Ground source heat pump performance in case of high humidity soil and yearly balanced heat transfer

•GSHPs are simulated in case of humid soil and yearly balanced heat transfer.•Humid soil and yearly balanced heat transfer imply higher compactness of GSHPs.•Resulting GSHPs are compared with other traditional and innovative HVAC systems.•GSHPs score best, especially in case of inverter-driven compressors. Ground source heat pump (GSHP) systems are spreading also in Southern Europe, due to their high energy efficiency both in heating and in cooling mode. Moreover, they are particularly suitable in historical cities because of difficulties in the integration of heating/cooling systems into buildings subjected to historical preservation regulations. In these cases, GSHP systems, especially the ones provided with borehole heat exchangers, are a suitable solution instead of gas boilers, air-cooled chillers or cooling towers. In humid soils, GSHP systems are even more interesting because of their enhanced performance due to higher values of soil thermal conductivity and capacity. In this paper, GSHP systems operating under these boundary conditions are analyzed through a specific case study set in Venice and related to the restoration of an historical building. With this analysis the relevant influences of soil thermal conductivity and yearly balanced heat transfer in the design of the borehole field are shown. In particular, the paper shows the possibility to achieve higher compactness of the borehole field footprint area when yearly balanced heat transfer in the borehole field is expected. Then, the second set of results contained in the paper shows how GSHP systems designed for high humidity soils and yearly balanced heat loads at the ground side, even if characterized by a compact footprint area, may still ensure better performance than other available and more common technologies such as boilers, air-cooled chillers, chillers coupled with cooling towers and heat pumps and chillers coupled with lagoon water. As a consequence, in this last comparison, the efficiency of GSHP systems is confirmed even when compact borehole installation areas are used. The analysis is performed in terms of both input energy consumption ratio and primary energy ratio and takes into account the energy consumption of auxiliary devices as well. The conclusions are drawn in terms of percentage, thus allowing the reader to extend the results achieved in this paper to systems operating in other contexts under similar boundary conditions.