Might Men Diagnosed with Metastatic Prostate Cancer Benefit from Definitive Treatment of the Primary Tumor? A SEER-Based Study
Abstract Background Few data exist regarding the impact on survival of definitive treatment of the prostate in men diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa). Objective To evaluate the survival of men diagnosed with mPCa based on definitive treatment of the prostate. Design, setting, and parti...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European urology 2014-06, Vol.65 (6), p.1058-1066 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1066 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1058 |
container_title | European urology |
container_volume | 65 |
creator | Culp, Stephen H Schellhammer, Paul F Williams, Michael B |
description | Abstract Background Few data exist regarding the impact on survival of definitive treatment of the prostate in men diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa). Objective To evaluate the survival of men diagnosed with mPCa based on definitive treatment of the prostate. Design, setting, and participants Men with documented stage IV (M1a–c) PCa at diagnosis identified using Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) (2004–2010) and divided based on definitive treatment of the prostate (radical prostatectomy [RP] or brachytherapy [BT]) or no surgery or radiation therapy (NSR). Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Kaplan-Meier methods were used to calculate overall survival (OS). Multivariable competing risks regression analysis was used to calculate disease-specific survival (DSS) probability and identify factors associated with cause-specific mortality (CSM). Results and limitations A total of 8185 patients were identified: NSR ( n = 7811), RP ( n = 245), and BT ( n = 129). The 5-yr OS and predicted DSS were each significantly higher in patients undergoing RP (67.4% and 75.8%, respectively) or BT (52.6 and 61.3%, respectively) compared with NSR patients (22.5% and 48.7%, respectively) ( p < 0.001). Undergoing RP or BT was each independently associated with decreased CSM ( p < 0.01). Similar results were noted regardless of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) M stage. Factors associated with increased CSM in patients undergoing local therapy included AJCC T4 stage, high-grade disease, prostate-specific antigen ≥20 ng/ml, age ≥70 yr, and pelvic lymphadenopathy ( p < 0.05). The major limitation of this study was the lack of variables from SEER known to influence survival of patients with mPCa, including treatment with systemic therapy. Conclusions Definitive treatment of the prostate in men diagnosed with mPCa suggests a survival benefit in this large population-based study. These results should serve as a foundation for future prospective trials. Patient summary We used a large population-based cancer database to examine survival in men diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) undergoing definitive therapy for the prostate. Local therapy (LT) appeared to confer a survival benefit. Therefore, we conclude that prospective trials are needed to further evaluate the role of LT in mPCa. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.11.012 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1520111505</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0302283813012098</els_id><sourcerecordid>1520111505</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-48d209f9298b0913e1049cffaf3ca6c4365579b68a6c3966048df982d71051e23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkk1vEzEQhlcIREPhHyDkCxKXDTP2fvkCatPwIbUCkXC2HO-4ccjuFttblAu_Ha8SQOLCyWPrfefj8WTZc4Q5Alavd3Ma_eiHOQcUc8Q5IH-QzbCpRV6XFTzMZiCA57wRzVn2JIQdAIhSisfZGS-4hBLELPt54263kd1Qz66cvu2HQC374eI2PUUdoo7OsM9-mCJiC90b8uySerIuMuuHjl2lsHfR3RNbe9Kxoz6ywbK4pWR0nfYHth67wb9lF2y1XH7JL_VUZBXH9vA0e2T1PtCz03mefX23XC8-5Nef3n9cXFznpijqmBdNy0FayWWzAYmCEApprNVWGF2ZQlRlWctN1aSLkFUFyWBlw9saoUTi4jx7dcx754fvI4WoOhcM7fe6p2EMCstEEbGEMkmLo9SkqYMnq-6OUygENZFXO3UkrybyClEl8sn24lRh3HTU_jH9Rp0EL08CHYzeW59YuvBX1xQFNlAn3ZujjhKPe0deBeMocW-dJxNVO7j_dfJvArNPP5RqfqMDhd0w-j6xVqgCV6BW05ZMS4IiuUE24hfKqLdd</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1520111505</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Might Men Diagnosed with Metastatic Prostate Cancer Benefit from Definitive Treatment of the Primary Tumor? A SEER-Based Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Culp, Stephen H ; Schellhammer, Paul F ; Williams, Michael B</creator><creatorcontrib>Culp, Stephen H ; Schellhammer, Paul F ; Williams, Michael B</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Few data exist regarding the impact on survival of definitive treatment of the prostate in men diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa). Objective To evaluate the survival of men diagnosed with mPCa based on definitive treatment of the prostate. Design, setting, and participants Men with documented stage IV (M1a–c) PCa at diagnosis identified using Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) (2004–2010) and divided based on definitive treatment of the prostate (radical prostatectomy [RP] or brachytherapy [BT]) or no surgery or radiation therapy (NSR). Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Kaplan-Meier methods were used to calculate overall survival (OS). Multivariable competing risks regression analysis was used to calculate disease-specific survival (DSS) probability and identify factors associated with cause-specific mortality (CSM). Results and limitations A total of 8185 patients were identified: NSR ( n = 7811), RP ( n = 245), and BT ( n = 129). The 5-yr OS and predicted DSS were each significantly higher in patients undergoing RP (67.4% and 75.8%, respectively) or BT (52.6 and 61.3%, respectively) compared with NSR patients (22.5% and 48.7%, respectively) ( p < 0.001). Undergoing RP or BT was each independently associated with decreased CSM ( p < 0.01). Similar results were noted regardless of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) M stage. Factors associated with increased CSM in patients undergoing local therapy included AJCC T4 stage, high-grade disease, prostate-specific antigen ≥20 ng/ml, age ≥70 yr, and pelvic lymphadenopathy ( p < 0.05). The major limitation of this study was the lack of variables from SEER known to influence survival of patients with mPCa, including treatment with systemic therapy. Conclusions Definitive treatment of the prostate in men diagnosed with mPCa suggests a survival benefit in this large population-based study. These results should serve as a foundation for future prospective trials. Patient summary We used a large population-based cancer database to examine survival in men diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) undergoing definitive therapy for the prostate. Local therapy (LT) appeared to confer a survival benefit. Therefore, we conclude that prospective trials are needed to further evaluate the role of LT in mPCa.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0302-2838</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7560</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.11.012</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24290503</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EUURAV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adenocarcinoma - mortality ; Adenocarcinoma - secondary ; Adenocarcinoma - therapy ; Age Factors ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Brachytherapy ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Kaplan-Meier Estimate ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; Male ; Male genital diseases ; Medical sciences ; Metastatic prostate cancer ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Grading ; Neoplasm Staging ; Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases ; Outcomes assessment ; Prostate-Specific Antigen - blood ; Prostatectomy ; Prostatic Neoplasms - mortality ; Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology ; Prostatic Neoplasms - therapy ; Radical prostatectomy ; SEER Program ; Survival Rate ; Tumors ; Tumors of the urinary system ; Urinary tract. Prostate gland ; Urology</subject><ispartof>European urology, 2014-06, Vol.65 (6), p.1058-1066</ispartof><rights>European Association of Urology</rights><rights>2013 European Association of Urology</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-48d209f9298b0913e1049cffaf3ca6c4365579b68a6c3966048df982d71051e23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-48d209f9298b0913e1049cffaf3ca6c4365579b68a6c3966048df982d71051e23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2013.11.012$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,3554,27933,27934,46004</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=28441807$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24290503$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Culp, Stephen H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schellhammer, Paul F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Michael B</creatorcontrib><title>Might Men Diagnosed with Metastatic Prostate Cancer Benefit from Definitive Treatment of the Primary Tumor? A SEER-Based Study</title><title>European urology</title><addtitle>Eur Urol</addtitle><description>Abstract Background Few data exist regarding the impact on survival of definitive treatment of the prostate in men diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa). Objective To evaluate the survival of men diagnosed with mPCa based on definitive treatment of the prostate. Design, setting, and participants Men with documented stage IV (M1a–c) PCa at diagnosis identified using Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) (2004–2010) and divided based on definitive treatment of the prostate (radical prostatectomy [RP] or brachytherapy [BT]) or no surgery or radiation therapy (NSR). Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Kaplan-Meier methods were used to calculate overall survival (OS). Multivariable competing risks regression analysis was used to calculate disease-specific survival (DSS) probability and identify factors associated with cause-specific mortality (CSM). Results and limitations A total of 8185 patients were identified: NSR ( n = 7811), RP ( n = 245), and BT ( n = 129). The 5-yr OS and predicted DSS were each significantly higher in patients undergoing RP (67.4% and 75.8%, respectively) or BT (52.6 and 61.3%, respectively) compared with NSR patients (22.5% and 48.7%, respectively) ( p < 0.001). Undergoing RP or BT was each independently associated with decreased CSM ( p < 0.01). Similar results were noted regardless of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) M stage. Factors associated with increased CSM in patients undergoing local therapy included AJCC T4 stage, high-grade disease, prostate-specific antigen ≥20 ng/ml, age ≥70 yr, and pelvic lymphadenopathy ( p < 0.05). The major limitation of this study was the lack of variables from SEER known to influence survival of patients with mPCa, including treatment with systemic therapy. Conclusions Definitive treatment of the prostate in men diagnosed with mPCa suggests a survival benefit in this large population-based study. These results should serve as a foundation for future prospective trials. Patient summary We used a large population-based cancer database to examine survival in men diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) undergoing definitive therapy for the prostate. Local therapy (LT) appeared to confer a survival benefit. Therefore, we conclude that prospective trials are needed to further evaluate the role of LT in mPCa.</description><subject>Adenocarcinoma - mortality</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - secondary</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - therapy</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Brachytherapy</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</subject><subject>Lymphatic Metastasis</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Male genital diseases</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Metastatic prostate cancer</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Grading</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases</subject><subject>Outcomes assessment</subject><subject>Prostate-Specific Antigen - blood</subject><subject>Prostatectomy</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Radical prostatectomy</subject><subject>SEER Program</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Tumors of the urinary system</subject><subject>Urinary tract. Prostate gland</subject><subject>Urology</subject><issn>0302-2838</issn><issn>1873-7560</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkk1vEzEQhlcIREPhHyDkCxKXDTP2fvkCatPwIbUCkXC2HO-4ccjuFttblAu_Ha8SQOLCyWPrfefj8WTZc4Q5Alavd3Ma_eiHOQcUc8Q5IH-QzbCpRV6XFTzMZiCA57wRzVn2JIQdAIhSisfZGS-4hBLELPt54263kd1Qz66cvu2HQC374eI2PUUdoo7OsM9-mCJiC90b8uySerIuMuuHjl2lsHfR3RNbe9Kxoz6ywbK4pWR0nfYHth67wb9lF2y1XH7JL_VUZBXH9vA0e2T1PtCz03mefX23XC8-5Nef3n9cXFznpijqmBdNy0FayWWzAYmCEApprNVWGF2ZQlRlWctN1aSLkFUFyWBlw9saoUTi4jx7dcx754fvI4WoOhcM7fe6p2EMCstEEbGEMkmLo9SkqYMnq-6OUygENZFXO3UkrybyClEl8sn24lRh3HTU_jH9Rp0EL08CHYzeW59YuvBX1xQFNlAn3ZujjhKPe0deBeMocW-dJxNVO7j_dfJvArNPP5RqfqMDhd0w-j6xVqgCV6BW05ZMS4IiuUE24hfKqLdd</recordid><startdate>20140601</startdate><enddate>20140601</enddate><creator>Culp, Stephen H</creator><creator>Schellhammer, Paul F</creator><creator>Williams, Michael B</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140601</creationdate><title>Might Men Diagnosed with Metastatic Prostate Cancer Benefit from Definitive Treatment of the Primary Tumor? A SEER-Based Study</title><author>Culp, Stephen H ; Schellhammer, Paul F ; Williams, Michael B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-48d209f9298b0913e1049cffaf3ca6c4365579b68a6c3966048df982d71051e23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adenocarcinoma - mortality</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - secondary</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - therapy</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Brachytherapy</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</topic><topic>Lymphatic Metastasis</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Male genital diseases</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Metastatic prostate cancer</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Grading</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases</topic><topic>Outcomes assessment</topic><topic>Prostate-Specific Antigen - blood</topic><topic>Prostatectomy</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Radical prostatectomy</topic><topic>SEER Program</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Tumors of the urinary system</topic><topic>Urinary tract. Prostate gland</topic><topic>Urology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Culp, Stephen H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schellhammer, Paul F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Michael B</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European urology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Culp, Stephen H</au><au>Schellhammer, Paul F</au><au>Williams, Michael B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Might Men Diagnosed with Metastatic Prostate Cancer Benefit from Definitive Treatment of the Primary Tumor? A SEER-Based Study</atitle><jtitle>European urology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur Urol</addtitle><date>2014-06-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1058</spage><epage>1066</epage><pages>1058-1066</pages><issn>0302-2838</issn><eissn>1873-7560</eissn><coden>EUURAV</coden><abstract>Abstract Background Few data exist regarding the impact on survival of definitive treatment of the prostate in men diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa). Objective To evaluate the survival of men diagnosed with mPCa based on definitive treatment of the prostate. Design, setting, and participants Men with documented stage IV (M1a–c) PCa at diagnosis identified using Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) (2004–2010) and divided based on definitive treatment of the prostate (radical prostatectomy [RP] or brachytherapy [BT]) or no surgery or radiation therapy (NSR). Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Kaplan-Meier methods were used to calculate overall survival (OS). Multivariable competing risks regression analysis was used to calculate disease-specific survival (DSS) probability and identify factors associated with cause-specific mortality (CSM). Results and limitations A total of 8185 patients were identified: NSR ( n = 7811), RP ( n = 245), and BT ( n = 129). The 5-yr OS and predicted DSS were each significantly higher in patients undergoing RP (67.4% and 75.8%, respectively) or BT (52.6 and 61.3%, respectively) compared with NSR patients (22.5% and 48.7%, respectively) ( p < 0.001). Undergoing RP or BT was each independently associated with decreased CSM ( p < 0.01). Similar results were noted regardless of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) M stage. Factors associated with increased CSM in patients undergoing local therapy included AJCC T4 stage, high-grade disease, prostate-specific antigen ≥20 ng/ml, age ≥70 yr, and pelvic lymphadenopathy ( p < 0.05). The major limitation of this study was the lack of variables from SEER known to influence survival of patients with mPCa, including treatment with systemic therapy. Conclusions Definitive treatment of the prostate in men diagnosed with mPCa suggests a survival benefit in this large population-based study. These results should serve as a foundation for future prospective trials. Patient summary We used a large population-based cancer database to examine survival in men diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) undergoing definitive therapy for the prostate. Local therapy (LT) appeared to confer a survival benefit. Therefore, we conclude that prospective trials are needed to further evaluate the role of LT in mPCa.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>24290503</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.eururo.2013.11.012</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0302-2838 |
ispartof | European urology, 2014-06, Vol.65 (6), p.1058-1066 |
issn | 0302-2838 1873-7560 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1520111505 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Adenocarcinoma - mortality Adenocarcinoma - secondary Adenocarcinoma - therapy Age Factors Aged Biological and medical sciences Brachytherapy Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics Humans Kaplan-Meier Estimate Lymphatic Metastasis Male Male genital diseases Medical sciences Metastatic prostate cancer Middle Aged Neoplasm Grading Neoplasm Staging Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases Outcomes assessment Prostate-Specific Antigen - blood Prostatectomy Prostatic Neoplasms - mortality Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology Prostatic Neoplasms - therapy Radical prostatectomy SEER Program Survival Rate Tumors Tumors of the urinary system Urinary tract. Prostate gland Urology |
title | Might Men Diagnosed with Metastatic Prostate Cancer Benefit from Definitive Treatment of the Primary Tumor? A SEER-Based Study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-11-29T11%3A24%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Might%20Men%20Diagnosed%20with%20Metastatic%20Prostate%20Cancer%20Benefit%20from%20Definitive%20Treatment%20of%20the%20Primary%20Tumor?%20A%20SEER-Based%20Study&rft.jtitle=European%20urology&rft.au=Culp,%20Stephen%20H&rft.date=2014-06-01&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1058&rft.epage=1066&rft.pages=1058-1066&rft.issn=0302-2838&rft.eissn=1873-7560&rft.coden=EUURAV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.eururo.2013.11.012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1520111505%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1520111505&rft_id=info:pmid/24290503&rft_els_id=S0302283813012098&rfr_iscdi=true |