Coalition Government and Possible Course of UK Political and Electoral System Reform after 2010 Parliamentary Elections
In this paper, the authors analyse the current state of affairs of a political system in theory and constitutional practice popularly termed the Westminster system, which also played the role of a prototype to ex-British dominions and some other countries. Exceptional for its longevity, it is also a...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Lex localis-journal of local self-government 2013-04, Vol.11 (2), p.157-176 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 176 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 157 |
| container_title | Lex localis-journal of local self-government |
| container_volume | 11 |
| creator | Djordjevic, Srdjan Palevic, Milan Rapajic, Milan |
| description | In this paper, the authors analyse the current state of affairs of a political system in theory and constitutional practice popularly termed the Westminster system, which also played the role of a prototype to ex-British dominions and some other countries. Exceptional for its longevity, it is also an example of stability and social consensuality about fundamental values. However, although this state creation has a monopoly in expressive symbolism, some weaknesses have been identified when it comes to the symbols and main elements of this system. One of its weak points is a two-party system of government, devoid of liveliness in a political process with latent agreement of different generations, and in essence, the same or cosmetically changed political establishment. Consistence of government of one or another party is caused by nature of the electoral system, whose main characteristics are the surplus of inequity and deficit of modernity. Adapted from the source document. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.4335/327 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1520312999</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1512215559</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c277t-8b5efb14867ad474f165f0034820163c538a7e8fa2d80041674df989fbb6a92c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1LAzEQhoMoWGr_Q8CLl9V8brJHKbWKBYva85LdncCW7KYmW6X_3qwVFE_OZSbDM2-YdxCaUnItOJc3nKkTNKFS00xyJU5_1edoFuOWpJCE5kxP0MfcG9cOre_x0r9D6DvoB2z6Bq99jG3lAM_9PkTA3uLNY-qOdG3cF7NwUA8-pNfLIQ7Q4WewPnTY2AECZoQSvDbBtWZUNeFwHEifxQt0Zo2LMPvOU7S5W7zO77PV0_JhfrvKaqbUkOlKgq2o0LkyjVDC0lxaQrjQSTznteTaKNDWsEYTImiuRGMLXdiqyk3Baj5FV0fdXfBve4hD2bWxBudMD34fSyoZ4ZQVRfEPlDJGpZQjevkH3SaT-rRISQUTXChC9A9Vh-RlAFvuQtslG0pKyvFUZToV_wTYLoLw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1424347008</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Coalition Government and Possible Course of UK Political and Electoral System Reform after 2010 Parliamentary Elections</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Political Science Complete</source><creator>Djordjevic, Srdjan ; Palevic, Milan ; Rapajic, Milan</creator><creatorcontrib>Djordjevic, Srdjan ; Palevic, Milan ; Rapajic, Milan</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper, the authors analyse the current state of affairs of a political system in theory and constitutional practice popularly termed the Westminster system, which also played the role of a prototype to ex-British dominions and some other countries. Exceptional for its longevity, it is also an example of stability and social consensuality about fundamental values. However, although this state creation has a monopoly in expressive symbolism, some weaknesses have been identified when it comes to the symbols and main elements of this system. One of its weak points is a two-party system of government, devoid of liveliness in a political process with latent agreement of different generations, and in essence, the same or cosmetically changed political establishment. Consistence of government of one or another party is caused by nature of the electoral system, whose main characteristics are the surplus of inequity and deficit of modernity. Adapted from the source document.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1581-5374</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1581-5374</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4335/327</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Maribor: Institute for Local Self-Government and Public Procurement Maribor</publisher><subject>Coalition governments ; Constitutional law ; Constitutions ; Economic structure ; Elections ; Electoral Systems ; Etiquette ; Foreign policy ; Longevity ; Modernity ; Monopolies ; Monopoly ; Political leadership ; Political Parties ; Political systems ; Politics ; Reform ; Stability ; Symbolism ; United Kingdom ; Values</subject><ispartof>Lex localis-journal of local self-government, 2013-04, Vol.11 (2), p.157-176</ispartof><rights>Copyright Institute for Local Self-Government and Public Procurement Maribor Apr 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12844,27864,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Djordjevic, Srdjan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palevic, Milan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rapajic, Milan</creatorcontrib><title>Coalition Government and Possible Course of UK Political and Electoral System Reform after 2010 Parliamentary Elections</title><title>Lex localis-journal of local self-government</title><description>In this paper, the authors analyse the current state of affairs of a political system in theory and constitutional practice popularly termed the Westminster system, which also played the role of a prototype to ex-British dominions and some other countries. Exceptional for its longevity, it is also an example of stability and social consensuality about fundamental values. However, although this state creation has a monopoly in expressive symbolism, some weaknesses have been identified when it comes to the symbols and main elements of this system. One of its weak points is a two-party system of government, devoid of liveliness in a political process with latent agreement of different generations, and in essence, the same or cosmetically changed political establishment. Consistence of government of one or another party is caused by nature of the electoral system, whose main characteristics are the surplus of inequity and deficit of modernity. Adapted from the source document.</description><subject>Coalition governments</subject><subject>Constitutional law</subject><subject>Constitutions</subject><subject>Economic structure</subject><subject>Elections</subject><subject>Electoral Systems</subject><subject>Etiquette</subject><subject>Foreign policy</subject><subject>Longevity</subject><subject>Modernity</subject><subject>Monopolies</subject><subject>Monopoly</subject><subject>Political leadership</subject><subject>Political Parties</subject><subject>Political systems</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Reform</subject><subject>Stability</subject><subject>Symbolism</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><subject>Values</subject><issn>1581-5374</issn><issn>1581-5374</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1LAzEQhoMoWGr_Q8CLl9V8brJHKbWKBYva85LdncCW7KYmW6X_3qwVFE_OZSbDM2-YdxCaUnItOJc3nKkTNKFS00xyJU5_1edoFuOWpJCE5kxP0MfcG9cOre_x0r9D6DvoB2z6Bq99jG3lAM_9PkTA3uLNY-qOdG3cF7NwUA8-pNfLIQ7Q4WewPnTY2AECZoQSvDbBtWZUNeFwHEifxQt0Zo2LMPvOU7S5W7zO77PV0_JhfrvKaqbUkOlKgq2o0LkyjVDC0lxaQrjQSTznteTaKNDWsEYTImiuRGMLXdiqyk3Baj5FV0fdXfBve4hD2bWxBudMD34fSyoZ4ZQVRfEPlDJGpZQjevkH3SaT-rRISQUTXChC9A9Vh-RlAFvuQtslG0pKyvFUZToV_wTYLoLw</recordid><startdate>20130401</startdate><enddate>20130401</enddate><creator>Djordjevic, Srdjan</creator><creator>Palevic, Milan</creator><creator>Rapajic, Milan</creator><general>Institute for Local Self-Government and Public Procurement Maribor</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BYOGL</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130401</creationdate><title>Coalition Government and Possible Course of UK Political and Electoral System Reform after 2010 Parliamentary Elections</title><author>Djordjevic, Srdjan ; Palevic, Milan ; Rapajic, Milan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c277t-8b5efb14867ad474f165f0034820163c538a7e8fa2d80041674df989fbb6a92c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Coalition governments</topic><topic>Constitutional law</topic><topic>Constitutions</topic><topic>Economic structure</topic><topic>Elections</topic><topic>Electoral Systems</topic><topic>Etiquette</topic><topic>Foreign policy</topic><topic>Longevity</topic><topic>Modernity</topic><topic>Monopolies</topic><topic>Monopoly</topic><topic>Political leadership</topic><topic>Political Parties</topic><topic>Political systems</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Reform</topic><topic>Stability</topic><topic>Symbolism</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><topic>Values</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Djordjevic, Srdjan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palevic, Milan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rapajic, Milan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>East Europe, Central Europe Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Lex localis-journal of local self-government</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Djordjevic, Srdjan</au><au>Palevic, Milan</au><au>Rapajic, Milan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Coalition Government and Possible Course of UK Political and Electoral System Reform after 2010 Parliamentary Elections</atitle><jtitle>Lex localis-journal of local self-government</jtitle><date>2013-04-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>157</spage><epage>176</epage><pages>157-176</pages><issn>1581-5374</issn><eissn>1581-5374</eissn><abstract>In this paper, the authors analyse the current state of affairs of a political system in theory and constitutional practice popularly termed the Westminster system, which also played the role of a prototype to ex-British dominions and some other countries. Exceptional for its longevity, it is also an example of stability and social consensuality about fundamental values. However, although this state creation has a monopoly in expressive symbolism, some weaknesses have been identified when it comes to the symbols and main elements of this system. One of its weak points is a two-party system of government, devoid of liveliness in a political process with latent agreement of different generations, and in essence, the same or cosmetically changed political establishment. Consistence of government of one or another party is caused by nature of the electoral system, whose main characteristics are the surplus of inequity and deficit of modernity. Adapted from the source document.</abstract><cop>Maribor</cop><pub>Institute for Local Self-Government and Public Procurement Maribor</pub><doi>10.4335/327</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1581-5374 |
| ispartof | Lex localis-journal of local self-government, 2013-04, Vol.11 (2), p.157-176 |
| issn | 1581-5374 1581-5374 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1520312999 |
| source | PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Political Science Complete |
| subjects | Coalition governments Constitutional law Constitutions Economic structure Elections Electoral Systems Etiquette Foreign policy Longevity Modernity Monopolies Monopoly Political leadership Political Parties Political systems Politics Reform Stability Symbolism United Kingdom Values |
| title | Coalition Government and Possible Course of UK Political and Electoral System Reform after 2010 Parliamentary Elections |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T12%3A15%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Coalition%20Government%20and%20Possible%20Course%20of%20UK%20Political%20and%20Electoral%20System%20Reform%20after%202010%20Parliamentary%20Elections&rft.jtitle=Lex%20localis-journal%20of%20local%20self-government&rft.au=Djordjevic,%20Srdjan&rft.date=2013-04-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=157&rft.epage=176&rft.pages=157-176&rft.issn=1581-5374&rft.eissn=1581-5374&rft_id=info:doi/10.4335/327&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1512215559%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1424347008&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |