Reinforcer magnitude and resistance to disruption of forgetting functions and response rates
The present experiment investigated the effects of reinforcer magnitude on resistance to disruption of remembering and response rates. Pigeons were exposed to a variable‐interval (VI), delayed‐matching‐to‐sample (DMTS) procedure with two components (rich and lean, distinguished by differing discrimi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior 2014-05, Vol.101 (3), p.373-384 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 384 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 373 |
container_title | Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior |
container_volume | 101 |
creator | Berry, Meredith S. Odum, Amy L. |
description | The present experiment investigated the effects of reinforcer magnitude on resistance to disruption of remembering and response rates. Pigeons were exposed to a variable‐interval (VI), delayed‐matching‐to‐sample (DMTS) procedure with two components (rich and lean, distinguished by differing discriminative stimuli and hopper presentation duration). Completion of a VI 20 s schedule resulted in DMTS trials. In a DMTS trial, a choice of one of two comparison stimuli resulted in food if the choice matched the color of the previously presented sample stimulus. Separable aspects of the forgetting functions (initial discrimination and rate of forgetting) were examined by determining accuracy across a range of delays. Response rates and accuracy were higher in the rich relative to the lean component during baseline, and were more persistent during disruptors (extinction and prefeeding). During DMTS trials, extinction decreased initial discrimination more in the lean than the rich component, but had no systematic effect on rate of forgetting. During prefeeding, the rate of forgetting increased more in the lean than the rich component, but initial discrimination was not systematically affected. These results show persistence of response rates and remembering are positively related to reinforcer magnitude. The type of disruptor also influences the way in which remembering is disrupted. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jeab.86 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1518813887</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1518813887</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3836-d35802816caa1c8361cd99f182688e31291e5e21d90ba42df7b5183b56073cd03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10F1rFDEUBuAgil2r-A8k4IWCTM1JNh9z2a61tSwq4seNEDLJmSXrbmZNZtD-e7Nu2wvBm-Rw8pxDeAl5CuwEGOOv1-i6E6PukRm0wjRCA9wns_rCG1nPI_KolHUtWqX5Q3LE55oLMWcz8v0TxtQP2WOmW7dKcZwCUpcCzVhiGV3ySMeBhljytBvjkOjQ0zqwwnGMaUX7Kfl9u9wO7WqNNLsRy2PyoHebgk9u7mPy5e3558Vls_xw8W5xumy8MEI1QUjDuAHlnQNfO-BD2_ZguDIGBfAWUCKH0LLOzXnodSfBiE4qpoUPTByTl4e9uzz8nLCMdhuLx83GJRymYqFyA8IYXenzf-h6mHKqv7NgNJeqlcCrenFQPg-lZOztLsety9cWmN0HbveBW6OqfHazb-q2GO7cbcIVvDqAX3GD1__bY6_OT8_-rmsOukaPv--0yz-s0kJL--39hV1eflzIN1-v7Jn4AyfMmCw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1872569512</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reinforcer magnitude and resistance to disruption of forgetting functions and response rates</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Berry, Meredith S. ; Odum, Amy L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Berry, Meredith S. ; Odum, Amy L.</creatorcontrib><description>The present experiment investigated the effects of reinforcer magnitude on resistance to disruption of remembering and response rates. Pigeons were exposed to a variable‐interval (VI), delayed‐matching‐to‐sample (DMTS) procedure with two components (rich and lean, distinguished by differing discriminative stimuli and hopper presentation duration). Completion of a VI 20 s schedule resulted in DMTS trials. In a DMTS trial, a choice of one of two comparison stimuli resulted in food if the choice matched the color of the previously presented sample stimulus. Separable aspects of the forgetting functions (initial discrimination and rate of forgetting) were examined by determining accuracy across a range of delays. Response rates and accuracy were higher in the rich relative to the lean component during baseline, and were more persistent during disruptors (extinction and prefeeding). During DMTS trials, extinction decreased initial discrimination more in the lean than the rich component, but had no systematic effect on rate of forgetting. During prefeeding, the rate of forgetting increased more in the lean than the rich component, but initial discrimination was not systematically affected. These results show persistence of response rates and remembering are positively related to reinforcer magnitude. The type of disruptor also influences the way in which remembering is disrupted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-5002</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-3711</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jeab.86</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24723340</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEABAU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Appetitive Behavior ; Association Learning ; Color Perception ; Columbidae ; Delay Discounting ; delayed matching to sample ; Discrimination Learning ; extinction ; Extinction, Psychological ; forgetting functions ; memory ; Motivation ; prefeeding ; Reaction Time ; Reinforcement Schedule ; reinforcer magnitude ; resistance to change ; Response rates ; Retention (Psychology) ; Stimuli</subject><ispartof>Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 2014-05, Vol.101 (3), p.373-384</ispartof><rights>Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior</rights><rights>Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3836-d35802816caa1c8361cd99f182688e31291e5e21d90ba42df7b5183b56073cd03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3836-d35802816caa1c8361cd99f182688e31291e5e21d90ba42df7b5183b56073cd03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjeab.86$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjeab.86$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24723340$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Berry, Meredith S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Odum, Amy L.</creatorcontrib><title>Reinforcer magnitude and resistance to disruption of forgetting functions and response rates</title><title>Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior</title><addtitle>J Exp Anal Behav</addtitle><description>The present experiment investigated the effects of reinforcer magnitude on resistance to disruption of remembering and response rates. Pigeons were exposed to a variable‐interval (VI), delayed‐matching‐to‐sample (DMTS) procedure with two components (rich and lean, distinguished by differing discriminative stimuli and hopper presentation duration). Completion of a VI 20 s schedule resulted in DMTS trials. In a DMTS trial, a choice of one of two comparison stimuli resulted in food if the choice matched the color of the previously presented sample stimulus. Separable aspects of the forgetting functions (initial discrimination and rate of forgetting) were examined by determining accuracy across a range of delays. Response rates and accuracy were higher in the rich relative to the lean component during baseline, and were more persistent during disruptors (extinction and prefeeding). During DMTS trials, extinction decreased initial discrimination more in the lean than the rich component, but had no systematic effect on rate of forgetting. During prefeeding, the rate of forgetting increased more in the lean than the rich component, but initial discrimination was not systematically affected. These results show persistence of response rates and remembering are positively related to reinforcer magnitude. The type of disruptor also influences the way in which remembering is disrupted.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Appetitive Behavior</subject><subject>Association Learning</subject><subject>Color Perception</subject><subject>Columbidae</subject><subject>Delay Discounting</subject><subject>delayed matching to sample</subject><subject>Discrimination Learning</subject><subject>extinction</subject><subject>Extinction, Psychological</subject><subject>forgetting functions</subject><subject>memory</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>prefeeding</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Reinforcement Schedule</subject><subject>reinforcer magnitude</subject><subject>resistance to change</subject><subject>Response rates</subject><subject>Retention (Psychology)</subject><subject>Stimuli</subject><issn>0022-5002</issn><issn>1938-3711</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10F1rFDEUBuAgil2r-A8k4IWCTM1JNh9z2a61tSwq4seNEDLJmSXrbmZNZtD-e7Nu2wvBm-Rw8pxDeAl5CuwEGOOv1-i6E6PukRm0wjRCA9wns_rCG1nPI_KolHUtWqX5Q3LE55oLMWcz8v0TxtQP2WOmW7dKcZwCUpcCzVhiGV3ySMeBhljytBvjkOjQ0zqwwnGMaUX7Kfl9u9wO7WqNNLsRy2PyoHebgk9u7mPy5e3558Vls_xw8W5xumy8MEI1QUjDuAHlnQNfO-BD2_ZguDIGBfAWUCKH0LLOzXnodSfBiE4qpoUPTByTl4e9uzz8nLCMdhuLx83GJRymYqFyA8IYXenzf-h6mHKqv7NgNJeqlcCrenFQPg-lZOztLsety9cWmN0HbveBW6OqfHazb-q2GO7cbcIVvDqAX3GD1__bY6_OT8_-rmsOukaPv--0yz-s0kJL--39hV1eflzIN1-v7Jn4AyfMmCw</recordid><startdate>201405</startdate><enddate>201405</enddate><creator>Berry, Meredith S.</creator><creator>Odum, Amy L.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201405</creationdate><title>Reinforcer magnitude and resistance to disruption of forgetting functions and response rates</title><author>Berry, Meredith S. ; Odum, Amy L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3836-d35802816caa1c8361cd99f182688e31291e5e21d90ba42df7b5183b56073cd03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Appetitive Behavior</topic><topic>Association Learning</topic><topic>Color Perception</topic><topic>Columbidae</topic><topic>Delay Discounting</topic><topic>delayed matching to sample</topic><topic>Discrimination Learning</topic><topic>extinction</topic><topic>Extinction, Psychological</topic><topic>forgetting functions</topic><topic>memory</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>prefeeding</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Reinforcement Schedule</topic><topic>reinforcer magnitude</topic><topic>resistance to change</topic><topic>Response rates</topic><topic>Retention (Psychology)</topic><topic>Stimuli</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Berry, Meredith S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Odum, Amy L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Berry, Meredith S.</au><au>Odum, Amy L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reinforcer magnitude and resistance to disruption of forgetting functions and response rates</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Anal Behav</addtitle><date>2014-05</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>101</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>373</spage><epage>384</epage><pages>373-384</pages><issn>0022-5002</issn><eissn>1938-3711</eissn><coden>JEABAU</coden><abstract>The present experiment investigated the effects of reinforcer magnitude on resistance to disruption of remembering and response rates. Pigeons were exposed to a variable‐interval (VI), delayed‐matching‐to‐sample (DMTS) procedure with two components (rich and lean, distinguished by differing discriminative stimuli and hopper presentation duration). Completion of a VI 20 s schedule resulted in DMTS trials. In a DMTS trial, a choice of one of two comparison stimuli resulted in food if the choice matched the color of the previously presented sample stimulus. Separable aspects of the forgetting functions (initial discrimination and rate of forgetting) were examined by determining accuracy across a range of delays. Response rates and accuracy were higher in the rich relative to the lean component during baseline, and were more persistent during disruptors (extinction and prefeeding). During DMTS trials, extinction decreased initial discrimination more in the lean than the rich component, but had no systematic effect on rate of forgetting. During prefeeding, the rate of forgetting increased more in the lean than the rich component, but initial discrimination was not systematically affected. These results show persistence of response rates and remembering are positively related to reinforcer magnitude. The type of disruptor also influences the way in which remembering is disrupted.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>24723340</pmid><doi>10.1002/jeab.86</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-5002 |
ispartof | Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 2014-05, Vol.101 (3), p.373-384 |
issn | 0022-5002 1938-3711 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1518813887 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; PubMed Central |
subjects | Animals Appetitive Behavior Association Learning Color Perception Columbidae Delay Discounting delayed matching to sample Discrimination Learning extinction Extinction, Psychological forgetting functions memory Motivation prefeeding Reaction Time Reinforcement Schedule reinforcer magnitude resistance to change Response rates Retention (Psychology) Stimuli |
title | Reinforcer magnitude and resistance to disruption of forgetting functions and response rates |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T23%3A19%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reinforcer%20magnitude%20and%20resistance%20to%20disruption%20of%20forgetting%20functions%20and%20response%20rates&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20experimental%20analysis%20of%20behavior&rft.au=Berry,%20Meredith%20S.&rft.date=2014-05&rft.volume=101&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=373&rft.epage=384&rft.pages=373-384&rft.issn=0022-5002&rft.eissn=1938-3711&rft.coden=JEABAU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jeab.86&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1518813887%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1872569512&rft_id=info:pmid/24723340&rfr_iscdi=true |