Fitness costs associated with field-evolved resistance to chlorantraniliprole in Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae)
Plutella xylostella (L.) is the most important pest of Brassicaceae worldwide, with a recent estimate of US$ 4–5 billion expenditure for the control of this insect. A case of very high resistance of this pest to chlorantraniliprole was recently associated with reduced efficacy in a Brazilian field o...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Bulletin of entomological research 2014-02, Vol.104 (1), p.88-96 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 96 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 88 |
| container_title | Bulletin of entomological research |
| container_volume | 104 |
| creator | Ribeiro, L.M.S. Wanderley-Teixeira, V. Ferreira, H.N. Teixeira, Á.A.C. Siqueira, H.A.A. |
| description | Plutella xylostella (L.) is the most important pest of Brassicaceae worldwide, with a recent estimate of US$ 4–5 billion expenditure for the control of this insect. A case of very high resistance of this pest to chlorantraniliprole was recently associated with reduced efficacy in a Brazilian field of Brassica spp. Although diamide resistance has been characterized, the fitness of insects due to such resistance has yet to be examined. Therefore, in this study, biological parameters were assessed in both susceptible and resistant strains of P. xylostella subjected to sublethal chlorantraniliprole concentrations. The field strain showed high resistance to chlorantraniliprole (RR50=27,793-fold), although resistance rapidly decreased in the first generations, showing instability. The exposure of susceptible and resistant larvae to their respective LC1, LC10, and LC25 values led to an increased duration of the larval and pupae phases and reduced weight in both strains; however, no significant differences in pupal viability across the treatments were observed. The resistant insects presented significantly lower larval weight and fecundity and higher larval and pupal periods, hatchability, and male longevity when not exposed to chlorantraniliprole, suggesting a fitness cost associated with resistance. In addition, resistant females showed a significantly higher egg-laying period and longevity at LC25, whereas the males lived longer at LC1. Chlorantraniliprole negatively impacted the biological parameters of both strains tested, although these effects were more relevant to the resistant insects. Resistant P. xylostella showed negative and positive biological trade-offs when compared with the susceptible individuals in both the absence and presence of chlorantraniliprole. Despite the important role that these trade-offs may play in the evolution of resistance to chlorantraniliprole, practical applications still depend on such information as the dominance of fitness costs and resistance. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0007485313000576 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1512326438</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0007485313000576</cupid><sourcerecordid>3247647911</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-42a8599a1fdb2adfc9ac3d6556b0edd268c3f244d7d67f7e8d8ae4500e2831f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV1rFDEUhoNY7Fr9Ad7ogAjtxWiSydd4J8WqsKDQej1kk5M2JTtZk0y1V_51M7tbFUW8OOTjPOflPbwIPSH4JcFEvjrHGEumeEe6euNS3EMLwiRvqZD4PlrM7XbuH6KHOV_XJ-tZ_wAdUkZpz7FcoO9nvoyQc2NiLrnROUfjdQHbfPXlqnEegm3hJoab-pUg-1z0aKApsTFXISY9llo--E2KARo_Np_CVCAE3Xy7DVVzez1ewsbbuCmQ9Os7wlsNJ4_QgdMhw-P9eYQuzt5enL5vlx_ffTh9s2wNE7i0jGrF-14TZ1dUW2d6bTorOBcrDNZSoUznKGNWWiGdBGWVBsYxBqo64rojdLyTrTa_TJDLsPbZzN5GiFMeCCe0o4J16v8o67HolRS8os__QK_jlMa6RxXEUvIa0ixIdpRJMecEbtgkv9bpdiB4mHMc_sqxzjzdK0-rNdifE3fBVeDFHtDZ6OBqCMbnX5wihPZboWc7zuk46MtUmc_nFBOBaym1XaLb29PrVfL2En7b4p8GfwAyhL8K</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1507750178</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fitness costs associated with field-evolved resistance to chlorantraniliprole in Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Ribeiro, L.M.S. ; Wanderley-Teixeira, V. ; Ferreira, H.N. ; Teixeira, Á.A.C. ; Siqueira, H.A.A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ribeiro, L.M.S. ; Wanderley-Teixeira, V. ; Ferreira, H.N. ; Teixeira, Á.A.C. ; Siqueira, H.A.A.</creatorcontrib><description>Plutella xylostella (L.) is the most important pest of Brassicaceae worldwide, with a recent estimate of US$ 4–5 billion expenditure for the control of this insect. A case of very high resistance of this pest to chlorantraniliprole was recently associated with reduced efficacy in a Brazilian field of Brassica spp. Although diamide resistance has been characterized, the fitness of insects due to such resistance has yet to be examined. Therefore, in this study, biological parameters were assessed in both susceptible and resistant strains of P. xylostella subjected to sublethal chlorantraniliprole concentrations. The field strain showed high resistance to chlorantraniliprole (RR50=27,793-fold), although resistance rapidly decreased in the first generations, showing instability. The exposure of susceptible and resistant larvae to their respective LC1, LC10, and LC25 values led to an increased duration of the larval and pupae phases and reduced weight in both strains; however, no significant differences in pupal viability across the treatments were observed. The resistant insects presented significantly lower larval weight and fecundity and higher larval and pupal periods, hatchability, and male longevity when not exposed to chlorantraniliprole, suggesting a fitness cost associated with resistance. In addition, resistant females showed a significantly higher egg-laying period and longevity at LC25, whereas the males lived longer at LC1. Chlorantraniliprole negatively impacted the biological parameters of both strains tested, although these effects were more relevant to the resistant insects. Resistant P. xylostella showed negative and positive biological trade-offs when compared with the susceptible individuals in both the absence and presence of chlorantraniliprole. Despite the important role that these trade-offs may play in the evolution of resistance to chlorantraniliprole, practical applications still depend on such information as the dominance of fitness costs and resistance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-4853</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1475-2670</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-2670</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0007485313000576</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24229507</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BEREA2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Animal populations ; Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Brassica ; Brassicaceae ; Brassicaceae - parasitology ; Brazil ; Chemical control ; Control ; Fecundity ; Female ; Fertility - drug effects ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Genetic Fitness - drug effects ; Genetic Fitness - physiology ; Insecticide Resistance - genetics ; Insecticides ; Insecticides - toxicity ; Insects ; Kaplan-Meier Estimate ; Larva - drug effects ; Larva - growth & development ; Larvae ; Lepidoptera ; Longevity ; Male ; Moths - drug effects ; Moths - growth & development ; ortho-Aminobenzoates - toxicity ; Pesticides ; Pests ; Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection ; Plant populations ; Plant resistance ; Plutella xylostella ; Plutellidae ; Protozoa. Invertebrates ; Research Paper</subject><ispartof>Bulletin of entomological research, 2014-02, Vol.104 (1), p.88-96</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-42a8599a1fdb2adfc9ac3d6556b0edd268c3f244d7d67f7e8d8ae4500e2831f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-42a8599a1fdb2adfc9ac3d6556b0edd268c3f244d7d67f7e8d8ae4500e2831f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0007485313000576/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,778,782,27907,27908,55611</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=28112976$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24229507$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ribeiro, L.M.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wanderley-Teixeira, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, H.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teixeira, Á.A.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siqueira, H.A.A.</creatorcontrib><title>Fitness costs associated with field-evolved resistance to chlorantraniliprole in Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae)</title><title>Bulletin of entomological research</title><addtitle>Bull. Entomol. Res</addtitle><description>Plutella xylostella (L.) is the most important pest of Brassicaceae worldwide, with a recent estimate of US$ 4–5 billion expenditure for the control of this insect. A case of very high resistance of this pest to chlorantraniliprole was recently associated with reduced efficacy in a Brazilian field of Brassica spp. Although diamide resistance has been characterized, the fitness of insects due to such resistance has yet to be examined. Therefore, in this study, biological parameters were assessed in both susceptible and resistant strains of P. xylostella subjected to sublethal chlorantraniliprole concentrations. The field strain showed high resistance to chlorantraniliprole (RR50=27,793-fold), although resistance rapidly decreased in the first generations, showing instability. The exposure of susceptible and resistant larvae to their respective LC1, LC10, and LC25 values led to an increased duration of the larval and pupae phases and reduced weight in both strains; however, no significant differences in pupal viability across the treatments were observed. The resistant insects presented significantly lower larval weight and fecundity and higher larval and pupal periods, hatchability, and male longevity when not exposed to chlorantraniliprole, suggesting a fitness cost associated with resistance. In addition, resistant females showed a significantly higher egg-laying period and longevity at LC25, whereas the males lived longer at LC1. Chlorantraniliprole negatively impacted the biological parameters of both strains tested, although these effects were more relevant to the resistant insects. Resistant P. xylostella showed negative and positive biological trade-offs when compared with the susceptible individuals in both the absence and presence of chlorantraniliprole. Despite the important role that these trade-offs may play in the evolution of resistance to chlorantraniliprole, practical applications still depend on such information as the dominance of fitness costs and resistance.</description><subject>Animal populations</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Brassica</subject><subject>Brassicaceae</subject><subject>Brassicaceae - parasitology</subject><subject>Brazil</subject><subject>Chemical control</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>Fecundity</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fertility - drug effects</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Genetic Fitness - drug effects</subject><subject>Genetic Fitness - physiology</subject><subject>Insecticide Resistance - genetics</subject><subject>Insecticides</subject><subject>Insecticides - toxicity</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</subject><subject>Larva - drug effects</subject><subject>Larva - growth & development</subject><subject>Larvae</subject><subject>Lepidoptera</subject><subject>Longevity</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Moths - drug effects</subject><subject>Moths - growth & development</subject><subject>ortho-Aminobenzoates - toxicity</subject><subject>Pesticides</subject><subject>Pests</subject><subject>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</subject><subject>Plant populations</subject><subject>Plant resistance</subject><subject>Plutella xylostella</subject><subject>Plutellidae</subject><subject>Protozoa. Invertebrates</subject><subject>Research Paper</subject><issn>0007-4853</issn><issn>1475-2670</issn><issn>1475-2670</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkV1rFDEUhoNY7Fr9Ad7ogAjtxWiSydd4J8WqsKDQej1kk5M2JTtZk0y1V_51M7tbFUW8OOTjPOflPbwIPSH4JcFEvjrHGEumeEe6euNS3EMLwiRvqZD4PlrM7XbuH6KHOV_XJ-tZ_wAdUkZpz7FcoO9nvoyQc2NiLrnROUfjdQHbfPXlqnEegm3hJoab-pUg-1z0aKApsTFXISY9llo--E2KARo_Np_CVCAE3Xy7DVVzez1ewsbbuCmQ9Os7wlsNJ4_QgdMhw-P9eYQuzt5enL5vlx_ffTh9s2wNE7i0jGrF-14TZ1dUW2d6bTorOBcrDNZSoUznKGNWWiGdBGWVBsYxBqo64rojdLyTrTa_TJDLsPbZzN5GiFMeCCe0o4J16v8o67HolRS8os__QK_jlMa6RxXEUvIa0ixIdpRJMecEbtgkv9bpdiB4mHMc_sqxzjzdK0-rNdifE3fBVeDFHtDZ6OBqCMbnX5wihPZboWc7zuk46MtUmc_nFBOBaym1XaLb29PrVfL2En7b4p8GfwAyhL8K</recordid><startdate>20140201</startdate><enddate>20140201</enddate><creator>Ribeiro, L.M.S.</creator><creator>Wanderley-Teixeira, V.</creator><creator>Ferreira, H.N.</creator><creator>Teixeira, Á.A.C.</creator><creator>Siqueira, H.A.A.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140201</creationdate><title>Fitness costs associated with field-evolved resistance to chlorantraniliprole in Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae)</title><author>Ribeiro, L.M.S. ; Wanderley-Teixeira, V. ; Ferreira, H.N. ; Teixeira, Á.A.C. ; Siqueira, H.A.A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-42a8599a1fdb2adfc9ac3d6556b0edd268c3f244d7d67f7e8d8ae4500e2831f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Animal populations</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Brassica</topic><topic>Brassicaceae</topic><topic>Brassicaceae - parasitology</topic><topic>Brazil</topic><topic>Chemical control</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>Fecundity</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fertility - drug effects</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Genetic Fitness - drug effects</topic><topic>Genetic Fitness - physiology</topic><topic>Insecticide Resistance - genetics</topic><topic>Insecticides</topic><topic>Insecticides - toxicity</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</topic><topic>Larva - drug effects</topic><topic>Larva - growth & development</topic><topic>Larvae</topic><topic>Lepidoptera</topic><topic>Longevity</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Moths - drug effects</topic><topic>Moths - growth & development</topic><topic>ortho-Aminobenzoates - toxicity</topic><topic>Pesticides</topic><topic>Pests</topic><topic>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</topic><topic>Plant populations</topic><topic>Plant resistance</topic><topic>Plutella xylostella</topic><topic>Plutellidae</topic><topic>Protozoa. Invertebrates</topic><topic>Research Paper</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ribeiro, L.M.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wanderley-Teixeira, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, H.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teixeira, Á.A.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siqueira, H.A.A.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Bulletin of entomological research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ribeiro, L.M.S.</au><au>Wanderley-Teixeira, V.</au><au>Ferreira, H.N.</au><au>Teixeira, Á.A.C.</au><au>Siqueira, H.A.A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fitness costs associated with field-evolved resistance to chlorantraniliprole in Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae)</atitle><jtitle>Bulletin of entomological research</jtitle><addtitle>Bull. Entomol. Res</addtitle><date>2014-02-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>104</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>88</spage><epage>96</epage><pages>88-96</pages><issn>0007-4853</issn><issn>1475-2670</issn><eissn>1475-2670</eissn><coden>BEREA2</coden><abstract>Plutella xylostella (L.) is the most important pest of Brassicaceae worldwide, with a recent estimate of US$ 4–5 billion expenditure for the control of this insect. A case of very high resistance of this pest to chlorantraniliprole was recently associated with reduced efficacy in a Brazilian field of Brassica spp. Although diamide resistance has been characterized, the fitness of insects due to such resistance has yet to be examined. Therefore, in this study, biological parameters were assessed in both susceptible and resistant strains of P. xylostella subjected to sublethal chlorantraniliprole concentrations. The field strain showed high resistance to chlorantraniliprole (RR50=27,793-fold), although resistance rapidly decreased in the first generations, showing instability. The exposure of susceptible and resistant larvae to their respective LC1, LC10, and LC25 values led to an increased duration of the larval and pupae phases and reduced weight in both strains; however, no significant differences in pupal viability across the treatments were observed. The resistant insects presented significantly lower larval weight and fecundity and higher larval and pupal periods, hatchability, and male longevity when not exposed to chlorantraniliprole, suggesting a fitness cost associated with resistance. In addition, resistant females showed a significantly higher egg-laying period and longevity at LC25, whereas the males lived longer at LC1. Chlorantraniliprole negatively impacted the biological parameters of both strains tested, although these effects were more relevant to the resistant insects. Resistant P. xylostella showed negative and positive biological trade-offs when compared with the susceptible individuals in both the absence and presence of chlorantraniliprole. Despite the important role that these trade-offs may play in the evolution of resistance to chlorantraniliprole, practical applications still depend on such information as the dominance of fitness costs and resistance.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>24229507</pmid><doi>10.1017/S0007485313000576</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0007-4853 |
| ispartof | Bulletin of entomological research, 2014-02, Vol.104 (1), p.88-96 |
| issn | 0007-4853 1475-2670 1475-2670 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1512326438 |
| source | MEDLINE; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
| subjects | Animal populations Animals Biological and medical sciences Brassica Brassicaceae Brassicaceae - parasitology Brazil Chemical control Control Fecundity Female Fertility - drug effects Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Genetic Fitness - drug effects Genetic Fitness - physiology Insecticide Resistance - genetics Insecticides Insecticides - toxicity Insects Kaplan-Meier Estimate Larva - drug effects Larva - growth & development Larvae Lepidoptera Longevity Male Moths - drug effects Moths - growth & development ortho-Aminobenzoates - toxicity Pesticides Pests Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection Plant populations Plant resistance Plutella xylostella Plutellidae Protozoa. Invertebrates Research Paper |
| title | Fitness costs associated with field-evolved resistance to chlorantraniliprole in Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T16%3A16%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fitness%20costs%20associated%20with%20field-evolved%20resistance%20to%20chlorantraniliprole%20in%20Plutella%20xylostella%20(Lepidoptera:%20Plutellidae)&rft.jtitle=Bulletin%20of%20entomological%20research&rft.au=Ribeiro,%20L.M.S.&rft.date=2014-02-01&rft.volume=104&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=88&rft.epage=96&rft.pages=88-96&rft.issn=0007-4853&rft.eissn=1475-2670&rft.coden=BEREA2&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0007485313000576&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3247647911%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1507750178&rft_id=info:pmid/24229507&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0007485313000576&rfr_iscdi=true |