Dosimetric inter-institutional comparison in European radiotherapy centres: Results of IAEA supported treatment planning system audit

Abstract Background and purpose. One of the newer audit modalities operated by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) involves audits of treatment planning systems (TPS) in radiotherapy. The main focus of the audit is the dosimetry verification of the delivery of a radiation treatment plan fo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Acta oncologica 2014-05, Vol.53 (5), p.628-636
Hauptverfasser: Gershkevitsh, Eduard, Pesznyak, Csilla, Petrovic, Borislava, Grezdo, Joseph, Chelminski, Krzysztof, do Carmo Lopes, Maria, Izewska, Joanna, Van Dyk, Jacob
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 636
container_issue 5
container_start_page 628
container_title Acta oncologica
container_volume 53
creator Gershkevitsh, Eduard
Pesznyak, Csilla
Petrovic, Borislava
Grezdo, Joseph
Chelminski, Krzysztof
do Carmo Lopes, Maria
Izewska, Joanna
Van Dyk, Jacob
description Abstract Background and purpose. One of the newer audit modalities operated by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) involves audits of treatment planning systems (TPS) in radiotherapy. The main focus of the audit is the dosimetry verification of the delivery of a radiation treatment plan for three-dimensional (3D) conformal radiotherapy using high energy photon beams. The audit has been carried out in eight European countries - Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Serbia, Slovakia, Poland and Portugal. The corresponding results are presented. Material and methods. The TPS audit reviews the dosimetry, treatment planning and radiotherapy delivery processes using the 'end-to-end' approach, i.e. following the pathway similar to that of the patient, through imaging, treatment planning and dose delivery. The audit is implemented at the national level with IAEA assistance. The national counterparts conduct the TPS audit at local radiotherapy centres through on-site visits. TPS calculated doses are compared with ion chamber measurements performed in an anthropomorphic phantom for eight test cases per algorithm/beam. A set of pre-defined agreement criteria is used to analyse the performance of TPSs. Results. TPS audit was carried out in 60 radiotherapy centres. In total, 190 data sets (combination of algorithm and beam quality) have been collected and reviewed. Dosimetry problems requiring interventions were discovered in about 10% of datasets. In addition, suboptimal beam modelling in TPSs was discovered in a number of cases. Conclusions. The TPS audit project using the IAEA methodology has verified the treatment planning system calculations for 3D conformal radiotherapy in a group of radiotherapy centres in Europe. It contributed to achieving better understanding of the performance of TPSs and helped to resolve issues related to imaging, dosimetry and treatment planning.
doi_str_mv 10.3109/0284186X.2013.840742
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1516397333</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1516397333</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-973e588e17494f4b402f6105a81b48bad29bb5676cbcdf612cdd29c47d52405b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFq3DAQhkVpSLbbvEEpOvbirSTLsreHwpJu20AgUFrITcjyuKtgS65GOuwD5L2rZZMeq8uA_m_mH-Yn5B1nm5qz7UcmOsk79bARjNebTrJWildkxVXDKyHUw2uyOiHVibkibxAfGWOibptLciUkV5IzuSJPXwK6GVJ0ljqfIFbOY3IpJxe8magN82Kiw-CLTPc5hgWMp9EMLqQDRLMcqQWfIuAn-gMwTwlpGOntbr-jmJclxAQDLbpJc-HoMhnvnf9N8YgJZmry4NJbcjGaCeH6ua7Jr6_7nzffq7v7b7c3u7vK1kqkatvW0HQd8FZu5Sh7ycSoOGtMx3vZ9WYQ275vVKtsb4eiCDuULyvboRGSNX29Jh_Oc5cY_mTApGeHFqayE4SMmjdc1cWlvDWRZ9TGgBhh1Et0s4lHzZk-BaBfAtCnAPQ5gNL2_tkh9zMM_5peLl6Az2fA-THE2RzATOlgTQT9GHIsN8f_O_wF6PeX7Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1516397333</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dosimetric inter-institutional comparison in European radiotherapy centres: Results of IAEA supported treatment planning system audit</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Taylor &amp; Francis</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Gershkevitsh, Eduard ; Pesznyak, Csilla ; Petrovic, Borislava ; Grezdo, Joseph ; Chelminski, Krzysztof ; do Carmo Lopes, Maria ; Izewska, Joanna ; Van Dyk, Jacob</creator><creatorcontrib>Gershkevitsh, Eduard ; Pesznyak, Csilla ; Petrovic, Borislava ; Grezdo, Joseph ; Chelminski, Krzysztof ; do Carmo Lopes, Maria ; Izewska, Joanna ; Van Dyk, Jacob</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background and purpose. One of the newer audit modalities operated by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) involves audits of treatment planning systems (TPS) in radiotherapy. The main focus of the audit is the dosimetry verification of the delivery of a radiation treatment plan for three-dimensional (3D) conformal radiotherapy using high energy photon beams. The audit has been carried out in eight European countries - Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Serbia, Slovakia, Poland and Portugal. The corresponding results are presented. Material and methods. The TPS audit reviews the dosimetry, treatment planning and radiotherapy delivery processes using the 'end-to-end' approach, i.e. following the pathway similar to that of the patient, through imaging, treatment planning and dose delivery. The audit is implemented at the national level with IAEA assistance. The national counterparts conduct the TPS audit at local radiotherapy centres through on-site visits. TPS calculated doses are compared with ion chamber measurements performed in an anthropomorphic phantom for eight test cases per algorithm/beam. A set of pre-defined agreement criteria is used to analyse the performance of TPSs. Results. TPS audit was carried out in 60 radiotherapy centres. In total, 190 data sets (combination of algorithm and beam quality) have been collected and reviewed. Dosimetry problems requiring interventions were discovered in about 10% of datasets. In addition, suboptimal beam modelling in TPSs was discovered in a number of cases. Conclusions. The TPS audit project using the IAEA methodology has verified the treatment planning system calculations for 3D conformal radiotherapy in a group of radiotherapy centres in Europe. It contributed to achieving better understanding of the performance of TPSs and helped to resolve issues related to imaging, dosimetry and treatment planning.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0284-186X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1651-226X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3109/0284186X.2013.840742</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24164104</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Informa Healthcare</publisher><subject>Europe ; Humans ; International Agencies ; Medical Audit ; Quality Assurance, Health Care ; Radiometry - standards ; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - standards ; Radiotherapy, Conformal - standards</subject><ispartof>Acta oncologica, 2014-05, Vol.53 (5), p.628-636</ispartof><rights>2014 Informa Healthcare 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-973e588e17494f4b402f6105a81b48bad29bb5676cbcdf612cdd29c47d52405b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-973e588e17494f4b402f6105a81b48bad29bb5676cbcdf612cdd29c47d52405b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.3109/0284186X.2013.840742$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformahealthcare$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.3109/0284186X.2013.840742$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformahealthcare$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,61221,61402</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24164104$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gershkevitsh, Eduard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pesznyak, Csilla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrovic, Borislava</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grezdo, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chelminski, Krzysztof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>do Carmo Lopes, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Izewska, Joanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Dyk, Jacob</creatorcontrib><title>Dosimetric inter-institutional comparison in European radiotherapy centres: Results of IAEA supported treatment planning system audit</title><title>Acta oncologica</title><addtitle>Acta Oncol</addtitle><description>Abstract Background and purpose. One of the newer audit modalities operated by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) involves audits of treatment planning systems (TPS) in radiotherapy. The main focus of the audit is the dosimetry verification of the delivery of a radiation treatment plan for three-dimensional (3D) conformal radiotherapy using high energy photon beams. The audit has been carried out in eight European countries - Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Serbia, Slovakia, Poland and Portugal. The corresponding results are presented. Material and methods. The TPS audit reviews the dosimetry, treatment planning and radiotherapy delivery processes using the 'end-to-end' approach, i.e. following the pathway similar to that of the patient, through imaging, treatment planning and dose delivery. The audit is implemented at the national level with IAEA assistance. The national counterparts conduct the TPS audit at local radiotherapy centres through on-site visits. TPS calculated doses are compared with ion chamber measurements performed in an anthropomorphic phantom for eight test cases per algorithm/beam. A set of pre-defined agreement criteria is used to analyse the performance of TPSs. Results. TPS audit was carried out in 60 radiotherapy centres. In total, 190 data sets (combination of algorithm and beam quality) have been collected and reviewed. Dosimetry problems requiring interventions were discovered in about 10% of datasets. In addition, suboptimal beam modelling in TPSs was discovered in a number of cases. Conclusions. The TPS audit project using the IAEA methodology has verified the treatment planning system calculations for 3D conformal radiotherapy in a group of radiotherapy centres in Europe. It contributed to achieving better understanding of the performance of TPSs and helped to resolve issues related to imaging, dosimetry and treatment planning.</description><subject>Europe</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>International Agencies</subject><subject>Medical Audit</subject><subject>Quality Assurance, Health Care</subject><subject>Radiometry - standards</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - standards</subject><subject>Radiotherapy, Conformal - standards</subject><issn>0284-186X</issn><issn>1651-226X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcFq3DAQhkVpSLbbvEEpOvbirSTLsreHwpJu20AgUFrITcjyuKtgS65GOuwD5L2rZZMeq8uA_m_mH-Yn5B1nm5qz7UcmOsk79bARjNebTrJWildkxVXDKyHUw2uyOiHVibkibxAfGWOibptLciUkV5IzuSJPXwK6GVJ0ljqfIFbOY3IpJxe8magN82Kiw-CLTPc5hgWMp9EMLqQDRLMcqQWfIuAn-gMwTwlpGOntbr-jmJclxAQDLbpJc-HoMhnvnf9N8YgJZmry4NJbcjGaCeH6ua7Jr6_7nzffq7v7b7c3u7vK1kqkatvW0HQd8FZu5Sh7ycSoOGtMx3vZ9WYQ275vVKtsb4eiCDuULyvboRGSNX29Jh_Oc5cY_mTApGeHFqayE4SMmjdc1cWlvDWRZ9TGgBhh1Et0s4lHzZk-BaBfAtCnAPQ5gNL2_tkh9zMM_5peLl6Az2fA-THE2RzATOlgTQT9GHIsN8f_O_wF6PeX7Q</recordid><startdate>20140501</startdate><enddate>20140501</enddate><creator>Gershkevitsh, Eduard</creator><creator>Pesznyak, Csilla</creator><creator>Petrovic, Borislava</creator><creator>Grezdo, Joseph</creator><creator>Chelminski, Krzysztof</creator><creator>do Carmo Lopes, Maria</creator><creator>Izewska, Joanna</creator><creator>Van Dyk, Jacob</creator><general>Informa Healthcare</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140501</creationdate><title>Dosimetric inter-institutional comparison in European radiotherapy centres: Results of IAEA supported treatment planning system audit</title><author>Gershkevitsh, Eduard ; Pesznyak, Csilla ; Petrovic, Borislava ; Grezdo, Joseph ; Chelminski, Krzysztof ; do Carmo Lopes, Maria ; Izewska, Joanna ; Van Dyk, Jacob</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-973e588e17494f4b402f6105a81b48bad29bb5676cbcdf612cdd29c47d52405b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Europe</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>International Agencies</topic><topic>Medical Audit</topic><topic>Quality Assurance, Health Care</topic><topic>Radiometry - standards</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - standards</topic><topic>Radiotherapy, Conformal - standards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gershkevitsh, Eduard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pesznyak, Csilla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrovic, Borislava</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grezdo, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chelminski, Krzysztof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>do Carmo Lopes, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Izewska, Joanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Dyk, Jacob</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Acta oncologica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gershkevitsh, Eduard</au><au>Pesznyak, Csilla</au><au>Petrovic, Borislava</au><au>Grezdo, Joseph</au><au>Chelminski, Krzysztof</au><au>do Carmo Lopes, Maria</au><au>Izewska, Joanna</au><au>Van Dyk, Jacob</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dosimetric inter-institutional comparison in European radiotherapy centres: Results of IAEA supported treatment planning system audit</atitle><jtitle>Acta oncologica</jtitle><addtitle>Acta Oncol</addtitle><date>2014-05-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>628</spage><epage>636</epage><pages>628-636</pages><issn>0284-186X</issn><eissn>1651-226X</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background and purpose. One of the newer audit modalities operated by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) involves audits of treatment planning systems (TPS) in radiotherapy. The main focus of the audit is the dosimetry verification of the delivery of a radiation treatment plan for three-dimensional (3D) conformal radiotherapy using high energy photon beams. The audit has been carried out in eight European countries - Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Serbia, Slovakia, Poland and Portugal. The corresponding results are presented. Material and methods. The TPS audit reviews the dosimetry, treatment planning and radiotherapy delivery processes using the 'end-to-end' approach, i.e. following the pathway similar to that of the patient, through imaging, treatment planning and dose delivery. The audit is implemented at the national level with IAEA assistance. The national counterparts conduct the TPS audit at local radiotherapy centres through on-site visits. TPS calculated doses are compared with ion chamber measurements performed in an anthropomorphic phantom for eight test cases per algorithm/beam. A set of pre-defined agreement criteria is used to analyse the performance of TPSs. Results. TPS audit was carried out in 60 radiotherapy centres. In total, 190 data sets (combination of algorithm and beam quality) have been collected and reviewed. Dosimetry problems requiring interventions were discovered in about 10% of datasets. In addition, suboptimal beam modelling in TPSs was discovered in a number of cases. Conclusions. The TPS audit project using the IAEA methodology has verified the treatment planning system calculations for 3D conformal radiotherapy in a group of radiotherapy centres in Europe. It contributed to achieving better understanding of the performance of TPSs and helped to resolve issues related to imaging, dosimetry and treatment planning.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Informa Healthcare</pub><pmid>24164104</pmid><doi>10.3109/0284186X.2013.840742</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0284-186X
ispartof Acta oncologica, 2014-05, Vol.53 (5), p.628-636
issn 0284-186X
1651-226X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1516397333
source MEDLINE; Access via Taylor & Francis; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Europe
Humans
International Agencies
Medical Audit
Quality Assurance, Health Care
Radiometry - standards
Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - standards
Radiotherapy, Conformal - standards
title Dosimetric inter-institutional comparison in European radiotherapy centres: Results of IAEA supported treatment planning system audit
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T08%3A35%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dosimetric%20inter-institutional%20comparison%20in%20European%20radiotherapy%20centres:%20Results%20of%20IAEA%20supported%20treatment%20planning%20system%20audit&rft.jtitle=Acta%20oncologica&rft.au=Gershkevitsh,%20Eduard&rft.date=2014-05-01&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=628&rft.epage=636&rft.pages=628-636&rft.issn=0284-186X&rft.eissn=1651-226X&rft_id=info:doi/10.3109/0284186X.2013.840742&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1516397333%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1516397333&rft_id=info:pmid/24164104&rfr_iscdi=true