180-W XPS GreenLight Laser Vaporisation Versus Transurethral Resection of the Prostate for the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Obstruction: 6-Month Safety and Efficacy Results of a European Multicentre Randomised Trial—The GOLIATH Study

Abstract Background The comparative outcome with GreenLight (GL) photoselective vaporisation of the prostate and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in men with lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) has been questioned. Objective The primary objective of t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European urology 2014-05, Vol.65 (5), p.931-942
Hauptverfasser: Bachmann, Alexander, Tubaro, Andrea, Barber, Neil, d’Ancona, Frank, Muir, Gordon, Witzsch, Ulrich, Grimm, Marc-Oliver, Benejam, Joan, Stolzenburg, Jens-Uwe, Riddick, Antony, Pahernik, Sascha, Roelink, Herman, Ameye, Filip, Saussine, Christian, Bruyère, Franck, Loidl, Wolfgang, Larner, Tim, Gogoi, Nirjan-Kumar, Hindley, Richard, Muschter, Rolf, Thorpe, Andrew, Shrotri, Nitin, Graham, Stuart, Hamann, Moritz, Miller, Kurt, Schostak, Martin, Capitán, Carlos, Knispel, Helmut, Thomas, J. Andrew
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 942
container_issue 5
container_start_page 931
container_title European urology
container_volume 65
creator Bachmann, Alexander
Tubaro, Andrea
Barber, Neil
d’Ancona, Frank
Muir, Gordon
Witzsch, Ulrich
Grimm, Marc-Oliver
Benejam, Joan
Stolzenburg, Jens-Uwe
Riddick, Antony
Pahernik, Sascha
Roelink, Herman
Ameye, Filip
Saussine, Christian
Bruyère, Franck
Loidl, Wolfgang
Larner, Tim
Gogoi, Nirjan-Kumar
Hindley, Richard
Muschter, Rolf
Thorpe, Andrew
Shrotri, Nitin
Graham, Stuart
Hamann, Moritz
Miller, Kurt
Schostak, Martin
Capitán, Carlos
Knispel, Helmut
Thomas, J. Andrew
description Abstract Background The comparative outcome with GreenLight (GL) photoselective vaporisation of the prostate and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in men with lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) has been questioned. Objective The primary objective of the GOLIATH study was to evaluate the noninferiority of 180-W GL XPS (XPS) to TURP for International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and maximum flow rate (Qmax ) at 6 mo and the proportion of patients who were complication free. Design, setting, and participants Prospective randomised controlled trial at 29 centres in 9 European countries involving 281 patients with BPO. Intervention 180-W GL XPS system or TURP. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Measurements used were IPSS, Qmax , prostate volume (PV), postvoid residual (PVR) and complications, perioperative parameters, and reintervention rates. Noninferiority was evaluated using one-sided tests at the 2.5% level of significance. The statistical significance of other comparisons was assessed at the (two-sided) 5% level. Results and limitations The study demonstrated the noninferiority of XPS to TURP for IPSS, Qmax , and complication-free proportion. PV and PVR were comparable between groups. Time until stable health status, length of catheterisation, and length of hospital stay were superior with XPS ( p < 0.001). Early reintervention rate within 30 d was three times higher after TURP ( p = 0.025); however, the overall postoperative reintervention rates were not significantly different between treatment arms. A limitation was the short follow-up. Conclusions XPS was shown to be noninferior (comparable) to TURP in terms of IPSS, Qmax , and proportion of patients free of complications. XPS results in a lower rate of early reinterventions but has a similar rate after 6 mo. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT01218672.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.10.040
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1508943197</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0302283813011354</els_id><sourcerecordid>1508943197</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-490be13139dcd572c9d139e11ea9c37e038cedef6795be5a0125e1e79817cda33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkstuEzEUhkcIREPhDRDyBonNBJ_xTGaGBVJbhbRSqlRNKOwsx3OmcZjYwRek7HgInpA1D4EnSUFiw8rW8ef_XP6TJC-BDoHC6O16iMEGa4YZBRZDQ5rTR8kAqpKlZTGij5MBZTRLs4pVJ8kz59aUUlbU7GlykuWMARTZIPkFFU0_kc83czKxiHqq7leeTIVDS-7E1ljlhFdGkzu0LjiysEK7YNGvrOjILTqU-2fTEr9CcmON88IjaY3dBxYWhd-g9j1xjlrd6wdISTJbOm_DXuEdGaXXRvsVmYsW_Y4I3ZBx2yop5K5PFDrvehFBxrHrLQpNrmNMyShukdxG3myUwybmVKL7-f3HIuafzKZXZ4tLMveh2T1PnrSic_jieJ4mHz-MFxeX6XQ2ubo4m6Yyz0uf5jVdIjBgdSObosxk3cQ7AqCoJSuRskpig-2orIslFoJCViBgWVdQykYwdpq8Oehurfka0HkeC5PYdUKjCY5DQas6Z1CXEc0PqIxDcRZbvrVqI-yOA-W9z3zNDz7z3uc-Gn2O314dM4TlBps_nx6MjcDrIyCcFF0bbZPK_eWqYpSxvIjc-wOHcR7fFFrupEId-1M2Wssbo_5Xyb8CslM6utZ9wR26tQlWx1lz4C7jlM_7nexXEhgFYEXOfgOO6OGm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1508943197</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>180-W XPS GreenLight Laser Vaporisation Versus Transurethral Resection of the Prostate for the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Obstruction: 6-Month Safety and Efficacy Results of a European Multicentre Randomised Trial—The GOLIATH Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Bachmann, Alexander ; Tubaro, Andrea ; Barber, Neil ; d’Ancona, Frank ; Muir, Gordon ; Witzsch, Ulrich ; Grimm, Marc-Oliver ; Benejam, Joan ; Stolzenburg, Jens-Uwe ; Riddick, Antony ; Pahernik, Sascha ; Roelink, Herman ; Ameye, Filip ; Saussine, Christian ; Bruyère, Franck ; Loidl, Wolfgang ; Larner, Tim ; Gogoi, Nirjan-Kumar ; Hindley, Richard ; Muschter, Rolf ; Thorpe, Andrew ; Shrotri, Nitin ; Graham, Stuart ; Hamann, Moritz ; Miller, Kurt ; Schostak, Martin ; Capitán, Carlos ; Knispel, Helmut ; Thomas, J. Andrew</creator><creatorcontrib>Bachmann, Alexander ; Tubaro, Andrea ; Barber, Neil ; d’Ancona, Frank ; Muir, Gordon ; Witzsch, Ulrich ; Grimm, Marc-Oliver ; Benejam, Joan ; Stolzenburg, Jens-Uwe ; Riddick, Antony ; Pahernik, Sascha ; Roelink, Herman ; Ameye, Filip ; Saussine, Christian ; Bruyère, Franck ; Loidl, Wolfgang ; Larner, Tim ; Gogoi, Nirjan-Kumar ; Hindley, Richard ; Muschter, Rolf ; Thorpe, Andrew ; Shrotri, Nitin ; Graham, Stuart ; Hamann, Moritz ; Miller, Kurt ; Schostak, Martin ; Capitán, Carlos ; Knispel, Helmut ; Thomas, J. Andrew</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background The comparative outcome with GreenLight (GL) photoselective vaporisation of the prostate and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in men with lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) has been questioned. Objective The primary objective of the GOLIATH study was to evaluate the noninferiority of 180-W GL XPS (XPS) to TURP for International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and maximum flow rate (Qmax ) at 6 mo and the proportion of patients who were complication free. Design, setting, and participants Prospective randomised controlled trial at 29 centres in 9 European countries involving 281 patients with BPO. Intervention 180-W GL XPS system or TURP. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Measurements used were IPSS, Qmax , prostate volume (PV), postvoid residual (PVR) and complications, perioperative parameters, and reintervention rates. Noninferiority was evaluated using one-sided tests at the 2.5% level of significance. The statistical significance of other comparisons was assessed at the (two-sided) 5% level. Results and limitations The study demonstrated the noninferiority of XPS to TURP for IPSS, Qmax , and complication-free proportion. PV and PVR were comparable between groups. Time until stable health status, length of catheterisation, and length of hospital stay were superior with XPS ( p &lt; 0.001). Early reintervention rate within 30 d was three times higher after TURP ( p = 0.025); however, the overall postoperative reintervention rates were not significantly different between treatment arms. A limitation was the short follow-up. Conclusions XPS was shown to be noninferior (comparable) to TURP in terms of IPSS, Qmax , and proportion of patients free of complications. XPS results in a lower rate of early reinterventions but has a similar rate after 6 mo. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT01218672.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0302-2838</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7560</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.10.040</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24331152</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EUURAV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adult ; Adverse events ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) ; Biological and medical sciences ; Clavien-Dindo classification ; Efficacy ; Europe ; Follow-Up Studies ; GreenLight XPS 180-W laser ; Hemorrhage - etiology ; Humans ; Intention to Treat Analysis ; Laser Therapy - adverse effects ; Length of Stay ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases ; Organ Size ; Photoselective vaporisation of the prostate (PVP) ; Prospective Studies ; Prostate - pathology ; Prostate-Specific Antigen - blood ; Prostatectomy - adverse effects ; Prostatic Hyperplasia - blood ; Prostatic Hyperplasia - complications ; Prostatic Hyperplasia - surgery ; Prostatism - etiology ; Prostatism - physiopathology ; Safety ; Severity of Illness Index ; Time Factors ; Transurethral surgery ; TURP ; Urinary Catheterization ; Urinary Incontinence - etiology ; Urinary Retention - etiology ; Urodynamics ; Urology</subject><ispartof>European urology, 2014-05, Vol.65 (5), p.931-942</ispartof><rights>2013</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-490be13139dcd572c9d139e11ea9c37e038cedef6795be5a0125e1e79817cda33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-490be13139dcd572c9d139e11ea9c37e038cedef6795be5a0125e1e79817cda33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2013.10.040$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=28562345$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24331152$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bachmann, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tubaro, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barber, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>d’Ancona, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muir, Gordon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Witzsch, Ulrich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grimm, Marc-Oliver</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benejam, Joan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stolzenburg, Jens-Uwe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riddick, Antony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pahernik, Sascha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roelink, Herman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ameye, Filip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saussine, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruyère, Franck</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loidl, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larner, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gogoi, Nirjan-Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hindley, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muschter, Rolf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thorpe, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shrotri, Nitin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graham, Stuart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamann, Moritz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Kurt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schostak, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Capitán, Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knispel, Helmut</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, J. Andrew</creatorcontrib><title>180-W XPS GreenLight Laser Vaporisation Versus Transurethral Resection of the Prostate for the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Obstruction: 6-Month Safety and Efficacy Results of a European Multicentre Randomised Trial—The GOLIATH Study</title><title>European urology</title><addtitle>Eur Urol</addtitle><description>Abstract Background The comparative outcome with GreenLight (GL) photoselective vaporisation of the prostate and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in men with lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) has been questioned. Objective The primary objective of the GOLIATH study was to evaluate the noninferiority of 180-W GL XPS (XPS) to TURP for International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and maximum flow rate (Qmax ) at 6 mo and the proportion of patients who were complication free. Design, setting, and participants Prospective randomised controlled trial at 29 centres in 9 European countries involving 281 patients with BPO. Intervention 180-W GL XPS system or TURP. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Measurements used were IPSS, Qmax , prostate volume (PV), postvoid residual (PVR) and complications, perioperative parameters, and reintervention rates. Noninferiority was evaluated using one-sided tests at the 2.5% level of significance. The statistical significance of other comparisons was assessed at the (two-sided) 5% level. Results and limitations The study demonstrated the noninferiority of XPS to TURP for IPSS, Qmax , and complication-free proportion. PV and PVR were comparable between groups. Time until stable health status, length of catheterisation, and length of hospital stay were superior with XPS ( p &lt; 0.001). Early reintervention rate within 30 d was three times higher after TURP ( p = 0.025); however, the overall postoperative reintervention rates were not significantly different between treatment arms. A limitation was the short follow-up. Conclusions XPS was shown to be noninferior (comparable) to TURP in terms of IPSS, Qmax , and proportion of patients free of complications. XPS results in a lower rate of early reinterventions but has a similar rate after 6 mo. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT01218672.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Adverse events</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Benign prostatic obstruction (BPO)</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Clavien-Dindo classification</subject><subject>Efficacy</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>GreenLight XPS 180-W laser</subject><subject>Hemorrhage - etiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intention to Treat Analysis</subject><subject>Laser Therapy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Length of Stay</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases</subject><subject>Organ Size</subject><subject>Photoselective vaporisation of the prostate (PVP)</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Prostate - pathology</subject><subject>Prostate-Specific Antigen - blood</subject><subject>Prostatectomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Prostatic Hyperplasia - blood</subject><subject>Prostatic Hyperplasia - complications</subject><subject>Prostatic Hyperplasia - surgery</subject><subject>Prostatism - etiology</subject><subject>Prostatism - physiopathology</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Transurethral surgery</subject><subject>TURP</subject><subject>Urinary Catheterization</subject><subject>Urinary Incontinence - etiology</subject><subject>Urinary Retention - etiology</subject><subject>Urodynamics</subject><subject>Urology</subject><issn>0302-2838</issn><issn>1873-7560</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkstuEzEUhkcIREPhDRDyBonNBJ_xTGaGBVJbhbRSqlRNKOwsx3OmcZjYwRek7HgInpA1D4EnSUFiw8rW8ef_XP6TJC-BDoHC6O16iMEGa4YZBRZDQ5rTR8kAqpKlZTGij5MBZTRLs4pVJ8kz59aUUlbU7GlykuWMARTZIPkFFU0_kc83czKxiHqq7leeTIVDS-7E1ljlhFdGkzu0LjiysEK7YNGvrOjILTqU-2fTEr9CcmON88IjaY3dBxYWhd-g9j1xjlrd6wdISTJbOm_DXuEdGaXXRvsVmYsW_Y4I3ZBx2yop5K5PFDrvehFBxrHrLQpNrmNMyShukdxG3myUwybmVKL7-f3HIuafzKZXZ4tLMveh2T1PnrSic_jieJ4mHz-MFxeX6XQ2ubo4m6Yyz0uf5jVdIjBgdSObosxk3cQ7AqCoJSuRskpig-2orIslFoJCViBgWVdQykYwdpq8Oehurfka0HkeC5PYdUKjCY5DQas6Z1CXEc0PqIxDcRZbvrVqI-yOA-W9z3zNDz7z3uc-Gn2O314dM4TlBps_nx6MjcDrIyCcFF0bbZPK_eWqYpSxvIjc-wOHcR7fFFrupEId-1M2Wssbo_5Xyb8CslM6utZ9wR26tQlWx1lz4C7jlM_7nexXEhgFYEXOfgOO6OGm</recordid><startdate>20140501</startdate><enddate>20140501</enddate><creator>Bachmann, Alexander</creator><creator>Tubaro, Andrea</creator><creator>Barber, Neil</creator><creator>d’Ancona, Frank</creator><creator>Muir, Gordon</creator><creator>Witzsch, Ulrich</creator><creator>Grimm, Marc-Oliver</creator><creator>Benejam, Joan</creator><creator>Stolzenburg, Jens-Uwe</creator><creator>Riddick, Antony</creator><creator>Pahernik, Sascha</creator><creator>Roelink, Herman</creator><creator>Ameye, Filip</creator><creator>Saussine, Christian</creator><creator>Bruyère, Franck</creator><creator>Loidl, Wolfgang</creator><creator>Larner, Tim</creator><creator>Gogoi, Nirjan-Kumar</creator><creator>Hindley, Richard</creator><creator>Muschter, Rolf</creator><creator>Thorpe, Andrew</creator><creator>Shrotri, Nitin</creator><creator>Graham, Stuart</creator><creator>Hamann, Moritz</creator><creator>Miller, Kurt</creator><creator>Schostak, Martin</creator><creator>Capitán, Carlos</creator><creator>Knispel, Helmut</creator><creator>Thomas, J. Andrew</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140501</creationdate><title>180-W XPS GreenLight Laser Vaporisation Versus Transurethral Resection of the Prostate for the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Obstruction: 6-Month Safety and Efficacy Results of a European Multicentre Randomised Trial—The GOLIATH Study</title><author>Bachmann, Alexander ; Tubaro, Andrea ; Barber, Neil ; d’Ancona, Frank ; Muir, Gordon ; Witzsch, Ulrich ; Grimm, Marc-Oliver ; Benejam, Joan ; Stolzenburg, Jens-Uwe ; Riddick, Antony ; Pahernik, Sascha ; Roelink, Herman ; Ameye, Filip ; Saussine, Christian ; Bruyère, Franck ; Loidl, Wolfgang ; Larner, Tim ; Gogoi, Nirjan-Kumar ; Hindley, Richard ; Muschter, Rolf ; Thorpe, Andrew ; Shrotri, Nitin ; Graham, Stuart ; Hamann, Moritz ; Miller, Kurt ; Schostak, Martin ; Capitán, Carlos ; Knispel, Helmut ; Thomas, J. Andrew</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-490be13139dcd572c9d139e11ea9c37e038cedef6795be5a0125e1e79817cda33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Adverse events</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Benign prostatic obstruction (BPO)</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Clavien-Dindo classification</topic><topic>Efficacy</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>GreenLight XPS 180-W laser</topic><topic>Hemorrhage - etiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intention to Treat Analysis</topic><topic>Laser Therapy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Length of Stay</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases</topic><topic>Organ Size</topic><topic>Photoselective vaporisation of the prostate (PVP)</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Prostate - pathology</topic><topic>Prostate-Specific Antigen - blood</topic><topic>Prostatectomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Prostatic Hyperplasia - blood</topic><topic>Prostatic Hyperplasia - complications</topic><topic>Prostatic Hyperplasia - surgery</topic><topic>Prostatism - etiology</topic><topic>Prostatism - physiopathology</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Transurethral surgery</topic><topic>TURP</topic><topic>Urinary Catheterization</topic><topic>Urinary Incontinence - etiology</topic><topic>Urinary Retention - etiology</topic><topic>Urodynamics</topic><topic>Urology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bachmann, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tubaro, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barber, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>d’Ancona, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muir, Gordon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Witzsch, Ulrich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grimm, Marc-Oliver</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benejam, Joan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stolzenburg, Jens-Uwe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riddick, Antony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pahernik, Sascha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roelink, Herman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ameye, Filip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saussine, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruyère, Franck</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loidl, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larner, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gogoi, Nirjan-Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hindley, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muschter, Rolf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thorpe, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shrotri, Nitin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graham, Stuart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamann, Moritz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Kurt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schostak, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Capitán, Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knispel, Helmut</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, J. Andrew</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European urology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bachmann, Alexander</au><au>Tubaro, Andrea</au><au>Barber, Neil</au><au>d’Ancona, Frank</au><au>Muir, Gordon</au><au>Witzsch, Ulrich</au><au>Grimm, Marc-Oliver</au><au>Benejam, Joan</au><au>Stolzenburg, Jens-Uwe</au><au>Riddick, Antony</au><au>Pahernik, Sascha</au><au>Roelink, Herman</au><au>Ameye, Filip</au><au>Saussine, Christian</au><au>Bruyère, Franck</au><au>Loidl, Wolfgang</au><au>Larner, Tim</au><au>Gogoi, Nirjan-Kumar</au><au>Hindley, Richard</au><au>Muschter, Rolf</au><au>Thorpe, Andrew</au><au>Shrotri, Nitin</au><au>Graham, Stuart</au><au>Hamann, Moritz</au><au>Miller, Kurt</au><au>Schostak, Martin</au><au>Capitán, Carlos</au><au>Knispel, Helmut</au><au>Thomas, J. Andrew</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>180-W XPS GreenLight Laser Vaporisation Versus Transurethral Resection of the Prostate for the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Obstruction: 6-Month Safety and Efficacy Results of a European Multicentre Randomised Trial—The GOLIATH Study</atitle><jtitle>European urology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur Urol</addtitle><date>2014-05-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>931</spage><epage>942</epage><pages>931-942</pages><issn>0302-2838</issn><eissn>1873-7560</eissn><coden>EUURAV</coden><abstract>Abstract Background The comparative outcome with GreenLight (GL) photoselective vaporisation of the prostate and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in men with lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) has been questioned. Objective The primary objective of the GOLIATH study was to evaluate the noninferiority of 180-W GL XPS (XPS) to TURP for International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and maximum flow rate (Qmax ) at 6 mo and the proportion of patients who were complication free. Design, setting, and participants Prospective randomised controlled trial at 29 centres in 9 European countries involving 281 patients with BPO. Intervention 180-W GL XPS system or TURP. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Measurements used were IPSS, Qmax , prostate volume (PV), postvoid residual (PVR) and complications, perioperative parameters, and reintervention rates. Noninferiority was evaluated using one-sided tests at the 2.5% level of significance. The statistical significance of other comparisons was assessed at the (two-sided) 5% level. Results and limitations The study demonstrated the noninferiority of XPS to TURP for IPSS, Qmax , and complication-free proportion. PV and PVR were comparable between groups. Time until stable health status, length of catheterisation, and length of hospital stay were superior with XPS ( p &lt; 0.001). Early reintervention rate within 30 d was three times higher after TURP ( p = 0.025); however, the overall postoperative reintervention rates were not significantly different between treatment arms. A limitation was the short follow-up. Conclusions XPS was shown to be noninferior (comparable) to TURP in terms of IPSS, Qmax , and proportion of patients free of complications. XPS results in a lower rate of early reinterventions but has a similar rate after 6 mo. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT01218672.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>24331152</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.eururo.2013.10.040</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0302-2838
ispartof European urology, 2014-05, Vol.65 (5), p.931-942
issn 0302-2838
1873-7560
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1508943197
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Adult
Adverse events
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Benign prostatic obstruction (BPO)
Biological and medical sciences
Clavien-Dindo classification
Efficacy
Europe
Follow-Up Studies
GreenLight XPS 180-W laser
Hemorrhage - etiology
Humans
Intention to Treat Analysis
Laser Therapy - adverse effects
Length of Stay
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases
Organ Size
Photoselective vaporisation of the prostate (PVP)
Prospective Studies
Prostate - pathology
Prostate-Specific Antigen - blood
Prostatectomy - adverse effects
Prostatic Hyperplasia - blood
Prostatic Hyperplasia - complications
Prostatic Hyperplasia - surgery
Prostatism - etiology
Prostatism - physiopathology
Safety
Severity of Illness Index
Time Factors
Transurethral surgery
TURP
Urinary Catheterization
Urinary Incontinence - etiology
Urinary Retention - etiology
Urodynamics
Urology
title 180-W XPS GreenLight Laser Vaporisation Versus Transurethral Resection of the Prostate for the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Obstruction: 6-Month Safety and Efficacy Results of a European Multicentre Randomised Trial—The GOLIATH Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T20%3A14%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=180-W%20XPS%20GreenLight%20Laser%20Vaporisation%20Versus%20Transurethral%20Resection%20of%20the%20Prostate%20for%20the%20Treatment%20of%20Benign%20Prostatic%20Obstruction:%206-Month%20Safety%20and%20Efficacy%20Results%20of%20a%20European%20Multicentre%20Randomised%20Trial%E2%80%94The%20GOLIATH%20Study&rft.jtitle=European%20urology&rft.au=Bachmann,%20Alexander&rft.date=2014-05-01&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=931&rft.epage=942&rft.pages=931-942&rft.issn=0302-2838&rft.eissn=1873-7560&rft.coden=EUURAV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.eururo.2013.10.040&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1508943197%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1508943197&rft_id=info:pmid/24331152&rft_els_id=S0302283813011354&rfr_iscdi=true