Avoiding Bid Protests

As a municipality of wastewater treatment district struggles to meet deadlines for completing construction of new facilities, a bid protest can be as damaging as a saboteur's dynamite--especially on a grant project financially assisted by EPA. EPA regulations require that their grantees review...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal - Water Pollution Control Federation 1989-01, Vol.61 (1), p.38-45
Hauptverfasser: Goodman, Allan H., Holland, J. Kent
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 45
container_issue 1
container_start_page 38
container_title Journal - Water Pollution Control Federation
container_volume 61
creator Goodman, Allan H.
Holland, J. Kent
description As a municipality of wastewater treatment district struggles to meet deadlines for completing construction of new facilities, a bid protest can be as damaging as a saboteur's dynamite--especially on a grant project financially assisted by EPA. EPA regulations require that their grantees review and decide bid protests challenging the grantee's procurement actions. Then, if the protester is not satisfied with the grantee's decision, an appeal can be submitted to EPA. While EPA considers the argument of the protester and grantee, months may pass and a construction season may be lost. Protests may be filed before bid opening, when a potential bidder believes deficiencies in bid documents, particularly the specifications, eliminate them or give their competitors an unfair advantage.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15127867</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>25046884</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>25046884</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j138t-836b98e4ef4b0fb513e5a079570ae06be4a9f4f4ee55a593aa43feef34d7a01d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjbFOwzAQQD2ARCmMjEidukU6986xM7YVlEqRygBzdCFn5Citi50i8fdUaqe3PL13oyYAhIVGwDt1n3MPgOC0m6in5W8MXTh8z1ahm72nOEoe84O69Txkebxyqj5fXz7Wb0W922zXy7roNbqxcFi2lRMSTy341mgUw2ArY4EFylaIK0-eRIxhUyEzoRfxSJ1l0B1O1fzSPab4czqfm33IXzIMfJB4yo02emFdac_i80Xs8xhTc0xhz-mvWRig0jnCf8f3P-s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>15127867</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Avoiding Bid Protests</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Goodman, Allan H. ; Holland, J. Kent</creator><creatorcontrib>Goodman, Allan H. ; Holland, J. Kent</creatorcontrib><description>As a municipality of wastewater treatment district struggles to meet deadlines for completing construction of new facilities, a bid protest can be as damaging as a saboteur's dynamite--especially on a grant project financially assisted by EPA. EPA regulations require that their grantees review and decide bid protests challenging the grantee's procurement actions. Then, if the protester is not satisfied with the grantee's decision, an appeal can be submitted to EPA. While EPA considers the argument of the protester and grantee, months may pass and a construction season may be lost. Protests may be filed before bid opening, when a potential bidder believes deficiencies in bid documents, particularly the specifications, eliminate them or give their competitors an unfair advantage.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1303</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Water Pollution Control Federation</publisher><subject>Administrative law ; Bidding ; Brands ; Design engineering ; Economic competition ; Environmental agencies ; Gambling equipment ; Political protests ; Procurement ; Project Management ; Subcontractors</subject><ispartof>Journal - Water Pollution Control Federation, 1989-01, Vol.61 (1), p.38-45</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1989 The Water Pollution Control Federation</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/25046884$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/25046884$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Goodman, Allan H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holland, J. Kent</creatorcontrib><title>Avoiding Bid Protests</title><title>Journal - Water Pollution Control Federation</title><description>As a municipality of wastewater treatment district struggles to meet deadlines for completing construction of new facilities, a bid protest can be as damaging as a saboteur's dynamite--especially on a grant project financially assisted by EPA. EPA regulations require that their grantees review and decide bid protests challenging the grantee's procurement actions. Then, if the protester is not satisfied with the grantee's decision, an appeal can be submitted to EPA. While EPA considers the argument of the protester and grantee, months may pass and a construction season may be lost. Protests may be filed before bid opening, when a potential bidder believes deficiencies in bid documents, particularly the specifications, eliminate them or give their competitors an unfair advantage.</description><subject>Administrative law</subject><subject>Bidding</subject><subject>Brands</subject><subject>Design engineering</subject><subject>Economic competition</subject><subject>Environmental agencies</subject><subject>Gambling equipment</subject><subject>Political protests</subject><subject>Procurement</subject><subject>Project Management</subject><subject>Subcontractors</subject><issn>0043-1303</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1989</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotjbFOwzAQQD2ARCmMjEidukU6986xM7YVlEqRygBzdCFn5Citi50i8fdUaqe3PL13oyYAhIVGwDt1n3MPgOC0m6in5W8MXTh8z1ahm72nOEoe84O69Txkebxyqj5fXz7Wb0W922zXy7roNbqxcFi2lRMSTy341mgUw2ArY4EFylaIK0-eRIxhUyEzoRfxSJ1l0B1O1fzSPab4czqfm33IXzIMfJB4yo02emFdac_i80Xs8xhTc0xhz-mvWRig0jnCf8f3P-s</recordid><startdate>19890101</startdate><enddate>19890101</enddate><creator>Goodman, Allan H.</creator><creator>Holland, J. Kent</creator><general>Water Pollution Control Federation</general><scope>7TV</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19890101</creationdate><title>Avoiding Bid Protests</title><author>Goodman, Allan H. ; Holland, J. Kent</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j138t-836b98e4ef4b0fb513e5a079570ae06be4a9f4f4ee55a593aa43feef34d7a01d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1989</creationdate><topic>Administrative law</topic><topic>Bidding</topic><topic>Brands</topic><topic>Design engineering</topic><topic>Economic competition</topic><topic>Environmental agencies</topic><topic>Gambling equipment</topic><topic>Political protests</topic><topic>Procurement</topic><topic>Project Management</topic><topic>Subcontractors</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Goodman, Allan H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holland, J. Kent</creatorcontrib><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Journal - Water Pollution Control Federation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Goodman, Allan H.</au><au>Holland, J. Kent</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Avoiding Bid Protests</atitle><jtitle>Journal - Water Pollution Control Federation</jtitle><date>1989-01-01</date><risdate>1989</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>38</spage><epage>45</epage><pages>38-45</pages><issn>0043-1303</issn><abstract>As a municipality of wastewater treatment district struggles to meet deadlines for completing construction of new facilities, a bid protest can be as damaging as a saboteur's dynamite--especially on a grant project financially assisted by EPA. EPA regulations require that their grantees review and decide bid protests challenging the grantee's procurement actions. Then, if the protester is not satisfied with the grantee's decision, an appeal can be submitted to EPA. While EPA considers the argument of the protester and grantee, months may pass and a construction season may be lost. Protests may be filed before bid opening, when a potential bidder believes deficiencies in bid documents, particularly the specifications, eliminate them or give their competitors an unfair advantage.</abstract><pub>Water Pollution Control Federation</pub><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0043-1303
ispartof Journal - Water Pollution Control Federation, 1989-01, Vol.61 (1), p.38-45
issn 0043-1303
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15127867
source Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects Administrative law
Bidding
Brands
Design engineering
Economic competition
Environmental agencies
Gambling equipment
Political protests
Procurement
Project Management
Subcontractors
title Avoiding Bid Protests
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T01%3A43%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Avoiding%20Bid%20Protests&rft.jtitle=Journal%20-%20Water%20Pollution%20Control%20Federation&rft.au=Goodman,%20Allan%20H.&rft.date=1989-01-01&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=38&rft.epage=45&rft.pages=38-45&rft.issn=0043-1303&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E25046884%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=15127867&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=25046884&rfr_iscdi=true