Continuous infusion of local anaesthetic following laparoscopic hysterectomy—a randomised controlled trial
Objective To estimate whether a continuous infusion of intraperitoneal local anaesthetic for 48 hours following laparoscopic hysterectomy reduced the need for opioids delivered with a patient‐controlled analgesia pump. Design Double‐blind randomised placebo‐controlled trial. Setting District general...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 2014-05, Vol.121 (6), p.754-760 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 760 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 754 |
container_title | BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology |
container_volume | 121 |
creator | Andrews, V Wright, JT Zakaria, F Banerjee, S Ballard, K |
description | Objective
To estimate whether a continuous infusion of intraperitoneal local anaesthetic for 48 hours following laparoscopic hysterectomy reduced the need for opioids delivered with a patient‐controlled analgesia pump.
Design
Double‐blind randomised placebo‐controlled trial.
Setting
District general hospital in the UK.
Population
Women undergoing a laparoscopic hysterectomy for a benign indication.
Methods
Women were randomised to receive either 0.5% levobupivicaine or 0.9% normal saline via an ON‐Q elastomeric pump for 48 hours postoperatively. The amount of opioids used via the patient‐controlled analgesia pump was recorded and pain was measured using an 11‐point Box Scale.
Main outcome measures
The primary outcome was the amount of patient‐administered morphine used over the first 48 postoperative hours. Secondary outcomes were length of hospital stay, oral analgesia use and level of patient‐reported pain.
Results
Sixty women participated and completed the trial. There was no difference (P = 0.59) in the median amount of patient‐administered morphine used between the levobupivicaine (23 mg) and placebo (18.5 mg) groups; median group difference 3.0 (95% CI −7.0 to 14.0). There was also no difference in the length of hospital stay with 40% of the treatment group remaining in hospital >48 hours compared with 30% of the placebo group (P = 0.08). Pain scores at all postoperative time points remained similar, with a median group difference in pain scores of 1.0 (95% CI −1.0 to 2.0) at the end of the first postoperative day.
Conclusions
Continuous infusion of 0.5% levobupivicaine into the peritoneal cavity following laparoscopic hysterectomy does not have any opioid‐sparing effects. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/1471-0528.12610 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1517878934</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3278170391</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4410-f2cb29a95824ea62746ba73de9f675f72d9d749a70b21bac9f1cf03b2ff071bd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkb1OwzAUhS0EoqUws6FILCxpbceJkxEqflWpC8yW49jUlWsXO1HVjYfgCXkS3B86sODFV1ffPbrnXAAuERyi-EaIUJTCHJdDhAsEj0D_0Dne1jCFGS574CyEOYSowDA7BT1MclLSDPaBGTvbatu5LiTaqi5oZxOnEuMENwm3XIZ2JlstEuWMcStt3xPDl9y7INwytmfr0EovResW6-_PL554bhu30EE2iYjaPo7FsvWam3NworgJ8mL_D8Dbw_3r-CmdTB-fx7eTVBCCYKqwqHHFq7zERPICU1LUnGaNrFRBc0VxUzWUVJzCGqOai0ohoWBWY6UgRXWTDcDNTnfp3UcXHbC4j5DGcCujUYZyREtaVhmJ6PUfdO46b-N2WwoXuCizSI12lIi-g5eKLb1ecL9mCLLNIdgmdraJnW0PESeu9rpdvZDNgf9NPgL5DlhpI9f_6bG7l-lO-AdecJU_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1517262683</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Continuous infusion of local anaesthetic following laparoscopic hysterectomy—a randomised controlled trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Andrews, V ; Wright, JT ; Zakaria, F ; Banerjee, S ; Ballard, K</creator><creatorcontrib>Andrews, V ; Wright, JT ; Zakaria, F ; Banerjee, S ; Ballard, K</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
To estimate whether a continuous infusion of intraperitoneal local anaesthetic for 48 hours following laparoscopic hysterectomy reduced the need for opioids delivered with a patient‐controlled analgesia pump.
Design
Double‐blind randomised placebo‐controlled trial.
Setting
District general hospital in the UK.
Population
Women undergoing a laparoscopic hysterectomy for a benign indication.
Methods
Women were randomised to receive either 0.5% levobupivicaine or 0.9% normal saline via an ON‐Q elastomeric pump for 48 hours postoperatively. The amount of opioids used via the patient‐controlled analgesia pump was recorded and pain was measured using an 11‐point Box Scale.
Main outcome measures
The primary outcome was the amount of patient‐administered morphine used over the first 48 postoperative hours. Secondary outcomes were length of hospital stay, oral analgesia use and level of patient‐reported pain.
Results
Sixty women participated and completed the trial. There was no difference (P = 0.59) in the median amount of patient‐administered morphine used between the levobupivicaine (23 mg) and placebo (18.5 mg) groups; median group difference 3.0 (95% CI −7.0 to 14.0). There was also no difference in the length of hospital stay with 40% of the treatment group remaining in hospital >48 hours compared with 30% of the placebo group (P = 0.08). Pain scores at all postoperative time points remained similar, with a median group difference in pain scores of 1.0 (95% CI −1.0 to 2.0) at the end of the first postoperative day.
Conclusions
Continuous infusion of 0.5% levobupivicaine into the peritoneal cavity following laparoscopic hysterectomy does not have any opioid‐sparing effects.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1470-0328</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-0528</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.12610</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24548730</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BIOGFQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Adult ; Aged ; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled - methods ; Analgesics, Opioid - administration & dosage ; Anesthesia ; Anesthetics, Local - administration & dosage ; Bupivacaine - administration & dosage ; Clinical outcomes ; Double-Blind Method ; Drug Administration Schedule ; Female ; Humans ; Hysterectomy ; Hysterectomy - adverse effects ; Hysterectomy - methods ; Injections, Intraperitoneal ; intraperitoneal ; laparoscopy ; Laparoscopy - adverse effects ; Length of Stay - statistics & numerical data ; local anaesthetic ; Middle Aged ; Morphine - administration & dosage ; Narcotics ; Pain Measurement - methods ; Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy ; Pain, Postoperative - psychology ; Patient Satisfaction - statistics & numerical data ; Treatment Failure ; United Kingdom - epidemiology]]></subject><ispartof>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2014-05, Vol.121 (6), p.754-760</ispartof><rights>2014 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists</rights><rights>2014 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4410-f2cb29a95824ea62746ba73de9f675f72d9d749a70b21bac9f1cf03b2ff071bd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4410-f2cb29a95824ea62746ba73de9f675f72d9d749a70b21bac9f1cf03b2ff071bd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1471-0528.12610$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1471-0528.12610$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24548730$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Andrews, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, JT</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zakaria, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banerjee, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ballard, K</creatorcontrib><title>Continuous infusion of local anaesthetic following laparoscopic hysterectomy—a randomised controlled trial</title><title>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</title><addtitle>BJOG</addtitle><description>Objective
To estimate whether a continuous infusion of intraperitoneal local anaesthetic for 48 hours following laparoscopic hysterectomy reduced the need for opioids delivered with a patient‐controlled analgesia pump.
Design
Double‐blind randomised placebo‐controlled trial.
Setting
District general hospital in the UK.
Population
Women undergoing a laparoscopic hysterectomy for a benign indication.
Methods
Women were randomised to receive either 0.5% levobupivicaine or 0.9% normal saline via an ON‐Q elastomeric pump for 48 hours postoperatively. The amount of opioids used via the patient‐controlled analgesia pump was recorded and pain was measured using an 11‐point Box Scale.
Main outcome measures
The primary outcome was the amount of patient‐administered morphine used over the first 48 postoperative hours. Secondary outcomes were length of hospital stay, oral analgesia use and level of patient‐reported pain.
Results
Sixty women participated and completed the trial. There was no difference (P = 0.59) in the median amount of patient‐administered morphine used between the levobupivicaine (23 mg) and placebo (18.5 mg) groups; median group difference 3.0 (95% CI −7.0 to 14.0). There was also no difference in the length of hospital stay with 40% of the treatment group remaining in hospital >48 hours compared with 30% of the placebo group (P = 0.08). Pain scores at all postoperative time points remained similar, with a median group difference in pain scores of 1.0 (95% CI −1.0 to 2.0) at the end of the first postoperative day.
Conclusions
Continuous infusion of 0.5% levobupivicaine into the peritoneal cavity following laparoscopic hysterectomy does not have any opioid‐sparing effects.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Analgesia, Patient-Controlled - methods</subject><subject>Analgesics, Opioid - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthetics, Local - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Bupivacaine - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Drug Administration Schedule</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hysterectomy</subject><subject>Hysterectomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Hysterectomy - methods</subject><subject>Injections, Intraperitoneal</subject><subject>intraperitoneal</subject><subject>laparoscopy</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Length of Stay - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>local anaesthetic</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Morphine - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Narcotics</subject><subject>Pain Measurement - methods</subject><subject>Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy</subject><subject>Pain, Postoperative - psychology</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Treatment Failure</subject><subject>United Kingdom - epidemiology</subject><issn>1470-0328</issn><issn>1471-0528</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkb1OwzAUhS0EoqUws6FILCxpbceJkxEqflWpC8yW49jUlWsXO1HVjYfgCXkS3B86sODFV1ffPbrnXAAuERyi-EaIUJTCHJdDhAsEj0D_0Dne1jCFGS574CyEOYSowDA7BT1MclLSDPaBGTvbatu5LiTaqi5oZxOnEuMENwm3XIZ2JlstEuWMcStt3xPDl9y7INwytmfr0EovResW6-_PL554bhu30EE2iYjaPo7FsvWam3NworgJ8mL_D8Dbw_3r-CmdTB-fx7eTVBCCYKqwqHHFq7zERPICU1LUnGaNrFRBc0VxUzWUVJzCGqOai0ohoWBWY6UgRXWTDcDNTnfp3UcXHbC4j5DGcCujUYZyREtaVhmJ6PUfdO46b-N2WwoXuCizSI12lIi-g5eKLb1ecL9mCLLNIdgmdraJnW0PESeu9rpdvZDNgf9NPgL5DlhpI9f_6bG7l-lO-AdecJU_</recordid><startdate>201405</startdate><enddate>201405</enddate><creator>Andrews, V</creator><creator>Wright, JT</creator><creator>Zakaria, F</creator><creator>Banerjee, S</creator><creator>Ballard, K</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201405</creationdate><title>Continuous infusion of local anaesthetic following laparoscopic hysterectomy—a randomised controlled trial</title><author>Andrews, V ; Wright, JT ; Zakaria, F ; Banerjee, S ; Ballard, K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4410-f2cb29a95824ea62746ba73de9f675f72d9d749a70b21bac9f1cf03b2ff071bd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Analgesia, Patient-Controlled - methods</topic><topic>Analgesics, Opioid - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthetics, Local - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Bupivacaine - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Drug Administration Schedule</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hysterectomy</topic><topic>Hysterectomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Hysterectomy - methods</topic><topic>Injections, Intraperitoneal</topic><topic>intraperitoneal</topic><topic>laparoscopy</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Length of Stay - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>local anaesthetic</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Morphine - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Narcotics</topic><topic>Pain Measurement - methods</topic><topic>Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy</topic><topic>Pain, Postoperative - psychology</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Treatment Failure</topic><topic>United Kingdom - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Andrews, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, JT</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zakaria, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banerjee, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ballard, K</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Andrews, V</au><au>Wright, JT</au><au>Zakaria, F</au><au>Banerjee, S</au><au>Ballard, K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Continuous infusion of local anaesthetic following laparoscopic hysterectomy—a randomised controlled trial</atitle><jtitle>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</jtitle><addtitle>BJOG</addtitle><date>2014-05</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>121</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>754</spage><epage>760</epage><pages>754-760</pages><issn>1470-0328</issn><eissn>1471-0528</eissn><coden>BIOGFQ</coden><abstract>Objective
To estimate whether a continuous infusion of intraperitoneal local anaesthetic for 48 hours following laparoscopic hysterectomy reduced the need for opioids delivered with a patient‐controlled analgesia pump.
Design
Double‐blind randomised placebo‐controlled trial.
Setting
District general hospital in the UK.
Population
Women undergoing a laparoscopic hysterectomy for a benign indication.
Methods
Women were randomised to receive either 0.5% levobupivicaine or 0.9% normal saline via an ON‐Q elastomeric pump for 48 hours postoperatively. The amount of opioids used via the patient‐controlled analgesia pump was recorded and pain was measured using an 11‐point Box Scale.
Main outcome measures
The primary outcome was the amount of patient‐administered morphine used over the first 48 postoperative hours. Secondary outcomes were length of hospital stay, oral analgesia use and level of patient‐reported pain.
Results
Sixty women participated and completed the trial. There was no difference (P = 0.59) in the median amount of patient‐administered morphine used between the levobupivicaine (23 mg) and placebo (18.5 mg) groups; median group difference 3.0 (95% CI −7.0 to 14.0). There was also no difference in the length of hospital stay with 40% of the treatment group remaining in hospital >48 hours compared with 30% of the placebo group (P = 0.08). Pain scores at all postoperative time points remained similar, with a median group difference in pain scores of 1.0 (95% CI −1.0 to 2.0) at the end of the first postoperative day.
Conclusions
Continuous infusion of 0.5% levobupivicaine into the peritoneal cavity following laparoscopic hysterectomy does not have any opioid‐sparing effects.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>24548730</pmid><doi>10.1111/1471-0528.12610</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1470-0328 |
ispartof | BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2014-05, Vol.121 (6), p.754-760 |
issn | 1470-0328 1471-0528 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1517878934 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Adult Aged Analgesia, Patient-Controlled - methods Analgesics, Opioid - administration & dosage Anesthesia Anesthetics, Local - administration & dosage Bupivacaine - administration & dosage Clinical outcomes Double-Blind Method Drug Administration Schedule Female Humans Hysterectomy Hysterectomy - adverse effects Hysterectomy - methods Injections, Intraperitoneal intraperitoneal laparoscopy Laparoscopy - adverse effects Length of Stay - statistics & numerical data local anaesthetic Middle Aged Morphine - administration & dosage Narcotics Pain Measurement - methods Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy Pain, Postoperative - psychology Patient Satisfaction - statistics & numerical data Treatment Failure United Kingdom - epidemiology |
title | Continuous infusion of local anaesthetic following laparoscopic hysterectomy—a randomised controlled trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T15%3A46%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Continuous%20infusion%20of%20local%20anaesthetic%20following%20laparoscopic%20hysterectomy%E2%80%94a%20randomised%20controlled%20trial&rft.jtitle=BJOG%20:%20an%20international%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynaecology&rft.au=Andrews,%20V&rft.date=2014-05&rft.volume=121&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=754&rft.epage=760&rft.pages=754-760&rft.issn=1470-0328&rft.eissn=1471-0528&rft.coden=BIOGFQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1471-0528.12610&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3278170391%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1517262683&rft_id=info:pmid/24548730&rfr_iscdi=true |