Laboratory Selection of Resistance to Spinosad in Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae)

A southern house mosquito Culex quinquefasciatus Say colony was established from surviving late instars and pupae from a semifield evaluation on Natular XRG (a granular formulation containing 2.5% spinosad). The initial lethal levels of Natular XRG against this colony were determined in the laborato...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of medical entomology 2014-03, Vol.51 (2), p.421-427
Hauptverfasser: Su, Tianyun, Cheng, Min-Lee
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 427
container_issue 2
container_start_page 421
container_title Journal of medical entomology
container_volume 51
creator Su, Tianyun
Cheng, Min-Lee
description A southern house mosquito Culex quinquefasciatus Say colony was established from surviving late instars and pupae from a semifield evaluation on Natular XRG (a granular formulation containing 2.5% spinosad). The initial lethal levels of Natular XRG against this colony were determined in the laboratory for the first-generation progeny (designated as F1). Selection pressure was applied at LC70–90 levels to 10,000–15,000 late third- and early fourth-instar larvae of each generation with Natular XRG. Susceptibility changes in response to selection were determined every other generation, where a gradual and steady decline in susceptibility occurred from generation F1 to F35, followed by significant decline from generations F37 to F45 For reference purposes, susceptibility of freshly collected wild populations as well as a laboratory colony of the same species was also determined concurrently, which fluctuated within a slightly wider range for the wild populations and a tighter range for the laboratory colony. By comparing with wild populations and laboratory reference colony, tolerance to spinosad was observed from generations up to F9 in the selected population. Resistance levels increased gradually from generation F11 to F35, and elevated significantly from generations F37 to F45 when resistance ratios reached 1,415.3- to 2,229.9-fold at LC50 and 9,613.1- to 17,062.6-fold at LC90 Possible mechanisms of resistance development to spinosad were discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1603/ME13173
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1516401578</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A535149371</galeid><sourcerecordid>A535149371</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b402t-d14cccffae2e6decf2e856c3ba1b1c61036c660fcc6aeaa7024a33c02ad482bc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10d9rFDEQB_Agir1W8T_QBRHrw9b82M3u-VbO2gongmcfJczOTkpkb3NNsmD_--bYa0FQ8hAIn5l8mWHsleBnQnP18duFUKJRT9hCLFVbyqVsn7IF51KWsm7rI3Yc42_OeSuq5XN2JKtGVhkt2K81dD5A8uGu2NBAmJwfC2-LHxRdTDAiFckXm50bfYS-cGOxmgb6U9xObrydyEJEB2mKxelnt0sU4NMeOHQ90IcX7JmFIdLLw33Crr9c_Fxdlevvl19X5-uyq7hMZS8qRLQWSJLuCa2kttaoOhCdQC240qg1t4gaCKDhsgKlkEvoq1Z2qE7Y6dx3F3wOFZPZuog0DDCSn6IRtdAVF3XTZvp2pjcwkHGj9SkA7rk5r1Wd56MakdXZP1Q-PW0d-pGsy-9_FbyfCzD4GANZswtuC-HOCG72KzKHFWX5-pB16rbUP7qHnWTwZgYWvIGb4KK53kiem3CumqXci3ez6JzPWf771T0-Ap-H</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1516401578</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Laboratory Selection of Resistance to Spinosad in Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Su, Tianyun ; Cheng, Min-Lee</creator><creatorcontrib>Su, Tianyun ; Cheng, Min-Lee</creatorcontrib><description>A southern house mosquito Culex quinquefasciatus Say colony was established from surviving late instars and pupae from a semifield evaluation on Natular XRG (a granular formulation containing 2.5% spinosad). The initial lethal levels of Natular XRG against this colony were determined in the laboratory for the first-generation progeny (designated as F1). Selection pressure was applied at LC70–90 levels to 10,000–15,000 late third- and early fourth-instar larvae of each generation with Natular XRG. Susceptibility changes in response to selection were determined every other generation, where a gradual and steady decline in susceptibility occurred from generation F1 to F35, followed by significant decline from generations F37 to F45 For reference purposes, susceptibility of freshly collected wild populations as well as a laboratory colony of the same species was also determined concurrently, which fluctuated within a slightly wider range for the wild populations and a tighter range for the laboratory colony. By comparing with wild populations and laboratory reference colony, tolerance to spinosad was observed from generations up to F9 in the selected population. Resistance levels increased gradually from generation F11 to F35, and elevated significantly from generations F37 to F45 when resistance ratios reached 1,415.3- to 2,229.9-fold at LC50 and 9,613.1- to 17,062.6-fold at LC90 Possible mechanisms of resistance development to spinosad were discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-2585</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-2928</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1603/ME13173</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24724292</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Entomological Society of America</publisher><subject>Animals ; Culex - genetics ; Culex quinquefasciatus ; Culicidae ; Diptera ; Drug Combinations ; Insecticide Resistance - genetics ; Insecticides ; instars ; larvae ; lethal concentration 50 ; Macrolides ; Mosquitoes ; population ; progeny ; pupae ; resistance development ; resistance mechanisms ; selection response ; Selection, Genetic ; spinosad ; VECTOR CONTROL, PEST MANAGEMENT, RESISTANCE, REPELLENTS</subject><ispartof>Journal of medical entomology, 2014-03, Vol.51 (2), p.421-427</ispartof><rights>2014 Entomological Society of America</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 Oxford University Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b402t-d14cccffae2e6decf2e856c3ba1b1c61036c660fcc6aeaa7024a33c02ad482bc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b402t-d14cccffae2e6decf2e856c3ba1b1c61036c660fcc6aeaa7024a33c02ad482bc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24724292$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Su, Tianyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Min-Lee</creatorcontrib><title>Laboratory Selection of Resistance to Spinosad in Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae)</title><title>Journal of medical entomology</title><addtitle>J Med Entomol</addtitle><description>A southern house mosquito Culex quinquefasciatus Say colony was established from surviving late instars and pupae from a semifield evaluation on Natular XRG (a granular formulation containing 2.5% spinosad). The initial lethal levels of Natular XRG against this colony were determined in the laboratory for the first-generation progeny (designated as F1). Selection pressure was applied at LC70–90 levels to 10,000–15,000 late third- and early fourth-instar larvae of each generation with Natular XRG. Susceptibility changes in response to selection were determined every other generation, where a gradual and steady decline in susceptibility occurred from generation F1 to F35, followed by significant decline from generations F37 to F45 For reference purposes, susceptibility of freshly collected wild populations as well as a laboratory colony of the same species was also determined concurrently, which fluctuated within a slightly wider range for the wild populations and a tighter range for the laboratory colony. By comparing with wild populations and laboratory reference colony, tolerance to spinosad was observed from generations up to F9 in the selected population. Resistance levels increased gradually from generation F11 to F35, and elevated significantly from generations F37 to F45 when resistance ratios reached 1,415.3- to 2,229.9-fold at LC50 and 9,613.1- to 17,062.6-fold at LC90 Possible mechanisms of resistance development to spinosad were discussed.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Culex - genetics</subject><subject>Culex quinquefasciatus</subject><subject>Culicidae</subject><subject>Diptera</subject><subject>Drug Combinations</subject><subject>Insecticide Resistance - genetics</subject><subject>Insecticides</subject><subject>instars</subject><subject>larvae</subject><subject>lethal concentration 50</subject><subject>Macrolides</subject><subject>Mosquitoes</subject><subject>population</subject><subject>progeny</subject><subject>pupae</subject><subject>resistance development</subject><subject>resistance mechanisms</subject><subject>selection response</subject><subject>Selection, Genetic</subject><subject>spinosad</subject><subject>VECTOR CONTROL, PEST MANAGEMENT, RESISTANCE, REPELLENTS</subject><issn>0022-2585</issn><issn>1938-2928</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10d9rFDEQB_Agir1W8T_QBRHrw9b82M3u-VbO2gongmcfJczOTkpkb3NNsmD_--bYa0FQ8hAIn5l8mWHsleBnQnP18duFUKJRT9hCLFVbyqVsn7IF51KWsm7rI3Yc42_OeSuq5XN2JKtGVhkt2K81dD5A8uGu2NBAmJwfC2-LHxRdTDAiFckXm50bfYS-cGOxmgb6U9xObrydyEJEB2mKxelnt0sU4NMeOHQ90IcX7JmFIdLLw33Crr9c_Fxdlevvl19X5-uyq7hMZS8qRLQWSJLuCa2kttaoOhCdQC240qg1t4gaCKDhsgKlkEvoq1Z2qE7Y6dx3F3wOFZPZuog0DDCSn6IRtdAVF3XTZvp2pjcwkHGj9SkA7rk5r1Wd56MakdXZP1Q-PW0d-pGsy-9_FbyfCzD4GANZswtuC-HOCG72KzKHFWX5-pB16rbUP7qHnWTwZgYWvIGb4KK53kiem3CumqXci3ez6JzPWf771T0-Ap-H</recordid><startdate>20140301</startdate><enddate>20140301</enddate><creator>Su, Tianyun</creator><creator>Cheng, Min-Lee</creator><general>Entomological Society of America</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140301</creationdate><title>Laboratory Selection of Resistance to Spinosad in Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae)</title><author>Su, Tianyun ; Cheng, Min-Lee</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b402t-d14cccffae2e6decf2e856c3ba1b1c61036c660fcc6aeaa7024a33c02ad482bc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Culex - genetics</topic><topic>Culex quinquefasciatus</topic><topic>Culicidae</topic><topic>Diptera</topic><topic>Drug Combinations</topic><topic>Insecticide Resistance - genetics</topic><topic>Insecticides</topic><topic>instars</topic><topic>larvae</topic><topic>lethal concentration 50</topic><topic>Macrolides</topic><topic>Mosquitoes</topic><topic>population</topic><topic>progeny</topic><topic>pupae</topic><topic>resistance development</topic><topic>resistance mechanisms</topic><topic>selection response</topic><topic>Selection, Genetic</topic><topic>spinosad</topic><topic>VECTOR CONTROL, PEST MANAGEMENT, RESISTANCE, REPELLENTS</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Su, Tianyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Min-Lee</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of medical entomology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Su, Tianyun</au><au>Cheng, Min-Lee</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Laboratory Selection of Resistance to Spinosad in Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae)</atitle><jtitle>Journal of medical entomology</jtitle><addtitle>J Med Entomol</addtitle><date>2014-03-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>421</spage><epage>427</epage><pages>421-427</pages><issn>0022-2585</issn><eissn>1938-2928</eissn><abstract>A southern house mosquito Culex quinquefasciatus Say colony was established from surviving late instars and pupae from a semifield evaluation on Natular XRG (a granular formulation containing 2.5% spinosad). The initial lethal levels of Natular XRG against this colony were determined in the laboratory for the first-generation progeny (designated as F1). Selection pressure was applied at LC70–90 levels to 10,000–15,000 late third- and early fourth-instar larvae of each generation with Natular XRG. Susceptibility changes in response to selection were determined every other generation, where a gradual and steady decline in susceptibility occurred from generation F1 to F35, followed by significant decline from generations F37 to F45 For reference purposes, susceptibility of freshly collected wild populations as well as a laboratory colony of the same species was also determined concurrently, which fluctuated within a slightly wider range for the wild populations and a tighter range for the laboratory colony. By comparing with wild populations and laboratory reference colony, tolerance to spinosad was observed from generations up to F9 in the selected population. Resistance levels increased gradually from generation F11 to F35, and elevated significantly from generations F37 to F45 when resistance ratios reached 1,415.3- to 2,229.9-fold at LC50 and 9,613.1- to 17,062.6-fold at LC90 Possible mechanisms of resistance development to spinosad were discussed.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Entomological Society of America</pub><pmid>24724292</pmid><doi>10.1603/ME13173</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-2585
ispartof Journal of medical entomology, 2014-03, Vol.51 (2), p.421-427
issn 0022-2585
1938-2928
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1516401578
source MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
subjects Animals
Culex - genetics
Culex quinquefasciatus
Culicidae
Diptera
Drug Combinations
Insecticide Resistance - genetics
Insecticides
instars
larvae
lethal concentration 50
Macrolides
Mosquitoes
population
progeny
pupae
resistance development
resistance mechanisms
selection response
Selection, Genetic
spinosad
VECTOR CONTROL, PEST MANAGEMENT, RESISTANCE, REPELLENTS
title Laboratory Selection of Resistance to Spinosad in Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T18%3A36%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Laboratory%20Selection%20of%20Resistance%20to%20Spinosad%20in%20Culex%20quinquefasciatus%20(Diptera:%20Culicidae)&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20medical%20entomology&rft.au=Su,%20Tianyun&rft.date=2014-03-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=421&rft.epage=427&rft.pages=421-427&rft.issn=0022-2585&rft.eissn=1938-2928&rft_id=info:doi/10.1603/ME13173&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA535149371%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1516401578&rft_id=info:pmid/24724292&rft_galeid=A535149371&rfr_iscdi=true