Reinforcer magnitude and resistance to disruption of forgetting functions and response rates

The present experiment investigated the effects of reinforcer magnitude on resistance to disruption of remembering and response rates. Pigeons were exposed to a variable‐interval (VI), delayed‐matching‐to‐sample (DMTS) procedure with two components (rich and lean, distinguished by differing discrimi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior 2014-05, Vol.101 (3), p.373-384
Hauptverfasser: Berry, Meredith S., Odum, Amy L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 384
container_issue 3
container_start_page 373
container_title Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior
container_volume 101
creator Berry, Meredith S.
Odum, Amy L.
description The present experiment investigated the effects of reinforcer magnitude on resistance to disruption of remembering and response rates. Pigeons were exposed to a variable‐interval (VI), delayed‐matching‐to‐sample (DMTS) procedure with two components (rich and lean, distinguished by differing discriminative stimuli and hopper presentation duration). Completion of a VI 20 s schedule resulted in DMTS trials. In a DMTS trial, a choice of one of two comparison stimuli resulted in food if the choice matched the color of the previously presented sample stimulus. Separable aspects of the forgetting functions (initial discrimination and rate of forgetting) were examined by determining accuracy across a range of delays. Response rates and accuracy were higher in the rich relative to the lean component during baseline, and were more persistent during disruptors (extinction and prefeeding). During DMTS trials, extinction decreased initial discrimination more in the lean than the rich component, but had no systematic effect on rate of forgetting. During prefeeding, the rate of forgetting increased more in the lean than the rich component, but initial discrimination was not systematically affected. These results show persistence of response rates and remembering are positively related to reinforcer magnitude. The type of disruptor also influences the way in which remembering is disrupted.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jeab.86
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1518813887</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1518813887</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3836-d35802816caa1c8361cd99f182688e31291e5e21d90ba42df7b5183b56073cd03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10F1rFDEUBuAgil2r-A8k4IWCTM1JNh9z2a61tSwq4seNEDLJmSXrbmZNZtD-e7Nu2wvBm-Rw8pxDeAl5CuwEGOOv1-i6E6PukRm0wjRCA9wns_rCG1nPI_KolHUtWqX5Q3LE55oLMWcz8v0TxtQP2WOmW7dKcZwCUpcCzVhiGV3ySMeBhljytBvjkOjQ0zqwwnGMaUX7Kfl9u9wO7WqNNLsRy2PyoHebgk9u7mPy5e3558Vls_xw8W5xumy8MEI1QUjDuAHlnQNfO-BD2_ZguDIGBfAWUCKH0LLOzXnodSfBiE4qpoUPTByTl4e9uzz8nLCMdhuLx83GJRymYqFyA8IYXenzf-h6mHKqv7NgNJeqlcCrenFQPg-lZOztLsety9cWmN0HbveBW6OqfHazb-q2GO7cbcIVvDqAX3GD1__bY6_OT8_-rmsOukaPv--0yz-s0kJL--39hV1eflzIN1-v7Jn4AyfMmCw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1872569512</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reinforcer magnitude and resistance to disruption of forgetting functions and response rates</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Berry, Meredith S. ; Odum, Amy L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Berry, Meredith S. ; Odum, Amy L.</creatorcontrib><description>The present experiment investigated the effects of reinforcer magnitude on resistance to disruption of remembering and response rates. Pigeons were exposed to a variable‐interval (VI), delayed‐matching‐to‐sample (DMTS) procedure with two components (rich and lean, distinguished by differing discriminative stimuli and hopper presentation duration). Completion of a VI 20 s schedule resulted in DMTS trials. In a DMTS trial, a choice of one of two comparison stimuli resulted in food if the choice matched the color of the previously presented sample stimulus. Separable aspects of the forgetting functions (initial discrimination and rate of forgetting) were examined by determining accuracy across a range of delays. Response rates and accuracy were higher in the rich relative to the lean component during baseline, and were more persistent during disruptors (extinction and prefeeding). During DMTS trials, extinction decreased initial discrimination more in the lean than the rich component, but had no systematic effect on rate of forgetting. During prefeeding, the rate of forgetting increased more in the lean than the rich component, but initial discrimination was not systematically affected. These results show persistence of response rates and remembering are positively related to reinforcer magnitude. The type of disruptor also influences the way in which remembering is disrupted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-5002</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-3711</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jeab.86</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24723340</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEABAU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Appetitive Behavior ; Association Learning ; Color Perception ; Columbidae ; Delay Discounting ; delayed matching to sample ; Discrimination Learning ; extinction ; Extinction, Psychological ; forgetting functions ; memory ; Motivation ; prefeeding ; Reaction Time ; Reinforcement Schedule ; reinforcer magnitude ; resistance to change ; Response rates ; Retention (Psychology) ; Stimuli</subject><ispartof>Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 2014-05, Vol.101 (3), p.373-384</ispartof><rights>Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior</rights><rights>Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3836-d35802816caa1c8361cd99f182688e31291e5e21d90ba42df7b5183b56073cd03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3836-d35802816caa1c8361cd99f182688e31291e5e21d90ba42df7b5183b56073cd03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjeab.86$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjeab.86$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24723340$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Berry, Meredith S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Odum, Amy L.</creatorcontrib><title>Reinforcer magnitude and resistance to disruption of forgetting functions and response rates</title><title>Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior</title><addtitle>J Exp Anal Behav</addtitle><description>The present experiment investigated the effects of reinforcer magnitude on resistance to disruption of remembering and response rates. Pigeons were exposed to a variable‐interval (VI), delayed‐matching‐to‐sample (DMTS) procedure with two components (rich and lean, distinguished by differing discriminative stimuli and hopper presentation duration). Completion of a VI 20 s schedule resulted in DMTS trials. In a DMTS trial, a choice of one of two comparison stimuli resulted in food if the choice matched the color of the previously presented sample stimulus. Separable aspects of the forgetting functions (initial discrimination and rate of forgetting) were examined by determining accuracy across a range of delays. Response rates and accuracy were higher in the rich relative to the lean component during baseline, and were more persistent during disruptors (extinction and prefeeding). During DMTS trials, extinction decreased initial discrimination more in the lean than the rich component, but had no systematic effect on rate of forgetting. During prefeeding, the rate of forgetting increased more in the lean than the rich component, but initial discrimination was not systematically affected. These results show persistence of response rates and remembering are positively related to reinforcer magnitude. The type of disruptor also influences the way in which remembering is disrupted.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Appetitive Behavior</subject><subject>Association Learning</subject><subject>Color Perception</subject><subject>Columbidae</subject><subject>Delay Discounting</subject><subject>delayed matching to sample</subject><subject>Discrimination Learning</subject><subject>extinction</subject><subject>Extinction, Psychological</subject><subject>forgetting functions</subject><subject>memory</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>prefeeding</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Reinforcement Schedule</subject><subject>reinforcer magnitude</subject><subject>resistance to change</subject><subject>Response rates</subject><subject>Retention (Psychology)</subject><subject>Stimuli</subject><issn>0022-5002</issn><issn>1938-3711</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10F1rFDEUBuAgil2r-A8k4IWCTM1JNh9z2a61tSwq4seNEDLJmSXrbmZNZtD-e7Nu2wvBm-Rw8pxDeAl5CuwEGOOv1-i6E6PukRm0wjRCA9wns_rCG1nPI_KolHUtWqX5Q3LE55oLMWcz8v0TxtQP2WOmW7dKcZwCUpcCzVhiGV3ySMeBhljytBvjkOjQ0zqwwnGMaUX7Kfl9u9wO7WqNNLsRy2PyoHebgk9u7mPy5e3558Vls_xw8W5xumy8MEI1QUjDuAHlnQNfO-BD2_ZguDIGBfAWUCKH0LLOzXnodSfBiE4qpoUPTByTl4e9uzz8nLCMdhuLx83GJRymYqFyA8IYXenzf-h6mHKqv7NgNJeqlcCrenFQPg-lZOztLsety9cWmN0HbveBW6OqfHazb-q2GO7cbcIVvDqAX3GD1__bY6_OT8_-rmsOukaPv--0yz-s0kJL--39hV1eflzIN1-v7Jn4AyfMmCw</recordid><startdate>201405</startdate><enddate>201405</enddate><creator>Berry, Meredith S.</creator><creator>Odum, Amy L.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201405</creationdate><title>Reinforcer magnitude and resistance to disruption of forgetting functions and response rates</title><author>Berry, Meredith S. ; Odum, Amy L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3836-d35802816caa1c8361cd99f182688e31291e5e21d90ba42df7b5183b56073cd03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Appetitive Behavior</topic><topic>Association Learning</topic><topic>Color Perception</topic><topic>Columbidae</topic><topic>Delay Discounting</topic><topic>delayed matching to sample</topic><topic>Discrimination Learning</topic><topic>extinction</topic><topic>Extinction, Psychological</topic><topic>forgetting functions</topic><topic>memory</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>prefeeding</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Reinforcement Schedule</topic><topic>reinforcer magnitude</topic><topic>resistance to change</topic><topic>Response rates</topic><topic>Retention (Psychology)</topic><topic>Stimuli</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Berry, Meredith S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Odum, Amy L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Berry, Meredith S.</au><au>Odum, Amy L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reinforcer magnitude and resistance to disruption of forgetting functions and response rates</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Anal Behav</addtitle><date>2014-05</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>101</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>373</spage><epage>384</epage><pages>373-384</pages><issn>0022-5002</issn><eissn>1938-3711</eissn><coden>JEABAU</coden><abstract>The present experiment investigated the effects of reinforcer magnitude on resistance to disruption of remembering and response rates. Pigeons were exposed to a variable‐interval (VI), delayed‐matching‐to‐sample (DMTS) procedure with two components (rich and lean, distinguished by differing discriminative stimuli and hopper presentation duration). Completion of a VI 20 s schedule resulted in DMTS trials. In a DMTS trial, a choice of one of two comparison stimuli resulted in food if the choice matched the color of the previously presented sample stimulus. Separable aspects of the forgetting functions (initial discrimination and rate of forgetting) were examined by determining accuracy across a range of delays. Response rates and accuracy were higher in the rich relative to the lean component during baseline, and were more persistent during disruptors (extinction and prefeeding). During DMTS trials, extinction decreased initial discrimination more in the lean than the rich component, but had no systematic effect on rate of forgetting. During prefeeding, the rate of forgetting increased more in the lean than the rich component, but initial discrimination was not systematically affected. These results show persistence of response rates and remembering are positively related to reinforcer magnitude. The type of disruptor also influences the way in which remembering is disrupted.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>24723340</pmid><doi>10.1002/jeab.86</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-5002
ispartof Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 2014-05, Vol.101 (3), p.373-384
issn 0022-5002
1938-3711
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1518813887
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; PubMed Central
subjects Animals
Appetitive Behavior
Association Learning
Color Perception
Columbidae
Delay Discounting
delayed matching to sample
Discrimination Learning
extinction
Extinction, Psychological
forgetting functions
memory
Motivation
prefeeding
Reaction Time
Reinforcement Schedule
reinforcer magnitude
resistance to change
Response rates
Retention (Psychology)
Stimuli
title Reinforcer magnitude and resistance to disruption of forgetting functions and response rates
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T23%3A19%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reinforcer%20magnitude%20and%20resistance%20to%20disruption%20of%20forgetting%20functions%20and%20response%20rates&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20experimental%20analysis%20of%20behavior&rft.au=Berry,%20Meredith%20S.&rft.date=2014-05&rft.volume=101&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=373&rft.epage=384&rft.pages=373-384&rft.issn=0022-5002&rft.eissn=1938-3711&rft.coden=JEABAU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jeab.86&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1518813887%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1872569512&rft_id=info:pmid/24723340&rfr_iscdi=true