Evaluation of alternative processes for final treatment of hazardous waste effluents

Evaluation of alternative processes for final treatment of hazardous waste effluents

Five process unit operations were evaluated for effectiveness in treating aqueous effluent from a hazardous waste treatment facility. The aqueous effluent contained residual amounts of various organics and heavy metals. The objective of the pilot test program was to produce an aqueous product which...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental progress 1989-02, Vol.8 (1), p.62-71
Hauptverfasser: Meardon, John A., Lyandres, Sol, Rees, John T., Shealy, Stuart
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Applied sciences
Exact sciences and technology
Other wastewaters
Pollution
Wastewaters
Water treatment and pollution
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 71
container_issue 1
container_start_page 62
container_title Environmental progress
container_volume 8
creator Meardon, John A.
Lyandres, Sol
Rees, John T.
Shealy, Stuart
description Five process unit operations were evaluated for effectiveness in treating aqueous effluent from a hazardous waste treatment facility. The aqueous effluent contained residual amounts of various organics and heavy metals. The objective of the pilot test program was to produce an aqueous product which could meet requirements for discharge to a POTW, or directly to the environment, and a solid product which could be disposed of in a Class I landfill. Processes evaluated included one primary, evaporative crystallization, two secondary, activated sludge bio‐treatment and reverse osmosis, and two tertiary, carbon adsorption and ultraviolet peroxidation. Test results from these process operations identified several processing configurations whereby the final treated product could meet discharge criteria. Performance results of each process unit operation are summarized and discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ep.3300080116
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15130997</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>15130997</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4486-22c1e1f013d1501de2f70cb84920c3dfa3141506611829c4d4aabeb88a6910433</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1v1DAQxS0EEsvCkXsOiFvKTOzEzhHabYtUlR4Wwc2adcYi4E0WO9sP_vp6tatWXNqDNbLmN2_ePCHeIxwhQPWJN0dSAoABxOaFmGGtdFm3Fb4UM6i0KZVq8bV4k9JvAKxRm5lYLq4pbGnqx6EYfUFh4jjk7zUXmzg6TolT4cdY-H6gUEyRaVrzMO3gX_SPYjduU3FDaeKCvQ_b3EtvxStPIfG7Q52L76eL5fF5efHt7Ovx54vSKWWasqocMnpA2WEN2HHlNbiVUW0FTnaeJKrcaBpEU7VOdYpoxStjqGkRlJRz8XGvm63-3XKa7LpPjkOggbMtm2-U0Lb6eVDqxsh6p1juQRfHlCJ7u4n9muKdRbC7kC1v7GPImf9wEKbkKPhIg-vTw1Bjagn5zYXeYzd94LunNe3i6r8FB0N9Tvj2YZLiH9toqWv74_LM_vxycrk8qZb2VN4D7tybCw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>13768353</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of alternative processes for final treatment of hazardous waste effluents</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Meardon, John A. ; Lyandres, Sol ; Rees, John T. ; Shealy, Stuart</creator><creatorcontrib>Meardon, John A. ; Lyandres, Sol ; Rees, John T. ; Shealy, Stuart</creatorcontrib><description>Five process unit operations were evaluated for effectiveness in treating aqueous effluent from a hazardous waste treatment facility. The aqueous effluent contained residual amounts of various organics and heavy metals. The objective of the pilot test program was to produce an aqueous product which could meet requirements for discharge to a POTW, or directly to the environment, and a solid product which could be disposed of in a Class I landfill. Processes evaluated included one primary, evaporative crystallization, two secondary, activated sludge bio‐treatment and reverse osmosis, and two tertiary, carbon adsorption and ultraviolet peroxidation. Test results from these process operations identified several processing configurations whereby the final treated product could meet discharge criteria. Performance results of each process unit operation are summarized and discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-4491</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1547-5921</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ep.3300080116</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ENVPDI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: American Institute of Chemical Engineers</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Exact sciences and technology ; Other wastewaters ; Pollution ; Wastewaters ; Water treatment and pollution</subject><ispartof>Environmental progress, 1989-02, Vol.8 (1), p.62-71</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1989 American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE)</rights><rights>1990 INIST-CNRS</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4486-22c1e1f013d1501de2f70cb84920c3dfa3141506611829c4d4aabeb88a6910433</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4486-22c1e1f013d1501de2f70cb84920c3dfa3141506611829c4d4aabeb88a6910433</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fep.3300080116$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fep.3300080116$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27929,27930,45579,45580</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=6853085$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Meardon, John A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lyandres, Sol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rees, John T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shealy, Stuart</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of alternative processes for final treatment of hazardous waste effluents</title><title>Environmental progress</title><addtitle>Environ. Prog</addtitle><description>Five process unit operations were evaluated for effectiveness in treating aqueous effluent from a hazardous waste treatment facility. The aqueous effluent contained residual amounts of various organics and heavy metals. The objective of the pilot test program was to produce an aqueous product which could meet requirements for discharge to a POTW, or directly to the environment, and a solid product which could be disposed of in a Class I landfill. Processes evaluated included one primary, evaporative crystallization, two secondary, activated sludge bio‐treatment and reverse osmosis, and two tertiary, carbon adsorption and ultraviolet peroxidation. Test results from these process operations identified several processing configurations whereby the final treated product could meet discharge criteria. Performance results of each process unit operation are summarized and discussed.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Other wastewaters</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Wastewaters</subject><subject>Water treatment and pollution</subject><issn>0278-4491</issn><issn>1547-5921</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1989</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkM1v1DAQxS0EEsvCkXsOiFvKTOzEzhHabYtUlR4Wwc2adcYi4E0WO9sP_vp6tatWXNqDNbLmN2_ePCHeIxwhQPWJN0dSAoABxOaFmGGtdFm3Fb4UM6i0KZVq8bV4k9JvAKxRm5lYLq4pbGnqx6EYfUFh4jjk7zUXmzg6TolT4cdY-H6gUEyRaVrzMO3gX_SPYjduU3FDaeKCvQ_b3EtvxStPIfG7Q52L76eL5fF5efHt7Ovx54vSKWWasqocMnpA2WEN2HHlNbiVUW0FTnaeJKrcaBpEU7VOdYpoxStjqGkRlJRz8XGvm63-3XKa7LpPjkOggbMtm2-U0Lb6eVDqxsh6p1juQRfHlCJ7u4n9muKdRbC7kC1v7GPImf9wEKbkKPhIg-vTw1Bjagn5zYXeYzd94LunNe3i6r8FB0N9Tvj2YZLiH9toqWv74_LM_vxycrk8qZb2VN4D7tybCw</recordid><startdate>198902</startdate><enddate>198902</enddate><creator>Meardon, John A.</creator><creator>Lyandres, Sol</creator><creator>Rees, John T.</creator><creator>Shealy, Stuart</creator><general>American Institute of Chemical Engineers</general><general>Willey</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198902</creationdate><title>Evaluation of alternative processes for final treatment of hazardous waste effluents</title><author>Meardon, John A. ; Lyandres, Sol ; Rees, John T. ; Shealy, Stuart</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4486-22c1e1f013d1501de2f70cb84920c3dfa3141506611829c4d4aabeb88a6910433</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1989</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Other wastewaters</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Wastewaters</topic><topic>Water treatment and pollution</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Meardon, John A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lyandres, Sol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rees, John T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shealy, Stuart</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Environmental progress</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Meardon, John A.</au><au>Lyandres, Sol</au><au>Rees, John T.</au><au>Shealy, Stuart</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of alternative processes for final treatment of hazardous waste effluents</atitle><jtitle>Environmental progress</jtitle><addtitle>Environ. Prog</addtitle><date>1989-02</date><risdate>1989</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>62</spage><epage>71</epage><pages>62-71</pages><issn>0278-4491</issn><eissn>1547-5921</eissn><coden>ENVPDI</coden><abstract>Five process unit operations were evaluated for effectiveness in treating aqueous effluent from a hazardous waste treatment facility. The aqueous effluent contained residual amounts of various organics and heavy metals. The objective of the pilot test program was to produce an aqueous product which could meet requirements for discharge to a POTW, or directly to the environment, and a solid product which could be disposed of in a Class I landfill. Processes evaluated included one primary, evaporative crystallization, two secondary, activated sludge bio‐treatment and reverse osmosis, and two tertiary, carbon adsorption and ultraviolet peroxidation. Test results from these process operations identified several processing configurations whereby the final treated product could meet discharge criteria. Performance results of each process unit operation are summarized and discussed.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>American Institute of Chemical Engineers</pub><doi>10.1002/ep.3300080116</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0278-4491
ispartof Environmental progress, 1989-02, Vol.8 (1), p.62-71
issn 0278-4491
1547-5921
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15130997
source Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Applied sciences
Exact sciences and technology
Other wastewaters
Pollution
Wastewaters
Water treatment and pollution
title Evaluation of alternative processes for final treatment of hazardous waste effluents
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T01%3A37%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20alternative%20processes%20for%20final%20treatment%20of%20hazardous%20waste%20effluents&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20progress&rft.au=Meardon,%20John%20A.&rft.date=1989-02&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=62&rft.epage=71&rft.pages=62-71&rft.issn=0278-4491&rft.eissn=1547-5921&rft.coden=ENVPDI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ep.3300080116&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E15130997%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=13768353&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true