Might Men Diagnosed with Metastatic Prostate Cancer Benefit from Definitive Treatment of the Primary Tumor? A SEER-Based Study

Abstract Background Few data exist regarding the impact on survival of definitive treatment of the prostate in men diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa). Objective To evaluate the survival of men diagnosed with mPCa based on definitive treatment of the prostate. Design, setting, and parti...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European urology 2014-06, Vol.65 (6), p.1058-1066
Hauptverfasser: Culp, Stephen H, Schellhammer, Paul F, Williams, Michael B
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1066
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1058
container_title European urology
container_volume 65
creator Culp, Stephen H
Schellhammer, Paul F
Williams, Michael B
description Abstract Background Few data exist regarding the impact on survival of definitive treatment of the prostate in men diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa). Objective To evaluate the survival of men diagnosed with mPCa based on definitive treatment of the prostate. Design, setting, and participants Men with documented stage IV (M1a–c) PCa at diagnosis identified using Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) (2004–2010) and divided based on definitive treatment of the prostate (radical prostatectomy [RP] or brachytherapy [BT]) or no surgery or radiation therapy (NSR). Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Kaplan-Meier methods were used to calculate overall survival (OS). Multivariable competing risks regression analysis was used to calculate disease-specific survival (DSS) probability and identify factors associated with cause-specific mortality (CSM). Results and limitations A total of 8185 patients were identified: NSR ( n = 7811), RP ( n = 245), and BT ( n = 129). The 5-yr OS and predicted DSS were each significantly higher in patients undergoing RP (67.4% and 75.8%, respectively) or BT (52.6 and 61.3%, respectively) compared with NSR patients (22.5% and 48.7%, respectively) ( p < 0.001). Undergoing RP or BT was each independently associated with decreased CSM ( p < 0.01). Similar results were noted regardless of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) M stage. Factors associated with increased CSM in patients undergoing local therapy included AJCC T4 stage, high-grade disease, prostate-specific antigen ≥20 ng/ml, age ≥70 yr, and pelvic lymphadenopathy ( p < 0.05). The major limitation of this study was the lack of variables from SEER known to influence survival of patients with mPCa, including treatment with systemic therapy. Conclusions Definitive treatment of the prostate in men diagnosed with mPCa suggests a survival benefit in this large population-based study. These results should serve as a foundation for future prospective trials. Patient summary We used a large population-based cancer database to examine survival in men diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) undergoing definitive therapy for the prostate. Local therapy (LT) appeared to confer a survival benefit. Therefore, we conclude that prospective trials are needed to further evaluate the role of LT in mPCa.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.11.012
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1520111505</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0302283813012098</els_id><sourcerecordid>1520111505</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-48d209f9298b0913e1049cffaf3ca6c4365579b68a6c3966048df982d71051e23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkk1vEzEQhlcIREPhHyDkCxKXDTP2fvkCatPwIbUCkXC2HO-4ccjuFttblAu_Ha8SQOLCyWPrfefj8WTZc4Q5Alavd3Ma_eiHOQcUc8Q5IH-QzbCpRV6XFTzMZiCA57wRzVn2JIQdAIhSisfZGS-4hBLELPt54263kd1Qz66cvu2HQC374eI2PUUdoo7OsM9-mCJiC90b8uySerIuMuuHjl2lsHfR3RNbe9Kxoz6ywbK4pWR0nfYHth67wb9lF2y1XH7JL_VUZBXH9vA0e2T1PtCz03mefX23XC8-5Nef3n9cXFznpijqmBdNy0FayWWzAYmCEApprNVWGF2ZQlRlWctN1aSLkFUFyWBlw9saoUTi4jx7dcx754fvI4WoOhcM7fe6p2EMCstEEbGEMkmLo9SkqYMnq-6OUygENZFXO3UkrybyClEl8sn24lRh3HTU_jH9Rp0EL08CHYzeW59YuvBX1xQFNlAn3ZujjhKPe0deBeMocW-dJxNVO7j_dfJvArNPP5RqfqMDhd0w-j6xVqgCV6BW05ZMS4IiuUE24hfKqLdd</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1520111505</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Might Men Diagnosed with Metastatic Prostate Cancer Benefit from Definitive Treatment of the Primary Tumor? A SEER-Based Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Culp, Stephen H ; Schellhammer, Paul F ; Williams, Michael B</creator><creatorcontrib>Culp, Stephen H ; Schellhammer, Paul F ; Williams, Michael B</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Few data exist regarding the impact on survival of definitive treatment of the prostate in men diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa). Objective To evaluate the survival of men diagnosed with mPCa based on definitive treatment of the prostate. Design, setting, and participants Men with documented stage IV (M1a–c) PCa at diagnosis identified using Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) (2004–2010) and divided based on definitive treatment of the prostate (radical prostatectomy [RP] or brachytherapy [BT]) or no surgery or radiation therapy (NSR). Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Kaplan-Meier methods were used to calculate overall survival (OS). Multivariable competing risks regression analysis was used to calculate disease-specific survival (DSS) probability and identify factors associated with cause-specific mortality (CSM). Results and limitations A total of 8185 patients were identified: NSR ( n = 7811), RP ( n = 245), and BT ( n = 129). The 5-yr OS and predicted DSS were each significantly higher in patients undergoing RP (67.4% and 75.8%, respectively) or BT (52.6 and 61.3%, respectively) compared with NSR patients (22.5% and 48.7%, respectively) ( p &lt; 0.001). Undergoing RP or BT was each independently associated with decreased CSM ( p &lt; 0.01). Similar results were noted regardless of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) M stage. Factors associated with increased CSM in patients undergoing local therapy included AJCC T4 stage, high-grade disease, prostate-specific antigen ≥20 ng/ml, age ≥70 yr, and pelvic lymphadenopathy ( p &lt; 0.05). The major limitation of this study was the lack of variables from SEER known to influence survival of patients with mPCa, including treatment with systemic therapy. Conclusions Definitive treatment of the prostate in men diagnosed with mPCa suggests a survival benefit in this large population-based study. These results should serve as a foundation for future prospective trials. Patient summary We used a large population-based cancer database to examine survival in men diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) undergoing definitive therapy for the prostate. Local therapy (LT) appeared to confer a survival benefit. Therefore, we conclude that prospective trials are needed to further evaluate the role of LT in mPCa.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0302-2838</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7560</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.11.012</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24290503</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EUURAV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adenocarcinoma - mortality ; Adenocarcinoma - secondary ; Adenocarcinoma - therapy ; Age Factors ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Brachytherapy ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Kaplan-Meier Estimate ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; Male ; Male genital diseases ; Medical sciences ; Metastatic prostate cancer ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Grading ; Neoplasm Staging ; Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases ; Outcomes assessment ; Prostate-Specific Antigen - blood ; Prostatectomy ; Prostatic Neoplasms - mortality ; Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology ; Prostatic Neoplasms - therapy ; Radical prostatectomy ; SEER Program ; Survival Rate ; Tumors ; Tumors of the urinary system ; Urinary tract. Prostate gland ; Urology</subject><ispartof>European urology, 2014-06, Vol.65 (6), p.1058-1066</ispartof><rights>European Association of Urology</rights><rights>2013 European Association of Urology</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-48d209f9298b0913e1049cffaf3ca6c4365579b68a6c3966048df982d71051e23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-48d209f9298b0913e1049cffaf3ca6c4365579b68a6c3966048df982d71051e23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2013.11.012$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,3554,27933,27934,46004</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=28441807$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24290503$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Culp, Stephen H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schellhammer, Paul F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Michael B</creatorcontrib><title>Might Men Diagnosed with Metastatic Prostate Cancer Benefit from Definitive Treatment of the Primary Tumor? A SEER-Based Study</title><title>European urology</title><addtitle>Eur Urol</addtitle><description>Abstract Background Few data exist regarding the impact on survival of definitive treatment of the prostate in men diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa). Objective To evaluate the survival of men diagnosed with mPCa based on definitive treatment of the prostate. Design, setting, and participants Men with documented stage IV (M1a–c) PCa at diagnosis identified using Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) (2004–2010) and divided based on definitive treatment of the prostate (radical prostatectomy [RP] or brachytherapy [BT]) or no surgery or radiation therapy (NSR). Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Kaplan-Meier methods were used to calculate overall survival (OS). Multivariable competing risks regression analysis was used to calculate disease-specific survival (DSS) probability and identify factors associated with cause-specific mortality (CSM). Results and limitations A total of 8185 patients were identified: NSR ( n = 7811), RP ( n = 245), and BT ( n = 129). The 5-yr OS and predicted DSS were each significantly higher in patients undergoing RP (67.4% and 75.8%, respectively) or BT (52.6 and 61.3%, respectively) compared with NSR patients (22.5% and 48.7%, respectively) ( p &lt; 0.001). Undergoing RP or BT was each independently associated with decreased CSM ( p &lt; 0.01). Similar results were noted regardless of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) M stage. Factors associated with increased CSM in patients undergoing local therapy included AJCC T4 stage, high-grade disease, prostate-specific antigen ≥20 ng/ml, age ≥70 yr, and pelvic lymphadenopathy ( p &lt; 0.05). The major limitation of this study was the lack of variables from SEER known to influence survival of patients with mPCa, including treatment with systemic therapy. Conclusions Definitive treatment of the prostate in men diagnosed with mPCa suggests a survival benefit in this large population-based study. These results should serve as a foundation for future prospective trials. Patient summary We used a large population-based cancer database to examine survival in men diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) undergoing definitive therapy for the prostate. Local therapy (LT) appeared to confer a survival benefit. Therefore, we conclude that prospective trials are needed to further evaluate the role of LT in mPCa.</description><subject>Adenocarcinoma - mortality</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - secondary</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - therapy</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Brachytherapy</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</subject><subject>Lymphatic Metastasis</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Male genital diseases</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Metastatic prostate cancer</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Grading</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases</subject><subject>Outcomes assessment</subject><subject>Prostate-Specific Antigen - blood</subject><subject>Prostatectomy</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Radical prostatectomy</subject><subject>SEER Program</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Tumors of the urinary system</subject><subject>Urinary tract. Prostate gland</subject><subject>Urology</subject><issn>0302-2838</issn><issn>1873-7560</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkk1vEzEQhlcIREPhHyDkCxKXDTP2fvkCatPwIbUCkXC2HO-4ccjuFttblAu_Ha8SQOLCyWPrfefj8WTZc4Q5Alavd3Ma_eiHOQcUc8Q5IH-QzbCpRV6XFTzMZiCA57wRzVn2JIQdAIhSisfZGS-4hBLELPt54263kd1Qz66cvu2HQC374eI2PUUdoo7OsM9-mCJiC90b8uySerIuMuuHjl2lsHfR3RNbe9Kxoz6ywbK4pWR0nfYHth67wb9lF2y1XH7JL_VUZBXH9vA0e2T1PtCz03mefX23XC8-5Nef3n9cXFznpijqmBdNy0FayWWzAYmCEApprNVWGF2ZQlRlWctN1aSLkFUFyWBlw9saoUTi4jx7dcx754fvI4WoOhcM7fe6p2EMCstEEbGEMkmLo9SkqYMnq-6OUygENZFXO3UkrybyClEl8sn24lRh3HTU_jH9Rp0EL08CHYzeW59YuvBX1xQFNlAn3ZujjhKPe0deBeMocW-dJxNVO7j_dfJvArNPP5RqfqMDhd0w-j6xVqgCV6BW05ZMS4IiuUE24hfKqLdd</recordid><startdate>20140601</startdate><enddate>20140601</enddate><creator>Culp, Stephen H</creator><creator>Schellhammer, Paul F</creator><creator>Williams, Michael B</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140601</creationdate><title>Might Men Diagnosed with Metastatic Prostate Cancer Benefit from Definitive Treatment of the Primary Tumor? A SEER-Based Study</title><author>Culp, Stephen H ; Schellhammer, Paul F ; Williams, Michael B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-48d209f9298b0913e1049cffaf3ca6c4365579b68a6c3966048df982d71051e23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adenocarcinoma - mortality</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - secondary</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - therapy</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Brachytherapy</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</topic><topic>Lymphatic Metastasis</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Male genital diseases</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Metastatic prostate cancer</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Grading</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases</topic><topic>Outcomes assessment</topic><topic>Prostate-Specific Antigen - blood</topic><topic>Prostatectomy</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Radical prostatectomy</topic><topic>SEER Program</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Tumors of the urinary system</topic><topic>Urinary tract. Prostate gland</topic><topic>Urology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Culp, Stephen H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schellhammer, Paul F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Michael B</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European urology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Culp, Stephen H</au><au>Schellhammer, Paul F</au><au>Williams, Michael B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Might Men Diagnosed with Metastatic Prostate Cancer Benefit from Definitive Treatment of the Primary Tumor? A SEER-Based Study</atitle><jtitle>European urology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur Urol</addtitle><date>2014-06-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1058</spage><epage>1066</epage><pages>1058-1066</pages><issn>0302-2838</issn><eissn>1873-7560</eissn><coden>EUURAV</coden><abstract>Abstract Background Few data exist regarding the impact on survival of definitive treatment of the prostate in men diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa). Objective To evaluate the survival of men diagnosed with mPCa based on definitive treatment of the prostate. Design, setting, and participants Men with documented stage IV (M1a–c) PCa at diagnosis identified using Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) (2004–2010) and divided based on definitive treatment of the prostate (radical prostatectomy [RP] or brachytherapy [BT]) or no surgery or radiation therapy (NSR). Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Kaplan-Meier methods were used to calculate overall survival (OS). Multivariable competing risks regression analysis was used to calculate disease-specific survival (DSS) probability and identify factors associated with cause-specific mortality (CSM). Results and limitations A total of 8185 patients were identified: NSR ( n = 7811), RP ( n = 245), and BT ( n = 129). The 5-yr OS and predicted DSS were each significantly higher in patients undergoing RP (67.4% and 75.8%, respectively) or BT (52.6 and 61.3%, respectively) compared with NSR patients (22.5% and 48.7%, respectively) ( p &lt; 0.001). Undergoing RP or BT was each independently associated with decreased CSM ( p &lt; 0.01). Similar results were noted regardless of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) M stage. Factors associated with increased CSM in patients undergoing local therapy included AJCC T4 stage, high-grade disease, prostate-specific antigen ≥20 ng/ml, age ≥70 yr, and pelvic lymphadenopathy ( p &lt; 0.05). The major limitation of this study was the lack of variables from SEER known to influence survival of patients with mPCa, including treatment with systemic therapy. Conclusions Definitive treatment of the prostate in men diagnosed with mPCa suggests a survival benefit in this large population-based study. These results should serve as a foundation for future prospective trials. Patient summary We used a large population-based cancer database to examine survival in men diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) undergoing definitive therapy for the prostate. Local therapy (LT) appeared to confer a survival benefit. Therefore, we conclude that prospective trials are needed to further evaluate the role of LT in mPCa.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>24290503</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.eururo.2013.11.012</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0302-2838
ispartof European urology, 2014-06, Vol.65 (6), p.1058-1066
issn 0302-2838
1873-7560
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1520111505
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Adenocarcinoma - mortality
Adenocarcinoma - secondary
Adenocarcinoma - therapy
Age Factors
Aged
Biological and medical sciences
Brachytherapy
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Humans
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Lymphatic Metastasis
Male
Male genital diseases
Medical sciences
Metastatic prostate cancer
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Grading
Neoplasm Staging
Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases
Outcomes assessment
Prostate-Specific Antigen - blood
Prostatectomy
Prostatic Neoplasms - mortality
Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology
Prostatic Neoplasms - therapy
Radical prostatectomy
SEER Program
Survival Rate
Tumors
Tumors of the urinary system
Urinary tract. Prostate gland
Urology
title Might Men Diagnosed with Metastatic Prostate Cancer Benefit from Definitive Treatment of the Primary Tumor? A SEER-Based Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-11-29T11%3A24%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Might%20Men%20Diagnosed%20with%20Metastatic%20Prostate%20Cancer%20Benefit%20from%20Definitive%20Treatment%20of%20the%20Primary%20Tumor?%20A%20SEER-Based%20Study&rft.jtitle=European%20urology&rft.au=Culp,%20Stephen%20H&rft.date=2014-06-01&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1058&rft.epage=1066&rft.pages=1058-1066&rft.issn=0302-2838&rft.eissn=1873-7560&rft.coden=EUURAV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.eururo.2013.11.012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1520111505%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1520111505&rft_id=info:pmid/24290503&rft_els_id=S0302283813012098&rfr_iscdi=true