Clonal Analysis via Barcoding Reveals Diverse Growth and Differentiation of Transplanted Mouse and Human Mammary Stem Cells

Cellular barcoding offers a powerful approach to characterize the growth and differentiation activity of large numbers of cotransplanted stem cells. Here, we describe a lentiviral genomic-barcoding and analysis strategy and its use to compare the clonal outputs of transplants of purified mouse and h...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cell stem cell 2014-02, Vol.14 (2), p.253-263
Hauptverfasser: Nguyen, Long V., Makarem, Maisam, Carles, Annaick, Moksa, Michelle, Kannan, Nagarajan, Pandoh, Pawan, Eirew, Peter, Osako, Tomo, Kardel, Melanie, Cheung, Alice M.S., Kennedy, William, Tse, Kane, Zeng, Thomas, Zhao, Yongjun, Humphries, R. Keith, Aparicio, Samuel, Eaves, Connie J., Hirst, Martin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 263
container_issue 2
container_start_page 253
container_title Cell stem cell
container_volume 14
creator Nguyen, Long V.
Makarem, Maisam
Carles, Annaick
Moksa, Michelle
Kannan, Nagarajan
Pandoh, Pawan
Eirew, Peter
Osako, Tomo
Kardel, Melanie
Cheung, Alice M.S.
Kennedy, William
Tse, Kane
Zeng, Thomas
Zhao, Yongjun
Humphries, R. Keith
Aparicio, Samuel
Eaves, Connie J.
Hirst, Martin
description Cellular barcoding offers a powerful approach to characterize the growth and differentiation activity of large numbers of cotransplanted stem cells. Here, we describe a lentiviral genomic-barcoding and analysis strategy and its use to compare the clonal outputs of transplants of purified mouse and human basal mammary epithelial cells. We found that both sources of transplanted cells produced many bilineage mammary epithelial clones in primary recipients, although primary clones containing only one detectable mammary lineage were also common. Interestingly, regardless of the species of origin, many clones evident in secondary recipients were not detected in the primary hosts, and others that were changed from appearing luminal-restricted to appearing bilineage. This barcoding methodology has thus revealed conservation between mice and humans of a previously unknown diversity in the growth and differentiation activities of their basal mammary epithelial cells stimulated to grow in transplanted hosts. [Display omitted] •A method for analyzing clones in regenerating epithelial populations is shown•Transplanted mouse and human basal mammary cells show similar growth patterns•In serial transplants of mammary cells, some clones show very delayed growth•Mammary clones may switch their differentiation behavior when serially transplanted Hirst et al. use barcoding to analyze clonal growth of transplanted mammary stem cells. They find that lineage phenotypes change and that many clones are only detected in secondary transplants.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.stem.2013.12.011
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1516760639</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1934590913005602</els_id><sourcerecordid>1499140613</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-189a9de7ea837a52608fa3c98c9f94a16f288b2aaa99c1a1826e0bc5fc300a1b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9v1DAQxSMEoqXwBTggH7kkeJw_jiUuZQstUqtKbTlbs84YvErsxc5uVfXL42gLx3KxLev3nt7MK4r3wCvg0H3aVGmmqRIc6gpExQFeFMfQy7ZUUsqX-a3qpmwVV0fFm5Q2nLcSuHxdHImmaXjH-XHxuBqDx5Gd5uMhucT2DtkXjCYMzv9kN7QnHBM7c3uKidh5DPfzL4Z-yF_WUiQ_O5xd8CxYdhfRp-2IfqaBXYVdFizkxW5Cz65wmjA-sNucma1oHNPb4pXN5vTu6T4pfnz7ere6KC-vz7-vTi9L0yg1l9ArVANJwr6W2IqO9xZro3qjrGoQOiv6fi0QUSkDCL3oiK9Na03NOcK6Pik-Hny3MfzeUZr15JLJCdBTDqmhhU52vKvV_9GcCPLqoM6oOKAmhpQiWb2NbplQA9dLP3qjl3700o8GoXM_WfThyX-3nmj4J_lbSAY-HwDKC9k7ijoZR97Q4CKZWQ_BPef_B-maokQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1499140613</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clonal Analysis via Barcoding Reveals Diverse Growth and Differentiation of Transplanted Mouse and Human Mammary Stem Cells</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>Cell Press Free Archives</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Nguyen, Long V. ; Makarem, Maisam ; Carles, Annaick ; Moksa, Michelle ; Kannan, Nagarajan ; Pandoh, Pawan ; Eirew, Peter ; Osako, Tomo ; Kardel, Melanie ; Cheung, Alice M.S. ; Kennedy, William ; Tse, Kane ; Zeng, Thomas ; Zhao, Yongjun ; Humphries, R. Keith ; Aparicio, Samuel ; Eaves, Connie J. ; Hirst, Martin</creator><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Long V. ; Makarem, Maisam ; Carles, Annaick ; Moksa, Michelle ; Kannan, Nagarajan ; Pandoh, Pawan ; Eirew, Peter ; Osako, Tomo ; Kardel, Melanie ; Cheung, Alice M.S. ; Kennedy, William ; Tse, Kane ; Zeng, Thomas ; Zhao, Yongjun ; Humphries, R. Keith ; Aparicio, Samuel ; Eaves, Connie J. ; Hirst, Martin</creatorcontrib><description>Cellular barcoding offers a powerful approach to characterize the growth and differentiation activity of large numbers of cotransplanted stem cells. Here, we describe a lentiviral genomic-barcoding and analysis strategy and its use to compare the clonal outputs of transplants of purified mouse and human basal mammary epithelial cells. We found that both sources of transplanted cells produced many bilineage mammary epithelial clones in primary recipients, although primary clones containing only one detectable mammary lineage were also common. Interestingly, regardless of the species of origin, many clones evident in secondary recipients were not detected in the primary hosts, and others that were changed from appearing luminal-restricted to appearing bilineage. This barcoding methodology has thus revealed conservation between mice and humans of a previously unknown diversity in the growth and differentiation activities of their basal mammary epithelial cells stimulated to grow in transplanted hosts. [Display omitted] •A method for analyzing clones in regenerating epithelial populations is shown•Transplanted mouse and human basal mammary cells show similar growth patterns•In serial transplants of mammary cells, some clones show very delayed growth•Mammary clones may switch their differentiation behavior when serially transplanted Hirst et al. use barcoding to analyze clonal growth of transplanted mammary stem cells. They find that lineage phenotypes change and that many clones are only detected in secondary transplants.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1934-5909</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1875-9777</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2013.12.011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24440600</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Cell Culture Techniques - methods ; Cell Differentiation ; Cell Lineage ; Cell Proliferation ; Cell Size ; Clone Cells ; Epithelial Cells - cytology ; Epithelial Cells - transplantation ; Female ; High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing ; Humans ; Mammary Glands, Animal - cytology ; Mammary Glands, Human - cytology ; Mice ; Regeneration ; Stem Cell Transplantation ; Stem Cells - cytology</subject><ispartof>Cell stem cell, 2014-02, Vol.14 (2), p.253-263</ispartof><rights>2014 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-189a9de7ea837a52608fa3c98c9f94a16f288b2aaa99c1a1826e0bc5fc300a1b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-189a9de7ea837a52608fa3c98c9f94a16f288b2aaa99c1a1826e0bc5fc300a1b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1934590913005602$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24440600$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Long V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Makarem, Maisam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carles, Annaick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moksa, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kannan, Nagarajan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pandoh, Pawan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eirew, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osako, Tomo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kardel, Melanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheung, Alice M.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kennedy, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tse, Kane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Yongjun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Humphries, R. Keith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aparicio, Samuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eaves, Connie J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirst, Martin</creatorcontrib><title>Clonal Analysis via Barcoding Reveals Diverse Growth and Differentiation of Transplanted Mouse and Human Mammary Stem Cells</title><title>Cell stem cell</title><addtitle>Cell Stem Cell</addtitle><description>Cellular barcoding offers a powerful approach to characterize the growth and differentiation activity of large numbers of cotransplanted stem cells. Here, we describe a lentiviral genomic-barcoding and analysis strategy and its use to compare the clonal outputs of transplants of purified mouse and human basal mammary epithelial cells. We found that both sources of transplanted cells produced many bilineage mammary epithelial clones in primary recipients, although primary clones containing only one detectable mammary lineage were also common. Interestingly, regardless of the species of origin, many clones evident in secondary recipients were not detected in the primary hosts, and others that were changed from appearing luminal-restricted to appearing bilineage. This barcoding methodology has thus revealed conservation between mice and humans of a previously unknown diversity in the growth and differentiation activities of their basal mammary epithelial cells stimulated to grow in transplanted hosts. [Display omitted] •A method for analyzing clones in regenerating epithelial populations is shown•Transplanted mouse and human basal mammary cells show similar growth patterns•In serial transplants of mammary cells, some clones show very delayed growth•Mammary clones may switch their differentiation behavior when serially transplanted Hirst et al. use barcoding to analyze clonal growth of transplanted mammary stem cells. They find that lineage phenotypes change and that many clones are only detected in secondary transplants.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Cell Culture Techniques - methods</subject><subject>Cell Differentiation</subject><subject>Cell Lineage</subject><subject>Cell Proliferation</subject><subject>Cell Size</subject><subject>Clone Cells</subject><subject>Epithelial Cells - cytology</subject><subject>Epithelial Cells - transplantation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mammary Glands, Animal - cytology</subject><subject>Mammary Glands, Human - cytology</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Regeneration</subject><subject>Stem Cell Transplantation</subject><subject>Stem Cells - cytology</subject><issn>1934-5909</issn><issn>1875-9777</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU9v1DAQxSMEoqXwBTggH7kkeJw_jiUuZQstUqtKbTlbs84YvErsxc5uVfXL42gLx3KxLev3nt7MK4r3wCvg0H3aVGmmqRIc6gpExQFeFMfQy7ZUUsqX-a3qpmwVV0fFm5Q2nLcSuHxdHImmaXjH-XHxuBqDx5Gd5uMhucT2DtkXjCYMzv9kN7QnHBM7c3uKidh5DPfzL4Z-yF_WUiQ_O5xd8CxYdhfRp-2IfqaBXYVdFizkxW5Cz65wmjA-sNucma1oHNPb4pXN5vTu6T4pfnz7ere6KC-vz7-vTi9L0yg1l9ArVANJwr6W2IqO9xZro3qjrGoQOiv6fi0QUSkDCL3oiK9Na03NOcK6Pik-Hny3MfzeUZr15JLJCdBTDqmhhU52vKvV_9GcCPLqoM6oOKAmhpQiWb2NbplQA9dLP3qjl3700o8GoXM_WfThyX-3nmj4J_lbSAY-HwDKC9k7ijoZR97Q4CKZWQ_BPef_B-maokQ</recordid><startdate>20140206</startdate><enddate>20140206</enddate><creator>Nguyen, Long V.</creator><creator>Makarem, Maisam</creator><creator>Carles, Annaick</creator><creator>Moksa, Michelle</creator><creator>Kannan, Nagarajan</creator><creator>Pandoh, Pawan</creator><creator>Eirew, Peter</creator><creator>Osako, Tomo</creator><creator>Kardel, Melanie</creator><creator>Cheung, Alice M.S.</creator><creator>Kennedy, William</creator><creator>Tse, Kane</creator><creator>Zeng, Thomas</creator><creator>Zhao, Yongjun</creator><creator>Humphries, R. Keith</creator><creator>Aparicio, Samuel</creator><creator>Eaves, Connie J.</creator><creator>Hirst, Martin</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140206</creationdate><title>Clonal Analysis via Barcoding Reveals Diverse Growth and Differentiation of Transplanted Mouse and Human Mammary Stem Cells</title><author>Nguyen, Long V. ; Makarem, Maisam ; Carles, Annaick ; Moksa, Michelle ; Kannan, Nagarajan ; Pandoh, Pawan ; Eirew, Peter ; Osako, Tomo ; Kardel, Melanie ; Cheung, Alice M.S. ; Kennedy, William ; Tse, Kane ; Zeng, Thomas ; Zhao, Yongjun ; Humphries, R. Keith ; Aparicio, Samuel ; Eaves, Connie J. ; Hirst, Martin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-189a9de7ea837a52608fa3c98c9f94a16f288b2aaa99c1a1826e0bc5fc300a1b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Cell Culture Techniques - methods</topic><topic>Cell Differentiation</topic><topic>Cell Lineage</topic><topic>Cell Proliferation</topic><topic>Cell Size</topic><topic>Clone Cells</topic><topic>Epithelial Cells - cytology</topic><topic>Epithelial Cells - transplantation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mammary Glands, Animal - cytology</topic><topic>Mammary Glands, Human - cytology</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Regeneration</topic><topic>Stem Cell Transplantation</topic><topic>Stem Cells - cytology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Long V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Makarem, Maisam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carles, Annaick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moksa, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kannan, Nagarajan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pandoh, Pawan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eirew, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osako, Tomo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kardel, Melanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheung, Alice M.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kennedy, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tse, Kane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Yongjun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Humphries, R. Keith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aparicio, Samuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eaves, Connie J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirst, Martin</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Cell stem cell</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nguyen, Long V.</au><au>Makarem, Maisam</au><au>Carles, Annaick</au><au>Moksa, Michelle</au><au>Kannan, Nagarajan</au><au>Pandoh, Pawan</au><au>Eirew, Peter</au><au>Osako, Tomo</au><au>Kardel, Melanie</au><au>Cheung, Alice M.S.</au><au>Kennedy, William</au><au>Tse, Kane</au><au>Zeng, Thomas</au><au>Zhao, Yongjun</au><au>Humphries, R. Keith</au><au>Aparicio, Samuel</au><au>Eaves, Connie J.</au><au>Hirst, Martin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clonal Analysis via Barcoding Reveals Diverse Growth and Differentiation of Transplanted Mouse and Human Mammary Stem Cells</atitle><jtitle>Cell stem cell</jtitle><addtitle>Cell Stem Cell</addtitle><date>2014-02-06</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>253</spage><epage>263</epage><pages>253-263</pages><issn>1934-5909</issn><eissn>1875-9777</eissn><abstract>Cellular barcoding offers a powerful approach to characterize the growth and differentiation activity of large numbers of cotransplanted stem cells. Here, we describe a lentiviral genomic-barcoding and analysis strategy and its use to compare the clonal outputs of transplants of purified mouse and human basal mammary epithelial cells. We found that both sources of transplanted cells produced many bilineage mammary epithelial clones in primary recipients, although primary clones containing only one detectable mammary lineage were also common. Interestingly, regardless of the species of origin, many clones evident in secondary recipients were not detected in the primary hosts, and others that were changed from appearing luminal-restricted to appearing bilineage. This barcoding methodology has thus revealed conservation between mice and humans of a previously unknown diversity in the growth and differentiation activities of their basal mammary epithelial cells stimulated to grow in transplanted hosts. [Display omitted] •A method for analyzing clones in regenerating epithelial populations is shown•Transplanted mouse and human basal mammary cells show similar growth patterns•In serial transplants of mammary cells, some clones show very delayed growth•Mammary clones may switch their differentiation behavior when serially transplanted Hirst et al. use barcoding to analyze clonal growth of transplanted mammary stem cells. They find that lineage phenotypes change and that many clones are only detected in secondary transplants.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>24440600</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.stem.2013.12.011</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1934-5909
ispartof Cell stem cell, 2014-02, Vol.14 (2), p.253-263
issn 1934-5909
1875-9777
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1516760639
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; Cell Press Free Archives; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Animals
Cell Culture Techniques - methods
Cell Differentiation
Cell Lineage
Cell Proliferation
Cell Size
Clone Cells
Epithelial Cells - cytology
Epithelial Cells - transplantation
Female
High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
Humans
Mammary Glands, Animal - cytology
Mammary Glands, Human - cytology
Mice
Regeneration
Stem Cell Transplantation
Stem Cells - cytology
title Clonal Analysis via Barcoding Reveals Diverse Growth and Differentiation of Transplanted Mouse and Human Mammary Stem Cells
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T18%3A16%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clonal%20Analysis%20via%20Barcoding%20Reveals%20Diverse%20Growth%20and%20Differentiation%20of%20Transplanted%20Mouse%20and%20Human%20Mammary%20Stem%20Cells&rft.jtitle=Cell%20stem%20cell&rft.au=Nguyen,%20Long%C2%A0V.&rft.date=2014-02-06&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=253&rft.epage=263&rft.pages=253-263&rft.issn=1934-5909&rft.eissn=1875-9777&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.stem.2013.12.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1499140613%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1499140613&rft_id=info:pmid/24440600&rft_els_id=S1934590913005602&rfr_iscdi=true