Evidence appraisal of Kaibori M, Matsui K, Ishizaki M, et al. A prospective randomized controlled trial of hemostasis with a bipolar sealer during hepatic transection for liver resection. Surgery . 2013;154(5):1046-1052

Reading research and incorporating valid research results into practice is a vital part of ensuring that perioperative nursing practice is evidence based. The AORN Research Evidence Appraisal Tool, which was adapted with permission from the Johns Hopkins Evidence-Based Practice Model and Guidelines,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:AORN journal 2014-03, Vol.99 (3), p.442-446
1. Verfasser: Allen, George
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 446
container_issue 3
container_start_page 442
container_title AORN journal
container_volume 99
creator Allen, George
description Reading research and incorporating valid research results into practice is a vital part of ensuring that perioperative nursing practice is evidence based. The AORN Research Evidence Appraisal Tool, which was adapted with permission from the Johns Hopkins Evidence-Based Practice Model and Guidelines, can help perioperative nurses evaluate research. This tool is used to evaluate the evidence upon which AORNs recommended practices are based. The tool can be used to appraise the level of evidence and quality of evidence for a single research study or a summary of multiple research studies. An abbreviated tool using only the sections of the tool relevant to the study appraised is included in this article. Each section of the tool is discussed to help readers understand why the study received a particular appraisal score and what that rating means to perioperative nursing practice. Clinical judgment should be used to determine whether the ndings of an individual study are of value and relevance in a particular setting or patient care situation. Individuals intending to put this studys ndings into practice are encouraged to review the original article to determine its applicability to their setting.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.aorn.2014.01.002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1516403165</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0001209214000039</els_id><sourcerecordid>1516403165</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2832-9318e7fd36acb6398017482c2e5b9daa08a4d06a1d5d3b101ec2ac3107a9e1ca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUt1u0zAYjRCIjcELcIEscTOkJfgnSZOBkKppwLSNSQyurS_O19WdGwc76dQ9TZ-lD8Kz4LQFpF0grmx_Ouf40zknil4ymjDK8rezBKxrEk5ZmlCWUMofRfusGBUxFXn5ONqnlLKY05LvRc-8n4UnFTx7Gu3xdMRTTvP96OfpQtfYKCTQtg60B0PshJyDrqzT5PKIXELne03Oj8iZn-p7uN1MsVuvwCRkvF61zvoWVacXSBw0tZ3re6yJsk3nrDHh2jm9kV2vpji3vgOvPbnT3ZQAqXRrDTjiEQw6UvdONzdkii10WgUmNH7Qtg2ZWEdM-MQRh7tZQq57d4NuSRISbBDvWJYeZm-OGU3zmNGMP4-eTMB4fLE7D6LvH0-_nXyOL64-nZ2ML2LFC8HjUrACR5Na5KCqXJQFZaO04IpjVpU1AC0grWkOrM5qUQXzUXFQgtERlMgUiIPocKsbzPjRo-_kXHuFxkCDtveSZSxPqWB5FqCvH0BntndN2C6gqEiZKFgRUHyLUsFd73AiW6fn4JaSUTmkL2dySF8O6UvKZEg_kF7tpPtqjvUfyu-4A2C0Bdxpg8v_kJTjq69f0nSQfr9lYnBxodFJr_TQm1q7kIWsrf73Zh8e0JXRjVZgbnGJ_q8D0nNJ5fXQ3KG4LN2UthS_AHoz6EI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1503413818</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evidence appraisal of Kaibori M, Matsui K, Ishizaki M, et al. A prospective randomized controlled trial of hemostasis with a bipolar sealer during hepatic transection for liver resection. Surgery . 2013;154(5):1046-1052</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Allen, George</creator><creatorcontrib>Allen, George</creatorcontrib><description>Reading research and incorporating valid research results into practice is a vital part of ensuring that perioperative nursing practice is evidence based. The AORN Research Evidence Appraisal Tool, which was adapted with permission from the Johns Hopkins Evidence-Based Practice Model and Guidelines, can help perioperative nurses evaluate research. This tool is used to evaluate the evidence upon which AORNs recommended practices are based. The tool can be used to appraise the level of evidence and quality of evidence for a single research study or a summary of multiple research studies. An abbreviated tool using only the sections of the tool relevant to the study appraised is included in this article. Each section of the tool is discussed to help readers understand why the study received a particular appraisal score and what that rating means to perioperative nursing practice. Clinical judgment should be used to determine whether the ndings of an individual study are of value and relevance in a particular setting or patient care situation. Individuals intending to put this studys ndings into practice are encouraged to review the original article to determine its applicability to their setting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-2092</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-0369</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.aorn.2014.01.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24724206</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Anesthesia &amp; Perioperative Care ; Cautery - instrumentation ; Clinical trials ; Female ; Hemostasis, Surgical - instrumentation ; Hepatectomy - instrumentation ; Humans ; Liver diseases ; Liver Neoplasms - surgery ; Male ; Nursing ; Perianesthesia ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>AORN journal, 2014-03, Vol.99 (3), p.442-446</ispartof><rights>AORN, Inc</rights><rights>2014 AORN, Inc</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Association of Operating Room Nurses, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1016%2Fj.aorn.2014.01.002$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1016%2Fj.aorn.2014.01.002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,1414,27913,27914,45563,45564</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24724206$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Allen, George</creatorcontrib><title>Evidence appraisal of Kaibori M, Matsui K, Ishizaki M, et al. A prospective randomized controlled trial of hemostasis with a bipolar sealer during hepatic transection for liver resection. Surgery . 2013;154(5):1046-1052</title><title>AORN journal</title><addtitle>AORN J</addtitle><description>Reading research and incorporating valid research results into practice is a vital part of ensuring that perioperative nursing practice is evidence based. The AORN Research Evidence Appraisal Tool, which was adapted with permission from the Johns Hopkins Evidence-Based Practice Model and Guidelines, can help perioperative nurses evaluate research. This tool is used to evaluate the evidence upon which AORNs recommended practices are based. The tool can be used to appraise the level of evidence and quality of evidence for a single research study or a summary of multiple research studies. An abbreviated tool using only the sections of the tool relevant to the study appraised is included in this article. Each section of the tool is discussed to help readers understand why the study received a particular appraisal score and what that rating means to perioperative nursing practice. Clinical judgment should be used to determine whether the ndings of an individual study are of value and relevance in a particular setting or patient care situation. Individuals intending to put this studys ndings into practice are encouraged to review the original article to determine its applicability to their setting.</description><subject>Anesthesia &amp; Perioperative Care</subject><subject>Cautery - instrumentation</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hemostasis, Surgical - instrumentation</subject><subject>Hepatectomy - instrumentation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Liver diseases</subject><subject>Liver Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Perianesthesia</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>0001-2092</issn><issn>1878-0369</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNUt1u0zAYjRCIjcELcIEscTOkJfgnSZOBkKppwLSNSQyurS_O19WdGwc76dQ9TZ-lD8Kz4LQFpF0grmx_Ouf40zknil4ymjDK8rezBKxrEk5ZmlCWUMofRfusGBUxFXn5ONqnlLKY05LvRc-8n4UnFTx7Gu3xdMRTTvP96OfpQtfYKCTQtg60B0PshJyDrqzT5PKIXELne03Oj8iZn-p7uN1MsVuvwCRkvF61zvoWVacXSBw0tZ3re6yJsk3nrDHh2jm9kV2vpji3vgOvPbnT3ZQAqXRrDTjiEQw6UvdONzdkii10WgUmNH7Qtg2ZWEdM-MQRh7tZQq57d4NuSRISbBDvWJYeZm-OGU3zmNGMP4-eTMB4fLE7D6LvH0-_nXyOL64-nZ2ML2LFC8HjUrACR5Na5KCqXJQFZaO04IpjVpU1AC0grWkOrM5qUQXzUXFQgtERlMgUiIPocKsbzPjRo-_kXHuFxkCDtveSZSxPqWB5FqCvH0BntndN2C6gqEiZKFgRUHyLUsFd73AiW6fn4JaSUTmkL2dySF8O6UvKZEg_kF7tpPtqjvUfyu-4A2C0Bdxpg8v_kJTjq69f0nSQfr9lYnBxodFJr_TQm1q7kIWsrf73Zh8e0JXRjVZgbnGJ_q8D0nNJ5fXQ3KG4LN2UthS_AHoz6EI</recordid><startdate>201403</startdate><enddate>201403</enddate><creator>Allen, George</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201403</creationdate><title>Evidence appraisal of Kaibori M, Matsui K, Ishizaki M, et al. A prospective randomized controlled trial of hemostasis with a bipolar sealer during hepatic transection for liver resection. Surgery . 2013;154(5):1046-1052</title><author>Allen, George</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2832-9318e7fd36acb6398017482c2e5b9daa08a4d06a1d5d3b101ec2ac3107a9e1ca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Anesthesia &amp; Perioperative Care</topic><topic>Cautery - instrumentation</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hemostasis, Surgical - instrumentation</topic><topic>Hepatectomy - instrumentation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Liver diseases</topic><topic>Liver Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Perianesthesia</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Allen, George</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>AORN journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Allen, George</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evidence appraisal of Kaibori M, Matsui K, Ishizaki M, et al. A prospective randomized controlled trial of hemostasis with a bipolar sealer during hepatic transection for liver resection. Surgery . 2013;154(5):1046-1052</atitle><jtitle>AORN journal</jtitle><addtitle>AORN J</addtitle><date>2014-03</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>99</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>442</spage><epage>446</epage><pages>442-446</pages><issn>0001-2092</issn><eissn>1878-0369</eissn><abstract>Reading research and incorporating valid research results into practice is a vital part of ensuring that perioperative nursing practice is evidence based. The AORN Research Evidence Appraisal Tool, which was adapted with permission from the Johns Hopkins Evidence-Based Practice Model and Guidelines, can help perioperative nurses evaluate research. This tool is used to evaluate the evidence upon which AORNs recommended practices are based. The tool can be used to appraise the level of evidence and quality of evidence for a single research study or a summary of multiple research studies. An abbreviated tool using only the sections of the tool relevant to the study appraised is included in this article. Each section of the tool is discussed to help readers understand why the study received a particular appraisal score and what that rating means to perioperative nursing practice. Clinical judgment should be used to determine whether the ndings of an individual study are of value and relevance in a particular setting or patient care situation. Individuals intending to put this studys ndings into practice are encouraged to review the original article to determine its applicability to their setting.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>24724206</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.aorn.2014.01.002</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-2092
ispartof AORN journal, 2014-03, Vol.99 (3), p.442-446
issn 0001-2092
1878-0369
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1516403165
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Anesthesia & Perioperative Care
Cautery - instrumentation
Clinical trials
Female
Hemostasis, Surgical - instrumentation
Hepatectomy - instrumentation
Humans
Liver diseases
Liver Neoplasms - surgery
Male
Nursing
Perianesthesia
Surgery
title Evidence appraisal of Kaibori M, Matsui K, Ishizaki M, et al. A prospective randomized controlled trial of hemostasis with a bipolar sealer during hepatic transection for liver resection. Surgery . 2013;154(5):1046-1052
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T08%3A53%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evidence%20appraisal%20of%20Kaibori%20M,%20Matsui%20K,%20Ishizaki%20M,%20et%C2%A0al.%20A%C2%A0prospective%20randomized%20controlled%20trial%20of%C2%A0hemostasis%20with%20a%20bipolar%20sealer%20during%20hepatic%20transection%20for%20liver%20resection.%20Surgery%20.%202013;154(5):1046-1052&rft.jtitle=AORN%20journal&rft.au=Allen,%20George&rft.date=2014-03&rft.volume=99&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=442&rft.epage=446&rft.pages=442-446&rft.issn=0001-2092&rft.eissn=1878-0369&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.aorn.2014.01.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1516403165%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1503413818&rft_id=info:pmid/24724206&rft_els_id=S0001209214000039&rfr_iscdi=true