Social acceptance of low carbon energy and associated infrastructures: A critical discussion
The promotion of low carbon energy and associated infrastructures for tackling climate change is a central task for governments worldwide. However, public and, mainly, local, opposition to those infrastructures may slow down or even halt that process. Thus, in the last few years a body of research h...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Energy policy 2013-07, Vol.58, p.1-5 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 5 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Energy policy |
container_volume | 58 |
creator | Batel, Susana Devine-Wright, Patrick Tangeland, Torvald |
description | The promotion of low carbon energy and associated infrastructures for tackling climate change is a central task for governments worldwide. However, public and, mainly, local, opposition to those infrastructures may slow down or even halt that process. Thus, in the last few years a body of research has developed specifically to understand the social acceptance of technologies such as wind turbines or bioenergy plants. We argue that the use of ‘acceptance’ in this literature should be further discussed. We contend that using the word ‘acceptance’ may present some constraints for the theoretical advancement of this area of research and to the implications that may be taken from it to the wider society. This is further highlighted through the presentation of findings from surveys conducted with nationally representative samples from the UK and Norway which examined their acceptance of and support for new high voltage power lines. We conclude by suggesting that the literature on public responses towards low carbon energy and associated infrastructures should be more critical in the conceptualisation of its research agenda, become empirically more consistent and transparent, and examine other types of relations between people and energy infrastructures besides acceptance or opposition. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.03.018 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1512207259</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301421513001729</els_id><sourcerecordid>1458545705</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c571t-a4761d1eac3aef06b9f2de5ae0870711b92e57f3f43b79179593eca2e210b55a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1rFTEUhgdR8Fr9BS4MiOBmrjn5mEwEF6XYKhRc1O6EcCZzpuQyTa7JTKX_3lxvceFChQPZPO_LyXma5iXwLXDo3u22FPdp3goOcsvrQP-o2UBvZNsZYx43Gy45tEqAfto8K2XHOVe9VZvm21XyAWeG3tN-weiJpYnN6QfzmIcUGUXKN_cM48iwlAO80MhCnDKWJa9-WTOV9-yU-RyW4GvVGIpfSwkpPm-eTDgXevHwnjTX5x-_nn1qL79cfD47vWy9NrC0qEwHIxB6iTTxbrCTGEkj8d5wAzBYQdpMclJyMBaM1VaSR0EC-KA1ypPm7bF3n9P3lcribusONM8YKa3FgQYhuBE1909U6V4rbbj-DxRsZ7kVXUVf_4Hu0ppj_bMDqXqhrFKyUvJI-ZxKyTS5fQ63mO8dcHfw6Hbul0d38Oh4Hehr6s1DN5Z63nr36EP5HRVGirqHqdyrIzdhcniTK3N9VYu66tqIHnglPhwJqi7uAmVXfKCqfAyZ_OLGFP66yU-Tk7xg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1348249443</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Social acceptance of low carbon energy and associated infrastructures: A critical discussion</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Batel, Susana ; Devine-Wright, Patrick ; Tangeland, Torvald</creator><creatorcontrib>Batel, Susana ; Devine-Wright, Patrick ; Tangeland, Torvald</creatorcontrib><description>The promotion of low carbon energy and associated infrastructures for tackling climate change is a central task for governments worldwide. However, public and, mainly, local, opposition to those infrastructures may slow down or even halt that process. Thus, in the last few years a body of research has developed specifically to understand the social acceptance of technologies such as wind turbines or bioenergy plants. We argue that the use of ‘acceptance’ in this literature should be further discussed. We contend that using the word ‘acceptance’ may present some constraints for the theoretical advancement of this area of research and to the implications that may be taken from it to the wider society. This is further highlighted through the presentation of findings from surveys conducted with nationally representative samples from the UK and Norway which examined their acceptance of and support for new high voltage power lines. We conclude by suggesting that the literature on public responses towards low carbon energy and associated infrastructures should be more critical in the conceptualisation of its research agenda, become empirically more consistent and transparent, and examine other types of relations between people and energy infrastructures besides acceptance or opposition.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4215</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6777</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.03.018</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ENPYAC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Acceptance ; Acceptances ; Air pollution ; Applied sciences ; bioenergy ; Carbon ; Carbon emissions ; Clean technology ; Climate change ; Economic data ; Energy ; Energy economics ; Energy policy ; Exact sciences and technology ; General, economic and professional studies ; Global warming ; Infrastructure ; Low carbon and associated energy infrastructures ; Natural energy ; Norway ; people ; Public infrastructure ; Renewable energy ; Social acceptance and support ; Social sciences ; society ; Studies ; Surveys ; Technology ; United Kingdom ; Western Europe ; wind turbines</subject><ispartof>Energy policy, 2013-07, Vol.58, p.1-5</ispartof><rights>2013 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Jul 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c571t-a4761d1eac3aef06b9f2de5ae0870711b92e57f3f43b79179593eca2e210b55a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c571t-a4761d1eac3aef06b9f2de5ae0870711b92e57f3f43b79179593eca2e210b55a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.03.018$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27846,27847,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=27321967$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Batel, Susana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devine-Wright, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tangeland, Torvald</creatorcontrib><title>Social acceptance of low carbon energy and associated infrastructures: A critical discussion</title><title>Energy policy</title><description>The promotion of low carbon energy and associated infrastructures for tackling climate change is a central task for governments worldwide. However, public and, mainly, local, opposition to those infrastructures may slow down or even halt that process. Thus, in the last few years a body of research has developed specifically to understand the social acceptance of technologies such as wind turbines or bioenergy plants. We argue that the use of ‘acceptance’ in this literature should be further discussed. We contend that using the word ‘acceptance’ may present some constraints for the theoretical advancement of this area of research and to the implications that may be taken from it to the wider society. This is further highlighted through the presentation of findings from surveys conducted with nationally representative samples from the UK and Norway which examined their acceptance of and support for new high voltage power lines. We conclude by suggesting that the literature on public responses towards low carbon energy and associated infrastructures should be more critical in the conceptualisation of its research agenda, become empirically more consistent and transparent, and examine other types of relations between people and energy infrastructures besides acceptance or opposition.</description><subject>Acceptance</subject><subject>Acceptances</subject><subject>Air pollution</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>bioenergy</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Carbon emissions</subject><subject>Clean technology</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Economic data</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy economics</subject><subject>Energy policy</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>General, economic and professional studies</subject><subject>Global warming</subject><subject>Infrastructure</subject><subject>Low carbon and associated energy infrastructures</subject><subject>Natural energy</subject><subject>Norway</subject><subject>people</subject><subject>Public infrastructure</subject><subject>Renewable energy</subject><subject>Social acceptance and support</subject><subject>Social sciences</subject><subject>society</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><subject>Western Europe</subject><subject>wind turbines</subject><issn>0301-4215</issn><issn>1873-6777</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1rFTEUhgdR8Fr9BS4MiOBmrjn5mEwEF6XYKhRc1O6EcCZzpuQyTa7JTKX_3lxvceFChQPZPO_LyXma5iXwLXDo3u22FPdp3goOcsvrQP-o2UBvZNsZYx43Gy45tEqAfto8K2XHOVe9VZvm21XyAWeG3tN-weiJpYnN6QfzmIcUGUXKN_cM48iwlAO80MhCnDKWJa9-WTOV9-yU-RyW4GvVGIpfSwkpPm-eTDgXevHwnjTX5x-_nn1qL79cfD47vWy9NrC0qEwHIxB6iTTxbrCTGEkj8d5wAzBYQdpMclJyMBaM1VaSR0EC-KA1ypPm7bF3n9P3lcribusONM8YKa3FgQYhuBE1909U6V4rbbj-DxRsZ7kVXUVf_4Hu0ppj_bMDqXqhrFKyUvJI-ZxKyTS5fQ63mO8dcHfw6Hbul0d38Oh4Hehr6s1DN5Z63nr36EP5HRVGirqHqdyrIzdhcniTK3N9VYu66tqIHnglPhwJqi7uAmVXfKCqfAyZ_OLGFP66yU-Tk7xg</recordid><startdate>20130701</startdate><enddate>20130701</enddate><creator>Batel, Susana</creator><creator>Devine-Wright, Patrick</creator><creator>Tangeland, Torvald</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130701</creationdate><title>Social acceptance of low carbon energy and associated infrastructures: A critical discussion</title><author>Batel, Susana ; Devine-Wright, Patrick ; Tangeland, Torvald</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c571t-a4761d1eac3aef06b9f2de5ae0870711b92e57f3f43b79179593eca2e210b55a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Acceptance</topic><topic>Acceptances</topic><topic>Air pollution</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>bioenergy</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Carbon emissions</topic><topic>Clean technology</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Economic data</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy economics</topic><topic>Energy policy</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>General, economic and professional studies</topic><topic>Global warming</topic><topic>Infrastructure</topic><topic>Low carbon and associated energy infrastructures</topic><topic>Natural energy</topic><topic>Norway</topic><topic>people</topic><topic>Public infrastructure</topic><topic>Renewable energy</topic><topic>Social acceptance and support</topic><topic>Social sciences</topic><topic>society</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><topic>Western Europe</topic><topic>wind turbines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Batel, Susana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devine-Wright, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tangeland, Torvald</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Energy policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Batel, Susana</au><au>Devine-Wright, Patrick</au><au>Tangeland, Torvald</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Social acceptance of low carbon energy and associated infrastructures: A critical discussion</atitle><jtitle>Energy policy</jtitle><date>2013-07-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>58</volume><spage>1</spage><epage>5</epage><pages>1-5</pages><issn>0301-4215</issn><eissn>1873-6777</eissn><coden>ENPYAC</coden><abstract>The promotion of low carbon energy and associated infrastructures for tackling climate change is a central task for governments worldwide. However, public and, mainly, local, opposition to those infrastructures may slow down or even halt that process. Thus, in the last few years a body of research has developed specifically to understand the social acceptance of technologies such as wind turbines or bioenergy plants. We argue that the use of ‘acceptance’ in this literature should be further discussed. We contend that using the word ‘acceptance’ may present some constraints for the theoretical advancement of this area of research and to the implications that may be taken from it to the wider society. This is further highlighted through the presentation of findings from surveys conducted with nationally representative samples from the UK and Norway which examined their acceptance of and support for new high voltage power lines. We conclude by suggesting that the literature on public responses towards low carbon energy and associated infrastructures should be more critical in the conceptualisation of its research agenda, become empirically more consistent and transparent, and examine other types of relations between people and energy infrastructures besides acceptance or opposition.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.enpol.2013.03.018</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0301-4215 |
ispartof | Energy policy, 2013-07, Vol.58, p.1-5 |
issn | 0301-4215 1873-6777 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1512207259 |
source | PAIS Index; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Acceptance Acceptances Air pollution Applied sciences bioenergy Carbon Carbon emissions Clean technology Climate change Economic data Energy Energy economics Energy policy Exact sciences and technology General, economic and professional studies Global warming Infrastructure Low carbon and associated energy infrastructures Natural energy Norway people Public infrastructure Renewable energy Social acceptance and support Social sciences society Studies Surveys Technology United Kingdom Western Europe wind turbines |
title | Social acceptance of low carbon energy and associated infrastructures: A critical discussion |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T05%3A07%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Social%20acceptance%20of%20low%20carbon%20energy%20and%20associated%20infrastructures:%20A%20critical%20discussion&rft.jtitle=Energy%20policy&rft.au=Batel,%20Susana&rft.date=2013-07-01&rft.volume=58&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=5&rft.pages=1-5&rft.issn=0301-4215&rft.eissn=1873-6777&rft.coden=ENPYAC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.03.018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1458545705%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1348249443&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0301421513001729&rfr_iscdi=true |