Simplified Clinical Prediction Scores to Target Viral Load Testing in Adults with Suspected First Line Treatment Failure in Phnom Penh, Cambodia: e87879

Background For settings with limited laboratory capacity, 2013 World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines recommend targeted HIV-1 viral load (VL) testing to identify virological failure. We previously developed and validated a clinical prediction score (CPS) for targeted VL testing, relying on clin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2014-02, Vol.9 (2)
Hauptverfasser: Griensven, Johan van, Phan, Vichet, Thai, Sopheak, Koole, Olivier, Lynen, Lutgarde
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page
container_title PloS one
container_volume 9
creator Griensven, Johan van
Phan, Vichet
Thai, Sopheak
Koole, Olivier
Lynen, Lutgarde
description Background For settings with limited laboratory capacity, 2013 World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines recommend targeted HIV-1 viral load (VL) testing to identify virological failure. We previously developed and validated a clinical prediction score (CPS) for targeted VL testing, relying on clinical, adherence and laboratory data. While outperforming the WHO failure criteria, it required substantial calculation and review of all previous laboratory tests. In response, we developed four simplified, less error-prone and broadly applicable CPS versions that can be done 'on the spot'. Methodology/Principal Findings From May 2010 to June 2011, we validated the original CPS in a non-governmental hospital in Phnom Penh, Cambodia applying the CPS to adults on first-line treatment >1 year. Virological failure was defined as a single VL >1000 copies/ml. The four CPSs included CPS1 with 'current CD4 count' instead of %-decline-from-peak CD4; CPS2 with hemoglobin measurements removed; CPS3 having 'decrease in CD4 count below baseline value' removed; CPS4 was purely clinical. Score development relied on the Spiegelhalter/Knill-Jones method. Variables independently associated with virological failure with a likelihood ratio greater than or equal to 1.5 or less than or equal to 0.67 were retained. CPS performance was evaluated based on the area-under-the-ROC-curve (AUROC) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The CPSs were validated in an independent dataset. A total of 1490 individuals (56.6% female, median age: 38 years (interquartile range (IQR 33-44)); median baseline CD4 count: 94 cells/ mu L (IQR 28-205), median time on antiretroviral therapy 3.6 years (IQR 2.1-5.1)), were included. Forty-five 45 (3.0%) individuals had virological failure. CPS1 yielded an AUROC of 0.69 (95% CI: 0.62-0.75) in validation, CPS2 an AUROC of 0.68 (95% CI: 0.62-0.74), and CPS3, an AUROC of 0.67 (95% CI: 0.61-0.73). The purely clinical CPS4 performed poorly (AUROC-0.59; 95% CI: 0.53-0.65). Conclusions Simplified CPSs retained acceptable accuracy as long as current CD4 count testing was included. Ease of field application and field accuracy remains to be defined.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0087879
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1512325198</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1512325198</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_15123251983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVjjtOxDAURS0kJIbPDiheScEEO1Z-dCgiopgiUiLakUneTN7IsYM_Yissl4DYwFS3Offcy9i94ImQhXg62eiM0sliDSacl0VZVBdsIyqZbvOUyyt27f2J80yWeb5h3x3Ni6YD4Qi1JkOD0tA6HGkIZA10g3XoIVjolTtigHdyK7GzaoQefSBzBDLwMkYdPHxRmKCLfsEhrMKGnA-wI4PQO1RhRhOgUaSjw99WOxk7Q4tmeoRazR92JPUM-Pf5ll0elPZ495837KF57eu37eLsZ1yX9zP5AbVWBm30e5GJVKaZqEp5BvoDPlVjDA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1512325198</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Simplified Clinical Prediction Scores to Target Viral Load Testing in Adults with Suspected First Line Treatment Failure in Phnom Penh, Cambodia: e87879</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><creator>Griensven, Johan van ; Phan, Vichet ; Thai, Sopheak ; Koole, Olivier ; Lynen, Lutgarde</creator><creatorcontrib>Griensven, Johan van ; Phan, Vichet ; Thai, Sopheak ; Koole, Olivier ; Lynen, Lutgarde</creatorcontrib><description>Background For settings with limited laboratory capacity, 2013 World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines recommend targeted HIV-1 viral load (VL) testing to identify virological failure. We previously developed and validated a clinical prediction score (CPS) for targeted VL testing, relying on clinical, adherence and laboratory data. While outperforming the WHO failure criteria, it required substantial calculation and review of all previous laboratory tests. In response, we developed four simplified, less error-prone and broadly applicable CPS versions that can be done 'on the spot'. Methodology/Principal Findings From May 2010 to June 2011, we validated the original CPS in a non-governmental hospital in Phnom Penh, Cambodia applying the CPS to adults on first-line treatment &gt;1 year. Virological failure was defined as a single VL &gt;1000 copies/ml. The four CPSs included CPS1 with 'current CD4 count' instead of %-decline-from-peak CD4; CPS2 with hemoglobin measurements removed; CPS3 having 'decrease in CD4 count below baseline value' removed; CPS4 was purely clinical. Score development relied on the Spiegelhalter/Knill-Jones method. Variables independently associated with virological failure with a likelihood ratio greater than or equal to 1.5 or less than or equal to 0.67 were retained. CPS performance was evaluated based on the area-under-the-ROC-curve (AUROC) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The CPSs were validated in an independent dataset. A total of 1490 individuals (56.6% female, median age: 38 years (interquartile range (IQR 33-44)); median baseline CD4 count: 94 cells/ mu L (IQR 28-205), median time on antiretroviral therapy 3.6 years (IQR 2.1-5.1)), were included. Forty-five 45 (3.0%) individuals had virological failure. CPS1 yielded an AUROC of 0.69 (95% CI: 0.62-0.75) in validation, CPS2 an AUROC of 0.68 (95% CI: 0.62-0.74), and CPS3, an AUROC of 0.67 (95% CI: 0.61-0.73). The purely clinical CPS4 performed poorly (AUROC-0.59; 95% CI: 0.53-0.65). Conclusions Simplified CPSs retained acceptable accuracy as long as current CD4 count testing was included. Ease of field application and field accuracy remains to be defined.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087879</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Human immunodeficiency virus 1</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2014-02, Vol.9 (2)</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Griensven, Johan van</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phan, Vichet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thai, Sopheak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koole, Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lynen, Lutgarde</creatorcontrib><title>Simplified Clinical Prediction Scores to Target Viral Load Testing in Adults with Suspected First Line Treatment Failure in Phnom Penh, Cambodia: e87879</title><title>PloS one</title><description>Background For settings with limited laboratory capacity, 2013 World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines recommend targeted HIV-1 viral load (VL) testing to identify virological failure. We previously developed and validated a clinical prediction score (CPS) for targeted VL testing, relying on clinical, adherence and laboratory data. While outperforming the WHO failure criteria, it required substantial calculation and review of all previous laboratory tests. In response, we developed four simplified, less error-prone and broadly applicable CPS versions that can be done 'on the spot'. Methodology/Principal Findings From May 2010 to June 2011, we validated the original CPS in a non-governmental hospital in Phnom Penh, Cambodia applying the CPS to adults on first-line treatment &gt;1 year. Virological failure was defined as a single VL &gt;1000 copies/ml. The four CPSs included CPS1 with 'current CD4 count' instead of %-decline-from-peak CD4; CPS2 with hemoglobin measurements removed; CPS3 having 'decrease in CD4 count below baseline value' removed; CPS4 was purely clinical. Score development relied on the Spiegelhalter/Knill-Jones method. Variables independently associated with virological failure with a likelihood ratio greater than or equal to 1.5 or less than or equal to 0.67 were retained. CPS performance was evaluated based on the area-under-the-ROC-curve (AUROC) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The CPSs were validated in an independent dataset. A total of 1490 individuals (56.6% female, median age: 38 years (interquartile range (IQR 33-44)); median baseline CD4 count: 94 cells/ mu L (IQR 28-205), median time on antiretroviral therapy 3.6 years (IQR 2.1-5.1)), were included. Forty-five 45 (3.0%) individuals had virological failure. CPS1 yielded an AUROC of 0.69 (95% CI: 0.62-0.75) in validation, CPS2 an AUROC of 0.68 (95% CI: 0.62-0.74), and CPS3, an AUROC of 0.67 (95% CI: 0.61-0.73). The purely clinical CPS4 performed poorly (AUROC-0.59; 95% CI: 0.53-0.65). Conclusions Simplified CPSs retained acceptable accuracy as long as current CD4 count testing was included. Ease of field application and field accuracy remains to be defined.</description><subject>Human immunodeficiency virus 1</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVjjtOxDAURS0kJIbPDiheScEEO1Z-dCgiopgiUiLakUneTN7IsYM_Yissl4DYwFS3Offcy9i94ImQhXg62eiM0sliDSacl0VZVBdsIyqZbvOUyyt27f2J80yWeb5h3x3Ni6YD4Qi1JkOD0tA6HGkIZA10g3XoIVjolTtigHdyK7GzaoQefSBzBDLwMkYdPHxRmKCLfsEhrMKGnA-wI4PQO1RhRhOgUaSjw99WOxk7Q4tmeoRazR92JPUM-Pf5ll0elPZ495837KF57eu37eLsZ1yX9zP5AbVWBm30e5GJVKaZqEp5BvoDPlVjDA</recordid><startdate>20140201</startdate><enddate>20140201</enddate><creator>Griensven, Johan van</creator><creator>Phan, Vichet</creator><creator>Thai, Sopheak</creator><creator>Koole, Olivier</creator><creator>Lynen, Lutgarde</creator><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140201</creationdate><title>Simplified Clinical Prediction Scores to Target Viral Load Testing in Adults with Suspected First Line Treatment Failure in Phnom Penh, Cambodia: e87879</title><author>Griensven, Johan van ; Phan, Vichet ; Thai, Sopheak ; Koole, Olivier ; Lynen, Lutgarde</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_15123251983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Human immunodeficiency virus 1</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Griensven, Johan van</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phan, Vichet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thai, Sopheak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koole, Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lynen, Lutgarde</creatorcontrib><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Griensven, Johan van</au><au>Phan, Vichet</au><au>Thai, Sopheak</au><au>Koole, Olivier</au><au>Lynen, Lutgarde</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Simplified Clinical Prediction Scores to Target Viral Load Testing in Adults with Suspected First Line Treatment Failure in Phnom Penh, Cambodia: e87879</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><date>2014-02-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>2</issue><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Background For settings with limited laboratory capacity, 2013 World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines recommend targeted HIV-1 viral load (VL) testing to identify virological failure. We previously developed and validated a clinical prediction score (CPS) for targeted VL testing, relying on clinical, adherence and laboratory data. While outperforming the WHO failure criteria, it required substantial calculation and review of all previous laboratory tests. In response, we developed four simplified, less error-prone and broadly applicable CPS versions that can be done 'on the spot'. Methodology/Principal Findings From May 2010 to June 2011, we validated the original CPS in a non-governmental hospital in Phnom Penh, Cambodia applying the CPS to adults on first-line treatment &gt;1 year. Virological failure was defined as a single VL &gt;1000 copies/ml. The four CPSs included CPS1 with 'current CD4 count' instead of %-decline-from-peak CD4; CPS2 with hemoglobin measurements removed; CPS3 having 'decrease in CD4 count below baseline value' removed; CPS4 was purely clinical. Score development relied on the Spiegelhalter/Knill-Jones method. Variables independently associated with virological failure with a likelihood ratio greater than or equal to 1.5 or less than or equal to 0.67 were retained. CPS performance was evaluated based on the area-under-the-ROC-curve (AUROC) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The CPSs were validated in an independent dataset. A total of 1490 individuals (56.6% female, median age: 38 years (interquartile range (IQR 33-44)); median baseline CD4 count: 94 cells/ mu L (IQR 28-205), median time on antiretroviral therapy 3.6 years (IQR 2.1-5.1)), were included. Forty-five 45 (3.0%) individuals had virological failure. CPS1 yielded an AUROC of 0.69 (95% CI: 0.62-0.75) in validation, CPS2 an AUROC of 0.68 (95% CI: 0.62-0.74), and CPS3, an AUROC of 0.67 (95% CI: 0.61-0.73). The purely clinical CPS4 performed poorly (AUROC-0.59; 95% CI: 0.53-0.65). Conclusions Simplified CPSs retained acceptable accuracy as long as current CD4 count testing was included. Ease of field application and field accuracy remains to be defined.</abstract><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0087879</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2014-02, Vol.9 (2)
issn 1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1512325198
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
subjects Human immunodeficiency virus 1
title Simplified Clinical Prediction Scores to Target Viral Load Testing in Adults with Suspected First Line Treatment Failure in Phnom Penh, Cambodia: e87879
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T22%3A58%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Simplified%20Clinical%20Prediction%20Scores%20to%20Target%20Viral%20Load%20Testing%20in%20Adults%20with%20Suspected%20First%20Line%20Treatment%20Failure%20in%20Phnom%20Penh,%20Cambodia:%20e87879&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Griensven,%20Johan%20van&rft.date=2014-02-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=2&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0087879&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1512325198%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1512325198&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true