Diagnostic Performance of Optical Coherence Tomography Ganglion Cell–Inner Plexiform Layer Thickness Measurements in Early Glaucoma

Purpose To evaluate the glaucoma diagnostic performance of ganglion cell inner–plexiform layer (GCIPL) parameters used individually and in combination with retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) or optic nerve head (ONH) parameters measured with Cirrus HD-OCT (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc, Dublin, CA). Design...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.) Minn.), 2014-04, Vol.121 (4), p.849-854
Hauptverfasser: Mwanza, Jean-Claude, MD, PhD, Budenz, Donald L., MD, MPH, Godfrey, David G., MD, Neelakantan, Arvind, MD, Sayyad, Fouad E., MD, Chang, Robert T., MD, Lee, Richard K., MD, PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 854
container_issue 4
container_start_page 849
container_title Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.)
container_volume 121
creator Mwanza, Jean-Claude, MD, PhD
Budenz, Donald L., MD, MPH
Godfrey, David G., MD
Neelakantan, Arvind, MD
Sayyad, Fouad E., MD
Chang, Robert T., MD
Lee, Richard K., MD, PhD
description Purpose To evaluate the glaucoma diagnostic performance of ganglion cell inner–plexiform layer (GCIPL) parameters used individually and in combination with retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) or optic nerve head (ONH) parameters measured with Cirrus HD-OCT (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc, Dublin, CA). Design Prospective cross-sectional study. Participants Fifty patients with early perimetric glaucoma and 49 age-matched healthy subjects. Methods Three peripapillary RNFL and 3 macular GCIPL scans were obtained in 1 eye of each participant. A patient was considered glaucomatous if at least 2 of the 3 RNFL or GCIPL scans had the average or at least 1 sector measurement flagged at 1% to 5% or less than 1%. The diagnostic performance was determined for each GCIPL, RNFL, and ONH parameter as well as for binary or-logic and and-logic combinations of GCIPL with RNFL or ONH parameters. Main Outcome Measures Sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), and negative likelihood ratio (NLR). Results Among GCIPL parameters, the minimum had the best diagnostic performance (sensitivity, 82.0%; specificity, 87.8%; PLR, 6.69; and NLR, 0.21). Inferior quadrant was the best RNFL parameter (sensitivity, 74%; specificity, 95.9%; PLR, 18.13; and NLR, 0.27), as was rim area (sensitivity, 68%; specificity, 98%; PLR, 33.3; and NLR, 0.33) among ONH parameters. The or-logic combination of minimum GCIPL and average RNFL provided the overall best diagnostic performance (sensitivity, 94%; specificity, 85.7%; PRL, 6.58; and NLR, 0.07) as compared with the best RNFL, best ONH, and best and-logic combination (minimum GCIPL and inferior quadrant RNFL; sensitivity, 64%; specificity, 100%; PLR, infinity; and NPR, 0.36). Conclusions The binary or-logic combination of minimum GCIPL and average RNFL or rim area provides better diagnostic performances than those of and-logic combinations or best single GCIPL, RNFL, or ONH parameters. This finding may be clinically valuable for the diagnosis of early glaucoma.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.10.044
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1513047188</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0161642013010518</els_id><sourcerecordid>1513047188</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4444-82c7c4e1dc654eed510aee57b09ce8e88ae7bc6d35b164434ebbccd342a0c82c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUsFu1DAQtRAV3Rb-ACEfuWSxYyebvSChbWkrbdVKLGfLmcxuvHXsYCeIvXHpF_CHfEkdbeHABV9GfnrzRvPeEPKWszlnvPywn_u-HVo9zxkXCZozKV-QGS_kMpMLLl6SWaLxrJQ5OyVnMe4ZY2Up5CtymkuxFEJWM_J4YfTO-TgYoPcYtj502gFSv6V3fQK1pSvfYsAJ3PjO74Lu2wO90m5njXd0hdb-_vnrxjkM9N7iDzNp0LU-pP-mNfDgMEZ6izqOATt0Q6TG0UsdbFKxegTf6dfkZKttxDfP9Zx8_Xy5WV1n67urm9WndQYyvazKYQESeQNlIRGbgjONWCxqtgSssKo0LmooG1HUvJRSSKxrgEbIXDNIzeKcvD_q9sF_GzEOqjMR0gbaoR-j4gUXLJlXVYkqj1QIPsaAW9UH0-lwUJypKQC1V8cA1BTAhKYAUtu75wlj3WHzt-mP44nw8UjAtOd3g0FFMJO7jQkIg2q8-d-EfwXAGjcl9YAHjHs_Bpc8VFzFXDH1ZTqC6QbSZpwVvBJPpjexWg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1513047188</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Diagnostic Performance of Optical Coherence Tomography Ganglion Cell–Inner Plexiform Layer Thickness Measurements in Early Glaucoma</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Mwanza, Jean-Claude, MD, PhD ; Budenz, Donald L., MD, MPH ; Godfrey, David G., MD ; Neelakantan, Arvind, MD ; Sayyad, Fouad E., MD ; Chang, Robert T., MD ; Lee, Richard K., MD, PhD</creator><creatorcontrib>Mwanza, Jean-Claude, MD, PhD ; Budenz, Donald L., MD, MPH ; Godfrey, David G., MD ; Neelakantan, Arvind, MD ; Sayyad, Fouad E., MD ; Chang, Robert T., MD ; Lee, Richard K., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose To evaluate the glaucoma diagnostic performance of ganglion cell inner–plexiform layer (GCIPL) parameters used individually and in combination with retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) or optic nerve head (ONH) parameters measured with Cirrus HD-OCT (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc, Dublin, CA). Design Prospective cross-sectional study. Participants Fifty patients with early perimetric glaucoma and 49 age-matched healthy subjects. Methods Three peripapillary RNFL and 3 macular GCIPL scans were obtained in 1 eye of each participant. A patient was considered glaucomatous if at least 2 of the 3 RNFL or GCIPL scans had the average or at least 1 sector measurement flagged at 1% to 5% or less than 1%. The diagnostic performance was determined for each GCIPL, RNFL, and ONH parameter as well as for binary or-logic and and-logic combinations of GCIPL with RNFL or ONH parameters. Main Outcome Measures Sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), and negative likelihood ratio (NLR). Results Among GCIPL parameters, the minimum had the best diagnostic performance (sensitivity, 82.0%; specificity, 87.8%; PLR, 6.69; and NLR, 0.21). Inferior quadrant was the best RNFL parameter (sensitivity, 74%; specificity, 95.9%; PLR, 18.13; and NLR, 0.27), as was rim area (sensitivity, 68%; specificity, 98%; PLR, 33.3; and NLR, 0.33) among ONH parameters. The or-logic combination of minimum GCIPL and average RNFL provided the overall best diagnostic performance (sensitivity, 94%; specificity, 85.7%; PRL, 6.58; and NLR, 0.07) as compared with the best RNFL, best ONH, and best and-logic combination (minimum GCIPL and inferior quadrant RNFL; sensitivity, 64%; specificity, 100%; PLR, infinity; and NPR, 0.36). Conclusions The binary or-logic combination of minimum GCIPL and average RNFL or rim area provides better diagnostic performances than those of and-logic combinations or best single GCIPL, RNFL, or ONH parameters. This finding may be clinically valuable for the diagnosis of early glaucoma.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0161-6420</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1549-4713</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.10.044</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24393348</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Axons - pathology ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological ; Female ; Glaucoma - diagnosis ; Humans ; Intraocular Pressure ; Likelihood Functions ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Ophthalmology ; Optic Disk - pathology ; Optic Nerve Diseases - diagnosis ; Prospective Studies ; Retinal Ganglion Cells - pathology ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Tomography, Optical Coherence ; Visual Field Tests ; Visual Fields - physiology</subject><ispartof>Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.), 2014-04, Vol.121 (4), p.849-854</ispartof><rights>American Academy of Ophthalmology</rights><rights>2014 American Academy of Ophthalmology</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4444-82c7c4e1dc654eed510aee57b09ce8e88ae7bc6d35b164434ebbccd342a0c82c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4444-82c7c4e1dc654eed510aee57b09ce8e88ae7bc6d35b164434ebbccd342a0c82c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.10.044$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24393348$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mwanza, Jean-Claude, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Budenz, Donald L., MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Godfrey, David G., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neelakantan, Arvind, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sayyad, Fouad E., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Robert T., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Richard K., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><title>Diagnostic Performance of Optical Coherence Tomography Ganglion Cell–Inner Plexiform Layer Thickness Measurements in Early Glaucoma</title><title>Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.)</title><addtitle>Ophthalmology</addtitle><description>Purpose To evaluate the glaucoma diagnostic performance of ganglion cell inner–plexiform layer (GCIPL) parameters used individually and in combination with retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) or optic nerve head (ONH) parameters measured with Cirrus HD-OCT (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc, Dublin, CA). Design Prospective cross-sectional study. Participants Fifty patients with early perimetric glaucoma and 49 age-matched healthy subjects. Methods Three peripapillary RNFL and 3 macular GCIPL scans were obtained in 1 eye of each participant. A patient was considered glaucomatous if at least 2 of the 3 RNFL or GCIPL scans had the average or at least 1 sector measurement flagged at 1% to 5% or less than 1%. The diagnostic performance was determined for each GCIPL, RNFL, and ONH parameter as well as for binary or-logic and and-logic combinations of GCIPL with RNFL or ONH parameters. Main Outcome Measures Sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), and negative likelihood ratio (NLR). Results Among GCIPL parameters, the minimum had the best diagnostic performance (sensitivity, 82.0%; specificity, 87.8%; PLR, 6.69; and NLR, 0.21). Inferior quadrant was the best RNFL parameter (sensitivity, 74%; specificity, 95.9%; PLR, 18.13; and NLR, 0.27), as was rim area (sensitivity, 68%; specificity, 98%; PLR, 33.3; and NLR, 0.33) among ONH parameters. The or-logic combination of minimum GCIPL and average RNFL provided the overall best diagnostic performance (sensitivity, 94%; specificity, 85.7%; PRL, 6.58; and NLR, 0.07) as compared with the best RNFL, best ONH, and best and-logic combination (minimum GCIPL and inferior quadrant RNFL; sensitivity, 64%; specificity, 100%; PLR, infinity; and NPR, 0.36). Conclusions The binary or-logic combination of minimum GCIPL and average RNFL or rim area provides better diagnostic performances than those of and-logic combinations or best single GCIPL, RNFL, or ONH parameters. This finding may be clinically valuable for the diagnosis of early glaucoma.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Axons - pathology</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Glaucoma - diagnosis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intraocular Pressure</subject><subject>Likelihood Functions</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Ophthalmology</subject><subject>Optic Disk - pathology</subject><subject>Optic Nerve Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Retinal Ganglion Cells - pathology</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Tomography, Optical Coherence</subject><subject>Visual Field Tests</subject><subject>Visual Fields - physiology</subject><issn>0161-6420</issn><issn>1549-4713</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUsFu1DAQtRAV3Rb-ACEfuWSxYyebvSChbWkrbdVKLGfLmcxuvHXsYCeIvXHpF_CHfEkdbeHABV9GfnrzRvPeEPKWszlnvPywn_u-HVo9zxkXCZozKV-QGS_kMpMLLl6SWaLxrJQ5OyVnMe4ZY2Up5CtymkuxFEJWM_J4YfTO-TgYoPcYtj502gFSv6V3fQK1pSvfYsAJ3PjO74Lu2wO90m5njXd0hdb-_vnrxjkM9N7iDzNp0LU-pP-mNfDgMEZ6izqOATt0Q6TG0UsdbFKxegTf6dfkZKttxDfP9Zx8_Xy5WV1n67urm9WndQYyvazKYQESeQNlIRGbgjONWCxqtgSssKo0LmooG1HUvJRSSKxrgEbIXDNIzeKcvD_q9sF_GzEOqjMR0gbaoR-j4gUXLJlXVYkqj1QIPsaAW9UH0-lwUJypKQC1V8cA1BTAhKYAUtu75wlj3WHzt-mP44nw8UjAtOd3g0FFMJO7jQkIg2q8-d-EfwXAGjcl9YAHjHs_Bpc8VFzFXDH1ZTqC6QbSZpwVvBJPpjexWg</recordid><startdate>201404</startdate><enddate>201404</enddate><creator>Mwanza, Jean-Claude, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Budenz, Donald L., MD, MPH</creator><creator>Godfrey, David G., MD</creator><creator>Neelakantan, Arvind, MD</creator><creator>Sayyad, Fouad E., MD</creator><creator>Chang, Robert T., MD</creator><creator>Lee, Richard K., MD, PhD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201404</creationdate><title>Diagnostic Performance of Optical Coherence Tomography Ganglion Cell–Inner Plexiform Layer Thickness Measurements in Early Glaucoma</title><author>Mwanza, Jean-Claude, MD, PhD ; Budenz, Donald L., MD, MPH ; Godfrey, David G., MD ; Neelakantan, Arvind, MD ; Sayyad, Fouad E., MD ; Chang, Robert T., MD ; Lee, Richard K., MD, PhD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4444-82c7c4e1dc654eed510aee57b09ce8e88ae7bc6d35b164434ebbccd342a0c82c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Axons - pathology</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Glaucoma - diagnosis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intraocular Pressure</topic><topic>Likelihood Functions</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Ophthalmology</topic><topic>Optic Disk - pathology</topic><topic>Optic Nerve Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Retinal Ganglion Cells - pathology</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Tomography, Optical Coherence</topic><topic>Visual Field Tests</topic><topic>Visual Fields - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mwanza, Jean-Claude, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Budenz, Donald L., MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Godfrey, David G., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neelakantan, Arvind, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sayyad, Fouad E., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Robert T., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Richard K., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mwanza, Jean-Claude, MD, PhD</au><au>Budenz, Donald L., MD, MPH</au><au>Godfrey, David G., MD</au><au>Neelakantan, Arvind, MD</au><au>Sayyad, Fouad E., MD</au><au>Chang, Robert T., MD</au><au>Lee, Richard K., MD, PhD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Diagnostic Performance of Optical Coherence Tomography Ganglion Cell–Inner Plexiform Layer Thickness Measurements in Early Glaucoma</atitle><jtitle>Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.)</jtitle><addtitle>Ophthalmology</addtitle><date>2014-04</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>121</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>849</spage><epage>854</epage><pages>849-854</pages><issn>0161-6420</issn><eissn>1549-4713</eissn><abstract>Purpose To evaluate the glaucoma diagnostic performance of ganglion cell inner–plexiform layer (GCIPL) parameters used individually and in combination with retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) or optic nerve head (ONH) parameters measured with Cirrus HD-OCT (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc, Dublin, CA). Design Prospective cross-sectional study. Participants Fifty patients with early perimetric glaucoma and 49 age-matched healthy subjects. Methods Three peripapillary RNFL and 3 macular GCIPL scans were obtained in 1 eye of each participant. A patient was considered glaucomatous if at least 2 of the 3 RNFL or GCIPL scans had the average or at least 1 sector measurement flagged at 1% to 5% or less than 1%. The diagnostic performance was determined for each GCIPL, RNFL, and ONH parameter as well as for binary or-logic and and-logic combinations of GCIPL with RNFL or ONH parameters. Main Outcome Measures Sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), and negative likelihood ratio (NLR). Results Among GCIPL parameters, the minimum had the best diagnostic performance (sensitivity, 82.0%; specificity, 87.8%; PLR, 6.69; and NLR, 0.21). Inferior quadrant was the best RNFL parameter (sensitivity, 74%; specificity, 95.9%; PLR, 18.13; and NLR, 0.27), as was rim area (sensitivity, 68%; specificity, 98%; PLR, 33.3; and NLR, 0.33) among ONH parameters. The or-logic combination of minimum GCIPL and average RNFL provided the overall best diagnostic performance (sensitivity, 94%; specificity, 85.7%; PRL, 6.58; and NLR, 0.07) as compared with the best RNFL, best ONH, and best and-logic combination (minimum GCIPL and inferior quadrant RNFL; sensitivity, 64%; specificity, 100%; PLR, infinity; and NPR, 0.36). Conclusions The binary or-logic combination of minimum GCIPL and average RNFL or rim area provides better diagnostic performances than those of and-logic combinations or best single GCIPL, RNFL, or ONH parameters. This finding may be clinically valuable for the diagnosis of early glaucoma.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>24393348</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.10.044</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0161-6420
ispartof Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.), 2014-04, Vol.121 (4), p.849-854
issn 0161-6420
1549-4713
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1513047188
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Axons - pathology
Cross-Sectional Studies
Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological
Female
Glaucoma - diagnosis
Humans
Intraocular Pressure
Likelihood Functions
Male
Middle Aged
Ophthalmology
Optic Disk - pathology
Optic Nerve Diseases - diagnosis
Prospective Studies
Retinal Ganglion Cells - pathology
Sensitivity and Specificity
Tomography, Optical Coherence
Visual Field Tests
Visual Fields - physiology
title Diagnostic Performance of Optical Coherence Tomography Ganglion Cell–Inner Plexiform Layer Thickness Measurements in Early Glaucoma
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T20%3A37%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diagnostic%20Performance%20of%20Optical%20Coherence%20Tomography%20Ganglion%20Cell%E2%80%93Inner%20Plexiform%20Layer%20Thickness%20Measurements%20in%20Early%20Glaucoma&rft.jtitle=Ophthalmology%20(Rochester,%20Minn.)&rft.au=Mwanza,%20Jean-Claude,%20MD,%20PhD&rft.date=2014-04&rft.volume=121&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=849&rft.epage=854&rft.pages=849-854&rft.issn=0161-6420&rft.eissn=1549-4713&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.10.044&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1513047188%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1513047188&rft_id=info:pmid/24393348&rft_els_id=S0161642013010518&rfr_iscdi=true