Dose requirements of remifentanil for intubation in nonparalyzed Chinese children

Summary Background The objective of this study was to determine ED50 and ED95 of remifentanil for intubation combined with propofol in nonparalyzed Chinese children. Methods Forty‐seven American Society of Anesthesiologists Class I children aged 4–11 years weighing 14–33.5 kg underwent general anest...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pediatric anesthesia 2014-05, Vol.24 (5), p.505-509
Hauptverfasser: Liu, Hua-Cheng, Tao, Wei-Ke, Zeng, Rui-Feng, ShangGuang, Wang-Ning, Li, Jun, Huang, Wen-Guang, Dong, Zhang-Lei, Wang, Xin, Lian, Qing-Quan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 509
container_issue 5
container_start_page 505
container_title Pediatric anesthesia
container_volume 24
creator Liu, Hua-Cheng
Tao, Wei-Ke
Zeng, Rui-Feng
ShangGuang, Wang-Ning
Li, Jun
Huang, Wen-Guang
Dong, Zhang-Lei
Wang, Xin
Lian, Qing-Quan
description Summary Background The objective of this study was to determine ED50 and ED95 of remifentanil for intubation combined with propofol in nonparalyzed Chinese children. Methods Forty‐seven American Society of Anesthesiologists Class I children aged 4–11 years weighing 14–33.5 kg underwent general anesthesia with 2.5 mg·kg−1 of intravenous propofol followed by remifentanil in Wenzhou, China. The initial dose of remifentanil was 2.5 μg·kg−1 injected over 60 s. Intubation was attempted 30 s after the completion of remifentanil injection. Level of difficulty to intubate was graded on a scoring system. If the initial intubation condition was deemed satisfactory, subsequent remifentanil doses were decreased by 0.25 μg·kg−1. If the intubating condition was deemed unsatisfactory, subsequent remifentanil doses were increased by 0.25 μg·kg−1. Mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and pulse oximetry were documented before and after induction, immediately after intubation, and 1 min after intubation. Results The ED50 of remifentanil used to render a satisfactory intubating condition used in combination with 2.5 mg·kg−1 of propofol in nonparalyzed Chinese children was 2.30 μg·kg−1 (95% confidence interval: 2.28–2.31 μg·kg−1), and the ED95 is 2.75 μg·kg−1 (95% confidence interval: 2.59–3.35 μg·kg−1). These doses were lower than previously reported. Conclusion When used in combination with 2.5 mg·kg−1 of intravenous propofol, ED50 and ED95 of remifentanil for adequate intubation in nonparalyzed children were lower than previously reported, at 2.30 and 2.75 μg·kg−1, respectively.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/pan.12354
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1514436939</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1514436939</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i3174-5fb32b33ff2214c78fbe500ca3001d6bf6fb642a02d8514a3e239428522b34c33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUtPxSAQhYnR-F74B0wTN26qwABtl6Y-c298RI3uCG0hoi29Qhu9_nrRqy5kw5nMdyaTOQjtEHxA4jucKXdAKHC2hNYJEzgteEGXoyacp1wwvoY2QnjGmAAVdBWtUZbhnHFYRzfHfdCJ16-j9brTbghJb2LdWRML5WybmN4n1g1jpQbbuygT17uZ8qqdf-gmKZ-s03FG_WTbxmu3hVaMaoPe_vk30f3pyV15nk6vzi7Ko2lqgWQs5aYCWgEYQylhdZabSnOMawVxzUZURphKMKowbXJOmAJNoWA05zS6WA2wifYXc2e-fx11GGRnQ63bVjndj0GS6GIgCigiuvcPfe5H7-J2XxQQYHmRR2r3hxqrTjdy5m2n_Fz-HisChwvgzbZ6_tcnWH6lIGMK8jsFeX10-S2iI104bBj0-59D-RcpMsi4fLg8k7fl5LEsxUTewieid4ew</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1513134898</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dose requirements of remifentanil for intubation in nonparalyzed Chinese children</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Liu, Hua-Cheng ; Tao, Wei-Ke ; Zeng, Rui-Feng ; ShangGuang, Wang-Ning ; Li, Jun ; Huang, Wen-Guang ; Dong, Zhang-Lei ; Wang, Xin ; Lian, Qing-Quan</creator><contributor>Lerman, Jerrold</contributor><creatorcontrib>Liu, Hua-Cheng ; Tao, Wei-Ke ; Zeng, Rui-Feng ; ShangGuang, Wang-Ning ; Li, Jun ; Huang, Wen-Guang ; Dong, Zhang-Lei ; Wang, Xin ; Lian, Qing-Quan ; Lerman, Jerrold</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Background The objective of this study was to determine ED50 and ED95 of remifentanil for intubation combined with propofol in nonparalyzed Chinese children. Methods Forty‐seven American Society of Anesthesiologists Class I children aged 4–11 years weighing 14–33.5 kg underwent general anesthesia with 2.5 mg·kg−1 of intravenous propofol followed by remifentanil in Wenzhou, China. The initial dose of remifentanil was 2.5 μg·kg−1 injected over 60 s. Intubation was attempted 30 s after the completion of remifentanil injection. Level of difficulty to intubate was graded on a scoring system. If the initial intubation condition was deemed satisfactory, subsequent remifentanil doses were decreased by 0.25 μg·kg−1. If the intubating condition was deemed unsatisfactory, subsequent remifentanil doses were increased by 0.25 μg·kg−1. Mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and pulse oximetry were documented before and after induction, immediately after intubation, and 1 min after intubation. Results The ED50 of remifentanil used to render a satisfactory intubating condition used in combination with 2.5 mg·kg−1 of propofol in nonparalyzed Chinese children was 2.30 μg·kg−1 (95% confidence interval: 2.28–2.31 μg·kg−1), and the ED95 is 2.75 μg·kg−1 (95% confidence interval: 2.59–3.35 μg·kg−1). These doses were lower than previously reported. Conclusion When used in combination with 2.5 mg·kg−1 of intravenous propofol, ED50 and ED95 of remifentanil for adequate intubation in nonparalyzed children were lower than previously reported, at 2.30 and 2.75 μg·kg−1, respectively.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1155-5645</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-9592</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/pan.12354</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24708453</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>France: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Analysis of Variance ; Anesthetics, Combined - administration &amp; dosage ; Anesthetics, Intravenous - administration &amp; dosage ; Blood Pressure - drug effects ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; children ; China ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; ED50 ; ED95 ; endotracheal intubation ; Female ; Heart Rate - drug effects ; Humans ; Intubation, Intratracheal - methods ; Male ; Piperidines - administration &amp; dosage ; propofol ; Propofol - administration &amp; dosage ; remifentanil</subject><ispartof>Pediatric anesthesia, 2014-05, Vol.24 (5), p.505-509</ispartof><rights>2014 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2014 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fpan.12354$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fpan.12354$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24708453$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Lerman, Jerrold</contributor><creatorcontrib>Liu, Hua-Cheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tao, Wei-Ke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Rui-Feng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ShangGuang, Wang-Ning</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Wen-Guang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Zhang-Lei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lian, Qing-Quan</creatorcontrib><title>Dose requirements of remifentanil for intubation in nonparalyzed Chinese children</title><title>Pediatric anesthesia</title><addtitle>Paediatr Anaesth</addtitle><description>Summary Background The objective of this study was to determine ED50 and ED95 of remifentanil for intubation combined with propofol in nonparalyzed Chinese children. Methods Forty‐seven American Society of Anesthesiologists Class I children aged 4–11 years weighing 14–33.5 kg underwent general anesthesia with 2.5 mg·kg−1 of intravenous propofol followed by remifentanil in Wenzhou, China. The initial dose of remifentanil was 2.5 μg·kg−1 injected over 60 s. Intubation was attempted 30 s after the completion of remifentanil injection. Level of difficulty to intubate was graded on a scoring system. If the initial intubation condition was deemed satisfactory, subsequent remifentanil doses were decreased by 0.25 μg·kg−1. If the intubating condition was deemed unsatisfactory, subsequent remifentanil doses were increased by 0.25 μg·kg−1. Mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and pulse oximetry were documented before and after induction, immediately after intubation, and 1 min after intubation. Results The ED50 of remifentanil used to render a satisfactory intubating condition used in combination with 2.5 mg·kg−1 of propofol in nonparalyzed Chinese children was 2.30 μg·kg−1 (95% confidence interval: 2.28–2.31 μg·kg−1), and the ED95 is 2.75 μg·kg−1 (95% confidence interval: 2.59–3.35 μg·kg−1). These doses were lower than previously reported. Conclusion When used in combination with 2.5 mg·kg−1 of intravenous propofol, ED50 and ED95 of remifentanil for adequate intubation in nonparalyzed children were lower than previously reported, at 2.30 and 2.75 μg·kg−1, respectively.</description><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Anesthetics, Combined - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Anesthetics, Intravenous - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Blood Pressure - drug effects</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>children</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</subject><subject>ED50</subject><subject>ED95</subject><subject>endotracheal intubation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Heart Rate - drug effects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intubation, Intratracheal - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Piperidines - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>propofol</subject><subject>Propofol - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>remifentanil</subject><issn>1155-5645</issn><issn>1460-9592</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkUtPxSAQhYnR-F74B0wTN26qwABtl6Y-c298RI3uCG0hoi29Qhu9_nrRqy5kw5nMdyaTOQjtEHxA4jucKXdAKHC2hNYJEzgteEGXoyacp1wwvoY2QnjGmAAVdBWtUZbhnHFYRzfHfdCJ16-j9brTbghJb2LdWRML5WybmN4n1g1jpQbbuygT17uZ8qqdf-gmKZ-s03FG_WTbxmu3hVaMaoPe_vk30f3pyV15nk6vzi7Ko2lqgWQs5aYCWgEYQylhdZabSnOMawVxzUZURphKMKowbXJOmAJNoWA05zS6WA2wifYXc2e-fx11GGRnQ63bVjndj0GS6GIgCigiuvcPfe5H7-J2XxQQYHmRR2r3hxqrTjdy5m2n_Fz-HisChwvgzbZ6_tcnWH6lIGMK8jsFeX10-S2iI104bBj0-59D-RcpMsi4fLg8k7fl5LEsxUTewieid4ew</recordid><startdate>201405</startdate><enddate>201405</enddate><creator>Liu, Hua-Cheng</creator><creator>Tao, Wei-Ke</creator><creator>Zeng, Rui-Feng</creator><creator>ShangGuang, Wang-Ning</creator><creator>Li, Jun</creator><creator>Huang, Wen-Guang</creator><creator>Dong, Zhang-Lei</creator><creator>Wang, Xin</creator><creator>Lian, Qing-Quan</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201405</creationdate><title>Dose requirements of remifentanil for intubation in nonparalyzed Chinese children</title><author>Liu, Hua-Cheng ; Tao, Wei-Ke ; Zeng, Rui-Feng ; ShangGuang, Wang-Ning ; Li, Jun ; Huang, Wen-Guang ; Dong, Zhang-Lei ; Wang, Xin ; Lian, Qing-Quan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i3174-5fb32b33ff2214c78fbe500ca3001d6bf6fb642a02d8514a3e239428522b34c33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Anesthetics, Combined - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Anesthetics, Intravenous - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Blood Pressure - drug effects</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>children</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</topic><topic>ED50</topic><topic>ED95</topic><topic>endotracheal intubation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Heart Rate - drug effects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intubation, Intratracheal - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Piperidines - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>propofol</topic><topic>Propofol - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>remifentanil</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liu, Hua-Cheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tao, Wei-Ke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Rui-Feng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ShangGuang, Wang-Ning</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Wen-Guang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Zhang-Lei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lian, Qing-Quan</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pediatric anesthesia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liu, Hua-Cheng</au><au>Tao, Wei-Ke</au><au>Zeng, Rui-Feng</au><au>ShangGuang, Wang-Ning</au><au>Li, Jun</au><au>Huang, Wen-Guang</au><au>Dong, Zhang-Lei</au><au>Wang, Xin</au><au>Lian, Qing-Quan</au><au>Lerman, Jerrold</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dose requirements of remifentanil for intubation in nonparalyzed Chinese children</atitle><jtitle>Pediatric anesthesia</jtitle><addtitle>Paediatr Anaesth</addtitle><date>2014-05</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>505</spage><epage>509</epage><pages>505-509</pages><issn>1155-5645</issn><eissn>1460-9592</eissn><abstract>Summary Background The objective of this study was to determine ED50 and ED95 of remifentanil for intubation combined with propofol in nonparalyzed Chinese children. Methods Forty‐seven American Society of Anesthesiologists Class I children aged 4–11 years weighing 14–33.5 kg underwent general anesthesia with 2.5 mg·kg−1 of intravenous propofol followed by remifentanil in Wenzhou, China. The initial dose of remifentanil was 2.5 μg·kg−1 injected over 60 s. Intubation was attempted 30 s after the completion of remifentanil injection. Level of difficulty to intubate was graded on a scoring system. If the initial intubation condition was deemed satisfactory, subsequent remifentanil doses were decreased by 0.25 μg·kg−1. If the intubating condition was deemed unsatisfactory, subsequent remifentanil doses were increased by 0.25 μg·kg−1. Mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and pulse oximetry were documented before and after induction, immediately after intubation, and 1 min after intubation. Results The ED50 of remifentanil used to render a satisfactory intubating condition used in combination with 2.5 mg·kg−1 of propofol in nonparalyzed Chinese children was 2.30 μg·kg−1 (95% confidence interval: 2.28–2.31 μg·kg−1), and the ED95 is 2.75 μg·kg−1 (95% confidence interval: 2.59–3.35 μg·kg−1). These doses were lower than previously reported. Conclusion When used in combination with 2.5 mg·kg−1 of intravenous propofol, ED50 and ED95 of remifentanil for adequate intubation in nonparalyzed children were lower than previously reported, at 2.30 and 2.75 μg·kg−1, respectively.</abstract><cop>France</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>24708453</pmid><doi>10.1111/pan.12354</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1155-5645
ispartof Pediatric anesthesia, 2014-05, Vol.24 (5), p.505-509
issn 1155-5645
1460-9592
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1514436939
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Analysis of Variance
Anesthetics, Combined - administration & dosage
Anesthetics, Intravenous - administration & dosage
Blood Pressure - drug effects
Child
Child, Preschool
children
China
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
ED50
ED95
endotracheal intubation
Female
Heart Rate - drug effects
Humans
Intubation, Intratracheal - methods
Male
Piperidines - administration & dosage
propofol
Propofol - administration & dosage
remifentanil
title Dose requirements of remifentanil for intubation in nonparalyzed Chinese children
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T01%3A49%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dose%20requirements%20of%20remifentanil%20for%20intubation%20in%20nonparalyzed%20Chinese%20children&rft.jtitle=Pediatric%20anesthesia&rft.au=Liu,%20Hua-Cheng&rft.date=2014-05&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=505&rft.epage=509&rft.pages=505-509&rft.issn=1155-5645&rft.eissn=1460-9592&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/pan.12354&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1514436939%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1513134898&rft_id=info:pmid/24708453&rfr_iscdi=true