © The Johns Hopkins University Press.</rights><rights>Copyright Johns Hopkins University Press May 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c568t-4fbe779c5af9d1433027e20abe335573742cbd0fb0ccf5a44ec3761385790283</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24518019$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24518019$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,12824,27842,27843,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Aaronson, Susan Ariel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Higham, Ian</creatorcontrib><title>"Re-righting Business": John Ruggie and the Struggle to Develop International Human Rights Standards for Transnational Firms</title><title>Human rights quarterly</title><description>As the major players in globalization, firms often operate in states where human rights may not be respected. Without direct intent, firms may be complicit in human rights violations. In 2008, John Ruggie, the United Nations (UN) Special Representative on business and human rights, developed a framework for policymakers to protect human rights and for executives to respect human rights. On 16 June 2011, the UN Human Rights Council endorsed Ruggie's "Guiding Principles" (GPs) for implementing this framework. This article describes how firms, states, and to a lesser extent nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), have responded to this delineation of the human rights responsibilities of business. This article makes four key points: 1) the GPs are an important advance in global governance; 2) the process of developing the GPs was a model of transparent, inclusive twenty-first century governance, although the public is generally unaware of the issue or the new policy; 3) the GPs are a creative and broad rethinking of how to evaluate the human rights performance of corporations; and 4) the GPs are unlikely to have much influence unless policymakers educate their national firms and their citizens regarding the human rights responsibilities of business and press these executives to act.</description><subject>Business</subject><subject>Citizens</subject><subject>Companies</subject><subject>Corporate governance</subject><subject>Corporate responsibility</subject><subject>Corporations</subject><subject>Creativity</subject><subject>Enterprises</subject><subject>Executives</subject><subject>Globalization</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Government and politics</subject><subject>Government spending</subject><subject>Human Rights</subject><subject>Human Rights Violations</subject><subject>International law and human rights</subject><subject>NGOs</subject><subject>Nongovernmental Organizations</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Press</subject><subject>Taxes</subject><subject>Transnationalism</subject><subject>Twenty First Century</subject><subject>United Nations</subject><issn>0275-0392</issn><issn>1085-794X</issn><issn>1085-794X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNks1v1DAQxSMEEkvhyBHJKhcuWcZfccINWsoWVUJq98DN8iZO4lUSb20HCal_PBMtLBIX6oul0e-N3sy8LHtNYU255O_7cL9mQPkagLMn2YpCKXNVie9PsxUwJXPgFXuevYhxDwBKsWKVPZzf2jy4rk9u6sinObrJxnj-gXz1_URu565zlpipIam35C4FLAyWJE8u7Q87-AO5npINk0nOT2Ygm3k0KFv6RcRRaEITSesD2QYzxRN45cIYX2bPWjNE--r3f5Ztrz5vLzb5zbcv1xcfb_JaFmXKRbuzSlW1NG3VUME5DmMZmJ3lXErFlWD1roF2B3XdSiOErbkqKC-lqoCV_Cx7d2x7CP5-tjHp0cXaDoOZrJ-jppJjV5Bl9QiUAcdlV-wRKGWMoln6f1TQiuM5oED07T_o3s-432GhoGD4pEAqP1J18DEG2-pDcKMJPzUFvWRBYxb0kgW9ZAH5zZEPo0vadC4eko7WhLrXbsLrLGUfOt14t7TgnBZ_MAaMAY4NheJiMShOBve2TuMc7V-PEmNVgr5borckj3IUQiVR9uYo28fkw8kuE5KWgNP_AtG119A</recordid><startdate>20130501</startdate><enddate>20130501</enddate><creator>Aaronson, Susan Ariel</creator><creator>Higham, Ian</creator><general>The Johns Hopkins University Press</general><general>Johns Hopkins University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130501</creationdate><title>"Re-righting Business": John Ruggie and the Struggle to Develop International Human Rights Standards for Transnational Firms</title><author>Aaronson, Susan Ariel ; Higham, Ian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c568t-4fbe779c5af9d1433027e20abe335573742cbd0fb0ccf5a44ec3761385790283</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Business</topic><topic>Citizens</topic><topic>Companies</topic><topic>Corporate governance</topic><topic>Corporate responsibility</topic><topic>Corporations</topic><topic>Creativity</topic><topic>Enterprises</topic><topic>Executives</topic><topic>Globalization</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Government and politics</topic><topic>Government spending</topic><topic>Human Rights</topic><topic>Human Rights Violations</topic><topic>International law and human rights</topic><topic>NGOs</topic><topic>Nongovernmental Organizations</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Press</topic><topic>Taxes</topic><topic>Transnationalism</topic><topic>Twenty First Century</topic><topic>United Nations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aaronson, Susan Ariel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Higham, Ian</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Human rights quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aaronson, Susan Ariel</au><au>Higham, Ian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>"Re-righting Business": John Ruggie and the Struggle to Develop International Human Rights Standards for Transnational Firms</atitle><jtitle>Human rights quarterly</jtitle><date>2013-05-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>333</spage><epage>364</epage><pages>333-364</pages><issn>0275-0392</issn><issn>1085-794X</issn><eissn>1085-794X</eissn><coden>HRQUDZ</coden><abstract>As the major players in globalization, firms often operate in states where human rights may not be respected. Without direct intent, firms may be complicit in human rights violations. In 2008, John Ruggie, the United Nations (UN) Special Representative on business and human rights, developed a framework for policymakers to protect human rights and for executives to respect human rights. On 16 June 2011, the UN Human Rights Council endorsed Ruggie's "Guiding Principles" (GPs) for implementing this framework. This article describes how firms, states, and to a lesser extent nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), have responded to this delineation of the human rights responsibilities of business. This article makes four key points: 1) the GPs are an important advance in global governance; 2) the process of developing the GPs was a model of transparent, inclusive twenty-first century governance, although the public is generally unaware of the issue or the new policy; 3) the GPs are a creative and broad rethinking of how to evaluate the human rights performance of corporations; and 4) the GPs are unlikely to have much influence unless policymakers educate their national firms and their citizens regarding the human rights responsibilities of business and press these executives to act.</abstract><cop>Baltimore</cop><pub>The Johns Hopkins University Press</pub><doi>10.1353/hrq.2013.0032</doi><tpages>32</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0275-0392
ispartof Human rights quarterly, 2013-05, Vol.35 (2), p.333-364
issn 0275-0392
1085-794X
1085-794X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1520313592
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Political Science Complete; PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; HeinOnline Law Journal Library
subjects Business
Citizens
Companies
Corporate governance
Corporate responsibility
Corporations
Creativity
Enterprises
Executives
Globalization
Governance
Government and politics
Government spending
Human Rights
Human Rights Violations
International law and human rights
NGOs
Nongovernmental Organizations
Policy making
Press
Taxes
Transnationalism
Twenty First Century
United Nations
title "Re-righting Business": John Ruggie and the Struggle to Develop International Human Rights Standards for Transnational Firms
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T06%3A44%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%22Re-righting%20Business%22:%20John%20Ruggie%20and%20the%20Struggle%20to%20Develop%20International%20Human%20Rights%20Standards%20for%20Transnational%20Firms&rft.jtitle=Human%20rights%20quarterly&rft.au=Aaronson,%20Susan%20Ariel&rft.date=2013-05-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=333&rft.epage=364&rft.pages=333-364&rft.issn=0275-0392&rft.eissn=1085-794X&rft.coden=HRQUDZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1353/hrq.2013.0032&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E24518019%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1406222254&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_informt_id=10.3316/agispt.20220520067346&rft_jstor_id=24518019&rfr_iscdi=true