Continuous infusion of local anaesthetic following laparoscopic hysterectomy—a randomised controlled trial

Objective To estimate whether a continuous infusion of intraperitoneal local anaesthetic for 48 hours following laparoscopic hysterectomy reduced the need for opioids delivered with a patient‐controlled analgesia pump. Design Double‐blind randomised placebo‐controlled trial. Setting District general...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 2014-05, Vol.121 (6), p.754-760
Hauptverfasser: Andrews, V, Wright, JT, Zakaria, F, Banerjee, S, Ballard, K
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 760
container_issue 6
container_start_page 754
container_title BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology
container_volume 121
creator Andrews, V
Wright, JT
Zakaria, F
Banerjee, S
Ballard, K
description Objective To estimate whether a continuous infusion of intraperitoneal local anaesthetic for 48 hours following laparoscopic hysterectomy reduced the need for opioids delivered with a patient‐controlled analgesia pump. Design Double‐blind randomised placebo‐controlled trial. Setting District general hospital in the UK. Population Women undergoing a laparoscopic hysterectomy for a benign indication. Methods Women were randomised to receive either 0.5% levobupivicaine or 0.9% normal saline via an ON‐Q elastomeric pump for 48 hours postoperatively. The amount of opioids used via the patient‐controlled analgesia pump was recorded and pain was measured using an 11‐point Box Scale. Main outcome measures The primary outcome was the amount of patient‐administered morphine used over the first 48 postoperative hours. Secondary outcomes were length of hospital stay, oral analgesia use and level of patient‐reported pain. Results Sixty women participated and completed the trial. There was no difference (P = 0.59) in the median amount of patient‐administered morphine used between the levobupivicaine (23 mg) and placebo (18.5 mg) groups; median group difference 3.0 (95% CI −7.0 to 14.0). There was also no difference in the length of hospital stay with 40% of the treatment group remaining in hospital >48 hours compared with 30% of the placebo group (P = 0.08). Pain scores at all postoperative time points remained similar, with a median group difference in pain scores of 1.0 (95% CI −1.0 to 2.0) at the end of the first postoperative day. Conclusions Continuous infusion of 0.5% levobupivicaine into the peritoneal cavity following laparoscopic hysterectomy does not have any opioid‐sparing effects.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1471-0528.12610
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1517878934</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3278170391</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4410-f2cb29a95824ea62746ba73de9f675f72d9d749a70b21bac9f1cf03b2ff071bd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkb1OwzAUhS0EoqUws6FILCxpbceJkxEqflWpC8yW49jUlWsXO1HVjYfgCXkS3B86sODFV1ffPbrnXAAuERyi-EaIUJTCHJdDhAsEj0D_0Dne1jCFGS574CyEOYSowDA7BT1MclLSDPaBGTvbatu5LiTaqi5oZxOnEuMENwm3XIZ2JlstEuWMcStt3xPDl9y7INwytmfr0EovResW6-_PL554bhu30EE2iYjaPo7FsvWam3NworgJ8mL_D8Dbw_3r-CmdTB-fx7eTVBCCYKqwqHHFq7zERPICU1LUnGaNrFRBc0VxUzWUVJzCGqOai0ohoWBWY6UgRXWTDcDNTnfp3UcXHbC4j5DGcCujUYZyREtaVhmJ6PUfdO46b-N2WwoXuCizSI12lIi-g5eKLb1ecL9mCLLNIdgmdraJnW0PESeu9rpdvZDNgf9NPgL5DlhpI9f_6bG7l-lO-AdecJU_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1517262683</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Continuous infusion of local anaesthetic following laparoscopic hysterectomy—a randomised controlled trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Andrews, V ; Wright, JT ; Zakaria, F ; Banerjee, S ; Ballard, K</creator><creatorcontrib>Andrews, V ; Wright, JT ; Zakaria, F ; Banerjee, S ; Ballard, K</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To estimate whether a continuous infusion of intraperitoneal local anaesthetic for 48 hours following laparoscopic hysterectomy reduced the need for opioids delivered with a patient‐controlled analgesia pump. Design Double‐blind randomised placebo‐controlled trial. Setting District general hospital in the UK. Population Women undergoing a laparoscopic hysterectomy for a benign indication. Methods Women were randomised to receive either 0.5% levobupivicaine or 0.9% normal saline via an ON‐Q elastomeric pump for 48 hours postoperatively. The amount of opioids used via the patient‐controlled analgesia pump was recorded and pain was measured using an 11‐point Box Scale. Main outcome measures The primary outcome was the amount of patient‐administered morphine used over the first 48 postoperative hours. Secondary outcomes were length of hospital stay, oral analgesia use and level of patient‐reported pain. Results Sixty women participated and completed the trial. There was no difference (P = 0.59) in the median amount of patient‐administered morphine used between the levobupivicaine (23 mg) and placebo (18.5 mg) groups; median group difference 3.0 (95% CI −7.0 to 14.0). There was also no difference in the length of hospital stay with 40% of the treatment group remaining in hospital &gt;48 hours compared with 30% of the placebo group (P = 0.08). Pain scores at all postoperative time points remained similar, with a median group difference in pain scores of 1.0 (95% CI −1.0 to 2.0) at the end of the first postoperative day. Conclusions Continuous infusion of 0.5% levobupivicaine into the peritoneal cavity following laparoscopic hysterectomy does not have any opioid‐sparing effects.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1470-0328</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-0528</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.12610</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24548730</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BIOGFQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Adult ; Aged ; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled - methods ; Analgesics, Opioid - administration & dosage ; Anesthesia ; Anesthetics, Local - administration & dosage ; Bupivacaine - administration & dosage ; Clinical outcomes ; Double-Blind Method ; Drug Administration Schedule ; Female ; Humans ; Hysterectomy ; Hysterectomy - adverse effects ; Hysterectomy - methods ; Injections, Intraperitoneal ; intraperitoneal ; laparoscopy ; Laparoscopy - adverse effects ; Length of Stay - statistics & numerical data ; local anaesthetic ; Middle Aged ; Morphine - administration & dosage ; Narcotics ; Pain Measurement - methods ; Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy ; Pain, Postoperative - psychology ; Patient Satisfaction - statistics & numerical data ; Treatment Failure ; United Kingdom - epidemiology]]></subject><ispartof>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2014-05, Vol.121 (6), p.754-760</ispartof><rights>2014 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists</rights><rights>2014 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4410-f2cb29a95824ea62746ba73de9f675f72d9d749a70b21bac9f1cf03b2ff071bd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4410-f2cb29a95824ea62746ba73de9f675f72d9d749a70b21bac9f1cf03b2ff071bd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1471-0528.12610$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1471-0528.12610$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24548730$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Andrews, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, JT</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zakaria, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banerjee, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ballard, K</creatorcontrib><title>Continuous infusion of local anaesthetic following laparoscopic hysterectomy—a randomised controlled trial</title><title>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</title><addtitle>BJOG</addtitle><description>Objective To estimate whether a continuous infusion of intraperitoneal local anaesthetic for 48 hours following laparoscopic hysterectomy reduced the need for opioids delivered with a patient‐controlled analgesia pump. Design Double‐blind randomised placebo‐controlled trial. Setting District general hospital in the UK. Population Women undergoing a laparoscopic hysterectomy for a benign indication. Methods Women were randomised to receive either 0.5% levobupivicaine or 0.9% normal saline via an ON‐Q elastomeric pump for 48 hours postoperatively. The amount of opioids used via the patient‐controlled analgesia pump was recorded and pain was measured using an 11‐point Box Scale. Main outcome measures The primary outcome was the amount of patient‐administered morphine used over the first 48 postoperative hours. Secondary outcomes were length of hospital stay, oral analgesia use and level of patient‐reported pain. Results Sixty women participated and completed the trial. There was no difference (P = 0.59) in the median amount of patient‐administered morphine used between the levobupivicaine (23 mg) and placebo (18.5 mg) groups; median group difference 3.0 (95% CI −7.0 to 14.0). There was also no difference in the length of hospital stay with 40% of the treatment group remaining in hospital &gt;48 hours compared with 30% of the placebo group (P = 0.08). Pain scores at all postoperative time points remained similar, with a median group difference in pain scores of 1.0 (95% CI −1.0 to 2.0) at the end of the first postoperative day. Conclusions Continuous infusion of 0.5% levobupivicaine into the peritoneal cavity following laparoscopic hysterectomy does not have any opioid‐sparing effects.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Analgesia, Patient-Controlled - methods</subject><subject>Analgesics, Opioid - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthetics, Local - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Bupivacaine - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Drug Administration Schedule</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hysterectomy</subject><subject>Hysterectomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Hysterectomy - methods</subject><subject>Injections, Intraperitoneal</subject><subject>intraperitoneal</subject><subject>laparoscopy</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Length of Stay - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>local anaesthetic</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Morphine - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Narcotics</subject><subject>Pain Measurement - methods</subject><subject>Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy</subject><subject>Pain, Postoperative - psychology</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Treatment Failure</subject><subject>United Kingdom - epidemiology</subject><issn>1470-0328</issn><issn>1471-0528</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkb1OwzAUhS0EoqUws6FILCxpbceJkxEqflWpC8yW49jUlWsXO1HVjYfgCXkS3B86sODFV1ffPbrnXAAuERyi-EaIUJTCHJdDhAsEj0D_0Dne1jCFGS574CyEOYSowDA7BT1MclLSDPaBGTvbatu5LiTaqi5oZxOnEuMENwm3XIZ2JlstEuWMcStt3xPDl9y7INwytmfr0EovResW6-_PL554bhu30EE2iYjaPo7FsvWam3NworgJ8mL_D8Dbw_3r-CmdTB-fx7eTVBCCYKqwqHHFq7zERPICU1LUnGaNrFRBc0VxUzWUVJzCGqOai0ohoWBWY6UgRXWTDcDNTnfp3UcXHbC4j5DGcCujUYZyREtaVhmJ6PUfdO46b-N2WwoXuCizSI12lIi-g5eKLb1ecL9mCLLNIdgmdraJnW0PESeu9rpdvZDNgf9NPgL5DlhpI9f_6bG7l-lO-AdecJU_</recordid><startdate>201405</startdate><enddate>201405</enddate><creator>Andrews, V</creator><creator>Wright, JT</creator><creator>Zakaria, F</creator><creator>Banerjee, S</creator><creator>Ballard, K</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201405</creationdate><title>Continuous infusion of local anaesthetic following laparoscopic hysterectomy—a randomised controlled trial</title><author>Andrews, V ; Wright, JT ; Zakaria, F ; Banerjee, S ; Ballard, K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4410-f2cb29a95824ea62746ba73de9f675f72d9d749a70b21bac9f1cf03b2ff071bd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Analgesia, Patient-Controlled - methods</topic><topic>Analgesics, Opioid - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthetics, Local - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Bupivacaine - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Drug Administration Schedule</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hysterectomy</topic><topic>Hysterectomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Hysterectomy - methods</topic><topic>Injections, Intraperitoneal</topic><topic>intraperitoneal</topic><topic>laparoscopy</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Length of Stay - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>local anaesthetic</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Morphine - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Narcotics</topic><topic>Pain Measurement - methods</topic><topic>Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy</topic><topic>Pain, Postoperative - psychology</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Treatment Failure</topic><topic>United Kingdom - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Andrews, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, JT</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zakaria, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banerjee, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ballard, K</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Andrews, V</au><au>Wright, JT</au><au>Zakaria, F</au><au>Banerjee, S</au><au>Ballard, K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Continuous infusion of local anaesthetic following laparoscopic hysterectomy—a randomised controlled trial</atitle><jtitle>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</jtitle><addtitle>BJOG</addtitle><date>2014-05</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>121</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>754</spage><epage>760</epage><pages>754-760</pages><issn>1470-0328</issn><eissn>1471-0528</eissn><coden>BIOGFQ</coden><abstract>Objective To estimate whether a continuous infusion of intraperitoneal local anaesthetic for 48 hours following laparoscopic hysterectomy reduced the need for opioids delivered with a patient‐controlled analgesia pump. Design Double‐blind randomised placebo‐controlled trial. Setting District general hospital in the UK. Population Women undergoing a laparoscopic hysterectomy for a benign indication. Methods Women were randomised to receive either 0.5% levobupivicaine or 0.9% normal saline via an ON‐Q elastomeric pump for 48 hours postoperatively. The amount of opioids used via the patient‐controlled analgesia pump was recorded and pain was measured using an 11‐point Box Scale. Main outcome measures The primary outcome was the amount of patient‐administered morphine used over the first 48 postoperative hours. Secondary outcomes were length of hospital stay, oral analgesia use and level of patient‐reported pain. Results Sixty women participated and completed the trial. There was no difference (P = 0.59) in the median amount of patient‐administered morphine used between the levobupivicaine (23 mg) and placebo (18.5 mg) groups; median group difference 3.0 (95% CI −7.0 to 14.0). There was also no difference in the length of hospital stay with 40% of the treatment group remaining in hospital &gt;48 hours compared with 30% of the placebo group (P = 0.08). Pain scores at all postoperative time points remained similar, with a median group difference in pain scores of 1.0 (95% CI −1.0 to 2.0) at the end of the first postoperative day. Conclusions Continuous infusion of 0.5% levobupivicaine into the peritoneal cavity following laparoscopic hysterectomy does not have any opioid‐sparing effects.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>24548730</pmid><doi>10.1111/1471-0528.12610</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1470-0328
ispartof BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2014-05, Vol.121 (6), p.754-760
issn 1470-0328
1471-0528
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1517878934
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Analgesia, Patient-Controlled - methods
Analgesics, Opioid - administration & dosage
Anesthesia
Anesthetics, Local - administration & dosage
Bupivacaine - administration & dosage
Clinical outcomes
Double-Blind Method
Drug Administration Schedule
Female
Humans
Hysterectomy
Hysterectomy - adverse effects
Hysterectomy - methods
Injections, Intraperitoneal
intraperitoneal
laparoscopy
Laparoscopy - adverse effects
Length of Stay - statistics & numerical data
local anaesthetic
Middle Aged
Morphine - administration & dosage
Narcotics
Pain Measurement - methods
Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy
Pain, Postoperative - psychology
Patient Satisfaction - statistics & numerical data
Treatment Failure
United Kingdom - epidemiology
title Continuous infusion of local anaesthetic following laparoscopic hysterectomy—a randomised controlled trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T15%3A46%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Continuous%20infusion%20of%20local%20anaesthetic%20following%20laparoscopic%20hysterectomy%E2%80%94a%20randomised%20controlled%20trial&rft.jtitle=BJOG%20:%20an%20international%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynaecology&rft.au=Andrews,%20V&rft.date=2014-05&rft.volume=121&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=754&rft.epage=760&rft.pages=754-760&rft.issn=1470-0328&rft.eissn=1471-0528&rft.coden=BIOGFQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1471-0528.12610&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3278170391%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1517262683&rft_id=info:pmid/24548730&rfr_iscdi=true