Quantitative measurement of femoral condyle cartilage in the knee by MRI: Validation study by multireaders

Purpose To determine reproducibility of the femoral condyle cartilage volume (CV) in cross‐sectional and longitudinal studies using various 3D imaging techniques at 1.5 T and 3 T. Materials and Methods In 21 subjects with osteoarthritis, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) including four different sequ...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of magnetic resonance imaging 2014-04, Vol.39 (4), p.972-977
Hauptverfasser: Fujinaga, Yasunari, Yoshioka, Hiroshi, Sakai, Toshinori, Sakai, Yoko, Souza, Felipe, Lang, Philipp
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 977
container_issue 4
container_start_page 972
container_title Journal of magnetic resonance imaging
container_volume 39
creator Fujinaga, Yasunari
Yoshioka, Hiroshi
Sakai, Toshinori
Sakai, Yoko
Souza, Felipe
Lang, Philipp
description Purpose To determine reproducibility of the femoral condyle cartilage volume (CV) in cross‐sectional and longitudinal studies using various 3D imaging techniques at 1.5 T and 3 T. Materials and Methods In 21 subjects with osteoarthritis, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) including four different sequences (sagittal 3D fat suppressed spoiled gradient‐echo [SPGR] at 1.5 T, fat suppressed fast low angle shot [FLASH] at 3 T, water‐excitation dual echo steady state [DESS] at 3 T, and water‐excitation multiecho data image combination [MEDIC] at 3 T) were acquired at baseline and ∼1 year later. The CV measured using semiautomated segmentation software by three readers was analyzed. Results The mean of the interclass correlation coefficient between each reader from SPGR, FLASH, DESS, and MEDIC was 0.899, 0.948, 0.943, and 0.954, respectively. The mean CV (×104 mm3) measured by each reader from SPGR/FLASH/DESS/MEDIC sequences was the following in this order: 1.34/1.52/1.50/1.35, 1.21/1.43/1.40/1.27, 1.22/1.37/1.36/1.22, and 1.17/1.36/1.35/1.21 by readers 1, 2, 3 (first analysis), and 3 (second analysis), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in CV between any readers in any sequences. The CV measured on FLASH and DESS tended to be greater than that on SPGR or MEDIC. Conclusion Inter‐ and intraobserver reproducibility of cartilage segmentation using semiautomated software was validated. Although there was no statistical significance, there was a tendency of under‐ or overestimating CV by each sequence. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2014;39:972–977. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jmri.24217
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1509409126</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3250707401</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4977-51ee8f2b63d651bef940a268b63fd8a08c8ac445189637bf235da58dba637cf73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtv1TAQRi0EoqVlww9AltggpBTbiR9hh6pSivrgUWBpOfEYfOskre1A8-_r29t2wYKVx54zR9Z8CL2gZI8Swt6uhuj3WMOofIS2KWesYlyJx6UmvK6oInILPUtpRQhp24Y_RVusoayWlG2j1ZfZjNlnk_0fwAOYNEcYYMx4ctjBMEUTcD-NdgmAexOzD-YXYD_i_BvwxQiAuwWffD16h3-Y4G3xTCNOebbLujHMIfsIxkJMu-iJMyHB87tzB33_cHC-_7E6Pjs82n9_XPVNK2XFKYByrBO1FZx24NqGGCZUeXBWGaJ6Zfqm4VS1opadYzW3hivbmXLtnax30OuN9zJOVzOkrAefegjBjDDNSVNOirKlTBT01T_oaprjWH63ppRgXLa8UG82VB-nlCI4fRn9YOKiKdHrBPQ6AX2bQIFf3innbgD7gN6vvAB0A_z1AZb_qPSnstZ7abWZ8SnD9cOMiRdayFpy_fP0UH_7LLlqz4U-rW8Aw6mgIg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1508625795</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantitative measurement of femoral condyle cartilage in the knee by MRI: Validation study by multireaders</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Fujinaga, Yasunari ; Yoshioka, Hiroshi ; Sakai, Toshinori ; Sakai, Yoko ; Souza, Felipe ; Lang, Philipp</creator><creatorcontrib>Fujinaga, Yasunari ; Yoshioka, Hiroshi ; Sakai, Toshinori ; Sakai, Yoko ; Souza, Felipe ; Lang, Philipp</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose To determine reproducibility of the femoral condyle cartilage volume (CV) in cross‐sectional and longitudinal studies using various 3D imaging techniques at 1.5 T and 3 T. Materials and Methods In 21 subjects with osteoarthritis, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) including four different sequences (sagittal 3D fat suppressed spoiled gradient‐echo [SPGR] at 1.5 T, fat suppressed fast low angle shot [FLASH] at 3 T, water‐excitation dual echo steady state [DESS] at 3 T, and water‐excitation multiecho data image combination [MEDIC] at 3 T) were acquired at baseline and ∼1 year later. The CV measured using semiautomated segmentation software by three readers was analyzed. Results The mean of the interclass correlation coefficient between each reader from SPGR, FLASH, DESS, and MEDIC was 0.899, 0.948, 0.943, and 0.954, respectively. The mean CV (×104 mm3) measured by each reader from SPGR/FLASH/DESS/MEDIC sequences was the following in this order: 1.34/1.52/1.50/1.35, 1.21/1.43/1.40/1.27, 1.22/1.37/1.36/1.22, and 1.17/1.36/1.35/1.21 by readers 1, 2, 3 (first analysis), and 3 (second analysis), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in CV between any readers in any sequences. The CV measured on FLASH and DESS tended to be greater than that on SPGR or MEDIC. Conclusion Inter‐ and intraobserver reproducibility of cartilage segmentation using semiautomated software was validated. Although there was no statistical significance, there was a tendency of under‐ or overestimating CV by each sequence. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2014;39:972–977. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-1807</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-2586</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24217</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24123712</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Cartilage, Articular - pathology ; Female ; Femur - pathology ; Humans ; Image Enhancement - methods ; Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods ; knee cartilage ; Knee Joint - pathology ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Observer Variation ; Osteoarthritis, Knee - pathology ; Pattern Recognition, Automated - methods ; reproducibility ; Reproducibility of Results ; segmentation ; Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><ispartof>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging, 2014-04, Vol.39 (4), p.972-977</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4977-51ee8f2b63d651bef940a268b63fd8a08c8ac445189637bf235da58dba637cf73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4977-51ee8f2b63d651bef940a268b63fd8a08c8ac445189637bf235da58dba637cf73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjmri.24217$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjmri.24217$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,1432,27922,27923,45572,45573,46407,46831</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24123712$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fujinaga, Yasunari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoshioka, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakai, Toshinori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakai, Yoko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Souza, Felipe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lang, Philipp</creatorcontrib><title>Quantitative measurement of femoral condyle cartilage in the knee by MRI: Validation study by multireaders</title><title>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging</title><addtitle>J. Magn. Reson. Imaging</addtitle><description>Purpose To determine reproducibility of the femoral condyle cartilage volume (CV) in cross‐sectional and longitudinal studies using various 3D imaging techniques at 1.5 T and 3 T. Materials and Methods In 21 subjects with osteoarthritis, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) including four different sequences (sagittal 3D fat suppressed spoiled gradient‐echo [SPGR] at 1.5 T, fat suppressed fast low angle shot [FLASH] at 3 T, water‐excitation dual echo steady state [DESS] at 3 T, and water‐excitation multiecho data image combination [MEDIC] at 3 T) were acquired at baseline and ∼1 year later. The CV measured using semiautomated segmentation software by three readers was analyzed. Results The mean of the interclass correlation coefficient between each reader from SPGR, FLASH, DESS, and MEDIC was 0.899, 0.948, 0.943, and 0.954, respectively. The mean CV (×104 mm3) measured by each reader from SPGR/FLASH/DESS/MEDIC sequences was the following in this order: 1.34/1.52/1.50/1.35, 1.21/1.43/1.40/1.27, 1.22/1.37/1.36/1.22, and 1.17/1.36/1.35/1.21 by readers 1, 2, 3 (first analysis), and 3 (second analysis), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in CV between any readers in any sequences. The CV measured on FLASH and DESS tended to be greater than that on SPGR or MEDIC. Conclusion Inter‐ and intraobserver reproducibility of cartilage segmentation using semiautomated software was validated. Although there was no statistical significance, there was a tendency of under‐ or overestimating CV by each sequence. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2014;39:972–977. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Cartilage, Articular - pathology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Femur - pathology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Enhancement - methods</subject><subject>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>knee cartilage</subject><subject>Knee Joint - pathology</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis, Knee - pathology</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Automated - methods</subject><subject>reproducibility</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>segmentation</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><issn>1053-1807</issn><issn>1522-2586</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUtv1TAQRi0EoqVlww9AltggpBTbiR9hh6pSivrgUWBpOfEYfOskre1A8-_r29t2wYKVx54zR9Z8CL2gZI8Swt6uhuj3WMOofIS2KWesYlyJx6UmvK6oInILPUtpRQhp24Y_RVusoayWlG2j1ZfZjNlnk_0fwAOYNEcYYMx4ctjBMEUTcD-NdgmAexOzD-YXYD_i_BvwxQiAuwWffD16h3-Y4G3xTCNOebbLujHMIfsIxkJMu-iJMyHB87tzB33_cHC-_7E6Pjs82n9_XPVNK2XFKYByrBO1FZx24NqGGCZUeXBWGaJ6Zfqm4VS1opadYzW3hivbmXLtnax30OuN9zJOVzOkrAefegjBjDDNSVNOirKlTBT01T_oaprjWH63ppRgXLa8UG82VB-nlCI4fRn9YOKiKdHrBPQ6AX2bQIFf3innbgD7gN6vvAB0A_z1AZb_qPSnstZ7abWZ8SnD9cOMiRdayFpy_fP0UH_7LLlqz4U-rW8Aw6mgIg</recordid><startdate>201404</startdate><enddate>201404</enddate><creator>Fujinaga, Yasunari</creator><creator>Yoshioka, Hiroshi</creator><creator>Sakai, Toshinori</creator><creator>Sakai, Yoko</creator><creator>Souza, Felipe</creator><creator>Lang, Philipp</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201404</creationdate><title>Quantitative measurement of femoral condyle cartilage in the knee by MRI: Validation study by multireaders</title><author>Fujinaga, Yasunari ; Yoshioka, Hiroshi ; Sakai, Toshinori ; Sakai, Yoko ; Souza, Felipe ; Lang, Philipp</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4977-51ee8f2b63d651bef940a268b63fd8a08c8ac445189637bf235da58dba637cf73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Cartilage, Articular - pathology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Femur - pathology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Enhancement - methods</topic><topic>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>knee cartilage</topic><topic>Knee Joint - pathology</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis, Knee - pathology</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Automated - methods</topic><topic>reproducibility</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>segmentation</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fujinaga, Yasunari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoshioka, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakai, Toshinori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakai, Yoko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Souza, Felipe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lang, Philipp</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fujinaga, Yasunari</au><au>Yoshioka, Hiroshi</au><au>Sakai, Toshinori</au><au>Sakai, Yoko</au><au>Souza, Felipe</au><au>Lang, Philipp</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantitative measurement of femoral condyle cartilage in the knee by MRI: Validation study by multireaders</atitle><jtitle>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging</jtitle><addtitle>J. Magn. Reson. Imaging</addtitle><date>2014-04</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>972</spage><epage>977</epage><pages>972-977</pages><issn>1053-1807</issn><eissn>1522-2586</eissn><abstract>Purpose To determine reproducibility of the femoral condyle cartilage volume (CV) in cross‐sectional and longitudinal studies using various 3D imaging techniques at 1.5 T and 3 T. Materials and Methods In 21 subjects with osteoarthritis, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) including four different sequences (sagittal 3D fat suppressed spoiled gradient‐echo [SPGR] at 1.5 T, fat suppressed fast low angle shot [FLASH] at 3 T, water‐excitation dual echo steady state [DESS] at 3 T, and water‐excitation multiecho data image combination [MEDIC] at 3 T) were acquired at baseline and ∼1 year later. The CV measured using semiautomated segmentation software by three readers was analyzed. Results The mean of the interclass correlation coefficient between each reader from SPGR, FLASH, DESS, and MEDIC was 0.899, 0.948, 0.943, and 0.954, respectively. The mean CV (×104 mm3) measured by each reader from SPGR/FLASH/DESS/MEDIC sequences was the following in this order: 1.34/1.52/1.50/1.35, 1.21/1.43/1.40/1.27, 1.22/1.37/1.36/1.22, and 1.17/1.36/1.35/1.21 by readers 1, 2, 3 (first analysis), and 3 (second analysis), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in CV between any readers in any sequences. The CV measured on FLASH and DESS tended to be greater than that on SPGR or MEDIC. Conclusion Inter‐ and intraobserver reproducibility of cartilage segmentation using semiautomated software was validated. Although there was no statistical significance, there was a tendency of under‐ or overestimating CV by each sequence. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2014;39:972–977. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>24123712</pmid><doi>10.1002/jmri.24217</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1053-1807
ispartof Journal of magnetic resonance imaging, 2014-04, Vol.39 (4), p.972-977
issn 1053-1807
1522-2586
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1509409126
source MEDLINE; Wiley Free Content; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Cartilage, Articular - pathology
Female
Femur - pathology
Humans
Image Enhancement - methods
Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods
knee cartilage
Knee Joint - pathology
Magnetic resonance imaging
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
Male
Middle Aged
Observer Variation
Osteoarthritis, Knee - pathology
Pattern Recognition, Automated - methods
reproducibility
Reproducibility of Results
segmentation
Sensitivity and Specificity
title Quantitative measurement of femoral condyle cartilage in the knee by MRI: Validation study by multireaders
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T14%3A25%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantitative%20measurement%20of%20femoral%20condyle%20cartilage%20in%20the%20knee%20by%20MRI:%20Validation%20study%20by%20multireaders&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20magnetic%20resonance%20imaging&rft.au=Fujinaga,%20Yasunari&rft.date=2014-04&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=972&rft.epage=977&rft.pages=972-977&rft.issn=1053-1807&rft.eissn=1522-2586&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jmri.24217&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3250707401%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1508625795&rft_id=info:pmid/24123712&rfr_iscdi=true