Biomass production from the U.S. forest and agriculture sectors in support of a renewable electricity standard

Production of renewable energy from biomass has been promoted as means to improve greenhouse gas balance in energy production, improve energy security, and provide jobs and income. However, uncertainties remain as to how the agriculture and forest sectors might jointly respond to increased demand fo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Energy policy 2013-07, Vol.58, p.64-74
Hauptverfasser: White, Eric M., Latta, Greg, Alig, Ralph J., Skog, Kenneth E., Adams, Darius M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 74
container_issue
container_start_page 64
container_title Energy policy
container_volume 58
creator White, Eric M.
Latta, Greg
Alig, Ralph J.
Skog, Kenneth E.
Adams, Darius M.
description Production of renewable energy from biomass has been promoted as means to improve greenhouse gas balance in energy production, improve energy security, and provide jobs and income. However, uncertainties remain as to how the agriculture and forest sectors might jointly respond to increased demand for bioelectricity feedstocks and the potential environmental consequences of increased biomass production. We use an economic model to examine how the agriculture and forest sectors might combine to respond to increased demands for bioelectricity under simulated future national-level renewable electricity standards. Both sectors are projected to contribute biomass, although energy crops, like switchgrass, produced on agriculture land are projected to be the primary feedstocks. At the highest targets for bioelectricity production, we project increased conversion of forest to agriculture land in support of agriculture biomass production. Although land conversion takes place in response to renewable electricity mandates, we project only minor increases in forest and agriculture emissions. Similarly, crop prices were projected to generally be stable in the face of increased bioelectricity demand and displacement of traditional agriculture crops. ► We model the response of forest and agriculture to increased bioelectricity demand. ► The agriculture sector, through energy crop production, is the key biomass provider. ► Increased land exchange is projected for the highest bioelectricity demands. ► Land exchange from forest to agriculture yield the greatest changes in GHG flux. ► Agriculture and forestry must be accounted for when considering bioenergy policy.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.02.029
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1512207000</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301421513001146</els_id><sourcerecordid>2961503221</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c571t-c53fe8f33623daac33617d50781cdba29bcc99be10c0fb0d3263d9dde06332cc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc2KFDEUhQtRsJ3xCVwYEMFN1-QmqUpl4cIZ_IMBF2OvQyq50TTVSZlUKfP2k7YHFy504JJk8Z3DPTlN8wJoCxT6i32LcU5TyyjwlrI66lGzgUHybS-lfNxsKKewFQy6p82zUvaUUjEosWniZUgHUwqZc3KrXUKKxOd0IMt3JLv2piU-ZSwLMdER8y0Hu07LmpEUtEvKhYRIyjrPKS8keWJIxoi_zDghwakiVRCWW1KWqjfZnTdPvJkKPr-_z5rdh_dfrz5tr798_Hz17nprOwlLPbnHwXPeM-6MsfUB0nVUDmDdaJgarVVqRKCW-pE6znrulHNIe86ZtfyseXPyrbF-rHV_fQjF4jSZiGktGjpgjMr6Df9HRTd0QnLJHoCC6hUI3lX01V_oPq051swauBiYUKI_UvxE2ZxKyej1nMPB5FsNVB-b1Xv9u1l9bFZTVkdV1et7b1OsmXw20YbyR8okZ6CkqNzLE-dN0sfuit7dVKO-xpZsEFCJtycCaxc_A2ZdbMBo0YVcy9MuhX9ucgef9MNf</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1348249465</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Biomass production from the U.S. forest and agriculture sectors in support of a renewable electricity standard</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>White, Eric M. ; Latta, Greg ; Alig, Ralph J. ; Skog, Kenneth E. ; Adams, Darius M.</creator><creatorcontrib>White, Eric M. ; Latta, Greg ; Alig, Ralph J. ; Skog, Kenneth E. ; Adams, Darius M.</creatorcontrib><description>Production of renewable energy from biomass has been promoted as means to improve greenhouse gas balance in energy production, improve energy security, and provide jobs and income. However, uncertainties remain as to how the agriculture and forest sectors might jointly respond to increased demand for bioelectricity feedstocks and the potential environmental consequences of increased biomass production. We use an economic model to examine how the agriculture and forest sectors might combine to respond to increased demands for bioelectricity under simulated future national-level renewable electricity standards. Both sectors are projected to contribute biomass, although energy crops, like switchgrass, produced on agriculture land are projected to be the primary feedstocks. At the highest targets for bioelectricity production, we project increased conversion of forest to agriculture land in support of agriculture biomass production. Although land conversion takes place in response to renewable electricity mandates, we project only minor increases in forest and agriculture emissions. Similarly, crop prices were projected to generally be stable in the face of increased bioelectricity demand and displacement of traditional agriculture crops. ► We model the response of forest and agriculture to increased bioelectricity demand. ► The agriculture sector, through energy crop production, is the key biomass provider. ► Increased land exchange is projected for the highest bioelectricity demands. ► Land exchange from forest to agriculture yield the greatest changes in GHG flux. ► Agriculture and forestry must be accounted for when considering bioenergy policy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4215</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6777</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.02.029</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ENPYAC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Agricultural industry ; Agriculture ; Air pollution ; Applied sciences ; bioelectricity ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomass ; Biomass energy ; biomass production ; crop prices ; econometric models ; Economic data ; Economic models ; Economic theory ; Electric energy ; Electric power ; Electricity ; Electricity generation ; emissions ; employment ; Energy ; energy balance ; energy crops ; Energy economics ; Energy policy ; Environment ; Exact sciences and technology ; feedstocks ; Forest and agriculture ; Forest products industry ; Forestry ; forests ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General, economic and professional studies ; Generalities. Production, biomass. Quality of wood and forest products. General forest ecology ; greenhouse gases ; Income ; Land ; Land exchange ; land use change ; Natural energy ; Panicum virgatum ; Prices ; Production ; Production. Biomass ; Raw materials ; Renewable electricity standards ; Renewable energy sources ; Studies ; traditional farming ; U.S.A</subject><ispartof>Energy policy, 2013-07, Vol.58, p.64-74</ispartof><rights>2013 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Jul 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c571t-c53fe8f33623daac33617d50781cdba29bcc99be10c0fb0d3263d9dde06332cc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c571t-c53fe8f33623daac33617d50781cdba29bcc99be10c0fb0d3263d9dde06332cc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.02.029$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27844,27845,27903,27904,45974</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=27321974$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>White, Eric M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Latta, Greg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alig, Ralph J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skog, Kenneth E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, Darius M.</creatorcontrib><title>Biomass production from the U.S. forest and agriculture sectors in support of a renewable electricity standard</title><title>Energy policy</title><description>Production of renewable energy from biomass has been promoted as means to improve greenhouse gas balance in energy production, improve energy security, and provide jobs and income. However, uncertainties remain as to how the agriculture and forest sectors might jointly respond to increased demand for bioelectricity feedstocks and the potential environmental consequences of increased biomass production. We use an economic model to examine how the agriculture and forest sectors might combine to respond to increased demands for bioelectricity under simulated future national-level renewable electricity standards. Both sectors are projected to contribute biomass, although energy crops, like switchgrass, produced on agriculture land are projected to be the primary feedstocks. At the highest targets for bioelectricity production, we project increased conversion of forest to agriculture land in support of agriculture biomass production. Although land conversion takes place in response to renewable electricity mandates, we project only minor increases in forest and agriculture emissions. Similarly, crop prices were projected to generally be stable in the face of increased bioelectricity demand and displacement of traditional agriculture crops. ► We model the response of forest and agriculture to increased bioelectricity demand. ► The agriculture sector, through energy crop production, is the key biomass provider. ► Increased land exchange is projected for the highest bioelectricity demands. ► Land exchange from forest to agriculture yield the greatest changes in GHG flux. ► Agriculture and forestry must be accounted for when considering bioenergy policy.</description><subject>Agricultural industry</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Air pollution</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>bioelectricity</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Biomass energy</subject><subject>biomass production</subject><subject>crop prices</subject><subject>econometric models</subject><subject>Economic data</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Electric energy</subject><subject>Electric power</subject><subject>Electricity</subject><subject>Electricity generation</subject><subject>emissions</subject><subject>employment</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>energy balance</subject><subject>energy crops</subject><subject>Energy economics</subject><subject>Energy policy</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>feedstocks</subject><subject>Forest and agriculture</subject><subject>Forest products industry</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>forests</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General, economic and professional studies</subject><subject>Generalities. Production, biomass. Quality of wood and forest products. General forest ecology</subject><subject>greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Income</subject><subject>Land</subject><subject>Land exchange</subject><subject>land use change</subject><subject>Natural energy</subject><subject>Panicum virgatum</subject><subject>Prices</subject><subject>Production</subject><subject>Production. Biomass</subject><subject>Raw materials</subject><subject>Renewable electricity standards</subject><subject>Renewable energy sources</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>traditional farming</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><issn>0301-4215</issn><issn>1873-6777</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc2KFDEUhQtRsJ3xCVwYEMFN1-QmqUpl4cIZ_IMBF2OvQyq50TTVSZlUKfP2k7YHFy504JJk8Z3DPTlN8wJoCxT6i32LcU5TyyjwlrI66lGzgUHybS-lfNxsKKewFQy6p82zUvaUUjEosWniZUgHUwqZc3KrXUKKxOd0IMt3JLv2piU-ZSwLMdER8y0Hu07LmpEUtEvKhYRIyjrPKS8keWJIxoi_zDghwakiVRCWW1KWqjfZnTdPvJkKPr-_z5rdh_dfrz5tr798_Hz17nprOwlLPbnHwXPeM-6MsfUB0nVUDmDdaJgarVVqRKCW-pE6znrulHNIe86ZtfyseXPyrbF-rHV_fQjF4jSZiGktGjpgjMr6Df9HRTd0QnLJHoCC6hUI3lX01V_oPq051swauBiYUKI_UvxE2ZxKyej1nMPB5FsNVB-b1Xv9u1l9bFZTVkdV1et7b1OsmXw20YbyR8okZ6CkqNzLE-dN0sfuit7dVKO-xpZsEFCJtycCaxc_A2ZdbMBo0YVcy9MuhX9ucgef9MNf</recordid><startdate>20130701</startdate><enddate>20130701</enddate><creator>White, Eric M.</creator><creator>Latta, Greg</creator><creator>Alig, Ralph J.</creator><creator>Skog, Kenneth E.</creator><creator>Adams, Darius M.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130701</creationdate><title>Biomass production from the U.S. forest and agriculture sectors in support of a renewable electricity standard</title><author>White, Eric M. ; Latta, Greg ; Alig, Ralph J. ; Skog, Kenneth E. ; Adams, Darius M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c571t-c53fe8f33623daac33617d50781cdba29bcc99be10c0fb0d3263d9dde06332cc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Agricultural industry</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Air pollution</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>bioelectricity</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Biomass energy</topic><topic>biomass production</topic><topic>crop prices</topic><topic>econometric models</topic><topic>Economic data</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Electric energy</topic><topic>Electric power</topic><topic>Electricity</topic><topic>Electricity generation</topic><topic>emissions</topic><topic>employment</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>energy balance</topic><topic>energy crops</topic><topic>Energy economics</topic><topic>Energy policy</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>feedstocks</topic><topic>Forest and agriculture</topic><topic>Forest products industry</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>forests</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General, economic and professional studies</topic><topic>Generalities. Production, biomass. Quality of wood and forest products. General forest ecology</topic><topic>greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Income</topic><topic>Land</topic><topic>Land exchange</topic><topic>land use change</topic><topic>Natural energy</topic><topic>Panicum virgatum</topic><topic>Prices</topic><topic>Production</topic><topic>Production. Biomass</topic><topic>Raw materials</topic><topic>Renewable electricity standards</topic><topic>Renewable energy sources</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>traditional farming</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>White, Eric M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Latta, Greg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alig, Ralph J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skog, Kenneth E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, Darius M.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Energy policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>White, Eric M.</au><au>Latta, Greg</au><au>Alig, Ralph J.</au><au>Skog, Kenneth E.</au><au>Adams, Darius M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Biomass production from the U.S. forest and agriculture sectors in support of a renewable electricity standard</atitle><jtitle>Energy policy</jtitle><date>2013-07-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>58</volume><spage>64</spage><epage>74</epage><pages>64-74</pages><issn>0301-4215</issn><eissn>1873-6777</eissn><coden>ENPYAC</coden><abstract>Production of renewable energy from biomass has been promoted as means to improve greenhouse gas balance in energy production, improve energy security, and provide jobs and income. However, uncertainties remain as to how the agriculture and forest sectors might jointly respond to increased demand for bioelectricity feedstocks and the potential environmental consequences of increased biomass production. We use an economic model to examine how the agriculture and forest sectors might combine to respond to increased demands for bioelectricity under simulated future national-level renewable electricity standards. Both sectors are projected to contribute biomass, although energy crops, like switchgrass, produced on agriculture land are projected to be the primary feedstocks. At the highest targets for bioelectricity production, we project increased conversion of forest to agriculture land in support of agriculture biomass production. Although land conversion takes place in response to renewable electricity mandates, we project only minor increases in forest and agriculture emissions. Similarly, crop prices were projected to generally be stable in the face of increased bioelectricity demand and displacement of traditional agriculture crops. ► We model the response of forest and agriculture to increased bioelectricity demand. ► The agriculture sector, through energy crop production, is the key biomass provider. ► Increased land exchange is projected for the highest bioelectricity demands. ► Land exchange from forest to agriculture yield the greatest changes in GHG flux. ► Agriculture and forestry must be accounted for when considering bioenergy policy.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.enpol.2013.02.029</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-4215
ispartof Energy policy, 2013-07, Vol.58, p.64-74
issn 0301-4215
1873-6777
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1512207000
source PAIS Index; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Agricultural industry
Agriculture
Air pollution
Applied sciences
bioelectricity
Biological and medical sciences
Biomass
Biomass energy
biomass production
crop prices
econometric models
Economic data
Economic models
Economic theory
Electric energy
Electric power
Electricity
Electricity generation
emissions
employment
Energy
energy balance
energy crops
Energy economics
Energy policy
Environment
Exact sciences and technology
feedstocks
Forest and agriculture
Forest products industry
Forestry
forests
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General, economic and professional studies
Generalities. Production, biomass. Quality of wood and forest products. General forest ecology
greenhouse gases
Income
Land
Land exchange
land use change
Natural energy
Panicum virgatum
Prices
Production
Production. Biomass
Raw materials
Renewable electricity standards
Renewable energy sources
Studies
traditional farming
U.S.A
title Biomass production from the U.S. forest and agriculture sectors in support of a renewable electricity standard
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T07%3A56%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Biomass%20production%20from%20the%20U.S.%20forest%20and%20agriculture%20sectors%20in%20support%20of%20a%20renewable%20electricity%20standard&rft.jtitle=Energy%20policy&rft.au=White,%20Eric%20M.&rft.date=2013-07-01&rft.volume=58&rft.spage=64&rft.epage=74&rft.pages=64-74&rft.issn=0301-4215&rft.eissn=1873-6777&rft.coden=ENPYAC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.02.029&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2961503221%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1348249465&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0301421513001146&rfr_iscdi=true