Developments and perspectives in the metal industry of Serbia

In the past decade, 2001-2011, Serbia had significant economic growth up until 2008 and a very impressive inflow of foreign direct investment and credit. Subsequent to 2008, however, due to the global crisis, and not the competitive structure of the domestic economy, Serbia was faced with a problem...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:South-east Europe review for labour and social affairs 2011-01, Vol.14 (3), p.375-399
1. Verfasser: Grozdanic, Radmila
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 399
container_issue 3
container_start_page 375
container_title South-east Europe review for labour and social affairs
container_volume 14
creator Grozdanic, Radmila
description In the past decade, 2001-2011, Serbia had significant economic growth up until 2008 and a very impressive inflow of foreign direct investment and credit. Subsequent to 2008, however, due to the global crisis, and not the competitive structure of the domestic economy, Serbia was faced with a problem of falling exports, non-trading of goods and a lack of liquidity. The largest negative effects of the crisis have been caused to industry (a decrease of 12.1%), especially manufacturing (a decrease of 15.8%) where the growth between 2001 and 2008 has been completely wiped out, trade (12.3%) and construction (25.1%). These adverse effects have led to crisis in the Serbian economy in conditions of high domestic demand and a high current account deficit. The result of the significant reduction in foreign capital inflows, the slowdown in lending activity and the major decline in wage growth was a decrease in domestic demand (8.4%). This drastic drop in demand, with an impact that was felt both in personal consumption and in production activities, has influenced a reduction in foreign trade, especially in imports (down 28%, while the export of goods is down 20%), resulting in an improved balance of payments in the current account. The deficit of EUR7.0bn in 2008 decreased to EUR2.1bn in 2009 (from 21.2% of GDP to 6.9%). In the second half of 2009 and in 2010, however, economic activity in Serbia has stabilised under the influence of a number of incentives. Serbia has achieved an average GDP growth rate of 4.4% over the past ten years. Abstracting the negative impact of the global economic crisis, the GDP growth rate has been relatively high (5.4% in 2001-2008.) However, this does not fully reflect the state of economic activities in Serbia: the extremely low base in the years preceding the transition period can mean that GDP growth appears over-large. Reprinted by permission of Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft
doi_str_mv 10.5771/1435-2869-2011-3-375
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1515981471</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>43293428</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>43293428</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2745-cafa05b895712d62a90f04e2720522584ee453f6730eadc0447eb66d8ac4f6553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhnNQcF39Bwo9eqnmY9K0hz3I-gkLHtRzyLYT7NI2NUkX1l9vl8riQfA0zPA-w8xDyAWj11IpdsNAyJTnWZFyylgqUqHkEZkdxifkNIQNpUAhlzOyuMMtNq5vsYshMV2V9OhDj2WstxiSukviByYtRtOMTTWE6HeJs8kr-nVtzsixNU3A8586J-8P92_Lp3T18vi8vF2lJVcg09JYQ-U6L6RivMq4KailgFxxKjmXOSCCFDZTgqKpSgqgcJ1lVW5KsJmUYk6upr29d58DhqjbOpTYNKZDNwTNJJNFzkCxMQpTtPQuBI9W975ujd9pRvXekN6r0HsVem9ICz0aGjE-YZ1rXdAbN_hu_Og_aPE39DvMx_BX3f8aRtBM95Ud-cuJ34To_OFQELwQwHPxDUhUhk8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1515981471</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Developments and perspectives in the metal industry of Serbia</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Grozdanic, Radmila</creator><creatorcontrib>Grozdanic, Radmila</creatorcontrib><description>In the past decade, 2001-2011, Serbia had significant economic growth up until 2008 and a very impressive inflow of foreign direct investment and credit. Subsequent to 2008, however, due to the global crisis, and not the competitive structure of the domestic economy, Serbia was faced with a problem of falling exports, non-trading of goods and a lack of liquidity. The largest negative effects of the crisis have been caused to industry (a decrease of 12.1%), especially manufacturing (a decrease of 15.8%) where the growth between 2001 and 2008 has been completely wiped out, trade (12.3%) and construction (25.1%). These adverse effects have led to crisis in the Serbian economy in conditions of high domestic demand and a high current account deficit. The result of the significant reduction in foreign capital inflows, the slowdown in lending activity and the major decline in wage growth was a decrease in domestic demand (8.4%). This drastic drop in demand, with an impact that was felt both in personal consumption and in production activities, has influenced a reduction in foreign trade, especially in imports (down 28%, while the export of goods is down 20%), resulting in an improved balance of payments in the current account. The deficit of EUR7.0bn in 2008 decreased to EUR2.1bn in 2009 (from 21.2% of GDP to 6.9%). In the second half of 2009 and in 2010, however, economic activity in Serbia has stabilised under the influence of a number of incentives. Serbia has achieved an average GDP growth rate of 4.4% over the past ten years. Abstracting the negative impact of the global economic crisis, the GDP growth rate has been relatively high (5.4% in 2001-2008.) However, this does not fully reflect the state of economic activities in Serbia: the extremely low base in the years preceding the transition period can mean that GDP growth appears over-large. Reprinted by permission of Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft</description><identifier>ISSN: 1435-2869</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5771/1435-2869-2011-3-375</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Baden-Baden: European Trade Union Institute</publisher><subject>Economic activity ; Economic conditions ; Economic growth ; Economic growth rate ; Employment ; Exports ; Foreign capital ; Gross domestic product ; Imports ; Industrial economics ; Industrial production ; Industry ; Manufacturing ; Manufacturing industries ; Metal industry ; Metals industries ; Production economics ; Prophets ; Serbia</subject><ispartof>South-east Europe review for labour and social affairs, 2011-01, Vol.14 (3), p.375-399</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/43293428$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/43293428$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,4024,27923,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Grozdanic, Radmila</creatorcontrib><title>Developments and perspectives in the metal industry of Serbia</title><title>South-east Europe review for labour and social affairs</title><addtitle>SEER</addtitle><description>In the past decade, 2001-2011, Serbia had significant economic growth up until 2008 and a very impressive inflow of foreign direct investment and credit. Subsequent to 2008, however, due to the global crisis, and not the competitive structure of the domestic economy, Serbia was faced with a problem of falling exports, non-trading of goods and a lack of liquidity. The largest negative effects of the crisis have been caused to industry (a decrease of 12.1%), especially manufacturing (a decrease of 15.8%) where the growth between 2001 and 2008 has been completely wiped out, trade (12.3%) and construction (25.1%). These adverse effects have led to crisis in the Serbian economy in conditions of high domestic demand and a high current account deficit. The result of the significant reduction in foreign capital inflows, the slowdown in lending activity and the major decline in wage growth was a decrease in domestic demand (8.4%). This drastic drop in demand, with an impact that was felt both in personal consumption and in production activities, has influenced a reduction in foreign trade, especially in imports (down 28%, while the export of goods is down 20%), resulting in an improved balance of payments in the current account. The deficit of EUR7.0bn in 2008 decreased to EUR2.1bn in 2009 (from 21.2% of GDP to 6.9%). In the second half of 2009 and in 2010, however, economic activity in Serbia has stabilised under the influence of a number of incentives. Serbia has achieved an average GDP growth rate of 4.4% over the past ten years. Abstracting the negative impact of the global economic crisis, the GDP growth rate has been relatively high (5.4% in 2001-2008.) However, this does not fully reflect the state of economic activities in Serbia: the extremely low base in the years preceding the transition period can mean that GDP growth appears over-large. Reprinted by permission of Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft</description><subject>Economic activity</subject><subject>Economic conditions</subject><subject>Economic growth</subject><subject>Economic growth rate</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Exports</subject><subject>Foreign capital</subject><subject>Gross domestic product</subject><subject>Imports</subject><subject>Industrial economics</subject><subject>Industrial production</subject><subject>Industry</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>Manufacturing industries</subject><subject>Metal industry</subject><subject>Metals industries</subject><subject>Production economics</subject><subject>Prophets</subject><subject>Serbia</subject><issn>1435-2869</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhnNQcF39Bwo9eqnmY9K0hz3I-gkLHtRzyLYT7NI2NUkX1l9vl8riQfA0zPA-w8xDyAWj11IpdsNAyJTnWZFyylgqUqHkEZkdxifkNIQNpUAhlzOyuMMtNq5vsYshMV2V9OhDj2WstxiSukviByYtRtOMTTWE6HeJs8kr-nVtzsixNU3A8586J-8P92_Lp3T18vi8vF2lJVcg09JYQ-U6L6RivMq4KailgFxxKjmXOSCCFDZTgqKpSgqgcJ1lVW5KsJmUYk6upr29d58DhqjbOpTYNKZDNwTNJJNFzkCxMQpTtPQuBI9W975ujd9pRvXekN6r0HsVem9ICz0aGjE-YZ1rXdAbN_hu_Og_aPE39DvMx_BX3f8aRtBM95Ud-cuJ34To_OFQELwQwHPxDUhUhk8</recordid><startdate>20110101</startdate><enddate>20110101</enddate><creator>Grozdanic, Radmila</creator><general>European Trade Union Institute</general><general>Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH &amp; Co. KG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110101</creationdate><title>Developments and perspectives in the metal industry of Serbia</title><author>Grozdanic, Radmila</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2745-cafa05b895712d62a90f04e2720522584ee453f6730eadc0447eb66d8ac4f6553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Economic activity</topic><topic>Economic conditions</topic><topic>Economic growth</topic><topic>Economic growth rate</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Exports</topic><topic>Foreign capital</topic><topic>Gross domestic product</topic><topic>Imports</topic><topic>Industrial economics</topic><topic>Industrial production</topic><topic>Industry</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>Manufacturing industries</topic><topic>Metal industry</topic><topic>Metals industries</topic><topic>Production economics</topic><topic>Prophets</topic><topic>Serbia</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Grozdanic, Radmila</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>South-east Europe review for labour and social affairs</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Grozdanic, Radmila</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Developments and perspectives in the metal industry of Serbia</atitle><jtitle>South-east Europe review for labour and social affairs</jtitle><addtitle>SEER</addtitle><date>2011-01-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>375</spage><epage>399</epage><pages>375-399</pages><issn>1435-2869</issn><abstract>In the past decade, 2001-2011, Serbia had significant economic growth up until 2008 and a very impressive inflow of foreign direct investment and credit. Subsequent to 2008, however, due to the global crisis, and not the competitive structure of the domestic economy, Serbia was faced with a problem of falling exports, non-trading of goods and a lack of liquidity. The largest negative effects of the crisis have been caused to industry (a decrease of 12.1%), especially manufacturing (a decrease of 15.8%) where the growth between 2001 and 2008 has been completely wiped out, trade (12.3%) and construction (25.1%). These adverse effects have led to crisis in the Serbian economy in conditions of high domestic demand and a high current account deficit. The result of the significant reduction in foreign capital inflows, the slowdown in lending activity and the major decline in wage growth was a decrease in domestic demand (8.4%). This drastic drop in demand, with an impact that was felt both in personal consumption and in production activities, has influenced a reduction in foreign trade, especially in imports (down 28%, while the export of goods is down 20%), resulting in an improved balance of payments in the current account. The deficit of EUR7.0bn in 2008 decreased to EUR2.1bn in 2009 (from 21.2% of GDP to 6.9%). In the second half of 2009 and in 2010, however, economic activity in Serbia has stabilised under the influence of a number of incentives. Serbia has achieved an average GDP growth rate of 4.4% over the past ten years. Abstracting the negative impact of the global economic crisis, the GDP growth rate has been relatively high (5.4% in 2001-2008.) However, this does not fully reflect the state of economic activities in Serbia: the extremely low base in the years preceding the transition period can mean that GDP growth appears over-large. Reprinted by permission of Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft</abstract><cop>Baden-Baden</cop><pub>European Trade Union Institute</pub><doi>10.5771/1435-2869-2011-3-375</doi><tpages>25</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1435-2869
ispartof South-east Europe review for labour and social affairs, 2011-01, Vol.14 (3), p.375-399
issn 1435-2869
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1515981471
source JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Economic activity
Economic conditions
Economic growth
Economic growth rate
Employment
Exports
Foreign capital
Gross domestic product
Imports
Industrial economics
Industrial production
Industry
Manufacturing
Manufacturing industries
Metal industry
Metals industries
Production economics
Prophets
Serbia
title Developments and perspectives in the metal industry of Serbia
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T21%3A43%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Developments%20and%20perspectives%20in%20the%20metal%20industry%20of%20Serbia&rft.jtitle=South-east%20Europe%20review%20for%20labour%20and%20social%20affairs&rft.au=Grozdanic,%20Radmila&rft.date=2011-01-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=375&rft.epage=399&rft.pages=375-399&rft.issn=1435-2869&rft_id=info:doi/10.5771/1435-2869-2011-3-375&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E43293428%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1515981471&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=43293428&rfr_iscdi=true