Misleading Suggestions can Alter Later Memory Reports even Following a Cognitive Interview

SUMMARY Taking an immediate recall test prior to misinformation exposure can increase eyewitness suggestibility—a finding termed retrieval‐enhanced suggestibility. Here, we examined whether retrieval‐enhanced suggestibility would occur when participants were administered an immediate Cognitive Inter...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Applied cognitive psychology 2014-01, Vol.28 (1), p.1-9
Hauptverfasser: LaPaglia, Jessica A., Wilford, Miko M., Rivard, Jillian R., Chan, Jason C. K., Fisher, Ronald P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 9
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1
container_title Applied cognitive psychology
container_volume 28
creator LaPaglia, Jessica A.
Wilford, Miko M.
Rivard, Jillian R.
Chan, Jason C. K.
Fisher, Ronald P.
description SUMMARY Taking an immediate recall test prior to misinformation exposure can increase eyewitness suggestibility—a finding termed retrieval‐enhanced suggestibility. Here, we examined whether retrieval‐enhanced suggestibility would occur when participants were administered an immediate Cognitive Interview (CI). The CI is an investigative interviewing technique that consistently elicits more correct details in memory reports than standard interviews. In this study, participants watched a video of a crime and then completed a distractor task (control condition), a free recall test, or the CI. They then heard misinformation presented in a narrative. Participants produced more accurate memory details in the CI than in free recall despite spending equal time on both tasks. However, the CI also increased the later report of misinformation relative to the control condition. These results show that initial retrieval can increase subsequent suggestibility even when such retrieval occurs under relatively ideal conditions. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/acp.2950
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1520311399</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1520311399</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4610-816ca4e746bf262cb5a27e6b4e2959bdee71b39c0a616037116f217340ded12e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkdFq2zAUhs3YoFk36CMIxmA37s6RbNm6DGFNC2k31o5Cb4SsHAd1ipVJTtK8_WwaOhgMdnN08-nj_OfPsjOEcwTgn43dnHNVwqtsgqBUDhWH19kE6rrOC6jhJHub0iMAKIl8kj1cu-TJLF23Yrfb1YpS70KXmDUdm_qeIluYcV7TOsQD-06bEPvEaEcduwjeh_3407BZWHWudztiV93A7xzt32VvWuMTvT--p9mPiy93s8t88XV-NZsucltIhLxGaU1BVSGblktum9LwimRT0BBDNUuiChuhLBiJEkSFKFuOlShgSUvkJE6zT8_eTQy_tkMAvXbJkvemo7BNGksOAlEo9R8olEJIjmJAP_yFPoZt7IYgGgs1EsNF_whtDClFavUmurWJB42gxz700Ice-xjQj0ehSdb4NprOuvTC83qoCPi4Y_7M7Z2nwz99ejr7dvQeeZd6enrhTfypZSWqUt_fzDXU9w9wiXN9I34DiQ2l4A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1492133888</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Misleading Suggestions can Alter Later Memory Reports even Following a Cognitive Interview</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>LaPaglia, Jessica A. ; Wilford, Miko M. ; Rivard, Jillian R. ; Chan, Jason C. K. ; Fisher, Ronald P.</creator><creatorcontrib>LaPaglia, Jessica A. ; Wilford, Miko M. ; Rivard, Jillian R. ; Chan, Jason C. K. ; Fisher, Ronald P.</creatorcontrib><description>SUMMARY Taking an immediate recall test prior to misinformation exposure can increase eyewitness suggestibility—a finding termed retrieval‐enhanced suggestibility. Here, we examined whether retrieval‐enhanced suggestibility would occur when participants were administered an immediate Cognitive Interview (CI). The CI is an investigative interviewing technique that consistently elicits more correct details in memory reports than standard interviews. In this study, participants watched a video of a crime and then completed a distractor task (control condition), a free recall test, or the CI. They then heard misinformation presented in a narrative. Participants produced more accurate memory details in the CI than in free recall despite spending equal time on both tasks. However, the CI also increased the later report of misinformation relative to the control condition. These results show that initial retrieval can increase subsequent suggestibility even when such retrieval occurs under relatively ideal conditions. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0888-4080</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-0720</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/acp.2950</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ACPSED</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Attention ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cognitive interviews ; Cognitive psychology ; Free recall ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human ; Information retrieval ; Learning. Memory ; Memory ; Misinformation ; Performance evaluation ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Recall ; Retrieval ; Suggestibility</subject><ispartof>Applied cognitive psychology, 2014-01, Vol.28 (1), p.1-9</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2013 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright John Wiley and Sons, Limited Jan/Feb 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4610-816ca4e746bf262cb5a27e6b4e2959bdee71b39c0a616037116f217340ded12e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4610-816ca4e746bf262cb5a27e6b4e2959bdee71b39c0a616037116f217340ded12e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Facp.2950$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Facp.2950$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,4024,27923,27924,27925,30999,31000,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=28088029$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>LaPaglia, Jessica A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilford, Miko M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rivard, Jillian R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Jason C. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fisher, Ronald P.</creatorcontrib><title>Misleading Suggestions can Alter Later Memory Reports even Following a Cognitive Interview</title><title>Applied cognitive psychology</title><addtitle>Appl. Cognit. Psychol</addtitle><description>SUMMARY Taking an immediate recall test prior to misinformation exposure can increase eyewitness suggestibility—a finding termed retrieval‐enhanced suggestibility. Here, we examined whether retrieval‐enhanced suggestibility would occur when participants were administered an immediate Cognitive Interview (CI). The CI is an investigative interviewing technique that consistently elicits more correct details in memory reports than standard interviews. In this study, participants watched a video of a crime and then completed a distractor task (control condition), a free recall test, or the CI. They then heard misinformation presented in a narrative. Participants produced more accurate memory details in the CI than in free recall despite spending equal time on both tasks. However, the CI also increased the later report of misinformation relative to the control condition. These results show that initial retrieval can increase subsequent suggestibility even when such retrieval occurs under relatively ideal conditions. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cognitive interviews</subject><subject>Cognitive psychology</subject><subject>Free recall</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Information retrieval</subject><subject>Learning. Memory</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Misinformation</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Recall</subject><subject>Retrieval</subject><subject>Suggestibility</subject><issn>0888-4080</issn><issn>1099-0720</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkdFq2zAUhs3YoFk36CMIxmA37s6RbNm6DGFNC2k31o5Cb4SsHAd1ipVJTtK8_WwaOhgMdnN08-nj_OfPsjOEcwTgn43dnHNVwqtsgqBUDhWH19kE6rrOC6jhJHub0iMAKIl8kj1cu-TJLF23Yrfb1YpS70KXmDUdm_qeIluYcV7TOsQD-06bEPvEaEcduwjeh_3407BZWHWudztiV93A7xzt32VvWuMTvT--p9mPiy93s8t88XV-NZsucltIhLxGaU1BVSGblktum9LwimRT0BBDNUuiChuhLBiJEkSFKFuOlShgSUvkJE6zT8_eTQy_tkMAvXbJkvemo7BNGksOAlEo9R8olEJIjmJAP_yFPoZt7IYgGgs1EsNF_whtDClFavUmurWJB42gxz700Ice-xjQj0ehSdb4NprOuvTC83qoCPi4Y_7M7Z2nwz99ejr7dvQeeZd6enrhTfypZSWqUt_fzDXU9w9wiXN9I34DiQ2l4A</recordid><startdate>201401</startdate><enddate>201401</enddate><creator>LaPaglia, Jessica A.</creator><creator>Wilford, Miko M.</creator><creator>Rivard, Jillian R.</creator><creator>Chan, Jason C. K.</creator><creator>Fisher, Ronald P.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201401</creationdate><title>Misleading Suggestions can Alter Later Memory Reports even Following a Cognitive Interview</title><author>LaPaglia, Jessica A. ; Wilford, Miko M. ; Rivard, Jillian R. ; Chan, Jason C. K. ; Fisher, Ronald P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4610-816ca4e746bf262cb5a27e6b4e2959bdee71b39c0a616037116f217340ded12e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cognitive interviews</topic><topic>Cognitive psychology</topic><topic>Free recall</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Information retrieval</topic><topic>Learning. Memory</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Misinformation</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Recall</topic><topic>Retrieval</topic><topic>Suggestibility</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>LaPaglia, Jessica A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilford, Miko M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rivard, Jillian R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Jason C. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fisher, Ronald P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Applied cognitive psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>LaPaglia, Jessica A.</au><au>Wilford, Miko M.</au><au>Rivard, Jillian R.</au><au>Chan, Jason C. K.</au><au>Fisher, Ronald P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Misleading Suggestions can Alter Later Memory Reports even Following a Cognitive Interview</atitle><jtitle>Applied cognitive psychology</jtitle><addtitle>Appl. Cognit. Psychol</addtitle><date>2014-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>9</epage><pages>1-9</pages><issn>0888-4080</issn><eissn>1099-0720</eissn><coden>ACPSED</coden><abstract>SUMMARY Taking an immediate recall test prior to misinformation exposure can increase eyewitness suggestibility—a finding termed retrieval‐enhanced suggestibility. Here, we examined whether retrieval‐enhanced suggestibility would occur when participants were administered an immediate Cognitive Interview (CI). The CI is an investigative interviewing technique that consistently elicits more correct details in memory reports than standard interviews. In this study, participants watched a video of a crime and then completed a distractor task (control condition), a free recall test, or the CI. They then heard misinformation presented in a narrative. Participants produced more accurate memory details in the CI than in free recall despite spending equal time on both tasks. However, the CI also increased the later report of misinformation relative to the control condition. These results show that initial retrieval can increase subsequent suggestibility even when such retrieval occurs under relatively ideal conditions. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/acp.2950</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0888-4080
ispartof Applied cognitive psychology, 2014-01, Vol.28 (1), p.1-9
issn 0888-4080
1099-0720
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1520311399
source Wiley-Blackwell Journals; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
subjects Attention
Biological and medical sciences
Cognitive interviews
Cognitive psychology
Free recall
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Human
Information retrieval
Learning. Memory
Memory
Misinformation
Performance evaluation
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Recall
Retrieval
Suggestibility
title Misleading Suggestions can Alter Later Memory Reports even Following a Cognitive Interview
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T09%3A47%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Misleading%20Suggestions%20can%20Alter%20Later%20Memory%20Reports%20even%20Following%20a%20Cognitive%20Interview&rft.jtitle=Applied%20cognitive%20psychology&rft.au=LaPaglia,%20Jessica%20A.&rft.date=2014-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=9&rft.pages=1-9&rft.issn=0888-4080&rft.eissn=1099-0720&rft.coden=ACPSED&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/acp.2950&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1520311399%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1492133888&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true