Clinical Effectiveness of Basic Root Canal Treatment after 24 Months: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract Introduction The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of basic root canal treatment (BRT) with tactile working length determination in terms of radiographic and clinical outcome parameters compared with endodontic treatment with standard radiographic working length con...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of endodontics 2014-04, Vol.40 (4), p.465-470
Hauptverfasser: Jordan, Rainer A., MSc, DDS, PhD, Holzner, Anna L., DDS, Markovic, Ljubisa, DDS, Brueckner, Inga, DDS, Zimmer, Stefan, MPHD, DDS, PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 470
container_issue 4
container_start_page 465
container_title Journal of endodontics
container_volume 40
creator Jordan, Rainer A., MSc, DDS, PhD
Holzner, Anna L., DDS
Markovic, Ljubisa, DDS
Brueckner, Inga, DDS
Zimmer, Stefan, MPHD, DDS, PhD
description Abstract Introduction The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of basic root canal treatment (BRT) with tactile working length determination in terms of radiographic and clinical outcome parameters compared with endodontic treatment with standard radiographic working length control. Methods This was a clinical, multicenter, controlled, open-label trial to evaluate BRT effectiveness after 24 months. The primary end point was the apical extension score of the radiographic quality parameter of root canal fillings. The secondary radiographic end point was the periapical index, and the secondary clinical end point was tooth tender to percussion. The safety end point was tooth loss as a consequence of endodontic failure. Statistical analyses of binary and categoric data were calculated using cross tables and the chi-square test. Results BRT with tactile working length determination compared with standard radiographic working length control did not significantly differ in terms of radiographic and clinical outcomes after 24 months. The apical extension of the root canal fillings and the periapical anatomic structures showed no significant differences according to radiographic analyses ( P = .5). Corresponding results were found in clinical aspects of tooth tender to percussion ( P = .6) and tooth loss ( P = .7). Conclusions Tactile working length determination in BRT resulted in comparable treatment outcomes compared with standard endodontic treatment with radiographic working length control and turned out to be an accurate method in BRT.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.joen.2013.10.028
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1510711382</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0099239913009746</els_id><sourcerecordid>1510711382</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-a280dd68e5d9444fdf1962eaad401de2eea5dd8631d390b9336915066ca345b93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9v1DAQxS0EotvCF-CAfOSSxWM7TowQUonKH6lVpbKcLdeeCIckLna2Uvn0dbQLBw6cPH56b6T5PUJeAdsCA_V22A4R5y1nIIqwZbx9QjbQNm0l6lo-JRvGtK640PqEnOY8MAaNEM1zcsKlUqrVYkNcN4Y5ODvSi75Ht4R7nDFnGnv60ebg6E2MC-3sXBy7hHaZcF6o7RdMlEt6FeflR35Hz-mNnX2cwm_0tCtiiuNYxl0KdnxBnvV2zPjy-J6R758udt2X6vL689fu_LJyEmCpLG-Z96rF2mspZe970IqjtV4y8MgRbe19qwR4odmtFkJpqJlSzgpZl_8ZeXPYe5firz3mxUwhOxxHO2PcZwM1sAZAtLxY-cHqUsw5YW_uUphsejDAzArXDGaFa1a4q1bgltDr4_797YT-b-QPzWJ4fzBgufI-YDLZBZwd-pAKW-Nj-P_-D__E3bGcn_iAeYj7VGood5jMDTPf1nrXdkGUqZFKPAKKG58b</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1510711382</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical Effectiveness of Basic Root Canal Treatment after 24 Months: A Randomized Controlled Trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Jordan, Rainer A., MSc, DDS, PhD ; Holzner, Anna L., DDS ; Markovic, Ljubisa, DDS ; Brueckner, Inga, DDS ; Zimmer, Stefan, MPHD, DDS, PhD</creator><creatorcontrib>Jordan, Rainer A., MSc, DDS, PhD ; Holzner, Anna L., DDS ; Markovic, Ljubisa, DDS ; Brueckner, Inga, DDS ; Zimmer, Stefan, MPHD, DDS, PhD</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Introduction The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of basic root canal treatment (BRT) with tactile working length determination in terms of radiographic and clinical outcome parameters compared with endodontic treatment with standard radiographic working length control. Methods This was a clinical, multicenter, controlled, open-label trial to evaluate BRT effectiveness after 24 months. The primary end point was the apical extension score of the radiographic quality parameter of root canal fillings. The secondary radiographic end point was the periapical index, and the secondary clinical end point was tooth tender to percussion. The safety end point was tooth loss as a consequence of endodontic failure. Statistical analyses of binary and categoric data were calculated using cross tables and the chi-square test. Results BRT with tactile working length determination compared with standard radiographic working length control did not significantly differ in terms of radiographic and clinical outcomes after 24 months. The apical extension of the root canal fillings and the periapical anatomic structures showed no significant differences according to radiographic analyses ( P = .5). Corresponding results were found in clinical aspects of tooth tender to percussion ( P = .6) and tooth loss ( P = .7). Conclusions Tactile working length determination in BRT resulted in comparable treatment outcomes compared with standard endodontic treatment with radiographic working length control and turned out to be an accurate method in BRT.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0099-2399</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-3554</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.10.028</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24666893</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Clinical trial ; Composite Resins - chemistry ; Dental Materials - chemistry ; dental pulp cavity ; Dental Pulp Cavity - diagnostic imaging ; dental pulp diseases ; Dental Restoration, Permanent - methods ; Dentistry ; Endocrinology &amp; Metabolism ; endodontics ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Male ; Methacrylates - chemistry ; Middle Aged ; Percussion ; Periapical Tissue - diagnostic imaging ; Pulpitis - therapy ; Radiography ; Resin Cements - chemistry ; Root Canal Filling Materials - therapeutic use ; Root Canal Obturation - methods ; Root Canal Therapy - methods ; Root Canal Therapy - standards ; Tooth Apex - diagnostic imaging ; Tooth Loss - etiology ; Toothache - etiology ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of endodontics, 2014-04, Vol.40 (4), p.465-470</ispartof><rights>American Association of Endodontists</rights><rights>2014 American Association of Endodontists</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 American Association of Endodontists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-a280dd68e5d9444fdf1962eaad401de2eea5dd8631d390b9336915066ca345b93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-a280dd68e5d9444fdf1962eaad401de2eea5dd8631d390b9336915066ca345b93</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6697-2548</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0099239913009746$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24666893$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jordan, Rainer A., MSc, DDS, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holzner, Anna L., DDS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Markovic, Ljubisa, DDS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brueckner, Inga, DDS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zimmer, Stefan, MPHD, DDS, PhD</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical Effectiveness of Basic Root Canal Treatment after 24 Months: A Randomized Controlled Trial</title><title>Journal of endodontics</title><addtitle>J Endod</addtitle><description>Abstract Introduction The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of basic root canal treatment (BRT) with tactile working length determination in terms of radiographic and clinical outcome parameters compared with endodontic treatment with standard radiographic working length control. Methods This was a clinical, multicenter, controlled, open-label trial to evaluate BRT effectiveness after 24 months. The primary end point was the apical extension score of the radiographic quality parameter of root canal fillings. The secondary radiographic end point was the periapical index, and the secondary clinical end point was tooth tender to percussion. The safety end point was tooth loss as a consequence of endodontic failure. Statistical analyses of binary and categoric data were calculated using cross tables and the chi-square test. Results BRT with tactile working length determination compared with standard radiographic working length control did not significantly differ in terms of radiographic and clinical outcomes after 24 months. The apical extension of the root canal fillings and the periapical anatomic structures showed no significant differences according to radiographic analyses ( P = .5). Corresponding results were found in clinical aspects of tooth tender to percussion ( P = .6) and tooth loss ( P = .7). Conclusions Tactile working length determination in BRT resulted in comparable treatment outcomes compared with standard endodontic treatment with radiographic working length control and turned out to be an accurate method in BRT.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Clinical trial</subject><subject>Composite Resins - chemistry</subject><subject>Dental Materials - chemistry</subject><subject>dental pulp cavity</subject><subject>Dental Pulp Cavity - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>dental pulp diseases</subject><subject>Dental Restoration, Permanent - methods</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Endocrinology &amp; Metabolism</subject><subject>endodontics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Methacrylates - chemistry</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Percussion</subject><subject>Periapical Tissue - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Pulpitis - therapy</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Resin Cements - chemistry</subject><subject>Root Canal Filling Materials - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Root Canal Obturation - methods</subject><subject>Root Canal Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Root Canal Therapy - standards</subject><subject>Tooth Apex - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Tooth Loss - etiology</subject><subject>Toothache - etiology</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0099-2399</issn><issn>1878-3554</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9v1DAQxS0EotvCF-CAfOSSxWM7TowQUonKH6lVpbKcLdeeCIckLna2Uvn0dbQLBw6cPH56b6T5PUJeAdsCA_V22A4R5y1nIIqwZbx9QjbQNm0l6lo-JRvGtK640PqEnOY8MAaNEM1zcsKlUqrVYkNcN4Y5ODvSi75Ht4R7nDFnGnv60ebg6E2MC-3sXBy7hHaZcF6o7RdMlEt6FeflR35Hz-mNnX2cwm_0tCtiiuNYxl0KdnxBnvV2zPjy-J6R758udt2X6vL689fu_LJyEmCpLG-Z96rF2mspZe970IqjtV4y8MgRbe19qwR4odmtFkJpqJlSzgpZl_8ZeXPYe5firz3mxUwhOxxHO2PcZwM1sAZAtLxY-cHqUsw5YW_uUphsejDAzArXDGaFa1a4q1bgltDr4_797YT-b-QPzWJ4fzBgufI-YDLZBZwd-pAKW-Nj-P_-D__E3bGcn_iAeYj7VGood5jMDTPf1nrXdkGUqZFKPAKKG58b</recordid><startdate>20140401</startdate><enddate>20140401</enddate><creator>Jordan, Rainer A., MSc, DDS, PhD</creator><creator>Holzner, Anna L., DDS</creator><creator>Markovic, Ljubisa, DDS</creator><creator>Brueckner, Inga, DDS</creator><creator>Zimmer, Stefan, MPHD, DDS, PhD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6697-2548</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20140401</creationdate><title>Clinical Effectiveness of Basic Root Canal Treatment after 24 Months: A Randomized Controlled Trial</title><author>Jordan, Rainer A., MSc, DDS, PhD ; Holzner, Anna L., DDS ; Markovic, Ljubisa, DDS ; Brueckner, Inga, DDS ; Zimmer, Stefan, MPHD, DDS, PhD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-a280dd68e5d9444fdf1962eaad401de2eea5dd8631d390b9336915066ca345b93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Clinical trial</topic><topic>Composite Resins - chemistry</topic><topic>Dental Materials - chemistry</topic><topic>dental pulp cavity</topic><topic>Dental Pulp Cavity - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>dental pulp diseases</topic><topic>Dental Restoration, Permanent - methods</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Endocrinology &amp; Metabolism</topic><topic>endodontics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Methacrylates - chemistry</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Percussion</topic><topic>Periapical Tissue - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Pulpitis - therapy</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Resin Cements - chemistry</topic><topic>Root Canal Filling Materials - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Root Canal Obturation - methods</topic><topic>Root Canal Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Root Canal Therapy - standards</topic><topic>Tooth Apex - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Tooth Loss - etiology</topic><topic>Toothache - etiology</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jordan, Rainer A., MSc, DDS, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holzner, Anna L., DDS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Markovic, Ljubisa, DDS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brueckner, Inga, DDS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zimmer, Stefan, MPHD, DDS, PhD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of endodontics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jordan, Rainer A., MSc, DDS, PhD</au><au>Holzner, Anna L., DDS</au><au>Markovic, Ljubisa, DDS</au><au>Brueckner, Inga, DDS</au><au>Zimmer, Stefan, MPHD, DDS, PhD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical Effectiveness of Basic Root Canal Treatment after 24 Months: A Randomized Controlled Trial</atitle><jtitle>Journal of endodontics</jtitle><addtitle>J Endod</addtitle><date>2014-04-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>465</spage><epage>470</epage><pages>465-470</pages><issn>0099-2399</issn><eissn>1878-3554</eissn><abstract>Abstract Introduction The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of basic root canal treatment (BRT) with tactile working length determination in terms of radiographic and clinical outcome parameters compared with endodontic treatment with standard radiographic working length control. Methods This was a clinical, multicenter, controlled, open-label trial to evaluate BRT effectiveness after 24 months. The primary end point was the apical extension score of the radiographic quality parameter of root canal fillings. The secondary radiographic end point was the periapical index, and the secondary clinical end point was tooth tender to percussion. The safety end point was tooth loss as a consequence of endodontic failure. Statistical analyses of binary and categoric data were calculated using cross tables and the chi-square test. Results BRT with tactile working length determination compared with standard radiographic working length control did not significantly differ in terms of radiographic and clinical outcomes after 24 months. The apical extension of the root canal fillings and the periapical anatomic structures showed no significant differences according to radiographic analyses ( P = .5). Corresponding results were found in clinical aspects of tooth tender to percussion ( P = .6) and tooth loss ( P = .7). Conclusions Tactile working length determination in BRT resulted in comparable treatment outcomes compared with standard endodontic treatment with radiographic working length control and turned out to be an accurate method in BRT.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>24666893</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.joen.2013.10.028</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6697-2548</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0099-2399
ispartof Journal of endodontics, 2014-04, Vol.40 (4), p.465-470
issn 0099-2399
1878-3554
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1510711382
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Clinical trial
Composite Resins - chemistry
Dental Materials - chemistry
dental pulp cavity
Dental Pulp Cavity - diagnostic imaging
dental pulp diseases
Dental Restoration, Permanent - methods
Dentistry
Endocrinology & Metabolism
endodontics
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Male
Methacrylates - chemistry
Middle Aged
Percussion
Periapical Tissue - diagnostic imaging
Pulpitis - therapy
Radiography
Resin Cements - chemistry
Root Canal Filling Materials - therapeutic use
Root Canal Obturation - methods
Root Canal Therapy - methods
Root Canal Therapy - standards
Tooth Apex - diagnostic imaging
Tooth Loss - etiology
Toothache - etiology
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult
title Clinical Effectiveness of Basic Root Canal Treatment after 24 Months: A Randomized Controlled Trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T09%3A29%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20Effectiveness%20of%20Basic%20Root%20Canal%20Treatment%20after%2024%20Months:%20A%20Randomized%20Controlled%20Trial&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20endodontics&rft.au=Jordan,%20Rainer%20A.,%20MSc,%20DDS,%20PhD&rft.date=2014-04-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=465&rft.epage=470&rft.pages=465-470&rft.issn=0099-2399&rft.eissn=1878-3554&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.joen.2013.10.028&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1510711382%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1510711382&rft_id=info:pmid/24666893&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0099239913009746&rfr_iscdi=true