Beta-blockers in portal hypertension: new developments and controversies

There are many studies investigating the role of non‐selective beta‐blockers in portal hypertension. Satisfactory reduction in portal pressure is possible in a third to half of patients with propranolol and nadolol, although combining these drugs with nitrates may be more effective. Carvedilol is a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Liver international 2014-05, Vol.34 (5), p.655-667
Hauptverfasser: Tripathi, Dhiraj, Hayes, Peter C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 667
container_issue 5
container_start_page 655
container_title Liver international
container_volume 34
creator Tripathi, Dhiraj
Hayes, Peter C.
description There are many studies investigating the role of non‐selective beta‐blockers in portal hypertension. Satisfactory reduction in portal pressure is possible in a third to half of patients with propranolol and nadolol, although combining these drugs with nitrates may be more effective. Carvedilol is a more potent agent than propranolol in reducing portal pressure, particularly in non‐responders, and is better tolerated. All these drugs have been studied in primary and secondary prophylaxis, sometimes in combination with band ligation and/or nitrates. There is some evidence to support combining these agents with band ligation, despite a lack of survival benefit and increased adverse events. Hemodynamic monitoring can help select non‐responders who may benefit from additional therapies such as band ligation, as lack of response is associated with worse outcomes. Propranolol should be used with caution in patients with refractory ascites, although the current evidence is not of sufficient quality to justify not using these drugs in such situations. Beta‐blockers have been shown to reduce bacterial translocation and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in cirrhosis.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/liv.12360
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1514437301</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1514437301</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4640-614ce8960f6fc9d016b9a0f678b9a46e7b650bac5ea7f932fc530e03033d60e03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMFPwjAYxRujEUQP_gNmRz0M2rXrNm9KFEgIelA8Nl33LU5GO9sB8t87HHDzu7z3Jb_3Dg-ha4L7pLlBWaz7JKAcn6AuYVHs04CS06MPaAddOPeFMUmSkJyjTsAIZTiMu2j8CLX009KoBVjnFdqrjK1l6X1uK7A1aFcYfe9p2HgZrKE01RJ07TypM08ZXVuzbnIFuEt0lsvSwdVee-j9-eltOPanL6PJ8GHqK8YZ9jlhCuKE45znKskw4WkimyeKG2UcopSHOJUqBBnlCQ1yFVIMmGJKM74zPXTb9lbWfK_A1WJZOAVlKTWYlRMkJIzRiGLSoHctqqxxzkIuKlsspd0KgsVuONEMJ_6Ga9ibfe0qXUJ2JA9LNcCgBTZFCdv_m8R0Mj9U-m2icDX8HBPSLgSPaBSKj9lIzHnCglkQi1f6C6Sohns</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1514437301</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Beta-blockers in portal hypertension: new developments and controversies</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Tripathi, Dhiraj ; Hayes, Peter C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tripathi, Dhiraj ; Hayes, Peter C.</creatorcontrib><description>There are many studies investigating the role of non‐selective beta‐blockers in portal hypertension. Satisfactory reduction in portal pressure is possible in a third to half of patients with propranolol and nadolol, although combining these drugs with nitrates may be more effective. Carvedilol is a more potent agent than propranolol in reducing portal pressure, particularly in non‐responders, and is better tolerated. All these drugs have been studied in primary and secondary prophylaxis, sometimes in combination with band ligation and/or nitrates. There is some evidence to support combining these agents with band ligation, despite a lack of survival benefit and increased adverse events. Hemodynamic monitoring can help select non‐responders who may benefit from additional therapies such as band ligation, as lack of response is associated with worse outcomes. Propranolol should be used with caution in patients with refractory ascites, although the current evidence is not of sufficient quality to justify not using these drugs in such situations. Beta‐blockers have been shown to reduce bacterial translocation and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in cirrhosis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1478-3223</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1478-3231</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/liv.12360</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24134058</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adrenergic beta-Antagonists - pharmacology ; Adrenergic beta-Antagonists - therapeutic use ; band ligation ; carvedilol ; cirrhosis ; Clinical Trials as Topic ; Hemodynamics - drug effects ; Humans ; Hypertension, Portal - complications ; Hypertension, Portal - drug therapy ; Hypertension, Portal - physiopathology ; Liver Cirrhosis - complications ; propranolol ; variceal bleeding</subject><ispartof>Liver international, 2014-05, Vol.34 (5), p.655-667</ispartof><rights>2013 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2013 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4640-614ce8960f6fc9d016b9a0f678b9a46e7b650bac5ea7f932fc530e03033d60e03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4640-614ce8960f6fc9d016b9a0f678b9a46e7b650bac5ea7f932fc530e03033d60e03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fliv.12360$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fliv.12360$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,1414,27911,27912,45561,45562</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24134058$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tripathi, Dhiraj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayes, Peter C.</creatorcontrib><title>Beta-blockers in portal hypertension: new developments and controversies</title><title>Liver international</title><addtitle>Liver Int</addtitle><description>There are many studies investigating the role of non‐selective beta‐blockers in portal hypertension. Satisfactory reduction in portal pressure is possible in a third to half of patients with propranolol and nadolol, although combining these drugs with nitrates may be more effective. Carvedilol is a more potent agent than propranolol in reducing portal pressure, particularly in non‐responders, and is better tolerated. All these drugs have been studied in primary and secondary prophylaxis, sometimes in combination with band ligation and/or nitrates. There is some evidence to support combining these agents with band ligation, despite a lack of survival benefit and increased adverse events. Hemodynamic monitoring can help select non‐responders who may benefit from additional therapies such as band ligation, as lack of response is associated with worse outcomes. Propranolol should be used with caution in patients with refractory ascites, although the current evidence is not of sufficient quality to justify not using these drugs in such situations. Beta‐blockers have been shown to reduce bacterial translocation and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in cirrhosis.</description><subject>Adrenergic beta-Antagonists - pharmacology</subject><subject>Adrenergic beta-Antagonists - therapeutic use</subject><subject>band ligation</subject><subject>carvedilol</subject><subject>cirrhosis</subject><subject>Clinical Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Hemodynamics - drug effects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypertension, Portal - complications</subject><subject>Hypertension, Portal - drug therapy</subject><subject>Hypertension, Portal - physiopathology</subject><subject>Liver Cirrhosis - complications</subject><subject>propranolol</subject><subject>variceal bleeding</subject><issn>1478-3223</issn><issn>1478-3231</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMFPwjAYxRujEUQP_gNmRz0M2rXrNm9KFEgIelA8Nl33LU5GO9sB8t87HHDzu7z3Jb_3Dg-ha4L7pLlBWaz7JKAcn6AuYVHs04CS06MPaAddOPeFMUmSkJyjTsAIZTiMu2j8CLX009KoBVjnFdqrjK1l6X1uK7A1aFcYfe9p2HgZrKE01RJ07TypM08ZXVuzbnIFuEt0lsvSwdVee-j9-eltOPanL6PJ8GHqK8YZ9jlhCuKE45znKskw4WkimyeKG2UcopSHOJUqBBnlCQ1yFVIMmGJKM74zPXTb9lbWfK_A1WJZOAVlKTWYlRMkJIzRiGLSoHctqqxxzkIuKlsspd0KgsVuONEMJ_6Ga9ibfe0qXUJ2JA9LNcCgBTZFCdv_m8R0Mj9U-m2icDX8HBPSLgSPaBSKj9lIzHnCglkQi1f6C6Sohns</recordid><startdate>201405</startdate><enddate>201405</enddate><creator>Tripathi, Dhiraj</creator><creator>Hayes, Peter C.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201405</creationdate><title>Beta-blockers in portal hypertension: new developments and controversies</title><author>Tripathi, Dhiraj ; Hayes, Peter C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4640-614ce8960f6fc9d016b9a0f678b9a46e7b650bac5ea7f932fc530e03033d60e03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adrenergic beta-Antagonists - pharmacology</topic><topic>Adrenergic beta-Antagonists - therapeutic use</topic><topic>band ligation</topic><topic>carvedilol</topic><topic>cirrhosis</topic><topic>Clinical Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Hemodynamics - drug effects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypertension, Portal - complications</topic><topic>Hypertension, Portal - drug therapy</topic><topic>Hypertension, Portal - physiopathology</topic><topic>Liver Cirrhosis - complications</topic><topic>propranolol</topic><topic>variceal bleeding</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tripathi, Dhiraj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayes, Peter C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Liver international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tripathi, Dhiraj</au><au>Hayes, Peter C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Beta-blockers in portal hypertension: new developments and controversies</atitle><jtitle>Liver international</jtitle><addtitle>Liver Int</addtitle><date>2014-05</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>655</spage><epage>667</epage><pages>655-667</pages><issn>1478-3223</issn><eissn>1478-3231</eissn><abstract>There are many studies investigating the role of non‐selective beta‐blockers in portal hypertension. Satisfactory reduction in portal pressure is possible in a third to half of patients with propranolol and nadolol, although combining these drugs with nitrates may be more effective. Carvedilol is a more potent agent than propranolol in reducing portal pressure, particularly in non‐responders, and is better tolerated. All these drugs have been studied in primary and secondary prophylaxis, sometimes in combination with band ligation and/or nitrates. There is some evidence to support combining these agents with band ligation, despite a lack of survival benefit and increased adverse events. Hemodynamic monitoring can help select non‐responders who may benefit from additional therapies such as band ligation, as lack of response is associated with worse outcomes. Propranolol should be used with caution in patients with refractory ascites, although the current evidence is not of sufficient quality to justify not using these drugs in such situations. Beta‐blockers have been shown to reduce bacterial translocation and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in cirrhosis.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>24134058</pmid><doi>10.1111/liv.12360</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1478-3223
ispartof Liver international, 2014-05, Vol.34 (5), p.655-667
issn 1478-3223
1478-3231
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1514437301
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Adrenergic beta-Antagonists - pharmacology
Adrenergic beta-Antagonists - therapeutic use
band ligation
carvedilol
cirrhosis
Clinical Trials as Topic
Hemodynamics - drug effects
Humans
Hypertension, Portal - complications
Hypertension, Portal - drug therapy
Hypertension, Portal - physiopathology
Liver Cirrhosis - complications
propranolol
variceal bleeding
title Beta-blockers in portal hypertension: new developments and controversies
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T02%3A04%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Beta-blockers%20in%20portal%20hypertension:%20new%20developments%20and%20controversies&rft.jtitle=Liver%20international&rft.au=Tripathi,%20Dhiraj&rft.date=2014-05&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=655&rft.epage=667&rft.pages=655-667&rft.issn=1478-3223&rft.eissn=1478-3231&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/liv.12360&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1514437301%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1514437301&rft_id=info:pmid/24134058&rfr_iscdi=true