Outcome and clinical significance of delayed endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair

Objective Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is considered the standard therapy for most patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Endoleak is a well-known EVAR-related complication that requires long-term follow-up. However, patient follow-up is often challenging outside clinical trials. We s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of vascular surgery 2014-04, Vol.59 (4), p.915-920
Hauptverfasser: Zhou, Wei, MD, Blay, Eddie, BA, Varu, Vinit, MD, Ali, Syed, BS, Jin, Michelle Qiushuang, BA, Sun, Lisa, MS, Joh, Jin Hyun, MD, PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 920
container_issue 4
container_start_page 915
container_title Journal of vascular surgery
container_volume 59
creator Zhou, Wei, MD
Blay, Eddie, BA
Varu, Vinit, MD
Ali, Syed, BS
Jin, Michelle Qiushuang, BA
Sun, Lisa, MS
Joh, Jin Hyun, MD, PhD
description Objective Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is considered the standard therapy for most patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Endoleak is a well-known EVAR-related complication that requires long-term follow-up. However, patient follow-up is often challenging outside clinical trials. We sought to evaluate the incidence and the effect of delayed endoleaks in a Veterans Administration (VA) health care system where long-term follow-up is ensured. Methods We retrospectively evaluated 213 consecutive patients who underwent EVAR at a referral Veterans Administration medical center. Age, aneurysm size, patency of lumbar and inferior mesenteric arteries, and follow-up evaluations were recorded. Type of endoleak, date of detection, and intervention were also documented. Patients who had 1 year after EVAR. All except one nontype II endoleak received prompt secondary interventions, and the one without intervention presented with aneurysm rupture. An isolated type II endoleak was detected in 34 patients at an average of 14.4 months (range, 0-76 months) after EVAR, 41% of which were detected >1 year after EVAR. Patients without a documented endoleak had a significant decrease in aneurysm size at the latest computed tomography evaluation compared to the preoperative size (4.8 vs 5.7 cm; P  < .001), whereas those with isolated type II endoleak had an increase at the latest computed tomography follow-up compared to preoperative size (5.8 vs 5.7 cm). Importantly, 59% of the patients with a type II endoleak had significant AAA enlargement (0.8 cm), and delayed type II endoleak was significantly associated with sac enlargement compared to type II endoleaks detected early. No significant correlation was seen between the diameter of inferior mesenteric artery or lumbar to AAA enlargement among the patients with a type II endoleak. Secondary interventions in 12 patients with isolated type II endoleak resulted in overall aneurysm stabilization or regression. Conclusions This long-term outcome study demonstrated that delayed endoleaks
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.10.093
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1510400670</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0741521413020016</els_id><sourcerecordid>1510400670</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-42f59cf9421f9b834f7d9f62b0287124ea3af817396c317b0a23cf381cea74bb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9r3DAQxUVoaTZJP0AuwcdevJ2RZMsmUCihTQuBHNoechKyPApy_Gcj2Qv77St3kx566Eka8d5j9HuMXSJsEbD82G27fdxyQJHmLdTihG0QapWXFdRv2AaUxLzgKE_ZWYwdAGJRqXfslEtRQlHJDXu4X2Y7DZSZsc1s70dvTZ9F_zh6l66jpWxyWUu9OVCb0dhOPZmnmBk3U_gz7020S29CSqAlHOKQBdoZHy7YW2f6SO9fznP26-uXnzff8rv72-83n-9yW6Cac8ldUVtXS46ubiohnWprV_IGeKWQSzLCuAqVqEsrUDVguLBOVGjJKNk04px9OObuwvS8UJz14KOlvk_7TEvUWCBIgFJBkuJRasMUYyCnd8EPJhw0gl6J6k4nonoluj4loslz9RK_NAO1fx2vCJPg-iig9Mm9p6Cj9ZTAtT6QnXU7-f_Gf_rH_VrCEx0odtMSxkRPo45cg_6xVro2igJ46rMUvwEM7pv0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1510400670</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Outcome and clinical significance of delayed endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Zhou, Wei, MD ; Blay, Eddie, BA ; Varu, Vinit, MD ; Ali, Syed, BS ; Jin, Michelle Qiushuang, BA ; Sun, Lisa, MS ; Joh, Jin Hyun, MD, PhD</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Wei, MD ; Blay, Eddie, BA ; Varu, Vinit, MD ; Ali, Syed, BS ; Jin, Michelle Qiushuang, BA ; Sun, Lisa, MS ; Joh, Jin Hyun, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><description>Objective Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is considered the standard therapy for most patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Endoleak is a well-known EVAR-related complication that requires long-term follow-up. However, patient follow-up is often challenging outside clinical trials. We sought to evaluate the incidence and the effect of delayed endoleaks in a Veterans Administration (VA) health care system where long-term follow-up is ensured. Methods We retrospectively evaluated 213 consecutive patients who underwent EVAR at a referral Veterans Administration medical center. Age, aneurysm size, patency of lumbar and inferior mesenteric arteries, and follow-up evaluations were recorded. Type of endoleak, date of detection, and intervention were also documented. Patients who had &lt;1 year of follow-up were excluded. The χ2 test, Student t -test, Mann-Whitney test, and Spearman correlation were used for data analysis. Results The analysis included 183 patients with a mean follow-up of 53 months (range, 12-141 months); of these, 48 patients (26%) had endoleaks, and 31 (17%) had aneurysm progression. The mean diagnosis time for nontype II (n = 14) endoleaks was 45 months (range, 3-127 months), and 71% were diagnosed &gt;1 year after EVAR. All except one nontype II endoleak received prompt secondary interventions, and the one without intervention presented with aneurysm rupture. An isolated type II endoleak was detected in 34 patients at an average of 14.4 months (range, 0-76 months) after EVAR, 41% of which were detected &gt;1 year after EVAR. Patients without a documented endoleak had a significant decrease in aneurysm size at the latest computed tomography evaluation compared to the preoperative size (4.8 vs 5.7 cm; P  &lt; .001), whereas those with isolated type II endoleak had an increase at the latest computed tomography follow-up compared to preoperative size (5.8 vs 5.7 cm). Importantly, 59% of the patients with a type II endoleak had significant AAA enlargement (0.8 cm), and delayed type II endoleak was significantly associated with sac enlargement compared to type II endoleaks detected early. No significant correlation was seen between the diameter of inferior mesenteric artery or lumbar to AAA enlargement among the patients with a type II endoleak. Secondary interventions in 12 patients with isolated type II endoleak resulted in overall aneurysm stabilization or regression. Conclusions This long-term outcome study demonstrated that delayed endoleaks appearing &gt;1 year after EVAR contributed to most of the overall endoleaks and were significantly associated with aneurysm sac growth. This study underscores that type II endoleak is not benign and that vigilant lifelong surveillance after EVAR is critical.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0741-5214</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6809</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.10.093</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24360584</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - diagnosis ; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - mortality ; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - surgery ; Aortography - methods ; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects ; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - mortality ; Chi-Square Distribution ; Disease Progression ; Disease-Free Survival ; Electronic Health Records ; Endoleak - diagnosis ; Endoleak - etiology ; Endoleak - mortality ; Endoleak - therapy ; Endovascular Procedures - adverse effects ; Endovascular Procedures - mortality ; Humans ; Kaplan-Meier Estimate ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Surgery ; Time Factors ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Treatment Outcome ; United States ; United States Department of Veterans Affairs</subject><ispartof>Journal of vascular surgery, 2014-04, Vol.59 (4), p.915-920</ispartof><rights>2014</rights><rights>Published by Mosby, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-42f59cf9421f9b834f7d9f62b0287124ea3af817396c317b0a23cf381cea74bb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-42f59cf9421f9b834f7d9f62b0287124ea3af817396c317b0a23cf381cea74bb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2013.10.093$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24360584$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Wei, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blay, Eddie, BA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varu, Vinit, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ali, Syed, BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jin, Michelle Qiushuang, BA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Lisa, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joh, Jin Hyun, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><title>Outcome and clinical significance of delayed endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair</title><title>Journal of vascular surgery</title><addtitle>J Vasc Surg</addtitle><description>Objective Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is considered the standard therapy for most patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Endoleak is a well-known EVAR-related complication that requires long-term follow-up. However, patient follow-up is often challenging outside clinical trials. We sought to evaluate the incidence and the effect of delayed endoleaks in a Veterans Administration (VA) health care system where long-term follow-up is ensured. Methods We retrospectively evaluated 213 consecutive patients who underwent EVAR at a referral Veterans Administration medical center. Age, aneurysm size, patency of lumbar and inferior mesenteric arteries, and follow-up evaluations were recorded. Type of endoleak, date of detection, and intervention were also documented. Patients who had &lt;1 year of follow-up were excluded. The χ2 test, Student t -test, Mann-Whitney test, and Spearman correlation were used for data analysis. Results The analysis included 183 patients with a mean follow-up of 53 months (range, 12-141 months); of these, 48 patients (26%) had endoleaks, and 31 (17%) had aneurysm progression. The mean diagnosis time for nontype II (n = 14) endoleaks was 45 months (range, 3-127 months), and 71% were diagnosed &gt;1 year after EVAR. All except one nontype II endoleak received prompt secondary interventions, and the one without intervention presented with aneurysm rupture. An isolated type II endoleak was detected in 34 patients at an average of 14.4 months (range, 0-76 months) after EVAR, 41% of which were detected &gt;1 year after EVAR. Patients without a documented endoleak had a significant decrease in aneurysm size at the latest computed tomography evaluation compared to the preoperative size (4.8 vs 5.7 cm; P  &lt; .001), whereas those with isolated type II endoleak had an increase at the latest computed tomography follow-up compared to preoperative size (5.8 vs 5.7 cm). Importantly, 59% of the patients with a type II endoleak had significant AAA enlargement (0.8 cm), and delayed type II endoleak was significantly associated with sac enlargement compared to type II endoleaks detected early. No significant correlation was seen between the diameter of inferior mesenteric artery or lumbar to AAA enlargement among the patients with a type II endoleak. Secondary interventions in 12 patients with isolated type II endoleak resulted in overall aneurysm stabilization or regression. Conclusions This long-term outcome study demonstrated that delayed endoleaks appearing &gt;1 year after EVAR contributed to most of the overall endoleaks and were significantly associated with aneurysm sac growth. This study underscores that type II endoleak is not benign and that vigilant lifelong surveillance after EVAR is critical.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - diagnosis</subject><subject>Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - mortality</subject><subject>Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - surgery</subject><subject>Aortography - methods</subject><subject>Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - mortality</subject><subject>Chi-Square Distribution</subject><subject>Disease Progression</subject><subject>Disease-Free Survival</subject><subject>Electronic Health Records</subject><subject>Endoleak - diagnosis</subject><subject>Endoleak - etiology</subject><subject>Endoleak - mortality</subject><subject>Endoleak - therapy</subject><subject>Endovascular Procedures - adverse effects</subject><subject>Endovascular Procedures - mortality</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>United States Department of Veterans Affairs</subject><issn>0741-5214</issn><issn>1097-6809</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9r3DAQxUVoaTZJP0AuwcdevJ2RZMsmUCihTQuBHNoechKyPApy_Gcj2Qv77St3kx566Eka8d5j9HuMXSJsEbD82G27fdxyQJHmLdTihG0QapWXFdRv2AaUxLzgKE_ZWYwdAGJRqXfslEtRQlHJDXu4X2Y7DZSZsc1s70dvTZ9F_zh6l66jpWxyWUu9OVCb0dhOPZmnmBk3U_gz7020S29CSqAlHOKQBdoZHy7YW2f6SO9fznP26-uXnzff8rv72-83n-9yW6Cac8ldUVtXS46ubiohnWprV_IGeKWQSzLCuAqVqEsrUDVguLBOVGjJKNk04px9OObuwvS8UJz14KOlvk_7TEvUWCBIgFJBkuJRasMUYyCnd8EPJhw0gl6J6k4nonoluj4loslz9RK_NAO1fx2vCJPg-iig9Mm9p6Cj9ZTAtT6QnXU7-f_Gf_rH_VrCEx0odtMSxkRPo45cg_6xVro2igJ46rMUvwEM7pv0</recordid><startdate>20140401</startdate><enddate>20140401</enddate><creator>Zhou, Wei, MD</creator><creator>Blay, Eddie, BA</creator><creator>Varu, Vinit, MD</creator><creator>Ali, Syed, BS</creator><creator>Jin, Michelle Qiushuang, BA</creator><creator>Sun, Lisa, MS</creator><creator>Joh, Jin Hyun, MD, PhD</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140401</creationdate><title>Outcome and clinical significance of delayed endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair</title><author>Zhou, Wei, MD ; Blay, Eddie, BA ; Varu, Vinit, MD ; Ali, Syed, BS ; Jin, Michelle Qiushuang, BA ; Sun, Lisa, MS ; Joh, Jin Hyun, MD, PhD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-42f59cf9421f9b834f7d9f62b0287124ea3af817396c317b0a23cf381cea74bb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - diagnosis</topic><topic>Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - mortality</topic><topic>Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - surgery</topic><topic>Aortography - methods</topic><topic>Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - mortality</topic><topic>Chi-Square Distribution</topic><topic>Disease Progression</topic><topic>Disease-Free Survival</topic><topic>Electronic Health Records</topic><topic>Endoleak - diagnosis</topic><topic>Endoleak - etiology</topic><topic>Endoleak - mortality</topic><topic>Endoleak - therapy</topic><topic>Endovascular Procedures - adverse effects</topic><topic>Endovascular Procedures - mortality</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>United States Department of Veterans Affairs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Wei, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blay, Eddie, BA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varu, Vinit, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ali, Syed, BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jin, Michelle Qiushuang, BA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Lisa, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joh, Jin Hyun, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of vascular surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhou, Wei, MD</au><au>Blay, Eddie, BA</au><au>Varu, Vinit, MD</au><au>Ali, Syed, BS</au><au>Jin, Michelle Qiushuang, BA</au><au>Sun, Lisa, MS</au><au>Joh, Jin Hyun, MD, PhD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Outcome and clinical significance of delayed endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair</atitle><jtitle>Journal of vascular surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Vasc Surg</addtitle><date>2014-04-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>915</spage><epage>920</epage><pages>915-920</pages><issn>0741-5214</issn><eissn>1097-6809</eissn><abstract>Objective Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is considered the standard therapy for most patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Endoleak is a well-known EVAR-related complication that requires long-term follow-up. However, patient follow-up is often challenging outside clinical trials. We sought to evaluate the incidence and the effect of delayed endoleaks in a Veterans Administration (VA) health care system where long-term follow-up is ensured. Methods We retrospectively evaluated 213 consecutive patients who underwent EVAR at a referral Veterans Administration medical center. Age, aneurysm size, patency of lumbar and inferior mesenteric arteries, and follow-up evaluations were recorded. Type of endoleak, date of detection, and intervention were also documented. Patients who had &lt;1 year of follow-up were excluded. The χ2 test, Student t -test, Mann-Whitney test, and Spearman correlation were used for data analysis. Results The analysis included 183 patients with a mean follow-up of 53 months (range, 12-141 months); of these, 48 patients (26%) had endoleaks, and 31 (17%) had aneurysm progression. The mean diagnosis time for nontype II (n = 14) endoleaks was 45 months (range, 3-127 months), and 71% were diagnosed &gt;1 year after EVAR. All except one nontype II endoleak received prompt secondary interventions, and the one without intervention presented with aneurysm rupture. An isolated type II endoleak was detected in 34 patients at an average of 14.4 months (range, 0-76 months) after EVAR, 41% of which were detected &gt;1 year after EVAR. Patients without a documented endoleak had a significant decrease in aneurysm size at the latest computed tomography evaluation compared to the preoperative size (4.8 vs 5.7 cm; P  &lt; .001), whereas those with isolated type II endoleak had an increase at the latest computed tomography follow-up compared to preoperative size (5.8 vs 5.7 cm). Importantly, 59% of the patients with a type II endoleak had significant AAA enlargement (0.8 cm), and delayed type II endoleak was significantly associated with sac enlargement compared to type II endoleaks detected early. No significant correlation was seen between the diameter of inferior mesenteric artery or lumbar to AAA enlargement among the patients with a type II endoleak. Secondary interventions in 12 patients with isolated type II endoleak resulted in overall aneurysm stabilization or regression. Conclusions This long-term outcome study demonstrated that delayed endoleaks appearing &gt;1 year after EVAR contributed to most of the overall endoleaks and were significantly associated with aneurysm sac growth. This study underscores that type II endoleak is not benign and that vigilant lifelong surveillance after EVAR is critical.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>24360584</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jvs.2013.10.093</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0741-5214
ispartof Journal of vascular surgery, 2014-04, Vol.59 (4), p.915-920
issn 0741-5214
1097-6809
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1510400670
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - diagnosis
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - mortality
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - surgery
Aortography - methods
Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects
Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - mortality
Chi-Square Distribution
Disease Progression
Disease-Free Survival
Electronic Health Records
Endoleak - diagnosis
Endoleak - etiology
Endoleak - mortality
Endoleak - therapy
Endovascular Procedures - adverse effects
Endovascular Procedures - mortality
Humans
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Male
Middle Aged
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Surgery
Time Factors
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Treatment Outcome
United States
United States Department of Veterans Affairs
title Outcome and clinical significance of delayed endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T23%3A07%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Outcome%20and%20clinical%20significance%20of%20delayed%20endoleaks%20after%20endovascular%20aneurysm%20repair&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20vascular%20surgery&rft.au=Zhou,%20Wei,%20MD&rft.date=2014-04-01&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=915&rft.epage=920&rft.pages=915-920&rft.issn=0741-5214&rft.eissn=1097-6809&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jvs.2013.10.093&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1510400670%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1510400670&rft_id=info:pmid/24360584&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0741521413020016&rfr_iscdi=true