Prognostic significance of the treatment-free interval in patients with recurrent endometrial cancer

Abstract Objective To identify prognostic factors of recurrent endometrial cancer, and clarify whether the treatment-free interval (TFI) predicts outcome in a wide spectrum of patients. Study design The clinical data of 60 patients treated for recurrent stage I–IV endometrial cancer between 1997 and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology 2014-04, Vol.175, p.92-96
Hauptverfasser: Shimamoto, Kumi, Saito, Toshiaki, Okadome, Masao, Shimokawa, Mototsugu
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 96
container_issue
container_start_page 92
container_title European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology
container_volume 175
creator Shimamoto, Kumi
Saito, Toshiaki
Okadome, Masao
Shimokawa, Mototsugu
description Abstract Objective To identify prognostic factors of recurrent endometrial cancer, and clarify whether the treatment-free interval (TFI) predicts outcome in a wide spectrum of patients. Study design The clinical data of 60 patients treated for recurrent stage I–IV endometrial cancer between 1997 and 2012 were reviewed retrospectively. The Kaplan–Meier method and Cox regression analysis were used to estimate overall survival (OS) following recurrence and determine the factors influencing outcomes. Results The median age at initial treatment was 59 (range 38–80) years and the median post-recurrence overall survival time was 40.0 (range 1.8–156.7) months. Multivariate analysis showed lymph node metastasis (hazard ratio (HR) 2.80; 95% confidence interval (95%CI) 1.29–6.09; p = 0.009), TFI (HR 0.33; 95% CI 0.15–0.76; p = 0.008), and symptomatic recurrence (HR 2.31, 95% CI 1.11–4.83, p = 0.0025) were independent prognostic factors. Patients whose tumors recurred after a TFI ≥ 12 months had better response rates than did those with a TFI < 12 months ( p < 0.001). Conclusion TFI is a significant prognostic factor in recurrent endometrial cancer. Furthermore, the effect of chemotherapy on recurrent endometrial cancer is probably influenced by the duration of TFI.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.01.002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1514436857</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0301211514000220</els_id><sourcerecordid>1514436857</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-728c35f41f020526b5390bfafbd2759c06b98b6b3f181614567e5a95f5cdbe2d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9v1DAQxS1ERZfCN0DIRy4JHsd2kgsSqvgnVSpS4Ww5znjrkMSL7RT12-NlCwcu9WVszZs38u8R8gpYDQzU26nGKezjUHMGomZQM8afkB10La9aJcVTsmMNg4oDyHPyPKWJldM0_TNyzoVouephR8avMezXkLK3NPn96p23ZrVIg6P5FmmOaPKCa65cRKR-zRjvzFwu9GCyL41Ef_l8SyPaLcbypriOYcEcfZH98YovyJkzc8KXD_WCfP_44dvl5-rq-tOXy_dXlRXQ5qrlnW2kE-AYZ5KrQTY9G5xxw8hb2Vumhr4b1NA46ECBkKpFaXrppB0H5GNzQd6cfA8x_NwwZb34ZHGezYphSxokCNGoTrZFKk5SG0NKEZ0-RL-YeK-B6SNfPekTX33kqxnowreMvX7YsA0Ljv-G_gItgncnAZZ_3nmMOtlCyeLoC6Gsx-Af2_C_gZ39WkKZf-A9pilscS0MNejENdM3x4yPEYMo6XLOmt_9baPQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1514436857</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prognostic significance of the treatment-free interval in patients with recurrent endometrial cancer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Shimamoto, Kumi ; Saito, Toshiaki ; Okadome, Masao ; Shimokawa, Mototsugu</creator><creatorcontrib>Shimamoto, Kumi ; Saito, Toshiaki ; Okadome, Masao ; Shimokawa, Mototsugu</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objective To identify prognostic factors of recurrent endometrial cancer, and clarify whether the treatment-free interval (TFI) predicts outcome in a wide spectrum of patients. Study design The clinical data of 60 patients treated for recurrent stage I–IV endometrial cancer between 1997 and 2012 were reviewed retrospectively. The Kaplan–Meier method and Cox regression analysis were used to estimate overall survival (OS) following recurrence and determine the factors influencing outcomes. Results The median age at initial treatment was 59 (range 38–80) years and the median post-recurrence overall survival time was 40.0 (range 1.8–156.7) months. Multivariate analysis showed lymph node metastasis (hazard ratio (HR) 2.80; 95% confidence interval (95%CI) 1.29–6.09; p = 0.009), TFI (HR 0.33; 95% CI 0.15–0.76; p = 0.008), and symptomatic recurrence (HR 2.31, 95% CI 1.11–4.83, p = 0.0025) were independent prognostic factors. Patients whose tumors recurred after a TFI ≥ 12 months had better response rates than did those with a TFI &lt; 12 months ( p &lt; 0.001). Conclusion TFI is a significant prognostic factor in recurrent endometrial cancer. Furthermore, the effect of chemotherapy on recurrent endometrial cancer is probably influenced by the duration of TFI.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-2115</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7654</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.01.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24472691</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier Ireland Ltd</publisher><subject>Adenocarcinoma - mortality ; Adenocarcinoma - pathology ; Adenocarcinoma - therapy ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Effect of chemotherapy ; Endometrial Neoplasms - mortality ; Endometrial Neoplasms - pathology ; Endometrial Neoplasms - therapy ; Female ; Humans ; Japan - epidemiology ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate Analysis ; Obstetrics and Gynecology ; Prognosis ; Prognostic factors ; Recurrence ; Recurrent endometrial cancer ; Retrospective Studies ; Time Factors ; Treatment-free interval</subject><ispartof>European journal of obstetrics &amp; gynecology and reproductive biology, 2014-04, Vol.175, p.92-96</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</rights><rights>2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-728c35f41f020526b5390bfafbd2759c06b98b6b3f181614567e5a95f5cdbe2d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-728c35f41f020526b5390bfafbd2759c06b98b6b3f181614567e5a95f5cdbe2d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.01.002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24472691$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shimamoto, Kumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saito, Toshiaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okadome, Masao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimokawa, Mototsugu</creatorcontrib><title>Prognostic significance of the treatment-free interval in patients with recurrent endometrial cancer</title><title>European journal of obstetrics &amp; gynecology and reproductive biology</title><addtitle>Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol</addtitle><description>Abstract Objective To identify prognostic factors of recurrent endometrial cancer, and clarify whether the treatment-free interval (TFI) predicts outcome in a wide spectrum of patients. Study design The clinical data of 60 patients treated for recurrent stage I–IV endometrial cancer between 1997 and 2012 were reviewed retrospectively. The Kaplan–Meier method and Cox regression analysis were used to estimate overall survival (OS) following recurrence and determine the factors influencing outcomes. Results The median age at initial treatment was 59 (range 38–80) years and the median post-recurrence overall survival time was 40.0 (range 1.8–156.7) months. Multivariate analysis showed lymph node metastasis (hazard ratio (HR) 2.80; 95% confidence interval (95%CI) 1.29–6.09; p = 0.009), TFI (HR 0.33; 95% CI 0.15–0.76; p = 0.008), and symptomatic recurrence (HR 2.31, 95% CI 1.11–4.83, p = 0.0025) were independent prognostic factors. Patients whose tumors recurred after a TFI ≥ 12 months had better response rates than did those with a TFI &lt; 12 months ( p &lt; 0.001). Conclusion TFI is a significant prognostic factor in recurrent endometrial cancer. Furthermore, the effect of chemotherapy on recurrent endometrial cancer is probably influenced by the duration of TFI.</description><subject>Adenocarcinoma - mortality</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - pathology</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - therapy</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Effect of chemotherapy</subject><subject>Endometrial Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Endometrial Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Endometrial Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Japan - epidemiology</subject><subject>Lymphatic Metastasis</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Obstetrics and Gynecology</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Prognostic factors</subject><subject>Recurrence</subject><subject>Recurrent endometrial cancer</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment-free interval</subject><issn>0301-2115</issn><issn>1872-7654</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU9v1DAQxS1ERZfCN0DIRy4JHsd2kgsSqvgnVSpS4Ww5znjrkMSL7RT12-NlCwcu9WVszZs38u8R8gpYDQzU26nGKezjUHMGomZQM8afkB10La9aJcVTsmMNg4oDyHPyPKWJldM0_TNyzoVouephR8avMezXkLK3NPn96p23ZrVIg6P5FmmOaPKCa65cRKR-zRjvzFwu9GCyL41Ef_l8SyPaLcbypriOYcEcfZH98YovyJkzc8KXD_WCfP_44dvl5-rq-tOXy_dXlRXQ5qrlnW2kE-AYZ5KrQTY9G5xxw8hb2Vumhr4b1NA46ECBkKpFaXrppB0H5GNzQd6cfA8x_NwwZb34ZHGezYphSxokCNGoTrZFKk5SG0NKEZ0-RL-YeK-B6SNfPekTX33kqxnowreMvX7YsA0Ljv-G_gItgncnAZZ_3nmMOtlCyeLoC6Gsx-Af2_C_gZ39WkKZf-A9pilscS0MNejENdM3x4yPEYMo6XLOmt_9baPQ</recordid><startdate>20140401</startdate><enddate>20140401</enddate><creator>Shimamoto, Kumi</creator><creator>Saito, Toshiaki</creator><creator>Okadome, Masao</creator><creator>Shimokawa, Mototsugu</creator><general>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140401</creationdate><title>Prognostic significance of the treatment-free interval in patients with recurrent endometrial cancer</title><author>Shimamoto, Kumi ; Saito, Toshiaki ; Okadome, Masao ; Shimokawa, Mototsugu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-728c35f41f020526b5390bfafbd2759c06b98b6b3f181614567e5a95f5cdbe2d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adenocarcinoma - mortality</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - pathology</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - therapy</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Effect of chemotherapy</topic><topic>Endometrial Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Endometrial Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Endometrial Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Japan - epidemiology</topic><topic>Lymphatic Metastasis</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Obstetrics and Gynecology</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Prognostic factors</topic><topic>Recurrence</topic><topic>Recurrent endometrial cancer</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment-free interval</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shimamoto, Kumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saito, Toshiaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okadome, Masao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimokawa, Mototsugu</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of obstetrics &amp; gynecology and reproductive biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shimamoto, Kumi</au><au>Saito, Toshiaki</au><au>Okadome, Masao</au><au>Shimokawa, Mototsugu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prognostic significance of the treatment-free interval in patients with recurrent endometrial cancer</atitle><jtitle>European journal of obstetrics &amp; gynecology and reproductive biology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol</addtitle><date>2014-04-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>175</volume><spage>92</spage><epage>96</epage><pages>92-96</pages><issn>0301-2115</issn><eissn>1872-7654</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objective To identify prognostic factors of recurrent endometrial cancer, and clarify whether the treatment-free interval (TFI) predicts outcome in a wide spectrum of patients. Study design The clinical data of 60 patients treated for recurrent stage I–IV endometrial cancer between 1997 and 2012 were reviewed retrospectively. The Kaplan–Meier method and Cox regression analysis were used to estimate overall survival (OS) following recurrence and determine the factors influencing outcomes. Results The median age at initial treatment was 59 (range 38–80) years and the median post-recurrence overall survival time was 40.0 (range 1.8–156.7) months. Multivariate analysis showed lymph node metastasis (hazard ratio (HR) 2.80; 95% confidence interval (95%CI) 1.29–6.09; p = 0.009), TFI (HR 0.33; 95% CI 0.15–0.76; p = 0.008), and symptomatic recurrence (HR 2.31, 95% CI 1.11–4.83, p = 0.0025) were independent prognostic factors. Patients whose tumors recurred after a TFI ≥ 12 months had better response rates than did those with a TFI &lt; 12 months ( p &lt; 0.001). Conclusion TFI is a significant prognostic factor in recurrent endometrial cancer. Furthermore, the effect of chemotherapy on recurrent endometrial cancer is probably influenced by the duration of TFI.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</pub><pmid>24472691</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.01.002</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-2115
ispartof European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology, 2014-04, Vol.175, p.92-96
issn 0301-2115
1872-7654
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1514436857
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Adenocarcinoma - mortality
Adenocarcinoma - pathology
Adenocarcinoma - therapy
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Effect of chemotherapy
Endometrial Neoplasms - mortality
Endometrial Neoplasms - pathology
Endometrial Neoplasms - therapy
Female
Humans
Japan - epidemiology
Lymphatic Metastasis
Middle Aged
Multivariate Analysis
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Prognosis
Prognostic factors
Recurrence
Recurrent endometrial cancer
Retrospective Studies
Time Factors
Treatment-free interval
title Prognostic significance of the treatment-free interval in patients with recurrent endometrial cancer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T18%3A48%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prognostic%20significance%20of%20the%20treatment-free%20interval%20in%20patients%20with%20recurrent%20endometrial%20cancer&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20&%20gynecology%20and%20reproductive%20biology&rft.au=Shimamoto,%20Kumi&rft.date=2014-04-01&rft.volume=175&rft.spage=92&rft.epage=96&rft.pages=92-96&rft.issn=0301-2115&rft.eissn=1872-7654&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.01.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1514436857%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1514436857&rft_id=info:pmid/24472691&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0301211514000220&rfr_iscdi=true