Empirical verification of the balanced scorecard

Purpose – The development and empirical verification of the balanced scorecard (BSC) model are key parts of the research of a case study on the performance measurement system (PMS) of the Ydria Motors LL Company (YM). The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach – The research...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Industrial management + data systems 2014-01, Vol.114 (2), p.203-219
1. Verfasser: Janes, Aleksander
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 219
container_issue 2
container_start_page 203
container_title Industrial management + data systems
container_volume 114
creator Janes, Aleksander
description Purpose – The development and empirical verification of the balanced scorecard (BSC) model are key parts of the research of a case study on the performance measurement system (PMS) of the Ydria Motors LL Company (YM). The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach – The research was performed as a single case study of modelling the BSC for the manufacturing company and founded on complementary use of qualitative and quantitative methods. The central part of the case study is an empirically evaluated layout of the BSC with the Engle-Granger two-step method. Findings – The results and findings from empirical analysis showed that the methods used are appropriate for inclusion in the methodological approach as they are complementary. Therefore, it can be asserted that the introduction of quantitative methods of continuous data analysis for the implementation of the BSC improved the established approach. In this research, an approach that represents the basis for further work in the field of research in PMSs of companies, with the use of econometric tools, was empirically tested and developed. Research limitations/implications – The generalization of research findings is limited to only one manufacturing company. With the continuation of the research on other case studies, the preliminary lessons learned can be expanded to other organizations. Originality/value – Following the research findings, it can be established that the methodology used provides support to organization's decision-making process in real-time and can be used with different strategies scenarios and forecast simulations and thus supports the prioritization of strategic initiatives. In addition, the developed model allows the integration and testing of various performance indicators and the identification and selection of the most appropriate KPIs.
doi_str_mv 10.1108/IMDS-04-2013-0195
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_emera</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1513503360</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1513503360</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-b5bce670e33d640ed14784c93ced6305986147721b280e60bbaa2559cab31c563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkE9LxDAQxYMouK5-AG8FL16ik06TNEdZ_y2seFDPIU2n2KXdrklX8Nubsl4UTzM83ns8foydC7gSAsrr5dPtC4eC5yCQgzDygM2EliWXusRDNoNcIZdS62N2EuMaIAm5mjG467dtaL3rsk8KbZO-sR022dBk4ztllevcxlOdRT8E8i7Up-yocV2ks587Z2_3d6-LR756flgublbco4GRV7LypDQQYq0KoFoUuiy8wVSmEKQpVVJ0Lqq8BFJQVc7lUhrvKhReKpyzy33vNgwfO4qj7dvoqUt7aNhFK6RACYgKkvXij3U97MImrbOiMJhLY4xOLrF3-TDEGKix29D2LnxZAXZiaCeGFgo7MbQTw5SBfYZ6Cq6r_438wo7fYGZwfQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1493259997</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Empirical verification of the balanced scorecard</title><source>Emerald Journals</source><source>Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection</source><creator>Janes, Aleksander</creator><creatorcontrib>Janes, Aleksander</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose – The development and empirical verification of the balanced scorecard (BSC) model are key parts of the research of a case study on the performance measurement system (PMS) of the Ydria Motors LL Company (YM). The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach – The research was performed as a single case study of modelling the BSC for the manufacturing company and founded on complementary use of qualitative and quantitative methods. The central part of the case study is an empirically evaluated layout of the BSC with the Engle-Granger two-step method. Findings – The results and findings from empirical analysis showed that the methods used are appropriate for inclusion in the methodological approach as they are complementary. Therefore, it can be asserted that the introduction of quantitative methods of continuous data analysis for the implementation of the BSC improved the established approach. In this research, an approach that represents the basis for further work in the field of research in PMSs of companies, with the use of econometric tools, was empirically tested and developed. Research limitations/implications – The generalization of research findings is limited to only one manufacturing company. With the continuation of the research on other case studies, the preliminary lessons learned can be expanded to other organizations. Originality/value – Following the research findings, it can be established that the methodology used provides support to organization's decision-making process in real-time and can be used with different strategies scenarios and forecast simulations and thus supports the prioritization of strategic initiatives. In addition, the developed model allows the integration and testing of various performance indicators and the identification and selection of the most appropriate KPIs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0263-5577</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-5783</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/IMDS-04-2013-0195</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IMDSD8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Wembley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Balanced Scorecard ; Balancing ; Case studies ; Computer simulation ; Data management systems ; Empirical analysis ; Error correction &amp; detection ; Hypotheses ; Inclusions ; Indicators ; Industry analysis ; Information &amp; knowledge management ; Information systems ; Managers ; Mathematical models ; Methodology ; Performance evaluation ; Performance measurement ; Qualitative research ; Strategic management</subject><ispartof>Industrial management + data systems, 2014-01, Vol.114 (2), p.203-219</ispartof><rights>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Copyright Emerald Group Publishing Limited 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-b5bce670e33d640ed14784c93ced6305986147721b280e60bbaa2559cab31c563</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-b5bce670e33d640ed14784c93ced6305986147721b280e60bbaa2559cab31c563</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IMDS-04-2013-0195/full/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IMDS-04-2013-0195/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,961,11614,21674,27901,27902,52661,52664,53219,53347</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Janes, Aleksander</creatorcontrib><title>Empirical verification of the balanced scorecard</title><title>Industrial management + data systems</title><description>Purpose – The development and empirical verification of the balanced scorecard (BSC) model are key parts of the research of a case study on the performance measurement system (PMS) of the Ydria Motors LL Company (YM). The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach – The research was performed as a single case study of modelling the BSC for the manufacturing company and founded on complementary use of qualitative and quantitative methods. The central part of the case study is an empirically evaluated layout of the BSC with the Engle-Granger two-step method. Findings – The results and findings from empirical analysis showed that the methods used are appropriate for inclusion in the methodological approach as they are complementary. Therefore, it can be asserted that the introduction of quantitative methods of continuous data analysis for the implementation of the BSC improved the established approach. In this research, an approach that represents the basis for further work in the field of research in PMSs of companies, with the use of econometric tools, was empirically tested and developed. Research limitations/implications – The generalization of research findings is limited to only one manufacturing company. With the continuation of the research on other case studies, the preliminary lessons learned can be expanded to other organizations. Originality/value – Following the research findings, it can be established that the methodology used provides support to organization's decision-making process in real-time and can be used with different strategies scenarios and forecast simulations and thus supports the prioritization of strategic initiatives. In addition, the developed model allows the integration and testing of various performance indicators and the identification and selection of the most appropriate KPIs.</description><subject>Balanced Scorecard</subject><subject>Balancing</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Data management systems</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>Error correction &amp; detection</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Inclusions</subject><subject>Indicators</subject><subject>Industry analysis</subject><subject>Information &amp; knowledge management</subject><subject>Information systems</subject><subject>Managers</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Methodology</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Performance measurement</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Strategic management</subject><issn>0263-5577</issn><issn>1758-5783</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptkE9LxDAQxYMouK5-AG8FL16ik06TNEdZ_y2seFDPIU2n2KXdrklX8Nubsl4UTzM83ns8foydC7gSAsrr5dPtC4eC5yCQgzDygM2EliWXusRDNoNcIZdS62N2EuMaIAm5mjG467dtaL3rsk8KbZO-sR022dBk4ztllevcxlOdRT8E8i7Up-yocV2ks587Z2_3d6-LR756flgublbco4GRV7LypDQQYq0KoFoUuiy8wVSmEKQpVVJ0Lqq8BFJQVc7lUhrvKhReKpyzy33vNgwfO4qj7dvoqUt7aNhFK6RACYgKkvXij3U97MImrbOiMJhLY4xOLrF3-TDEGKix29D2LnxZAXZiaCeGFgo7MbQTw5SBfYZ6Cq6r_438wo7fYGZwfQ</recordid><startdate>20140101</startdate><enddate>20140101</enddate><creator>Janes, Aleksander</creator><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140101</creationdate><title>Empirical verification of the balanced scorecard</title><author>Janes, Aleksander</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-b5bce670e33d640ed14784c93ced6305986147721b280e60bbaa2559cab31c563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Balanced Scorecard</topic><topic>Balancing</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Data management systems</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>Error correction &amp; detection</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Inclusions</topic><topic>Indicators</topic><topic>Industry analysis</topic><topic>Information &amp; knowledge management</topic><topic>Information systems</topic><topic>Managers</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Methodology</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Performance measurement</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Strategic management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Janes, Aleksander</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Industrial management + data systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Janes, Aleksander</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Empirical verification of the balanced scorecard</atitle><jtitle>Industrial management + data systems</jtitle><date>2014-01-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>114</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>203</spage><epage>219</epage><pages>203-219</pages><issn>0263-5577</issn><eissn>1758-5783</eissn><coden>IMDSD8</coden><abstract>Purpose – The development and empirical verification of the balanced scorecard (BSC) model are key parts of the research of a case study on the performance measurement system (PMS) of the Ydria Motors LL Company (YM). The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach – The research was performed as a single case study of modelling the BSC for the manufacturing company and founded on complementary use of qualitative and quantitative methods. The central part of the case study is an empirically evaluated layout of the BSC with the Engle-Granger two-step method. Findings – The results and findings from empirical analysis showed that the methods used are appropriate for inclusion in the methodological approach as they are complementary. Therefore, it can be asserted that the introduction of quantitative methods of continuous data analysis for the implementation of the BSC improved the established approach. In this research, an approach that represents the basis for further work in the field of research in PMSs of companies, with the use of econometric tools, was empirically tested and developed. Research limitations/implications – The generalization of research findings is limited to only one manufacturing company. With the continuation of the research on other case studies, the preliminary lessons learned can be expanded to other organizations. Originality/value – Following the research findings, it can be established that the methodology used provides support to organization's decision-making process in real-time and can be used with different strategies scenarios and forecast simulations and thus supports the prioritization of strategic initiatives. In addition, the developed model allows the integration and testing of various performance indicators and the identification and selection of the most appropriate KPIs.</abstract><cop>Wembley</cop><pub>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/IMDS-04-2013-0195</doi><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0263-5577
ispartof Industrial management + data systems, 2014-01, Vol.114 (2), p.203-219
issn 0263-5577
1758-5783
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1513503360
source Emerald Journals; Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection
subjects Balanced Scorecard
Balancing
Case studies
Computer simulation
Data management systems
Empirical analysis
Error correction & detection
Hypotheses
Inclusions
Indicators
Industry analysis
Information & knowledge management
Information systems
Managers
Mathematical models
Methodology
Performance evaluation
Performance measurement
Qualitative research
Strategic management
title Empirical verification of the balanced scorecard
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T04%3A52%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_emera&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Empirical%20verification%20of%20the%20balanced%20scorecard&rft.jtitle=Industrial%20management%20+%20data%20systems&rft.au=Janes,%20Aleksander&rft.date=2014-01-01&rft.volume=114&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=203&rft.epage=219&rft.pages=203-219&rft.issn=0263-5577&rft.eissn=1758-5783&rft.coden=IMDSD8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/IMDS-04-2013-0195&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_emera%3E1513503360%3C/proquest_emera%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1493259997&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true