Learning Confounds Algometric Assessment of Mechanical Thresholds in Normal Dogs
Objective To perform algometric readings in normal dogs in a design that would assess possible confounding factors. Study Design Prospective study. Animals Skeletally mature spayed female, intact male and castrated male retriever or retriever mix dogs without orthopedic or neurologic disease (n = 19...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Veterinary surgery 2014-03, Vol.43 (3), p.361-367 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 367 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 361 |
| container_title | Veterinary surgery |
| container_volume | 43 |
| creator | Coleman, Kevin D. Schmiedt, Chad W. Kirkby, Kristin A. Coleman, Amanda E. Robertson, Sheilah A. Hash, Jon Lascelles, B. Duncan X. |
| description | Objective
To perform algometric readings in normal dogs in a design that would assess possible confounding factors.
Study Design
Prospective study.
Animals
Skeletally mature spayed female, intact male and castrated male retriever or retriever mix dogs without orthopedic or neurologic disease (n = 19).
Methods
Twelve common surgical sites were selected for algometric pressure testing. Threshold response was defined as a conscious recognition of the stimulus, and recorded in Newtons. Sites were tested in the same order, and the testing sequence repeated 3 times on each side of the dog. Dogs were tested in the morning and evening of the same day and was repeated 10–14 days later, allowing 4 separate data collections for each dog.
Results
Data were analyzed using ANOVA or ANCOVA. When all the data were included in the analysis, dog (P |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2014.12112.x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1512559516</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1512559516</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4362-611a6c14848af6a3fec0f463b66f169ab911f207682a5baeee953e98a37c5ea33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1vEzEQhi0EomnhL6CVuHDZrcdfu74gRQEKbShIpNCb5bizyYZdu9hZNf333W1KDpzwZSzPM-9YDyEZ0AKGc7opQHKWa0mvC0ZBFMAAWLF7RiaHxnMyoaAg50LrI3Kc0oZSqoXgL8kREwKortiEfJ-jjb7xq2wWfB16f5OyabsKHW5j47JpSphSh36bhTr7im5tfeNsmy3WEdM6tAPe-OwyxG54_BBW6RV5Uds24eunekKuPn1czD7n829nX2bTee4EVyxXAFY5EJWobK0sr9HRWii-VKoGpe1SA9SMlqpiVi4tImrJUVeWl06i5fyEvNvn3sbwp8e0NV2THLat9Rj6ZEACk1JLUAP69h90E_roh9-NFCgmqnKkqj3lYkgpYm1uY9PZeG-AmtG62ZhRrhnlmtG6ebRudsPom6cF_bLDm8PgX80D8H4P3DUt3v93sPn54-rxOgTk-4AmbXF3CLDxt1ElL6X5dXlm1Dmwi4Vi5po_AJ4ynuU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1511624876</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Learning Confounds Algometric Assessment of Mechanical Thresholds in Normal Dogs</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Coleman, Kevin D. ; Schmiedt, Chad W. ; Kirkby, Kristin A. ; Coleman, Amanda E. ; Robertson, Sheilah A. ; Hash, Jon ; Lascelles, B. Duncan X.</creator><creatorcontrib>Coleman, Kevin D. ; Schmiedt, Chad W. ; Kirkby, Kristin A. ; Coleman, Amanda E. ; Robertson, Sheilah A. ; Hash, Jon ; Lascelles, B. Duncan X.</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[Objective
To perform algometric readings in normal dogs in a design that would assess possible confounding factors.
Study Design
Prospective study.
Animals
Skeletally mature spayed female, intact male and castrated male retriever or retriever mix dogs without orthopedic or neurologic disease (n = 19).
Methods
Twelve common surgical sites were selected for algometric pressure testing. Threshold response was defined as a conscious recognition of the stimulus, and recorded in Newtons. Sites were tested in the same order, and the testing sequence repeated 3 times on each side of the dog. Dogs were tested in the morning and evening of the same day and was repeated 10–14 days later, allowing 4 separate data collections for each dog.
Results
Data were analyzed using ANOVA or ANCOVA. When all the data were included in the analysis, dog (P < .0001), order (P < .0001), site (P < .0001), site order (P = .0217), time (P < .0001), day (P < .0001) and repetition (P < .0001) all significantly affected the algometer readings. When only the first reading for each site was included in the analysis, dog (P < .0001), site (P < .0001) and sex (P < .0001) all significantly affected algometer readings.
Conclusion
These results suggest that learning occurred over repeated collection time points, with dogs anticipating the stimulus and reacting at lower thresholds.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 0161-3499</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-950X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2014.12112.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24410982</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Biomechanics ; Dogs ; Dogs - physiology ; Female ; Learning ; Male ; Nociception - physiology ; Pain - veterinary ; Pressure - adverse effects ; Veterinary medicine</subject><ispartof>Veterinary surgery, 2014-03, Vol.43 (3), p.361-367</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2014 by The American College of Veterinary Surgeons</rights><rights>Copyright 2014 by The American College of Veterinary Surgeons.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4362-611a6c14848af6a3fec0f463b66f169ab911f207682a5baeee953e98a37c5ea33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4362-611a6c14848af6a3fec0f463b66f169ab911f207682a5baeee953e98a37c5ea33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1532-950X.2014.12112.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1532-950X.2014.12112.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24410982$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Coleman, Kevin D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmiedt, Chad W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirkby, Kristin A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coleman, Amanda E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robertson, Sheilah A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hash, Jon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lascelles, B. Duncan X.</creatorcontrib><title>Learning Confounds Algometric Assessment of Mechanical Thresholds in Normal Dogs</title><title>Veterinary surgery</title><addtitle>Veterinary Surgery</addtitle><description><![CDATA[Objective
To perform algometric readings in normal dogs in a design that would assess possible confounding factors.
Study Design
Prospective study.
Animals
Skeletally mature spayed female, intact male and castrated male retriever or retriever mix dogs without orthopedic or neurologic disease (n = 19).
Methods
Twelve common surgical sites were selected for algometric pressure testing. Threshold response was defined as a conscious recognition of the stimulus, and recorded in Newtons. Sites were tested in the same order, and the testing sequence repeated 3 times on each side of the dog. Dogs were tested in the morning and evening of the same day and was repeated 10–14 days later, allowing 4 separate data collections for each dog.
Results
Data were analyzed using ANOVA or ANCOVA. When all the data were included in the analysis, dog (P < .0001), order (P < .0001), site (P < .0001), site order (P = .0217), time (P < .0001), day (P < .0001) and repetition (P < .0001) all significantly affected the algometer readings. When only the first reading for each site was included in the analysis, dog (P < .0001), site (P < .0001) and sex (P < .0001) all significantly affected algometer readings.
Conclusion
These results suggest that learning occurred over repeated collection time points, with dogs anticipating the stimulus and reacting at lower thresholds.]]></description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Biomechanics</subject><subject>Dogs</subject><subject>Dogs - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Nociception - physiology</subject><subject>Pain - veterinary</subject><subject>Pressure - adverse effects</subject><subject>Veterinary medicine</subject><issn>0161-3499</issn><issn>1532-950X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE1vEzEQhi0EomnhL6CVuHDZrcdfu74gRQEKbShIpNCb5bizyYZdu9hZNf333W1KDpzwZSzPM-9YDyEZ0AKGc7opQHKWa0mvC0ZBFMAAWLF7RiaHxnMyoaAg50LrI3Kc0oZSqoXgL8kREwKortiEfJ-jjb7xq2wWfB16f5OyabsKHW5j47JpSphSh36bhTr7im5tfeNsmy3WEdM6tAPe-OwyxG54_BBW6RV5Uds24eunekKuPn1czD7n829nX2bTee4EVyxXAFY5EJWobK0sr9HRWii-VKoGpe1SA9SMlqpiVi4tImrJUVeWl06i5fyEvNvn3sbwp8e0NV2THLat9Rj6ZEACk1JLUAP69h90E_roh9-NFCgmqnKkqj3lYkgpYm1uY9PZeG-AmtG62ZhRrhnlmtG6ebRudsPom6cF_bLDm8PgX80D8H4P3DUt3v93sPn54-rxOgTk-4AmbXF3CLDxt1ElL6X5dXlm1Dmwi4Vi5po_AJ4ynuU</recordid><startdate>20140301</startdate><enddate>20140301</enddate><creator>Coleman, Kevin D.</creator><creator>Schmiedt, Chad W.</creator><creator>Kirkby, Kristin A.</creator><creator>Coleman, Amanda E.</creator><creator>Robertson, Sheilah A.</creator><creator>Hash, Jon</creator><creator>Lascelles, B. Duncan X.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140301</creationdate><title>Learning Confounds Algometric Assessment of Mechanical Thresholds in Normal Dogs</title><author>Coleman, Kevin D. ; Schmiedt, Chad W. ; Kirkby, Kristin A. ; Coleman, Amanda E. ; Robertson, Sheilah A. ; Hash, Jon ; Lascelles, B. Duncan X.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4362-611a6c14848af6a3fec0f463b66f169ab911f207682a5baeee953e98a37c5ea33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Biomechanics</topic><topic>Dogs</topic><topic>Dogs - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Nociception - physiology</topic><topic>Pain - veterinary</topic><topic>Pressure - adverse effects</topic><topic>Veterinary medicine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Coleman, Kevin D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmiedt, Chad W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirkby, Kristin A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coleman, Amanda E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robertson, Sheilah A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hash, Jon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lascelles, B. Duncan X.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Veterinary surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Coleman, Kevin D.</au><au>Schmiedt, Chad W.</au><au>Kirkby, Kristin A.</au><au>Coleman, Amanda E.</au><au>Robertson, Sheilah A.</au><au>Hash, Jon</au><au>Lascelles, B. Duncan X.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Learning Confounds Algometric Assessment of Mechanical Thresholds in Normal Dogs</atitle><jtitle>Veterinary surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Veterinary Surgery</addtitle><date>2014-03-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>361</spage><epage>367</epage><pages>361-367</pages><issn>0161-3499</issn><eissn>1532-950X</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[Objective
To perform algometric readings in normal dogs in a design that would assess possible confounding factors.
Study Design
Prospective study.
Animals
Skeletally mature spayed female, intact male and castrated male retriever or retriever mix dogs without orthopedic or neurologic disease (n = 19).
Methods
Twelve common surgical sites were selected for algometric pressure testing. Threshold response was defined as a conscious recognition of the stimulus, and recorded in Newtons. Sites were tested in the same order, and the testing sequence repeated 3 times on each side of the dog. Dogs were tested in the morning and evening of the same day and was repeated 10–14 days later, allowing 4 separate data collections for each dog.
Results
Data were analyzed using ANOVA or ANCOVA. When all the data were included in the analysis, dog (P < .0001), order (P < .0001), site (P < .0001), site order (P = .0217), time (P < .0001), day (P < .0001) and repetition (P < .0001) all significantly affected the algometer readings. When only the first reading for each site was included in the analysis, dog (P < .0001), site (P < .0001) and sex (P < .0001) all significantly affected algometer readings.
Conclusion
These results suggest that learning occurred over repeated collection time points, with dogs anticipating the stimulus and reacting at lower thresholds.]]></abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>24410982</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1532-950X.2014.12112.x</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0161-3499 |
| ispartof | Veterinary surgery, 2014-03, Vol.43 (3), p.361-367 |
| issn | 0161-3499 1532-950X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1512559516 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
| subjects | Animals Biomechanical Phenomena Biomechanics Dogs Dogs - physiology Female Learning Male Nociception - physiology Pain - veterinary Pressure - adverse effects Veterinary medicine |
| title | Learning Confounds Algometric Assessment of Mechanical Thresholds in Normal Dogs |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T22%3A09%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Learning%20Confounds%20Algometric%20Assessment%20of%20Mechanical%20Thresholds%20in%20Normal%20Dogs&rft.jtitle=Veterinary%20surgery&rft.au=Coleman,%20Kevin%20D.&rft.date=2014-03-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=361&rft.epage=367&rft.pages=361-367&rft.issn=0161-3499&rft.eissn=1532-950X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1532-950X.2014.12112.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1512559516%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1511624876&rft_id=info:pmid/24410982&rfr_iscdi=true |