Post‐anaesthetic discharge scoring criteria: key findings from a systematic review
Background Patient safety depends on nurses’ clinical judgment. In post‐anaesthetic care, objective scoring systems are commonly used to help nurses assess when a patient is ready to go back to the ward or be discharged home after day surgery. Although there are several criteria used to assess patie...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of evidence-based healthcare 2013-12, Vol.11 (4), p.275-284 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 284 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 275 |
container_title | International journal of evidence-based healthcare |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Phillips, Nicole Margaret Street, Maryann Kent, Bridie Haesler, Emily Cadeddu, Mary |
description | Background
Patient safety depends on nurses’ clinical judgment. In post‐anaesthetic care, objective scoring systems are commonly used to help nurses assess when a patient is ready to go back to the ward or be discharged home after day surgery. Although there are several criteria used to assess patient readiness for discharge from the post‐anaesthetic care unit, evaluation of the validity and reliability of these criteria is scarce.
Aims
This article presents key findings from a systematic review conducted to identify the essential components of an effective and feasible scoring system to assess patients following surgical anaesthesia for discharge from the post‐anaesthetic care unit.
Methods
The protocol for the systematic review of quantitative studies investigating assessment criteria for discharge of adult patients from the post‐anaesthetic care unit was approved by the Joanna Briggs Institute and conducted consistent with the methodology of the Institute. Twelve databases and grey literature, such as conference proceedings, were searched for published studies between 1970 and 2010. Two reviewers independently assessed study eligibility for inclusion. Reference lists of included studies were appraised.
Results
Eight studies met the inclusion criteria; only one was a randomised controlled trial. Variables identified as essential when assessing a patient's readiness for discharge from the post‐anaesthetic care unit were conscious state, blood pressure, nausea and vomiting, and pain. Assessment of psychomotor and cognitive recovery and other vital signs were also identified as relevant variables to consider.
Conclusions
There was limited high‐quality research regarding criteria to assess patient readiness for discharge from the post‐anaesthetic unit. The key recommendations, with moderate to high risk of bias, include that assessment of specific variables (pain, conscious state, blood pressure, and nausea and vomiting) should be made before patient discharge. These key findings have informed a subsequent study to reach international consensus on effective assessment criteria and a project to test the clinical reliability of a tool for use by nurses in assessing patient readiness for discharge from post‐anaesthetic care. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/1744-1609.12044 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1514417234</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1465176616</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4174-ad88491a74a6e8ed8bc2da000517ea4a7f740da8e843365255ecec84e9dcbab43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMtOwzAQRS0EoqWwZoeyZJPWThzHYQcVT1UCobK2ps6kNTRNsVOq7vgEvpEvwaGPLcxmRqMzd64uIaeMdpmvHks5D5mgWZdFlPM90t5t9rdzkiUtcuTcK6WxpJk4JK2IR5nMItYmw6fK1d-fXzADdPUEa6OD3Dg9ATvGwOnKmtk40NbUaA1cBG-4Cgozy_3WBYWtygACt3I1ltCcWvwwuDwmBwVMHZ5seoe83FwP-3fh4PH2vn85CDX31kLIpeQZg5SDQIm5HOkoB0ppwlIEDmmRcpqDRMnjWCRRkqBGLTlmuR7BiMcdcr7WndvqfeH9q9Jbx-kUZlgtnGIJ4_5TFP8D5cJ_FYIJj_bWqLaVcxYLNbemBLtSjKomddXkqpqM1W_q_uJsI74YlZjv-G3MHkjWwNJMcfWXnnq4el4L_wA3ZY1h</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1465176616</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Post‐anaesthetic discharge scoring criteria: key findings from a systematic review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Phillips, Nicole Margaret ; Street, Maryann ; Kent, Bridie ; Haesler, Emily ; Cadeddu, Mary</creator><creatorcontrib>Phillips, Nicole Margaret ; Street, Maryann ; Kent, Bridie ; Haesler, Emily ; Cadeddu, Mary</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Patient safety depends on nurses’ clinical judgment. In post‐anaesthetic care, objective scoring systems are commonly used to help nurses assess when a patient is ready to go back to the ward or be discharged home after day surgery. Although there are several criteria used to assess patient readiness for discharge from the post‐anaesthetic care unit, evaluation of the validity and reliability of these criteria is scarce.
Aims
This article presents key findings from a systematic review conducted to identify the essential components of an effective and feasible scoring system to assess patients following surgical anaesthesia for discharge from the post‐anaesthetic care unit.
Methods
The protocol for the systematic review of quantitative studies investigating assessment criteria for discharge of adult patients from the post‐anaesthetic care unit was approved by the Joanna Briggs Institute and conducted consistent with the methodology of the Institute. Twelve databases and grey literature, such as conference proceedings, were searched for published studies between 1970 and 2010. Two reviewers independently assessed study eligibility for inclusion. Reference lists of included studies were appraised.
Results
Eight studies met the inclusion criteria; only one was a randomised controlled trial. Variables identified as essential when assessing a patient's readiness for discharge from the post‐anaesthetic care unit were conscious state, blood pressure, nausea and vomiting, and pain. Assessment of psychomotor and cognitive recovery and other vital signs were also identified as relevant variables to consider.
Conclusions
There was limited high‐quality research regarding criteria to assess patient readiness for discharge from the post‐anaesthetic unit. The key recommendations, with moderate to high risk of bias, include that assessment of specific variables (pain, conscious state, blood pressure, and nausea and vomiting) should be made before patient discharge. These key findings have informed a subsequent study to reach international consensus on effective assessment criteria and a project to test the clinical reliability of a tool for use by nurses in assessing patient readiness for discharge from post‐anaesthetic care.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1744-1595</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1744-1609</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1744-1609.12044</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24298921</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia</publisher><subject>Blood Pressure ; Consciousness ; discharge assessment ; Humans ; nursing assessment ; Pain ; Patient Discharge - standards ; Postanesthesia Nursing - standards ; Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting ; Postoperative Period ; post‐anaesthetic care unit ; Reproducibility of Results ; systematic review</subject><ispartof>International journal of evidence-based healthcare, 2013-12, Vol.11 (4), p.275-284</ispartof><rights>2013 The Authors. International Journal of Evidence‐Based Healthcare © 2013 The Joanna Briggs Institute</rights><rights>2013 The Authors. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare © 2013 The Joanna Briggs Institute.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4174-ad88491a74a6e8ed8bc2da000517ea4a7f740da8e843365255ecec84e9dcbab43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4174-ad88491a74a6e8ed8bc2da000517ea4a7f740da8e843365255ecec84e9dcbab43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1744-1609.12044$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1744-1609.12044$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>313,314,780,784,792,1417,27922,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24298921$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Phillips, Nicole Margaret</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Street, Maryann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kent, Bridie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haesler, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cadeddu, Mary</creatorcontrib><title>Post‐anaesthetic discharge scoring criteria: key findings from a systematic review</title><title>International journal of evidence-based healthcare</title><addtitle>Int J Evid Based Healthc</addtitle><description>Background
Patient safety depends on nurses’ clinical judgment. In post‐anaesthetic care, objective scoring systems are commonly used to help nurses assess when a patient is ready to go back to the ward or be discharged home after day surgery. Although there are several criteria used to assess patient readiness for discharge from the post‐anaesthetic care unit, evaluation of the validity and reliability of these criteria is scarce.
Aims
This article presents key findings from a systematic review conducted to identify the essential components of an effective and feasible scoring system to assess patients following surgical anaesthesia for discharge from the post‐anaesthetic care unit.
Methods
The protocol for the systematic review of quantitative studies investigating assessment criteria for discharge of adult patients from the post‐anaesthetic care unit was approved by the Joanna Briggs Institute and conducted consistent with the methodology of the Institute. Twelve databases and grey literature, such as conference proceedings, were searched for published studies between 1970 and 2010. Two reviewers independently assessed study eligibility for inclusion. Reference lists of included studies were appraised.
Results
Eight studies met the inclusion criteria; only one was a randomised controlled trial. Variables identified as essential when assessing a patient's readiness for discharge from the post‐anaesthetic care unit were conscious state, blood pressure, nausea and vomiting, and pain. Assessment of psychomotor and cognitive recovery and other vital signs were also identified as relevant variables to consider.
Conclusions
There was limited high‐quality research regarding criteria to assess patient readiness for discharge from the post‐anaesthetic unit. The key recommendations, with moderate to high risk of bias, include that assessment of specific variables (pain, conscious state, blood pressure, and nausea and vomiting) should be made before patient discharge. These key findings have informed a subsequent study to reach international consensus on effective assessment criteria and a project to test the clinical reliability of a tool for use by nurses in assessing patient readiness for discharge from post‐anaesthetic care.</description><subject>Blood Pressure</subject><subject>Consciousness</subject><subject>discharge assessment</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>nursing assessment</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Patient Discharge - standards</subject><subject>Postanesthesia Nursing - standards</subject><subject>Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting</subject><subject>Postoperative Period</subject><subject>post‐anaesthetic care unit</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>systematic review</subject><issn>1744-1595</issn><issn>1744-1609</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkMtOwzAQRS0EoqWwZoeyZJPWThzHYQcVT1UCobK2ps6kNTRNsVOq7vgEvpEvwaGPLcxmRqMzd64uIaeMdpmvHks5D5mgWZdFlPM90t5t9rdzkiUtcuTcK6WxpJk4JK2IR5nMItYmw6fK1d-fXzADdPUEa6OD3Dg9ATvGwOnKmtk40NbUaA1cBG-4Cgozy_3WBYWtygACt3I1ltCcWvwwuDwmBwVMHZ5seoe83FwP-3fh4PH2vn85CDX31kLIpeQZg5SDQIm5HOkoB0ppwlIEDmmRcpqDRMnjWCRRkqBGLTlmuR7BiMcdcr7WndvqfeH9q9Jbx-kUZlgtnGIJ4_5TFP8D5cJ_FYIJj_bWqLaVcxYLNbemBLtSjKomddXkqpqM1W_q_uJsI74YlZjv-G3MHkjWwNJMcfWXnnq4el4L_wA3ZY1h</recordid><startdate>201312</startdate><enddate>201312</enddate><creator>Phillips, Nicole Margaret</creator><creator>Street, Maryann</creator><creator>Kent, Bridie</creator><creator>Haesler, Emily</creator><creator>Cadeddu, Mary</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201312</creationdate><title>Post‐anaesthetic discharge scoring criteria: key findings from a systematic review</title><author>Phillips, Nicole Margaret ; Street, Maryann ; Kent, Bridie ; Haesler, Emily ; Cadeddu, Mary</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4174-ad88491a74a6e8ed8bc2da000517ea4a7f740da8e843365255ecec84e9dcbab43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Blood Pressure</topic><topic>Consciousness</topic><topic>discharge assessment</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>nursing assessment</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Patient Discharge - standards</topic><topic>Postanesthesia Nursing - standards</topic><topic>Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting</topic><topic>Postoperative Period</topic><topic>post‐anaesthetic care unit</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Phillips, Nicole Margaret</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Street, Maryann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kent, Bridie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haesler, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cadeddu, Mary</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><jtitle>International journal of evidence-based healthcare</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Phillips, Nicole Margaret</au><au>Street, Maryann</au><au>Kent, Bridie</au><au>Haesler, Emily</au><au>Cadeddu, Mary</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Post‐anaesthetic discharge scoring criteria: key findings from a systematic review</atitle><jtitle>International journal of evidence-based healthcare</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Evid Based Healthc</addtitle><date>2013-12</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>275</spage><epage>284</epage><pages>275-284</pages><issn>1744-1595</issn><eissn>1744-1609</eissn><abstract>Background
Patient safety depends on nurses’ clinical judgment. In post‐anaesthetic care, objective scoring systems are commonly used to help nurses assess when a patient is ready to go back to the ward or be discharged home after day surgery. Although there are several criteria used to assess patient readiness for discharge from the post‐anaesthetic care unit, evaluation of the validity and reliability of these criteria is scarce.
Aims
This article presents key findings from a systematic review conducted to identify the essential components of an effective and feasible scoring system to assess patients following surgical anaesthesia for discharge from the post‐anaesthetic care unit.
Methods
The protocol for the systematic review of quantitative studies investigating assessment criteria for discharge of adult patients from the post‐anaesthetic care unit was approved by the Joanna Briggs Institute and conducted consistent with the methodology of the Institute. Twelve databases and grey literature, such as conference proceedings, were searched for published studies between 1970 and 2010. Two reviewers independently assessed study eligibility for inclusion. Reference lists of included studies were appraised.
Results
Eight studies met the inclusion criteria; only one was a randomised controlled trial. Variables identified as essential when assessing a patient's readiness for discharge from the post‐anaesthetic care unit were conscious state, blood pressure, nausea and vomiting, and pain. Assessment of psychomotor and cognitive recovery and other vital signs were also identified as relevant variables to consider.
Conclusions
There was limited high‐quality research regarding criteria to assess patient readiness for discharge from the post‐anaesthetic unit. The key recommendations, with moderate to high risk of bias, include that assessment of specific variables (pain, conscious state, blood pressure, and nausea and vomiting) should be made before patient discharge. These key findings have informed a subsequent study to reach international consensus on effective assessment criteria and a project to test the clinical reliability of a tool for use by nurses in assessing patient readiness for discharge from post‐anaesthetic care.</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pmid>24298921</pmid><doi>10.1111/1744-1609.12044</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1744-1595 |
ispartof | International journal of evidence-based healthcare, 2013-12, Vol.11 (4), p.275-284 |
issn | 1744-1595 1744-1609 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1514417234 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Journals |
subjects | Blood Pressure Consciousness discharge assessment Humans nursing assessment Pain Patient Discharge - standards Postanesthesia Nursing - standards Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Postoperative Period post‐anaesthetic care unit Reproducibility of Results systematic review |
title | Post‐anaesthetic discharge scoring criteria: key findings from a systematic review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T18%3A37%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Post%E2%80%90anaesthetic%20discharge%20scoring%20criteria:%20key%20findings%20from%20a%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20evidence-based%20healthcare&rft.au=Phillips,%20Nicole%20Margaret&rft.date=2013-12&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=275&rft.epage=284&rft.pages=275-284&rft.issn=1744-1595&rft.eissn=1744-1609&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1744-1609.12044&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1465176616%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1465176616&rft_id=info:pmid/24298921&rfr_iscdi=true |