Quantitative measurement of femoral condyle cartilage in the knee by MRI: Validation study by multireaders
Purpose To determine reproducibility of the femoral condyle cartilage volume (CV) in cross‐sectional and longitudinal studies using various 3D imaging techniques at 1.5 T and 3 T. Materials and Methods In 21 subjects with osteoarthritis, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) including four different sequ...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of magnetic resonance imaging 2014-04, Vol.39 (4), p.972-977 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 977 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 972 |
container_title | Journal of magnetic resonance imaging |
container_volume | 39 |
creator | Fujinaga, Yasunari Yoshioka, Hiroshi Sakai, Toshinori Sakai, Yoko Souza, Felipe Lang, Philipp |
description | Purpose
To determine reproducibility of the femoral condyle cartilage volume (CV) in cross‐sectional and longitudinal studies using various 3D imaging techniques at 1.5 T and 3 T.
Materials and Methods
In 21 subjects with osteoarthritis, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) including four different sequences (sagittal 3D fat suppressed spoiled gradient‐echo [SPGR] at 1.5 T, fat suppressed fast low angle shot [FLASH] at 3 T, water‐excitation dual echo steady state [DESS] at 3 T, and water‐excitation multiecho data image combination [MEDIC] at 3 T) were acquired at baseline and ∼1 year later. The CV measured using semiautomated segmentation software by three readers was analyzed.
Results
The mean of the interclass correlation coefficient between each reader from SPGR, FLASH, DESS, and MEDIC was 0.899, 0.948, 0.943, and 0.954, respectively. The mean CV (×104 mm3) measured by each reader from SPGR/FLASH/DESS/MEDIC sequences was the following in this order: 1.34/1.52/1.50/1.35, 1.21/1.43/1.40/1.27, 1.22/1.37/1.36/1.22, and 1.17/1.36/1.35/1.21 by readers 1, 2, 3 (first analysis), and 3 (second analysis), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in CV between any readers in any sequences. The CV measured on FLASH and DESS tended to be greater than that on SPGR or MEDIC.
Conclusion
Inter‐ and intraobserver reproducibility of cartilage segmentation using semiautomated software was validated. Although there was no statistical significance, there was a tendency of under‐ or overestimating CV by each sequence. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2014;39:972–977. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jmri.24217 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1509409126</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3250707401</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4977-51ee8f2b63d651bef940a268b63fd8a08c8ac445189637bf235da58dba637cf73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtv1TAQRi0EoqVlww9AltggpBTbiR9hh6pSivrgUWBpOfEYfOskre1A8-_r29t2wYKVx54zR9Z8CL2gZI8Swt6uhuj3WMOofIS2KWesYlyJx6UmvK6oInILPUtpRQhp24Y_RVusoayWlG2j1ZfZjNlnk_0fwAOYNEcYYMx4ctjBMEUTcD-NdgmAexOzD-YXYD_i_BvwxQiAuwWffD16h3-Y4G3xTCNOebbLujHMIfsIxkJMu-iJMyHB87tzB33_cHC-_7E6Pjs82n9_XPVNK2XFKYByrBO1FZx24NqGGCZUeXBWGaJ6Zfqm4VS1opadYzW3hivbmXLtnax30OuN9zJOVzOkrAefegjBjDDNSVNOirKlTBT01T_oaprjWH63ppRgXLa8UG82VB-nlCI4fRn9YOKiKdHrBPQ6AX2bQIFf3innbgD7gN6vvAB0A_z1AZb_qPSnstZ7abWZ8SnD9cOMiRdayFpy_fP0UH_7LLlqz4U-rW8Aw6mgIg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1508625795</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantitative measurement of femoral condyle cartilage in the knee by MRI: Validation study by multireaders</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Fujinaga, Yasunari ; Yoshioka, Hiroshi ; Sakai, Toshinori ; Sakai, Yoko ; Souza, Felipe ; Lang, Philipp</creator><creatorcontrib>Fujinaga, Yasunari ; Yoshioka, Hiroshi ; Sakai, Toshinori ; Sakai, Yoko ; Souza, Felipe ; Lang, Philipp</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
To determine reproducibility of the femoral condyle cartilage volume (CV) in cross‐sectional and longitudinal studies using various 3D imaging techniques at 1.5 T and 3 T.
Materials and Methods
In 21 subjects with osteoarthritis, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) including four different sequences (sagittal 3D fat suppressed spoiled gradient‐echo [SPGR] at 1.5 T, fat suppressed fast low angle shot [FLASH] at 3 T, water‐excitation dual echo steady state [DESS] at 3 T, and water‐excitation multiecho data image combination [MEDIC] at 3 T) were acquired at baseline and ∼1 year later. The CV measured using semiautomated segmentation software by three readers was analyzed.
Results
The mean of the interclass correlation coefficient between each reader from SPGR, FLASH, DESS, and MEDIC was 0.899, 0.948, 0.943, and 0.954, respectively. The mean CV (×104 mm3) measured by each reader from SPGR/FLASH/DESS/MEDIC sequences was the following in this order: 1.34/1.52/1.50/1.35, 1.21/1.43/1.40/1.27, 1.22/1.37/1.36/1.22, and 1.17/1.36/1.35/1.21 by readers 1, 2, 3 (first analysis), and 3 (second analysis), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in CV between any readers in any sequences. The CV measured on FLASH and DESS tended to be greater than that on SPGR or MEDIC.
Conclusion
Inter‐ and intraobserver reproducibility of cartilage segmentation using semiautomated software was validated. Although there was no statistical significance, there was a tendency of under‐ or overestimating CV by each sequence. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2014;39:972–977. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-1807</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-2586</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24217</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24123712</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Cartilage, Articular - pathology ; Female ; Femur - pathology ; Humans ; Image Enhancement - methods ; Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods ; knee cartilage ; Knee Joint - pathology ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Observer Variation ; Osteoarthritis, Knee - pathology ; Pattern Recognition, Automated - methods ; reproducibility ; Reproducibility of Results ; segmentation ; Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><ispartof>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging, 2014-04, Vol.39 (4), p.972-977</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4977-51ee8f2b63d651bef940a268b63fd8a08c8ac445189637bf235da58dba637cf73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4977-51ee8f2b63d651bef940a268b63fd8a08c8ac445189637bf235da58dba637cf73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjmri.24217$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjmri.24217$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,1432,27922,27923,45572,45573,46407,46831</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24123712$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fujinaga, Yasunari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoshioka, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakai, Toshinori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakai, Yoko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Souza, Felipe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lang, Philipp</creatorcontrib><title>Quantitative measurement of femoral condyle cartilage in the knee by MRI: Validation study by multireaders</title><title>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging</title><addtitle>J. Magn. Reson. Imaging</addtitle><description>Purpose
To determine reproducibility of the femoral condyle cartilage volume (CV) in cross‐sectional and longitudinal studies using various 3D imaging techniques at 1.5 T and 3 T.
Materials and Methods
In 21 subjects with osteoarthritis, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) including four different sequences (sagittal 3D fat suppressed spoiled gradient‐echo [SPGR] at 1.5 T, fat suppressed fast low angle shot [FLASH] at 3 T, water‐excitation dual echo steady state [DESS] at 3 T, and water‐excitation multiecho data image combination [MEDIC] at 3 T) were acquired at baseline and ∼1 year later. The CV measured using semiautomated segmentation software by three readers was analyzed.
Results
The mean of the interclass correlation coefficient between each reader from SPGR, FLASH, DESS, and MEDIC was 0.899, 0.948, 0.943, and 0.954, respectively. The mean CV (×104 mm3) measured by each reader from SPGR/FLASH/DESS/MEDIC sequences was the following in this order: 1.34/1.52/1.50/1.35, 1.21/1.43/1.40/1.27, 1.22/1.37/1.36/1.22, and 1.17/1.36/1.35/1.21 by readers 1, 2, 3 (first analysis), and 3 (second analysis), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in CV between any readers in any sequences. The CV measured on FLASH and DESS tended to be greater than that on SPGR or MEDIC.
Conclusion
Inter‐ and intraobserver reproducibility of cartilage segmentation using semiautomated software was validated. Although there was no statistical significance, there was a tendency of under‐ or overestimating CV by each sequence. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2014;39:972–977. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Cartilage, Articular - pathology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Femur - pathology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Enhancement - methods</subject><subject>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>knee cartilage</subject><subject>Knee Joint - pathology</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis, Knee - pathology</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Automated - methods</subject><subject>reproducibility</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>segmentation</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><issn>1053-1807</issn><issn>1522-2586</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUtv1TAQRi0EoqVlww9AltggpBTbiR9hh6pSivrgUWBpOfEYfOskre1A8-_r29t2wYKVx54zR9Z8CL2gZI8Swt6uhuj3WMOofIS2KWesYlyJx6UmvK6oInILPUtpRQhp24Y_RVusoayWlG2j1ZfZjNlnk_0fwAOYNEcYYMx4ctjBMEUTcD-NdgmAexOzD-YXYD_i_BvwxQiAuwWffD16h3-Y4G3xTCNOebbLujHMIfsIxkJMu-iJMyHB87tzB33_cHC-_7E6Pjs82n9_XPVNK2XFKYByrBO1FZx24NqGGCZUeXBWGaJ6Zfqm4VS1opadYzW3hivbmXLtnax30OuN9zJOVzOkrAefegjBjDDNSVNOirKlTBT01T_oaprjWH63ppRgXLa8UG82VB-nlCI4fRn9YOKiKdHrBPQ6AX2bQIFf3innbgD7gN6vvAB0A_z1AZb_qPSnstZ7abWZ8SnD9cOMiRdayFpy_fP0UH_7LLlqz4U-rW8Aw6mgIg</recordid><startdate>201404</startdate><enddate>201404</enddate><creator>Fujinaga, Yasunari</creator><creator>Yoshioka, Hiroshi</creator><creator>Sakai, Toshinori</creator><creator>Sakai, Yoko</creator><creator>Souza, Felipe</creator><creator>Lang, Philipp</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201404</creationdate><title>Quantitative measurement of femoral condyle cartilage in the knee by MRI: Validation study by multireaders</title><author>Fujinaga, Yasunari ; Yoshioka, Hiroshi ; Sakai, Toshinori ; Sakai, Yoko ; Souza, Felipe ; Lang, Philipp</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4977-51ee8f2b63d651bef940a268b63fd8a08c8ac445189637bf235da58dba637cf73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Cartilage, Articular - pathology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Femur - pathology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Enhancement - methods</topic><topic>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>knee cartilage</topic><topic>Knee Joint - pathology</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis, Knee - pathology</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Automated - methods</topic><topic>reproducibility</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>segmentation</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fujinaga, Yasunari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoshioka, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakai, Toshinori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakai, Yoko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Souza, Felipe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lang, Philipp</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fujinaga, Yasunari</au><au>Yoshioka, Hiroshi</au><au>Sakai, Toshinori</au><au>Sakai, Yoko</au><au>Souza, Felipe</au><au>Lang, Philipp</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantitative measurement of femoral condyle cartilage in the knee by MRI: Validation study by multireaders</atitle><jtitle>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging</jtitle><addtitle>J. Magn. Reson. Imaging</addtitle><date>2014-04</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>972</spage><epage>977</epage><pages>972-977</pages><issn>1053-1807</issn><eissn>1522-2586</eissn><abstract>Purpose
To determine reproducibility of the femoral condyle cartilage volume (CV) in cross‐sectional and longitudinal studies using various 3D imaging techniques at 1.5 T and 3 T.
Materials and Methods
In 21 subjects with osteoarthritis, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) including four different sequences (sagittal 3D fat suppressed spoiled gradient‐echo [SPGR] at 1.5 T, fat suppressed fast low angle shot [FLASH] at 3 T, water‐excitation dual echo steady state [DESS] at 3 T, and water‐excitation multiecho data image combination [MEDIC] at 3 T) were acquired at baseline and ∼1 year later. The CV measured using semiautomated segmentation software by three readers was analyzed.
Results
The mean of the interclass correlation coefficient between each reader from SPGR, FLASH, DESS, and MEDIC was 0.899, 0.948, 0.943, and 0.954, respectively. The mean CV (×104 mm3) measured by each reader from SPGR/FLASH/DESS/MEDIC sequences was the following in this order: 1.34/1.52/1.50/1.35, 1.21/1.43/1.40/1.27, 1.22/1.37/1.36/1.22, and 1.17/1.36/1.35/1.21 by readers 1, 2, 3 (first analysis), and 3 (second analysis), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in CV between any readers in any sequences. The CV measured on FLASH and DESS tended to be greater than that on SPGR or MEDIC.
Conclusion
Inter‐ and intraobserver reproducibility of cartilage segmentation using semiautomated software was validated. Although there was no statistical significance, there was a tendency of under‐ or overestimating CV by each sequence. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2014;39:972–977. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>24123712</pmid><doi>10.1002/jmri.24217</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1053-1807 |
ispartof | Journal of magnetic resonance imaging, 2014-04, Vol.39 (4), p.972-977 |
issn | 1053-1807 1522-2586 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1509409126 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Free Content; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Aged Aged, 80 and over Cartilage, Articular - pathology Female Femur - pathology Humans Image Enhancement - methods Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods knee cartilage Knee Joint - pathology Magnetic resonance imaging Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods Male Middle Aged Observer Variation Osteoarthritis, Knee - pathology Pattern Recognition, Automated - methods reproducibility Reproducibility of Results segmentation Sensitivity and Specificity |
title | Quantitative measurement of femoral condyle cartilage in the knee by MRI: Validation study by multireaders |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T14%3A25%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantitative%20measurement%20of%20femoral%20condyle%20cartilage%20in%20the%20knee%20by%20MRI:%20Validation%20study%20by%20multireaders&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20magnetic%20resonance%20imaging&rft.au=Fujinaga,%20Yasunari&rft.date=2014-04&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=972&rft.epage=977&rft.pages=972-977&rft.issn=1053-1807&rft.eissn=1522-2586&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jmri.24217&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3250707401%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1508625795&rft_id=info:pmid/24123712&rfr_iscdi=true |