Sensorial differences according to sex and ages

Objective To investigate age and sex differences in orofacial sensory detection. Methods One hundred and twenty‐six (126) healthy subjects were divided into five groups according to their ages. They were assessed with a quantitative sensory testing protocol for gustative, olfactory, thermal (cold/wa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Oral diseases 2014-04, Vol.20 (3), p.e103-e110
Hauptverfasser: da Silva, LA, Lin, SM, Teixeira, MJ, de Siqueira, JTT, Jacob Filho, W, de Siqueira, SRDT
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e110
container_issue 3
container_start_page e103
container_title Oral diseases
container_volume 20
creator da Silva, LA
Lin, SM
Teixeira, MJ
de Siqueira, JTT
Jacob Filho, W
de Siqueira, SRDT
description Objective To investigate age and sex differences in orofacial sensory detection. Methods One hundred and twenty‐six (126) healthy subjects were divided into five groups according to their ages. They were assessed with a quantitative sensory testing protocol for gustative, olfactory, thermal (cold/warm), mechanical (tactile/vibration/electric), and pain (deep/superficial) detection thresholds. The corneal reflex was also evaluated. Data were analyzed with the one‐way ANOVA, chi‐squared, Fisher's exact, Mann–Whitney, and Kruskal–Wallis tests. Results The groups of subjects over 61 years old had higher olfactory (P 
doi_str_mv 10.1111/odi.12145
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1519254266</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1519254266</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4265-4798841277125410057f933289c56ede658c307bf1f17cb9285efa2c6c27926e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1PAjEQhhujEUQP_gGziRc9LPRj226PBgVJCBzUyK0p3VmyuOxiCxH-vVU-DibOZebwvE8mL0LXBLdJmE6dFW1CScJPUJMITGKcUn4absaTmFM2aaAL7-cYE6kYPUcNyqQSTLEm6rxA5WtXmDLKijwHB5UFHxlra5cV1Sxa1ZGHTWSqLDIz8JfoLDelh6v9bqG33tNr9zkejvuD7sMwtgkVPE6kStOEUCkJ5QnBmMtcMUZTZbmADARPLcNympOcSDtVNOWQG2qFpVJRAayF7nbepas_1-BXelF4C2VpKqjXXhNOVDBTIQJ6-wed12tXhe8ChWUiUs5VoO53lHW19w5yvXTFwritJlj_tKhDi_q3xcDe7I3r6QKyI3moLQCdHfBVlLD936THj4ODMt4lCr-CzTFh3IcWkkmu30d9zYaThI96PS3ZN2ZchuI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1507468559</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sensorial differences according to sex and ages</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>da Silva, LA ; Lin, SM ; Teixeira, MJ ; de Siqueira, JTT ; Jacob Filho, W ; de Siqueira, SRDT</creator><creatorcontrib>da Silva, LA ; Lin, SM ; Teixeira, MJ ; de Siqueira, JTT ; Jacob Filho, W ; de Siqueira, SRDT</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[Objective To investigate age and sex differences in orofacial sensory detection. Methods One hundred and twenty‐six (126) healthy subjects were divided into five groups according to their ages. They were assessed with a quantitative sensory testing protocol for gustative, olfactory, thermal (cold/warm), mechanical (tactile/vibration/electric), and pain (deep/superficial) detection thresholds. The corneal reflex was also evaluated. Data were analyzed with the one‐way ANOVA, chi‐squared, Fisher's exact, Mann–Whitney, and Kruskal–Wallis tests. Results The groups of subjects over 61 years old had higher olfactory (P < 0.001), gustative (sweet P = 0.004, salty P = 0.007, sour P = 0.006), thermal (warm P < 0.001, cold P < 0.001), and tactile (P < 0.001) detection thresholds than the others. The vibration detection threshold was high only for subjects over 75 years old (P < 0.001). The electric and deep pain detection thresholds were different for the 61–75 years old group (P ≤ 0.001). Women in all age groups had lower gustative (sweet P = 0.020, salty P = 0.002, sour P < 0.001, and bitter P = 0.002), olfactory (P = 0.010), warm (P < 0.001) and deep (P < 0.001), and superficial pain (P = 0.008) detection thresholds than men, and men from all age groups had lower vibratory detection thresholds (P = 0.006) than women. Conclusion High sensory detection thresholds were observed in subjects over the 6th decade of life, and women had a more accurate sensory perception than men.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 1354-523X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1601-0825</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/odi.12145</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23796393</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Denmark: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Age differences ; Age Factors ; Aged ; aging ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Dentistry ; elderly ; Female ; Gender differences ; gustation ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Mouth ; olfaction ; Pain ; quantitative sensory testing ; Sensory perception ; Sensory Thresholds - physiology ; Sex Factors ; somatosensory thresholds ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Oral diseases, 2014-04, Vol.20 (3), p.e103-e110</ispartof><rights>2013 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2013 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4265-4798841277125410057f933289c56ede658c307bf1f17cb9285efa2c6c27926e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4265-4798841277125410057f933289c56ede658c307bf1f17cb9285efa2c6c27926e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fodi.12145$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fodi.12145$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23796393$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>da Silva, LA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, SM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teixeira, MJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Siqueira, JTT</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacob Filho, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Siqueira, SRDT</creatorcontrib><title>Sensorial differences according to sex and ages</title><title>Oral diseases</title><addtitle>Oral Dis</addtitle><description><![CDATA[Objective To investigate age and sex differences in orofacial sensory detection. Methods One hundred and twenty‐six (126) healthy subjects were divided into five groups according to their ages. They were assessed with a quantitative sensory testing protocol for gustative, olfactory, thermal (cold/warm), mechanical (tactile/vibration/electric), and pain (deep/superficial) detection thresholds. The corneal reflex was also evaluated. Data were analyzed with the one‐way ANOVA, chi‐squared, Fisher's exact, Mann–Whitney, and Kruskal–Wallis tests. Results The groups of subjects over 61 years old had higher olfactory (P < 0.001), gustative (sweet P = 0.004, salty P = 0.007, sour P = 0.006), thermal (warm P < 0.001, cold P < 0.001), and tactile (P < 0.001) detection thresholds than the others. The vibration detection threshold was high only for subjects over 75 years old (P < 0.001). The electric and deep pain detection thresholds were different for the 61–75 years old group (P ≤ 0.001). Women in all age groups had lower gustative (sweet P = 0.020, salty P = 0.002, sour P < 0.001, and bitter P = 0.002), olfactory (P = 0.010), warm (P < 0.001) and deep (P < 0.001), and superficial pain (P = 0.008) detection thresholds than men, and men from all age groups had lower vibratory detection thresholds (P = 0.006) than women. Conclusion High sensory detection thresholds were observed in subjects over the 6th decade of life, and women had a more accurate sensory perception than men.]]></description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age differences</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>aging</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>elderly</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gender differences</subject><subject>gustation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mouth</subject><subject>olfaction</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>quantitative sensory testing</subject><subject>Sensory perception</subject><subject>Sensory Thresholds - physiology</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>somatosensory thresholds</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1354-523X</issn><issn>1601-0825</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1PAjEQhhujEUQP_gGziRc9LPRj226PBgVJCBzUyK0p3VmyuOxiCxH-vVU-DibOZebwvE8mL0LXBLdJmE6dFW1CScJPUJMITGKcUn4absaTmFM2aaAL7-cYE6kYPUcNyqQSTLEm6rxA5WtXmDLKijwHB5UFHxlra5cV1Sxa1ZGHTWSqLDIz8JfoLDelh6v9bqG33tNr9zkejvuD7sMwtgkVPE6kStOEUCkJ5QnBmMtcMUZTZbmADARPLcNympOcSDtVNOWQG2qFpVJRAayF7nbepas_1-BXelF4C2VpKqjXXhNOVDBTIQJ6-wed12tXhe8ChWUiUs5VoO53lHW19w5yvXTFwritJlj_tKhDi_q3xcDe7I3r6QKyI3moLQCdHfBVlLD936THj4ODMt4lCr-CzTFh3IcWkkmu30d9zYaThI96PS3ZN2ZchuI</recordid><startdate>201404</startdate><enddate>201404</enddate><creator>da Silva, LA</creator><creator>Lin, SM</creator><creator>Teixeira, MJ</creator><creator>de Siqueira, JTT</creator><creator>Jacob Filho, W</creator><creator>de Siqueira, SRDT</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201404</creationdate><title>Sensorial differences according to sex and ages</title><author>da Silva, LA ; Lin, SM ; Teixeira, MJ ; de Siqueira, JTT ; Jacob Filho, W ; de Siqueira, SRDT</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4265-4798841277125410057f933289c56ede658c307bf1f17cb9285efa2c6c27926e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age differences</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>aging</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>elderly</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gender differences</topic><topic>gustation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mouth</topic><topic>olfaction</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>quantitative sensory testing</topic><topic>Sensory perception</topic><topic>Sensory Thresholds - physiology</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>somatosensory thresholds</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>da Silva, LA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, SM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teixeira, MJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Siqueira, JTT</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacob Filho, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Siqueira, SRDT</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Oral diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>da Silva, LA</au><au>Lin, SM</au><au>Teixeira, MJ</au><au>de Siqueira, JTT</au><au>Jacob Filho, W</au><au>de Siqueira, SRDT</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sensorial differences according to sex and ages</atitle><jtitle>Oral diseases</jtitle><addtitle>Oral Dis</addtitle><date>2014-04</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>e103</spage><epage>e110</epage><pages>e103-e110</pages><issn>1354-523X</issn><eissn>1601-0825</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[Objective To investigate age and sex differences in orofacial sensory detection. Methods One hundred and twenty‐six (126) healthy subjects were divided into five groups according to their ages. They were assessed with a quantitative sensory testing protocol for gustative, olfactory, thermal (cold/warm), mechanical (tactile/vibration/electric), and pain (deep/superficial) detection thresholds. The corneal reflex was also evaluated. Data were analyzed with the one‐way ANOVA, chi‐squared, Fisher's exact, Mann–Whitney, and Kruskal–Wallis tests. Results The groups of subjects over 61 years old had higher olfactory (P < 0.001), gustative (sweet P = 0.004, salty P = 0.007, sour P = 0.006), thermal (warm P < 0.001, cold P < 0.001), and tactile (P < 0.001) detection thresholds than the others. The vibration detection threshold was high only for subjects over 75 years old (P < 0.001). The electric and deep pain detection thresholds were different for the 61–75 years old group (P ≤ 0.001). Women in all age groups had lower gustative (sweet P = 0.020, salty P = 0.002, sour P < 0.001, and bitter P = 0.002), olfactory (P = 0.010), warm (P < 0.001) and deep (P < 0.001), and superficial pain (P = 0.008) detection thresholds than men, and men from all age groups had lower vibratory detection thresholds (P = 0.006) than women. Conclusion High sensory detection thresholds were observed in subjects over the 6th decade of life, and women had a more accurate sensory perception than men.]]></abstract><cop>Denmark</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>23796393</pmid><doi>10.1111/odi.12145</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1354-523X
ispartof Oral diseases, 2014-04, Vol.20 (3), p.e103-e110
issn 1354-523X
1601-0825
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1519254266
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Age differences
Age Factors
Aged
aging
Cross-Sectional Studies
Dentistry
elderly
Female
Gender differences
gustation
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Mouth
olfaction
Pain
quantitative sensory testing
Sensory perception
Sensory Thresholds - physiology
Sex Factors
somatosensory thresholds
Young Adult
title Sensorial differences according to sex and ages
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T12%3A07%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sensorial%20differences%20according%20to%20sex%20and%20ages&rft.jtitle=Oral%20diseases&rft.au=da%20Silva,%20LA&rft.date=2014-04&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e103&rft.epage=e110&rft.pages=e103-e110&rft.issn=1354-523X&rft.eissn=1601-0825&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/odi.12145&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1519254266%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1507468559&rft_id=info:pmid/23796393&rfr_iscdi=true