Early hard palate closure using a vomer flap in unilateral cleft lip and palate: effects on cleft width

Objectives Although no universal consensus exists on treatment of cleft palates, early hard palate closure is commonly performed. The aim of the present study was to determine the influence of a vomer flap for early hard palate closure on residual palatal cleft width in patients with a unilateral co...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical oral investigations 2014-05, Vol.18 (4), p.1285-1290
Hauptverfasser: de Jong, Johanna P., Breugem, Corstiaan C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1290
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1285
container_title Clinical oral investigations
container_volume 18
creator de Jong, Johanna P.
Breugem, Corstiaan C.
description Objectives Although no universal consensus exists on treatment of cleft palates, early hard palate closure is commonly performed. The aim of the present study was to determine the influence of a vomer flap for early hard palate closure on residual palatal cleft width in patients with a unilateral complete cleft lip and palate (UCLP). Materials and methods Forty-seven UCLP patients were retrospectively divided into two groups. Group A consisted of 25 patients who underwent early lip closure and simultaneous hard palate closure using a vomer flap. Group B included 22 patients who had lip closure only at first surgery. Palatal cleft widths of both groups were measured at two time points and were compared using the Mann–Whitney U test to examine the influence of vomerplasty in this very early stage. Results No significant difference of baseline characteristics between the groups was found, and comparison of age at the time of surgeries was not significantly different. Mean age at the time of vomerplasty was 4.0 months. After the first surgery, a significantly greater total cleft width reduction of 5.0 mm average was found in group A compared to only 1.5 mm reduction in group B. This reduction took place after an average of 7.1 and 7.0 months, respectively. Conclusions Lip closure accompanied by early hard palate closure using a vomer flap is associated with a significant postoperative reduction of the residual cleft when compared to lip closure only. Clinical relevance This study shows another great advantage of performing early hard palate closure using a vomer flap.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00784-013-1091-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1520109355</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3287751081</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-41caf82e8f4cafd7b1799a052d7946a1f7ee597408c5b91e14cf2a854230d8213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1LxDAQhoMofqz-AC8S8OKlmknSpvEmi18geNFzyLaT3Uq2rUmr-O_NuquI4GVmIM_7ZpiXkGNg58CYuoiplDJjIDJgGjKxRfZBiiITSsH218yzQpewRw5ifGEMZKHELtnjQpdaFsU-mV_b4D_owoaa9tbbAWnluzgGpGNs2jm19K1bYqDO2542LR3bZkUF6xOIbqC-6altv9WXFJ3Daoi0azfAe1MPi0Oy46yPeLTpE_J8c_00vcseHm_vp1cPWSUUHzIJlXUlx9LJNNRqBkpry3Jeq7SvBacQc60kK6t8pgFBVo7bMpdcsLrkICbkbO3bh-51xDiYZRMr9N622I3RQM5ZupXI84Se_kFfujG0abtEgZYacikSBWuqCl2MAZ3pQ7O04cMAM6sUzDoFk1IwqxTMSnOycR5nS6x_FN9nTwBfAzE9tXMMv77-1_UTl56RNw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1519491543</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Early hard palate closure using a vomer flap in unilateral cleft lip and palate: effects on cleft width</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink (Online service)</source><creator>de Jong, Johanna P. ; Breugem, Corstiaan C.</creator><creatorcontrib>de Jong, Johanna P. ; Breugem, Corstiaan C.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives Although no universal consensus exists on treatment of cleft palates, early hard palate closure is commonly performed. The aim of the present study was to determine the influence of a vomer flap for early hard palate closure on residual palatal cleft width in patients with a unilateral complete cleft lip and palate (UCLP). Materials and methods Forty-seven UCLP patients were retrospectively divided into two groups. Group A consisted of 25 patients who underwent early lip closure and simultaneous hard palate closure using a vomer flap. Group B included 22 patients who had lip closure only at first surgery. Palatal cleft widths of both groups were measured at two time points and were compared using the Mann–Whitney U test to examine the influence of vomerplasty in this very early stage. Results No significant difference of baseline characteristics between the groups was found, and comparison of age at the time of surgeries was not significantly different. Mean age at the time of vomerplasty was 4.0 months. After the first surgery, a significantly greater total cleft width reduction of 5.0 mm average was found in group A compared to only 1.5 mm reduction in group B. This reduction took place after an average of 7.1 and 7.0 months, respectively. Conclusions Lip closure accompanied by early hard palate closure using a vomer flap is associated with a significant postoperative reduction of the residual cleft when compared to lip closure only. Clinical relevance This study shows another great advantage of performing early hard palate closure using a vomer flap.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1432-6981</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1436-3771</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00784-013-1091-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23989466</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Cleft Lip - pathology ; Cleft Lip - surgery ; Cleft Palate - pathology ; Cleft Palate - surgery ; Dentistry ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Medicine ; Original Article ; Palate, Hard - surgery</subject><ispartof>Clinical oral investigations, 2014-05, Vol.18 (4), p.1285-1290</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-41caf82e8f4cafd7b1799a052d7946a1f7ee597408c5b91e14cf2a854230d8213</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-41caf82e8f4cafd7b1799a052d7946a1f7ee597408c5b91e14cf2a854230d8213</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00784-013-1091-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00784-013-1091-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23989466$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>de Jong, Johanna P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breugem, Corstiaan C.</creatorcontrib><title>Early hard palate closure using a vomer flap in unilateral cleft lip and palate: effects on cleft width</title><title>Clinical oral investigations</title><addtitle>Clin Oral Invest</addtitle><addtitle>Clin Oral Investig</addtitle><description>Objectives Although no universal consensus exists on treatment of cleft palates, early hard palate closure is commonly performed. The aim of the present study was to determine the influence of a vomer flap for early hard palate closure on residual palatal cleft width in patients with a unilateral complete cleft lip and palate (UCLP). Materials and methods Forty-seven UCLP patients were retrospectively divided into two groups. Group A consisted of 25 patients who underwent early lip closure and simultaneous hard palate closure using a vomer flap. Group B included 22 patients who had lip closure only at first surgery. Palatal cleft widths of both groups were measured at two time points and were compared using the Mann–Whitney U test to examine the influence of vomerplasty in this very early stage. Results No significant difference of baseline characteristics between the groups was found, and comparison of age at the time of surgeries was not significantly different. Mean age at the time of vomerplasty was 4.0 months. After the first surgery, a significantly greater total cleft width reduction of 5.0 mm average was found in group A compared to only 1.5 mm reduction in group B. This reduction took place after an average of 7.1 and 7.0 months, respectively. Conclusions Lip closure accompanied by early hard palate closure using a vomer flap is associated with a significant postoperative reduction of the residual cleft when compared to lip closure only. Clinical relevance This study shows another great advantage of performing early hard palate closure using a vomer flap.</description><subject>Cleft Lip - pathology</subject><subject>Cleft Lip - surgery</subject><subject>Cleft Palate - pathology</subject><subject>Cleft Palate - surgery</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Palate, Hard - surgery</subject><issn>1432-6981</issn><issn>1436-3771</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1LxDAQhoMofqz-AC8S8OKlmknSpvEmi18geNFzyLaT3Uq2rUmr-O_NuquI4GVmIM_7ZpiXkGNg58CYuoiplDJjIDJgGjKxRfZBiiITSsH218yzQpewRw5ifGEMZKHELtnjQpdaFsU-mV_b4D_owoaa9tbbAWnluzgGpGNs2jm19K1bYqDO2542LR3bZkUF6xOIbqC-6altv9WXFJ3Daoi0azfAe1MPi0Oy46yPeLTpE_J8c_00vcseHm_vp1cPWSUUHzIJlXUlx9LJNNRqBkpry3Jeq7SvBacQc60kK6t8pgFBVo7bMpdcsLrkICbkbO3bh-51xDiYZRMr9N622I3RQM5ZupXI84Se_kFfujG0abtEgZYacikSBWuqCl2MAZ3pQ7O04cMAM6sUzDoFk1IwqxTMSnOycR5nS6x_FN9nTwBfAzE9tXMMv77-1_UTl56RNw</recordid><startdate>20140501</startdate><enddate>20140501</enddate><creator>de Jong, Johanna P.</creator><creator>Breugem, Corstiaan C.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140501</creationdate><title>Early hard palate closure using a vomer flap in unilateral cleft lip and palate: effects on cleft width</title><author>de Jong, Johanna P. ; Breugem, Corstiaan C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-41caf82e8f4cafd7b1799a052d7946a1f7ee597408c5b91e14cf2a854230d8213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Cleft Lip - pathology</topic><topic>Cleft Lip - surgery</topic><topic>Cleft Palate - pathology</topic><topic>Cleft Palate - surgery</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Palate, Hard - surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de Jong, Johanna P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breugem, Corstiaan C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical oral investigations</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de Jong, Johanna P.</au><au>Breugem, Corstiaan C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Early hard palate closure using a vomer flap in unilateral cleft lip and palate: effects on cleft width</atitle><jtitle>Clinical oral investigations</jtitle><stitle>Clin Oral Invest</stitle><addtitle>Clin Oral Investig</addtitle><date>2014-05-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1285</spage><epage>1290</epage><pages>1285-1290</pages><issn>1432-6981</issn><eissn>1436-3771</eissn><abstract>Objectives Although no universal consensus exists on treatment of cleft palates, early hard palate closure is commonly performed. The aim of the present study was to determine the influence of a vomer flap for early hard palate closure on residual palatal cleft width in patients with a unilateral complete cleft lip and palate (UCLP). Materials and methods Forty-seven UCLP patients were retrospectively divided into two groups. Group A consisted of 25 patients who underwent early lip closure and simultaneous hard palate closure using a vomer flap. Group B included 22 patients who had lip closure only at first surgery. Palatal cleft widths of both groups were measured at two time points and were compared using the Mann–Whitney U test to examine the influence of vomerplasty in this very early stage. Results No significant difference of baseline characteristics between the groups was found, and comparison of age at the time of surgeries was not significantly different. Mean age at the time of vomerplasty was 4.0 months. After the first surgery, a significantly greater total cleft width reduction of 5.0 mm average was found in group A compared to only 1.5 mm reduction in group B. This reduction took place after an average of 7.1 and 7.0 months, respectively. Conclusions Lip closure accompanied by early hard palate closure using a vomer flap is associated with a significant postoperative reduction of the residual cleft when compared to lip closure only. Clinical relevance This study shows another great advantage of performing early hard palate closure using a vomer flap.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>23989466</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00784-013-1091-3</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1432-6981
ispartof Clinical oral investigations, 2014-05, Vol.18 (4), p.1285-1290
issn 1432-6981
1436-3771
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1520109355
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink (Online service)
subjects Cleft Lip - pathology
Cleft Lip - surgery
Cleft Palate - pathology
Cleft Palate - surgery
Dentistry
Female
Humans
Male
Medicine
Original Article
Palate, Hard - surgery
title Early hard palate closure using a vomer flap in unilateral cleft lip and palate: effects on cleft width
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T06%3A39%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Early%20hard%20palate%20closure%20using%20a%20vomer%20flap%20in%20unilateral%20cleft%20lip%20and%20palate:%20effects%20on%20cleft%20width&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20oral%20investigations&rft.au=de%20Jong,%20Johanna%20P.&rft.date=2014-05-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1285&rft.epage=1290&rft.pages=1285-1290&rft.issn=1432-6981&rft.eissn=1436-3771&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00784-013-1091-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3287751081%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1519491543&rft_id=info:pmid/23989466&rfr_iscdi=true